OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of decitabine combined with low-dose CEG regimen (DCEG) and decitabine combined with low-dose CAG regimen (DCAG) in the treatment of elderly patients with MDS and MDS-transformed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 7 medical centers, 45 patients with MDS (≥ 60 years old) and MDS-transformed AML from October 2016 to January 2019 were enrolled, with the median age of 68.5 years old. The risk stratification of patients was poor or very poor, according to IPSS-R score. The treament results of decitabine combined with CEG and decitabine combined with CAG were compared. RESULTS: The comparison of the two regiem showed that the DCEG regimen had advantages on total effective rate (ORR, 86.4% vs 47.8%, respectively), overall survival time (OS) (10.0 months vs 6.0 months, respectively) and progression-free survival time (PFS) (9.0 months vs 3.0 months, respectively). About 50% of MDS patients treated by DCEG regimen achieved PR or CR, with a median OS of 31 months. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with PR or CR after induction therapy and DCEG regimen had longer survival time (31months). The incidence of bone marrow suppression, infection and treatment-related mortality rate were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION Decitabine combined with CEG regimen could improve the survival of patients with high-risk MDS and MDS-transformed AML. The conclusion of the reaserch needs to be validated by a larger prospective randomized clinical trial.
Aclarubicin ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Azacitidine/therapeutic use* ; Cytarabine/therapeutic use* ; Decitabine/therapeutic use* ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes/drug therapy* ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Abstract　　 Demethylating agents (HMAs) hold an important status in therapy for elderly acute myeloid leukemia, who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy (ICT). Beyond the edge of monotherapy, domestic and foreign scholars have carried out a lot of studies on combination strategies, such as HMAs with low-intensity therapy (G-CSF, low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin, CAG), with targeted therapy (BCL-2 inhibitor), with immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICI), and with other epigenetic therapys (isocitrate dehydrogenase or histonedeacetylase inhibitor）. Some of these researches have obtained positive results and discussed the mechanisms of combination strategies besides. In this review, the combination of HMAs with other drugs are summraized briefly.
Aclarubicin ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Cytarabine ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; Humans ; Isocitrate Dehydrogenase ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCAG regimen for treating the intermediate or high risk MDS and AML. METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of decitabine combined with CAG regimen for intermediate or high risk MDS and AML from inception to March, 2018. The quality of each RCT was evaluated by the Cochrane collaboration´s tool for assessing the risk of bias.Then, the data were analyzed by using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: Twenty-four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, containing 1 557 patients with intermediate or high-risk MDS and AML, of whom 594 were AML patients and 590 were MDS patients. The patients treated with the DCAG regimen were enrolled in DCAG group, and the patients treated with single-agent decitabine or CAG regimen were enrolled in control group. RESULTS: The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with other therapies, the complete remission rate of DCAG regimen in patients with intermediate or high-risk MDS and AML was high (RR=1.63，95% CI=1.43-1.85，P＜0.000 01), and the overall response rate was also high (RR=1. 35，95% CI=1.24-1.46，P＜0.000 01); Subgroup analysis results showed that DCAG regimen was better than CAG regimen in the complete remission rate (RR=1.71，95% CI=1.49-1.97，P＜0.000 01), and slightly better than single-agent decitabine group (RR=1.43，95% CI=1.08-1.91，P=0.01). In terms of adverse reactions, there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of myelosuppression, pulmonary infection, gastrointestinal reactions, and bleeding events between the 2 groups (P＞0.05). CONCLUSION DCAG regimen has significant efficacy in the treatment of intermediate or high-risk MDS and AML, and is superior to CAG regimen and single-agent dicitabine regimen. As compared with control group, there was no significant difference in adverse events. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above mentioned conclusion.
Aclarubicin ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Cytarabine ; Decitabine ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute ; drug therapy ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes ; drug therapy

Aclarubicin/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Child ; Cytarabine/therapeutic use* ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Remission Induction ; Treatment Outcome

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of decitabine in combination with lower-dose CAG regimen (G-CSF, cytarabine and aclarubicin; D-CAG regimen) in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts (MDS-EB) and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), compared to standard CAG regimen. Methods: A total of 42 patients with newly diagnosed MDS-EB and AML-MRC from May 2011 to March 2017 were included in the retrospective study. 21 cases were initially treated with G-CSF for priming, in combination with cytarabine of 10 mg/m(2) q12h for 14 days and aclarubicin of 20 mg/d for 4 days (CAG regimen) and the other 21 cases were initially treated with decitabine of 20 mg/m(2) for 5 days and lower-dose CAG regimen (cytarabine of 10 mg/m(2) q12h for 7 days, aclarubicin of 10 mg/d for 4 days, and G-CSF for priming (D-CAG regimen). After two cycles of induction chemotherapy, the patients who obtained complete remission(CR) received consolidation chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Results: Among a total of 42 patients, the median age was 52.5 years (18-65 years) and 64.3% of them were male. Baseline characteristics of patients between D-CAG group and CAG group showed no significant differences. The CR for patients in D-CAG group was 81.0% (17/21), compared to 52.4% (11/21) in CAG group after 2 cycles of therapy (χ(2)=3.857, P=0.050). The overall response rate (ORR) for patients in D-CAG group and CAG group was 85.7% (18/21) and 76.2% (15/21) respectively, without significant difference (χ(2)=1.273, P=0.259). By December 2017, the median follow-up of D-CAG group and CAG group was 13(6-32) months and 15(2-36) months respectively. Finally, 10 patients in D-CAG group and 7 patients in CAG group received HSCT respectively. Except patients receiving HSCT, the median leukemia-free survival (LFS) time for patients in D-CAG group and CAG group was 18.0 (95%CI 6.6-29.4) months and 11.0 (95%CI 0-23.9) months respectively. Probabilities of 12 months LFS for D-CAG group and CAG group were (63.6±14.5)% and (50.0±13.4)% respectively, without difference (χ(2)=0.049, P=0.824). Except patients receiving HSCT, there were 2 deaths in D-CAG group and 7 deaths in CAG group respectively. The cumulative probabilities of 12 months OS for non-HSCT patients in D-CAG group and CAG group were (90.9±8.7)% and (61.5±13.5)% respectively, without significant difference (χ(2)=1.840, P=0.175). The incidences of side effects between D-CAG group and CAG group did not show significant differences (P=0.479), and the main side effects included cytopenias, pneumonia, infections of skin and soft tissues, neutropenic patients with fever, liver dysfunction. Conclusion: The decitabine in combination with lower-dose CAG regimen improved CR for patients with MDS-EB and AML-MRC, and was a promising choice.
Aclarubicin ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Cytarabine/administration & dosage* ; Decitabine/administration & dosage* ; Female ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage* ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes/drug therapy* ; Remission Induction ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo observe the efficacy and safety of modified Shengma Biejia Decoction (MSBD) combined with CAG program in treating elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with yin deficiency toxin stasis syndrome (YDTSS).

METHODSTotally 46 elderly AML patients were assigned to the treatment group (24 cases; treated with MSBD + CAG) and the control group (22 cases; treated with CAG + placebos of Chinese medicine) according to random digit table. The therapeutic course of CM placebo or MSBD was 21 days. The clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were observed. Meanwhile, physical state (ECOG Score), transfusion dependency, and TCM syndrome score were compared before and after treatment.

RESULTS(1) The complete remission rate was 54% (13/24) and the objective response rate (ORR) was 71% (17/24) in the treatment group, obviously higher than those of the control group [36% (8/22); 54% (13/24)], with statistical difference (P = 0.036, 0.042). When comparing the efficacy based on risk level, the moderate and poor ORR was 71% (10/14) and 67% (6/9) in the treatment group, and 57% (8/14) and 33% (2/6) in the control group, with statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.048; P = 0.010). (2) Compared with before treatment in the same group, the ECOG score significantly decreased, the average infusion time of red cells and platelets were markedly prolonged in the treatment group after treatment (P < 0.05). ECOG score, the average infusion time of red cells and platelets were significantly better in the treatment group than in the control group after treatment (P < 0.05). (3) Compared with before treatment in the same group, scores of fever, hemorrhage, and bone pain were markedly reduced in the control group (P < 0.05); scores of fever, fatigue, hemorrhage, dry mouth, and bone pain were markedly reduced in the treatment group (P < 0.05). Better effect in relief of fever, fatigue, hemorrhage, dry mouth, and so on was obtained in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.05). (4) In aspect of hematotoxicity, the incidence of neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia was obviously lower in the treatment group than in the control group [29.2% (7/24) vs 54.5% (12/22); 16.7% (4/ 24) vs 45.5% (10/22); 33.3% (8/24) vs 63.6% (14/22); P < 0.05]. The incidence of fatigue and anorexia was obviously lower in the treatment group than in the control group [37.5% (9/24) vs 63.6% (14/22), 37.5% (9/24) vs 81.8% (18/22); P < 0.05].

CONCLUSIONMSBD combined with CAG program in treating elderly AML patients with YDTSS, with efficacy enhancing toxicity reducing effect, had distinct advantages in improving physical condition and clinical symptoms, and reducing transfusion dependency.

Aclarubicin ; therapeutic use ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Cytarabine ; therapeutic use ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; therapeutic use ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute ; drug therapy ; Medicine, Chinese Traditional ; Phytotherapy ; Yin Deficiency ; drug therapy

OBJECTIVETo study the curative effect of HAG and CAG regimens for patients with acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) and high/medium-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

METHODSFifty two patients from January 2010 to January 2014 were enrolled in this study, 32 were diagnosed with AML and 20 with MDS. All the patients were divided into 2 groups: 26 in HAG group (26 cases) and another 26 in CAG group (26 cases). The bone marrow examination, remission rate, PFS, OS and side reaction rates were compared between 2 groups.

RESULTSAfter treatment, the bone marrow hyperplasia and juvenile cells were decreased significantly. In HAG group, the remission rate was 57.69% and that was 76.92% in CAG group, the difference between these 2 groups was statistically significant (P<0.05), but the survival time was not statistically significant different between 2 groups (P>0.05). The incidence of side reaction in HAG group was 11.54%, that in CAG group was 7.69%, there was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONBoth CAG and HAG regimens have shown significant curative effects for acute myelocytic leukemia and high/medium-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Aclarubicin ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Bone Marrow Examination ; Cytarabine ; therapeutic use ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute ; drug therapy ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes ; drug therapy ; Remission Induction

Aclarubicin ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Cytarabine ; therapeutic use ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma ; drug therapy ; Recurrence

Aclarubicin ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Cytarabine ; therapeutic use ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Interferons ; therapeutic use ; Interleukin-2 ; therapeutic use ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute ; drug therapy ; Recurrence ; Remission Induction ; Thalidomide ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the HAA regimen (homoharringtonine,cytarabine and aclarubicin)as salvage chemotherapy in the treatment of refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed 64 patients with refractory/relapsed AML who received the HAA regimen as salvage chemotherapy. The complete remission (CR)rate was analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and relapse free survival (RFS), and the differences were compared by Log-rank test.

RESULTSThe overall CR rate was 70.1%, and 67.1% of the patients attained CR after the first induction course. The early death rate was 0. The median follow-up time was 61 (range:6-120) months. The estimated 3-year OS rate was 46.8% and the estimated 3-year RFS rate was 42.8%. The CR rates of patients with favorable/intermediate and unfavorable cytogenetics were 76.4% and 33.3%, respectively. The 3-year OS of favorable/intermediate and unfavorable group were 53.7% and 10.0%, respectively. The median survival time of unfavorable group was only 8 months. The side effects associated with the HAA regimen were tolerable, in which the most common toxicities were myelosuppression and infection.

CONCLUSIONHAA regimen is associated with a higher rate of CR and longer-term survival and its toxicity can be tolerated. The regimen is suitable for refractory/relapsed AML patients with favorable or intermediate risk .

Aclarubicin ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Cytarabine ; therapeutic use ; Harringtonines ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute ; drug therapy ; Recurrence ; Remission Induction ; Retrospective Studies ; Salvage Therapy ; Survival Rate