Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic digestive system disorder triggered by multiple factors, which is clinically prevalent and affects patients' quality of life. Laparoscopic fundoplication serves as the mainstay of surgical treatment for GERD, requiring standardized preoperative examinations to assess patients' reflux status and esophageal motility for individualized selection of fundoplication techniques. Intraoperative regulation of the fundoplication tension with a bougie aims to balance the anti-reflux efficacy and the risk of postoperative dysphagia. Additionally, membranous anatomy research guided by embryonic development facilitates optimization of surgical approaches and provides a theoretical basis for surgical innovation. This article deeply discusses the status of GERD diagnosis and treatment, as well as the surgical anti-reflux mechanisms, from multiple aspects including pathogenesis, diagnosis, and surgical management. We also contemplate the existing challenges in the embryonic development and anatomy of the anti-reflux barrier.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic digestive system disorder triggered by multiple factors, which is clinically prevalent and affects patients' quality of life. Laparoscopic fundoplication serves as the mainstay of surgical treatment for GERD, requiring standardized preoperative examinations to assess patients' reflux status and esophageal motility for individualized selection of fundoplication techniques. Intraoperative regulation of the fundoplication tension with a bougie aims to balance the anti-reflux efficacy and the risk of postoperative dysphagia. Additionally, membranous anatomy research guided by embryonic development facilitates optimization of surgical approaches and provides a theoretical basis for surgical innovation. This article deeply discusses the status of GERD diagnosis and treatment, as well as the surgical anti-reflux mechanisms, from multiple aspects including pathogenesis, diagnosis, and surgical management. We also contemplate the existing challenges in the embryonic development and anatomy of the anti-reflux barrier.

Obesity is one of the main risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). With the development of social economy, the global obesity population shows a continuous growth trend, leading to an increase in the incidence rate of GERD. Obesity, especially the central obesity, is closely related to GERD. The increase of intra-abdominal pressure caused by obesity may lead to the destruction of "anti-reflux barrier" through a variety of mechanical mechanisms, and the various cytokines produced by visceral adipose tissue in obesity population may contribute to the occurr-ence and development of GERD through various biological effects. The authors explore the mechanism of obesity in the occurrence and development of GERD from both mechanical and biological effects, aiming to help clinical physicians improve their understanding of GERD.

Objective:To investigate the changes in plasma ghrelin and influencing factors of weight loss effects after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with fundoplication surgery (LSGFD).Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 115 obesity patients who were admitted to the People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from April to June 2023 were collected. There were 37 males and 78 females, aged (37±9)years. Of 115 pati-ents, 93 cases undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) were divided into the LSG group, and 22 cases undergoing LSGFD were divided into the LSGFD group. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and the independent sample t test was used for com-parison between groups. Count data were described as absolute numbers, and the chi-square test was used for comparison between groups. Repeated measurement data were analyzed using the repeated ANOVA, and their variances were tested using a spherical test. The Logistic regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Results:(1) Changes in preoperative and postoperative plasma ghrelin in two groups of patients. The plasma ghrelin of patients at preopera-tive and postoperative 6 months changed from (16±14)×10 2 ng/L to (10±4)×10 2 ng/L in the LSG group and changed from (12±11)×10 2 ng/L to (11±3)×10 2 ng/L in the LSGFD group. There was no significant difference in the time effect, inter group effect, and interaction effect of changes in plasma ghrelin between the LSG group and the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( Ftime=2.199, Fgroup=0.001, Finteraction=0.793, P>0.05). There was a significant difference in plasma ghrelin in the LSG group before and after surgery at 6 months ( t=4.148, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in plasma ghrelin in the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( t=0.622, P>0.05). (2) Changes in preoperative and postoperative weight loss and metabolic related indicators in two groups of patients. ① There was a significant difference in the time effect of changes in body mass between the LSG group and the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( Ftime=242.285, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the inter group effect and interaction effect of changes in body mass between the LSG group and the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( Fgroup=1.163, Finteraction=0.606, P>0.05). There were significant differences in body mass in the LSG group or the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( t=23.597, 14.680, P<0.05). ② There was a significant difference in the time effect of changes in body mass index (BMI) between the LSG group and the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( Ftime=382.431, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the inter group effect and interaction effect of changes in BMI between the LSG group and the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( Fgroup=1.619, Finteraction=1.085, P>0.05). There were significant differences in BMI in the LSG group or the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( t=25.645, 16.628, P<0.05). ③ There was a significant difference in the time effect of changes in excess weight loss (%EWL) between the LSG group and the LSGFD group after surgery at 1 to 6 months ( Ftime=666.136, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the inter group effect and interaction effect of changes in %EWL between the LSG group and the LSGFD group after surgery at 1 to 6 months ( Fgroup=0.127, Finteraction=0.498, P>0.05). ④ There was no significant difference in the time effect, inter group effect, and interaction effect of changes in fasting blood glucose between the LSG group and the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( Ftime=1.573, Fgroup=1.872, Finteraction=0.948, P>0.05). There was a significant difference in fasting blood glucose in the LSG group before and after surgery at 6 months ( t=2.675, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in fasting blood glucose in the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( t=1.074, P>0.05). ⑤ There were significant differences in the inter group effect and interaction effect of changes in triglyceride between the LSG group and the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( Fgroup=8.419, Finteraction=3.180, P<0.05), and there was no significant diffe-rence in the time effect of changes in triglyceride between the LSG group and the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( Ftime=1.398, P>0.05). Results of individual effect shown that there was no significant difference in triglyceride in the LSG group or the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 3 months ( F=2.956, 3.248, P>0.05), and there were significant differences in trigly-ceride in the LSG group or the LSGFD group after surgery at 1 month and 6 months ( F=14.152, 3.477, P<0.05). There was a significant difference in triglyceride in the LSG group before and after surgery at 6 months ( t=3.164, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in triglyceride in the LSGFG group before and after surgery at 6 months ( t=0.023, P>0.05). ⑥ There were significant differences in the time effect and inter group effect of changes in total cholesterol between the LSG group and the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( Ftime=3.662, Fgroup=7.591, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the interaction effect of changes in total cholesterol between the LSG group and the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( Finteraction=0.626, P>0.05). There was a significant difference in cholesterol in the LSG group before and after surgery at 6 months ( t=3.253, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in total cholesterol in the LSGFG group before and after surgery at 6 months ( t=1.567, P>0.05). ⑦ There were significant differences in the time effect and inter group effect of changes in uric acid between the LSG group and the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( Ftime=15.306, Fgroup=4.244, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the interaction effect of changes in uric acid between the LSG group and the LSGFD group before and after surgery at 6 months ( Finteraction=0.968, P>0.05). There were significant differ-ences in uric acid in the LSG group or the LSGFG group before and after surgery at 6 months ( t=6.152, 3.660, P<0.05). (3) Analysis of influencing factors on postoperative weight loss effects. Results of multivariate analysis showed that preoperative BMI, postoperative 6 months plasma ghrelin were independent protective factors for postoperative weight loss effects ( odds ratio=0.881, 0.673, 95% confidence interval as 0.817-0.950, 0.577-0.787, P<0.05). Conclusions:The decrease in plasma ghrelin in patients after LSGFD is not as obvious as that in patients after LSG, but it can achieve the same weight loss and metabolic improvement effects as after LSG. The lower preoperative BMI and postoperative 6 months plasma ghrelin are independent protective factors for postoperative weight loss effects.

Protease activating receptor (PAR) is a member of G protein-coupled receptor family, which includes four subtypes, namely PAR1, PAR2, PAR3 and PAR4. Except PAR2 trypsin receptor, other subunits belong to thrombin receptor. These receptors exist widely in various tissues of the body, especially in the digestive system to play a certain biological effect. In recent ten years, studies have shown that PAR1 and PAR2 play a key role in immune inflammatory response, which has aroused people′s attention. At present, it is of clinical value to study the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by exploring the unique activation mode of PAR2 in the pathological processes of esophageal mucosal damage, pain transmission, immune inflammatory response, stress and so on. This review aims to elucidate the molecular mechanism of PAR2 in gastroesophageal inflammation.

