1.Smart Nanocarriers as an Emerging Platform in Urologic Cancer Immunotherapy: A Review on Clinical Insights and Applications
Sania HASSAN ; Afshan AYAZ ; Afaf NAWAZ ; Sawera KHALIL ; Sadia MAQSOOD ; Saira ATHAR ; Ammara RASHEED ; Sania SAEED ; Samrah SHAMS ; Hafiz Muhammad SULTAN
Journal of Urologic Oncology 2025;23(2):164-187
A new generation of smart nanocarriers offers excellent safety, efficiency, and targeted drug delivery for cancer immunotherapy. Conventional cancer treatments, such as radiation and chemotherapy, are often associated with severe systemic toxicity and extensive collateral damage to healthy tissues. In contrast, the enhanced permeability and retention effect and active targeting mechanisms of certain nanocarriers, such as liposomes, dendrimers, polymeric nanoparticles, and lipid-based systems, enable precise drug delivery. Therapeutic agents can be encapsulated within nanoscale delivery systems, protected from early degradation, and released in response to specific signals within the tumor microenvironment, such as changes in pH or enzyme concentrations. Targeting accuracy is further improved through surface modifications, including ligands, antibodies, or aptamers, which facilitate intracellular uptake and mitigate off-target effects. Additionally, the wide variety of nanocarrier structures available—from polymersomes and micelles to nanospheres and nanocapsules—allows customized applications tailored to different cancer types and stages. Current research highlights the potential for immunomodulatory drugs loaded into nanocarriers to enhance antitumor immunity and overcome mechanisms of immunoresistance. This review discusses the classification, processes, and biological applications of smart nanocarriers, with particular emphasis on how they can advance cancer immunotherapy by addressing challenges related to drug loading, targeted delivery, and biocompatibility.
2.Prognostic value of hematological parameters in older adult patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary intervention: a single centre prospective study.
Umar Hafiz KHAN ; Murtaza Rashid PALA ; Imran HAFEEZ ; Afshan SHABIR ; Amrit DHAR ; Hilal Ahmad RATHER
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2023;20(8):596-601
BACKGROUND:
Cardiovascular disease is a significant contributor to the disease burden in geriatric patients. Underlying systemic inflammation is thought to be the cause of age-related changes in the bone marrow and a major risk factor for atherosclerosis. The purpose of the study was to assess the accuracy of these hematological biomarkers in predicting 30-day mortality in older patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
METHODS:
This was a prospective observational study of 601 older adult patients (age > 60 years) with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention over two years (2017-2019). The relationship between baseline hematological parameters and mortality was assessed during the 30-day follow-up. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were done to evaluate for diagnostic accuracy of various hematological parameters.
RESULTS:
The mean age of presentation was 77 ± 17 years. The mean neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) value was 5.07 ± 4.90 and the mean platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) value was 108.65 ± 85.82. On univariate analysis, total leucocyte count [odds ratio (OR) = 0.85, P = 0.021], hematocrit (OR = 0.91, P = 0.018), NLR (OR = 1.10, P = 0.001) and PLR (OR = 1.05, P = 0.001) were associated with mortality. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, NLR predicted mortality with 68.1% and PLR with 65.7% accuracy. On multivariate analysis, NLR (OR = 1.096, 95% CI: 1.006-1.15, P = 0.035) was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
For the risk classification of all elderly ACS patients, we highly advise using NLR rather than the total white blood cell count.
3.Development of e-learning in medical education: a student's perspective
Nour Al JAMIL ; Samina SHAIKH ; Sabrina MUNIR ; Saleha MALEK ; Afshan KHAN
Korean Journal of Medical Education 2019;31(4):371-373
No abstract available.
Education, Medical

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail