The American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC), in collaboration with multiple professional organizations, jointly released the "Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults" in August 2025. Based on the latest evidence-based medical findings from February 2015 to January 2025, the guideline proposes an individualized treatment strategy grounded in total cardiovascular disease risk stratification, incorporates the novel PREVENT risk assessment model, lowers the medication initiation threshold and control targets for high-risk populations, and provides specific management recommendations for special populations. This article provides an interpretation of these updates and conducts a comparative analysis with the current status of hypertension prevention and treatment in China as well as Chinese guidelines, aiming to offer reference for hypertension control practices in China.

The American Heart Association (AHA) officially released the "2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association" on January 27, 2025. This report systematically compiles the latest statistics on major cardiovascular diseases worldwide, while simultaneously integrating relevant outcome indicators, including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs, and updating the global prevalence patterns and evolving trends of diverse risk factors impacting cardiovascular health, providing essential guidance for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Synthesizing insights from this pivotal report and other relevant studies, this article highlights key findings concerning the global prevalence and mortality of heart diseases, associated risk factors, and emerging diagnostic and therapeutic technologies.

OBJECTIVE To form an expert consensus addressing clinical issues regarding the use of parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors （DTIs） in special populations. METHODS Led by the Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital（the Affiliated Hospital of UESTC）， a multidisciplinary working group was formed comprising experts from multiple fields， including clinical pharmacy， cardiac surgery， obstetrics， pediatrics and evidence-based medicine. Through literature review and the Delphi method， clinical questions regarding the efficacy and safety of parenteral DTIs used in special populations were identified. A structured design was adopted using the “Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome” （PICO） framework；systematic searches were conducted in CJFD， PubMed， Embase and other databases. Relevant evidence from randomized controlled trials，cohort studies and systematic reviews were included and synthesized. Evidence quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment，Development and Evaluation （GRADE） approach， and recommendations were formulated through three rounds of Delphi surveys and expert consensus meetings. RESULTS &CONCLUSIONS Seven clinical questions were ultimately selected （with a consensus rate exceeding 90%）， resulting in the formulation of seven recommendations on the use of parenteral DTIs in special populations， including children， pregnant women， patients with hepatic or renal impairment， patients with mesenteric venous thrombosis， and individuals with thrombophilia. These recommendations clarify the preferred agents， dosing ranges， monitoring parameters， and safety management strategies for parenteral DTIs in these special populations. This expert consensus， which is formulated based on the best available evidence， provides evidence-based guidance for standardized and individualized use of parenteral DTIs in special populations.

ObjectiveTo develop an assessment tool for apraxia of speech (AOS) of Chinese Putonghua speakers and test its reliability and validity. MethodsThe Chinese Apraxia of Speech Assessment and Diagnostic Tool (CAADT) was developed based on the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale 3.5, combined with the linguistic characteristics of Chinese and clinical experience. The tool consistsed of eleven items across three sections: articulation, prosody and alternating motion rates. Six experts evaluated the content validity. From November, 2024 to May, 2025, 51 patients with post-stroke AOS (experimental group) and ten patients with post-stroke aphasia without AOS (control group) were recruited from Anhui Wannan Rehabilitation Hospital (the Fifth People's Hospital of Wuhu), and tested with CAADT. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient, Kendall's coefficient of concordance W and Pearson correlation coefficient. Validity was evaluated using the content validity index (CVI) and Spearman correlation coefficient. Discriminative effect was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. ResultsThe Cronbach's α coefficients for the articulation and prosody sections and the total scale were all > 0.9, while it was 0.454 for the alternating motion rates. Inter-rater reliability was good (W ≥ 0.598, P < 0.001). Test-retest reliability showed high positive correlations for the three sections and the total score between the two assessments (r ≥ 0.84, P < 0.001). The scale-level CVI was 0.95, and the item-level CVI ≥ 0.83. The Spearman correlation coefficients among the sections ranged from 0.30 to 0.70. ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.953, with a cut-off value of 11, yielding a sensitivity of 0.92 and a specificity of 0.90. ConclusionCAADT demonstrates good reliability, validity and discriminative effect, which can be used for clinical assessment and auxiliary diagnosis of Chinese Putonghua speaking patients with post-stroke AOS.

Objective To construct an evaluation model for the use of large-scale medical equipment based on the analytic hierarchy process(AHP).Methods The indicators of the evaluation model were determined with considerations on the req-uirements of Accreditation Standard for Tertiary Hospitals(2022 edition),performance assessment standards of municipal departments for large-scale medical equipment in medical institutions over the years,the present situation of medical insti-tutions,key indexes for performance evaluation and the basic operational efficiency of the equipment.The evaluation model was established by calculating the weights of the indicators with AHP and performing the consistency test.The utilization of four CT devices in some hospital in a certain year was used as an example to comprehensively evaluate the rationality and feasibility of the model.Results There were 5 first-level indicators and 14 second-level indicators involved in the large-scale medical equipment usage evaluation model.The first-level indicators were made up of the usage,social benefits,functional utilization,economic benefits,scientific research and teaching benefits,with the weights of 45.156%,21.090%,12.113%,15.983%,and 5.657%,respectively,with all the first-level and second-level indicators passing the consistency test.The analysis of levels indicator weights showed the indicators affecting the operational efficiency included positive rate,expected work rate,utilization rate,etc.Comprehensive evaluation indicated the model was consistent with the traditional evaluation modes when used for ranking the equipment usage.Conclusion The AHP-based large-scale medical equipment usage evaluation model with high practicality facilitates the decision of medical institutions for the utilization,allocation and management of specialized medical equipment.[Chinese Medical Equipment Journal,2025,46(8):86-90]

Objective To compile a comprehension assessment scale of double-conditional phrases for adults and to test its reliability and validity.Methods With reference to the compilation process of local and international word lists,a comprehension assessment scale of double-conditional phrases for adults was developed.The scale was used to assess 40 aphasia patients and 20 ordinary adults as subjects from four hospitals in Shanghai.The internal consistency reliability,split-half reliability,retest reliability and calibration validity of the scale were evaluated and analyzed[the western aphasia battery(WAB)as a calibrated measurcment instrument].Results The scale consists of 30 questions,including five types of phrases:coordinate phrases,verb-object phrases,subject-predicate phrases,endocentric phrases and interface-object phrases.Compared with the ordinary adult group,the total score of the scale and the scores of each dimension in the aphasia group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P＜0.001).The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total score was 0.894,the half coefficient was 0.924,and the correlation coefficient for the retest reliability of the total score was 0.923,with retest reliability for each type of word group ranging from 0.731 to 0.903.With the exception of the repetition scores,correlation coefficients be-tween the scale and all other scores of WAB were all＞0.6(P＜0.01).Conclusion The self-developed"Adult Double Conditional Phrases Auditory Comprehension Assessment Scale"demonstrates good reliability and validity.It serves as a scientific and reliable tool for evaluating the auditory comprehension ability of adult patients.

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of artificial intelligence(AI)-assisted imaging diagnostic trials using multi-reader multi-case(MRMC)design,so as to provide a scientific basis for clinical evaluation of imaging diagnostic trials.Methods The MRMC design,widely used in imaging diagnostic trials,was adopted in this study.The Obuchowski-Rockette(OR)method of MRMC design was detailed,including model construction and test methods.A case study was conducted,collecting imaging data of 200 subjects from 3 hospitals,with 133 cases of rib fractures and 68 cases of non-rib fractures.Three radiologists reviewed all CT images of the subjects.The area under curve(AUC)value,sensitivity and specificity in detecting rib fractures between 2 reading modalities(radiologists with AI assistance vs radiologists reading independently)were compared.Results The AI-assisted reading group had an AUC value of 0.958,while the radiologist-independent reading group had an AUC value of 0.902,showing a significant difference(P＜0.001).The overall sensitivity and specificity of the AI-assisted reading group were 0.970 and 0.946,respectively;while the sensitivity and specificity of the radiologist-independent reading group were 0.838 and 0.966,respectively.The difference of sensitivity between groups was 0.131(95％confidence interval[CI]0.091-0.171),and the difference of specificity was-0.020(95％CI-0.059-0.020),indicating a significant difference in sensitivity but not in specificity between AI-assisted and radiologist-independent reading groups.Both groups had positive likelihood ratios(+LR)greater than 10 and negative likelihood ratios(-LR)less than 0.2,with positive predictive values approaching 1,suggesting that the diagnostic accuracy of the AI-assisted imaging diagnostic trials was high.Conclusion The AI-assisted reading method demonstrates a significant advantage in enhancing diagnostic efficiency,not only improving the diagnostic accuracy and detection rate of rib fractures,but also improving the work efficiency of radiologists and optimizing hospital services.

Objective To estimate the sample size of radiological diagnostic tests in multireader multicase(MRMC)design,and to explore the numbers of readers and cases under 3 different inference situations:random-reader random-case,fixed-reader random-case,and random-reader fixed-case.Methods The images of 114 participants(45 cases diagnosed as aortic coarctation by the gold standard)in the Van Dyke dataset were used,and 5 radiologists read these images under 2 different magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)sequences(Spin-echo and Cine MRI)to obtain the pre-experiment data.Then Obuchowski-Rockette method was used to estimate sample size.Results The mean area under curve(AUC)of aortic coarctation determined by radiologists was 0.941(95%confidence interval[CI]0.899-0.983)with the Spin-echo MRI sequence,and 0.897(95%CI 0.837-0.957)with the Cine MRI sequence.When the effect size was 0.044 and the number of readers was 5,we needed 337 participants for random-reader random-case,162 participants for fixed-reader random-case,and 282 participants for random-reader fixed-case.Conclusion In MRMC design,we need both the number of readers and cases;the larger the number of readers,the smaller the cases required.We need more samples under the situation of random-reader random-case,when the number of readers is≥5.

Objective:To analyze the clinical features and risk factors for renal injury in children with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive IgA vasculitis (IgAV).Methods:A case-control study was conducted. Seventy-two ANCA-positive IgAV children hospitalized at the Children′s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2017 to October 2022 were enrolled as the ANCA-positive group. Propensity score matching (1∶4) using the nearest neighbor was performed with age and gender as covariate, and 288 cases ANCA-negative IgAV children were included as the ANCA-negative group. Patients with renal injury were named ANCA-positive IgAV nephritis (IgAVN) group and ANCA-negative IgAVN group, respectively. The ANCA-positive IgAVN group was further divided into myeloperoxidase (MPO) group and proteinase 3 (PR3) group based on the type of ANCA. Clinical data including manifestations, laboratory tests, renal injury, and prognosis were collected. Comparisons between groups were performed using independent sample t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, χ2 tests, or Fisher′s exact tests. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess differences in the time to renal injury onset, and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for renal injury. Results:Among the 72 ANCA-positive IgAV children (41 males, 31 females, age of 7.7 (5.3, 11.2) years), no significant difference in age or gender was observed compared to the ANCA-negative group (both P>0.05). The ANCA-positive group had higher IgM levels, a higher incidence of recurrent rash, and shorter thrombin time (all P<0.05). Among children with renal injury, the ANCA-positive group showed significant differences in the incidence of hematuria, clinical classification, and grade A prognosis compared to the ANCA-negative group (all P<0.05), but no difference was found in the time to renal involvement onest or renal pathology (all P>0.05). The MPO group had higher rates of microscopic hematuria, gross hematuria, acute renal insufficiency, glomerular sclerosis, and grade B prognosis compared to the ANCA-negative IgAVN group (all P<0.05), with a later onset of renal involvement ( P<0.05). Elevated serum creatinine ( OR=1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.14) and shortened thrombin time ( OR=0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.92) were independent risk factors for renal injury in ANCA-positive IgAV children (all P<0.05). Conclusions:Children with ANCA-positive IgAV are more likely to experience recurrent rash. MPO-ANCA-positive IgAVN children have higher risks of hematuria, acute kidney injury and glomerular sclerosis, with later-onset but poorer renal prognosis compared to ANCA-negative IgAVN children. Higher serum creatinine levels and shorter thrombin time may be associated with renal injury in children with ANCA-positive IgAV.

Objective:To develop and validate a prediction model for medication adherence among patients receiving allergen sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT).Methods:A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted, and a total of 288 patients who received SLIT treatment at an allergy center in the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital) from December 2023 to July 2024 were assigned to the modeling group. Additionally, 122 patients from August to October 2024 were assigned to the validation group. Data of patients′ general information, medication beliefs, anxiety levels, social support, disease perception, and medication adherence were collected. Single-factor analysis and LASSO regression were utilized to identify potential predictors, and a prediction model for medication adherence was constructed using multifactorial logistic regression. A nomogram was then developed based on the model. The model′s discriminatory ability was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), the area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The model was then validated in the validation cohort.Results:Single-factor analysis and LASSO regression identified a total of nine predictive factors. Logistic regression revealed that medical belief tendency [ OR (95% CI) =2.420 (1.116-5.248), P=0.025], the somatic control dimension in self-rating anxiety scales [ OR (95% CI)=1.404 (1.241-1.589), P<0.001], the subjective support dimension in social support assessment [ OR (95% CI)=0.784 (0.725-0.847), P<0.001], and the cognitive dimension in illness perception [ OR (95% CI)=0.725 (0.647-0.813), P<0.001] were independent predictors of medication adherence in patients undergoing SLIT. The AUC value of the model was 0.899 (95% CI=0.863-0.934) in the modeling group and 0.882 (95% CI=0.820-0.944) in the validation group, indicating good discriminatory ability. The optimal cutoff value of the model was 0.493, with a sensitivity of 81.1% and specificity of 85.7% in the modeling group, and a sensitivity of 87.3% and specificity of 82.5% in the validation group. Conclusion:The medication adherence prediction model developed in this study for patients undergoing SLIT exhibits good predictive performance and provides valuable guidance for early intervention by clinical healthcare professionals.