Protease activating receptor (PAR) is a member of G protein-coupled receptor family, which includes four subtypes, namely PAR1, PAR2, PAR3 and PAR4. Except PAR2 trypsin receptor, other subunits belong to thrombin receptor. These receptors exist widely in various tissues of the body, especially in the digestive system to play a certain biological effect. In recent ten years, studies have shown that PAR1 and PAR2 play a key role in immune inflammatory response, which has aroused people′s attention. At present, it is of clinical value to study the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by exploring the unique activation mode of PAR2 in the pathological processes of esophageal mucosal damage, pain transmission, immune inflammatory response, stress and so on. This review aims to elucidate the molecular mechanism of PAR2 in gastroesophageal inflammation.

Objective: To analyze the short-term clinical effects of robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of the hiatal hernia. Methods: The clinical data of 56 patients underwent minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair from January 2021 to January 2022 in the Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region were retrospectively analyzed. There were 32 males and 24 females, aging (59.7±10.7) years (range: 28 to 75 years). All patients were divided into laparoscopy group (n=27) and robot group (n=29) according to surgical procedures. Perioperative conditions, hospital stay, and improvement in symptoms before and after surgery were compared between the two groups by the t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and χ² test. Results: All surgical procedures were successfully completed, without conversion to laparotomy or change in operation mode. There were no serious complications related to the operation. The intraoperative blood loss of the robot group was less than that of the laparoscopic group (M (IQR)): (20 (110) ml vs. 40 (80) ml, Z=-4.098, P<0.01). The operation time ((111.7±33.6) minutes vs. (120.4±35.0) minutes, t=-0.943, P=0.350) and hospitalization time ((3.9±1.4) days vs. (4.7±1.9) days, t=-1.980, P=0.053) of the robot group and the laparoscopic group were similar. Follow-up for 12 months after the operation showed no postoperative complications and recurrence. The score of the health-related quality of life questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the robot group decreased from 10.8±2.8 before the operation to 6.5±0.6 after the operation, and that in the laparoscopic group decreased from 10.6±2.1 before the operation to 6.3±0.6 after the operation. There was no difference in the influence of different surgical methods on the change in score (t=0.030,P=0.976). Conclusion: Compared with laparoscopic repair of the hiatal hernia, robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair has the advantages of less bleeding, rapid postoperative recovery and good short-term effect.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Hernia, Hiatal/complications* ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotics ; Herniorrhaphy/methods* ; Quality of Life ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Recurrence ; Fundoplication/methods*

Obesity and diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are metabolic related diseases with high incidence rate at present. Obesity is considered as one of the risk factors of T2DM. At present, the interaction mechanism between obesity and T2DM has not been clearly studied.Adipose tissue is an endocrine organ related to the pathophysiology of obesity and its complications. Adipose tissue can not only store a lot of energy, but also secrete many hormones, oxidative stress and inflammatory factors, which may be related to the occurrence and development of T2DM. Under long-term and low-dose stimulation, the sustainable low grade inflammation of fat is considered to be an important mechanism for the occurrence and development of obese T2DM. Therefore, this paper mainly summarizes the research progress of low grade fat inflammation in obese T2DM.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the common gastrointestinal diseases. The treatment options for GERD includes lifestyle changes, medication, and surgery. With the development of surgical technology, minimally invasive surgery has become more and more widely used in clinical practice due to its advantages such as less trauma and rapid postoperative recovery. Laparoscopic fundoplication is the standard surgical treatment for GERD. Due to the postoperative complications of laparoscopic fundoplication, a variety of new alternative minimally invasive surgery methods, which are expected to provide new treatment options for GERD patients, have emerged recently. Surgical minimally invasive procedures include magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA), bariatric surgery, and lower esophageal sphincter electric stimulating therapy (LES-EST). Endoscopic minimally invasive procedures include transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), Stretta radiofrequency ablation, and anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS). This article mainly describes the current status of minimally invasive surgical treatment of GERD.

Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are all the metabolic diseases with high incidence rate. There is a clear correlation between the them. Weight-loss surgery is the important treatment of surgical method for obesity and T2DM.However, the mechanism of T2DM for weight loss surgery is not yet clear.The secretion level of glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) was affected after weight loss surgery. The secretion of GLP-1 can delay gastric emptying, increase satiety, improve insulin resistance (IR) and promote β insulin release, inhibition of glucagon synthesis and secretion, and improvement of pancreatic function β cell function. All of these changes were conducive to glycemic control. Therefore, this paper aims to summarize and describe the relationship between the effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on blood glucose and GLP-1/dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) pathway in obese T2DM patients.