1.Outcomes of Medial Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in a University Hospital
Nasuruddin MH ; Abbas AA ; Merican AM ; Ayob KA ; Hashim MS ; Selvaratnam V
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2026;20(No. 1):10-
Introduction: Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy
(MOWHTO) is one of the modalities to treat
unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (KO). Many studies
have shown good outcomes of MOWHTO, but there are no
published series of Malaysian patients. The aim of this study
is to determine the outcome of MOWHTO in primary medial
compartment KO in a university teaching hospital in
Malaysia.
Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of
patients who underwent MOWHTO in our Joint
Reconstruction Unit between 2017 and 2022 with a
minimum of 12 months follow-up.
Results: Data from a total of 15 knees were reviewed. The
mean age of patients was 41.8 years, and the mean BMI was
31.7. The mean Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) osteoarthritis grade
was 2.87 (±0.52). The mean hip knee angle (HKA) preoperatively was 12.26° varus and post-operatively was 3.33°
valgus. Mean correction of HKA was 13.59°. The results
revealed an improvement in all patients, as observed from
the significant mean difference between pre-operative
(38.53) and post-operative (77.60) Knee Injury and
Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) (p-value<0.001) scores.
Patients who were above 50 years old showed a significantly
better improvement in KOOS score compared to those below
50 (p-value <0.05). There was no significant difference
observed between BMI and KOOS score improvement (Fstat=0.580, p-value >0.05).
Conclusion: MOWHTO is a good treatment option in
medial compartment primary KO with varus deformity
among Malaysian population. A larger sample size with a
longer follow-up period is needed to draw a definitive
conclusion
2.Bibliometric Analysis of Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal using Scopus Database
Kow RY ; Low CL ; Abbas AA ; Zulkifly AH
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2024;18(No.2):1-9
Introduction: The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal (MOJ)
(ISSN 1985-2533 / 2232-111X) is the official publication of
the Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA) and the
ASEAN Orthopaedic Association (AOA). In May 2007,
MOA published the first standalone issue of MOJ with the
aim of disseminating new knowledge and providing updates
in orthopaedics, trauma and musculoskeletal research. Since
then, MOJ has grown significantly, achieving indexing in
numerous databases and attaining a 2nd Quartile (Q2) rank
in the Scopus database in 2022. This bibliometric analysis
aims to explore the trends and distribution of articles
published in MOJ.
Materials and methods: Bibliometric data for MOJ was
extracted from the SCOPUS database, covering the years
from its indexing to 2022. Information such as authors,
country, document type, author’s keywords, citations, and
other parameters were extracted using the bibliometrix
package in the R Studio software. The data were then
presented in tables and illustrative graphs using the same
software.
Results: A total of 305 articles were retrieved from the
Scopus database during the study period. Two-thirds of the
articles were original articles and review articles. The highest
number of citations received by an article is 56, and top ten
articles in MOJ were authored by researchers from seven
different countries, highlighting the journal’s diversity.
Despite receiving submissions from various countries, there
is minimal collaboration between authors of different
countries. Keywords such as “covid-19” and “pandemic”
dominate the authors’ keyword section due to the once-in-alife-time COVID-19 which during the study period, resulting
in numerous publications related to this issue.
Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis reviews all the
articles indexed in the Scopus database and provides insight
into the contributors’ information and the trends in
orthopaedic research. By identifying the lack of
collaboration between countries, it is hoped that this analysis
can inspire more orthopaedic surgeons and researchers to
collaborate and produce high-quality publications.
3.Autologous chondrocyte implantation for knee focal cartilage defects: 3 years' follow-up at the University Malaya Medical Centre.
Abbas Aa ; Mohamad Ja ; Lydia Al ; Selvaratnam L ; Razif A ; Ab-Rahim S ; kavitha G ; Shilpa Pn ; Kamarul T
Journal of University of Malaya Medical Centre 2014;17(1):8-13
Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is a widely accepted procedure for the treatment of large, fullthickness
chondral defects involving various joints, but its use in developing countries is limited because of high
cost and failure rates due to limited resources and support systems. Five patients (age <45 years) with focal
cartilage defects received ACI at University of Malaya from 2006 to 2007 and followed up for 36 months. The
average presubjective Knee Evaluation Forms (IKDC) improved from 38.44±6.29 to 25.6±8.04 postoperatively,
the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) went from 25.6±8.04 to 13.96±1.63 and the American Knee Society Score (AKSS)
improved from 80±14.33 to 92.96±5.82 post-operatively. Thus improvements were seen in the IKDC and
AKSS score but not in the OKS. Magnetic resonance images showed the presence of cartilage tissue filling in
the lateral and medial patellar facet and medial femoral condyle in three patients. Failures were seen in two
patients, both with patellar defects and over the age of 36 years. Treatment with autologous chondrocyte
implantation for focal cartilage defect in lateral and medial patellar facet and medial femoral condyle showed
early improvement which was maintained at 3 yrs follow-up. ACI provided satisfactory outcome in focal cartilage
defects involving the femoral condyle.
Chondrocytes
4.Morsellized Allograft and Acetabular Reconstruction Cage: Follow up of 2 to 9 years
Abbas AA ; Merican AM ; Mohamad JA
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2007;1(1):5-7
We report the outcome of 32 patients who underwent total hip replacement (THR) augmented with morsellized fresh frozen femoral head allografts and acetabular reconstruction cages. Nine patients underwent primary THR and 23 patients underwent revision THR. Follow up ranged from two to 9 years. Two most common indications for the procedures as reported in literature were rheumatoid arthritis and aseptic loosening of the hip. All but one patient achieved good outcome with radiographs showing full incorporatio
5.Five Year Follow up of One Stage Bilateral Total HipArthroplasty
Tai CC ; Abbas AA ; Varaprasad M
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2007;1(1):22-25
We report on the medium term outcome of five patients (ten hips) who underwent one stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty. Both Harris Hip Scores and Oxford Hip Scores improved postoperatively as did range of motion. There was no radiographic evidence of loosening in any hip arthroplasty involved in this study, however one revision surgery was needed due to periprosthetic fracture. There were no increased medical complications. Based on our limited experience, we believe that one stage bilateral total hip


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail