OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of short arm deformity in patients with achondroplasia, and summarize the progress of its lenthening and reconstruction, so as to provide reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: The literature on the lenthening of upper limb with achondroplastic short arm deformity at home and abroad in recent years was reviewed, and the characteristics, extension methods, postoperative management, effectiveness evaluation, and related complications of short arm deformity were summarized. RESULTS: Achondroplastic short arm deformity affect the patient's daily perineal hygiene activities. Although the upper limb is proportionately shortened, the humerus is mainly short limb deformity. Bilateral humeral lengthening is a common treatment method, and the traditional lengthening tools are mainly external fixation, guided by Ilizarov distraction osteogenesis concept; intramedullary lengthening is the latest treatment method. Lengthening percentage and healing index are commonly used for clinical evaluation indexes, and complications such as nerve injury may occur during upper limb lengthening. CONCLUSION In addition to appearance improvement, achondroplastic short arm lengthening is of great significance in achieving self-management of individual perineal hygiene. Lenthening and reconstruction methods are constantly being innovated and improved.
Humans ; Achondroplasia/surgery* ; Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods* ; Bone Lengthening/methods* ; Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods* ; Humerus/abnormalities* ; Treatment Outcome ; Ilizarov Technique ; Arm/abnormalities*

PURPOSE: Although bilateral lower-limb lengthening has been performed on patients with achondroplasia, the outcomes for the tibia and femur in terms of radiographic parameters, clinical results, and complications have not been compared with each other. We proposed 1) to compare the radiological outcomes of femoral and tibial lengthening and 2) to investigate the differences of complications related to lengthening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients (average age, 14 years 4 months) with achondroplasia who underwent bilateral limb lengthening between 2004 and 2012. All patients first underwent bilateral tibial lengthening, and at 9-48 months (average, 17.8 months) after this procedure, bilateral femoral lengthening was performed. We analyzed the pixel value ratio (PVR) and characteristics of the callus of the lengthened area on serial radiographs. The external fixation index (EFI) and healing index (HI) were computed to compare tibial and femoral lengthening. The complications related to lengthening were assessed. RESULTS: The average gain in length was 8.4 cm for the femur and 9.8 cm for the tibia. The PVR, EFI, and HI of the tibia were significantly better than those of the femur. Fewer complications were found during the lengthening of the tibia than during the lengthening of the femur. CONCLUSION: Tibial lengthening had a significantly lower complication rate and a higher callus formation rate than femoral lengthening. Our findings suggest that bilateral limb lengthening (tibia, followed by femur) remains a reasonable option; however, we should be more cautious when performing femoral lengthening in selected patients.
Achondroplasia/*surgery ; Adolescent ; Bone Lengthening/*methods ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Femur/radiography/*surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Tibia/radiography/*surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult