A singular medical incident can alert health officials to an emerging, if not widespread, but possibly undetected publichealth concern.

Our issue contains a remarkable case of a ruptured hepatic abscess in a 3-year-old, which turned out to be MethicillinresistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by authors Torrico and Tarnate.The concern is that the infection is communityacquired,and the patient was immunocompetent. This sounds the alarm for the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR)in the communities and calls for a response from health authorities to investigate, analyze, and propose solutions for sucha sentinel event.

We need to support these efforts and, in this issue, we publish such work from our investigators. Antimicrobial resistanceis an urgent global health concern.The impact is magnified in low to middle-income countries where health risks are high,and health infrastructure is weak. Thus, it is imperative that determinants of AMR are scrutinized to allow crafting offocused strategies to combat the problem.

The article by Dela Cruz and Hernandez on the prevalence and practices of antibiotic misuse among adult residents ofRodriguez, Rizal, contributes to this analysis.The paper reveals a disturbing prevalence of self-medication and identifiesbarriers to accessing proper health education and care. This is a global problem, and the paper from Brazil relates the observationof community pharmacists of antibiotic misuse to the rise of antimicrobial resistance.

Dela Cruz and Hernandez recommend stricter antibiotic regulation, and this falls squarely into the scope of concernof another article in this issue, the “Research Needs in Philippine Pharmaceutical Sciences: A Qualitative Perspective fromRegulatory and Clinical Research Sectors of the Pharmaceutical Industry” by Pena and co-authors.Interestingly, whiledrug registration and clinical trials were the focus of the paper, it may be a desired expansion of the regulatory reach of theindustry to temper the use of antibiotics as it is being dispensed to end users.Antimicrobial stewardship involves ethicalpromotion of use and equitable access to appropriate treatment, and these concerns require the responsible participation of thepharmaceutical industry.

Health challenges are complex. The analysis of these challenges requires surveillance of literature for sentinel events, useof community-based research to investigate phenomena, and system mapping to identify relevant sectors to improve strategyand to involve relevant stakeholders.

We support this type of scholarship, which seeks to expand the focus from isolated clinical interventions towards placinga spotlight on relevant work that will lead to impactful reform of broad health ecosystems.

Introduction: The increasing prevalence of diabetes represents a significant global health challenge. Modifiable risk factors, including physical inactivity, unhealthy dietary habits, and obesity contribute substantially to this rising burden. In conjunction with the 2025 World Diabetes Day (WDD) campaign focusing on “diabetes and the workplace,” we assessed diabetes risk among healthcare workers in our hospital using the Modified Asian Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (ModAsian FINDRISC). Methodology: Healthcare workers from various departments were invited to participate in the hospital WDD celebration. A total of 286 attendees underwent anthropometric measurements and completed the ModAsian FINDSRIC questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the prevalence of risk factors and overall diabetes risk. Results: The participants included doctors, nurses, allied healthcare professionals, as well as hospital support and administrative staff. The majority of participants (74.8%) were aged below 45 years. 39.2% were overweight while 30.8% were obese. One-third (37.4%) had increased waist circumference (WC) (≥90 cm for men, ≥80 cm for women). Additionally, 20% of respondents reported being on antihypertensive medication, and 23.8% had previously recorded high blood glucose. A family history of diabetes mellitus (DM) was reported by 62.6% of respondents. Additionally, about onethird were sedentary with less than 30 minutes of daily exercise or physical activity, another one-third did not consume fruits or vegetables on a daily basis. The median ModAsian FINDRISC score was 8, with approximately 30% of them classified as having moderate to very high risk of developing DM (moderate: 17.5%; high: 10.8%; very high: 2.8%). Conclusion These results revealed high metabolic risk in healthcare workers and highlight the need for targeted workplace health promotion strategies to reduce the risk of developing diabetes.
Tertiary Care Centers ; Health Personnel ; Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ensuring the total well-being of healthcare workers (HCWs), including their mental health and psychological well-being, is an essential aspect in the delivery of patient care and the preservation of the health workforce. This study aimed to determine the level of mental well-being and emotional state of HCWs in terms of depression, anxiety, and stress using the DASS-21 scale in a tertiary government hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines and to identify the job-related factors that may be associated with these outcomes.

This is an analytical, cross-sectional study among HCWs involved in direct patient care in a tertiary government hospital in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data collection was conducted from February to March 2022 through an online self-administered questionnaire, which included the Demand-Control-Support Questionnaire (DCSQ), and the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). This was sent to doctors, nurses, and allied medical workers actively working in the clinical areas. All responses were collected and analyzed.

Three hundred sixty-four healthcare workers were included in the study. Majority were single (62.62%), living with immediate family (50.82%), and working in a COVID-designated area (62.09%). High prevalence of depression (49.18%), anxiety (61.54%), and stress (30.22%) was found among the HCWs. Work in high infection/COVID-designated areas was significantly associated with anxiety and stress, and high-job demand was significantly associated with all three mental health states compared to low job-demand.

Focus should be placed on modifying the condition of high job demand among healthcare workers working in hospitals. This includes ensuring optimum staffing levels and patient to HCW ratio which avoids HCWs from being subjected to high workloads and time pressures that subsequently increase risk for stress, anxiety, and depression.

OBJECTIVES

While many healthcare workers (HCWs) contracted COVID-19 during the pandemic, more information is needed to fully understand the potential for adverse health effects in this population segment. The aim of the present study is to examine the association between healthcare worker status and neurologic and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 infected inpatients.

Using the nationwide database provided by the retrospective cohort Philippine CORONA study, we extracted relevant data and performed a secondary analysis primarily focusing on the presentation and outcomes of healthcare workers. Propensity score matching in a 3:1 ratio was performed to match HCWs and non-HCWs. We performed multiple logistic and Cox regression analyses to determine the relationship between HCWs and COVID-19 clinical outcomes.

We included 3,362 patients infected with COVID-19; of which, 854 were HCWs. Among the HCWs, a total of 31 (3.63%) and 45 (5.27%) had the primary outcomes of in-hospital mortality and respiratory failure, respectively. For both overall and 3:1 propensity-matched cohorts, being an HCW significantly decreased the odds of the following outcomes: severe/critical COVID-19 at nadir; in-hospital mortality; respiratory failure; intensive care unit admission; and hospital stay >14 days.

We found that being an HCW is not associated with worse neurologic and clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Objective To understand the willingness of general practitioner(GP) to enhance working competence in community healthcare centers in Shanghai and provide a basis for the competence training of GPs in community healthcare centers. Methods In August 2023,GPs were selected from some community healthcare centers in Shanghai and their willingness to enhance working competence were studied by a questionnaire survey.The survey included 39 secondary indicators in three dimensions:general practice theory,skills,and humanity. Results A total of 1 192 GPs completed the questionnaire,with an effective rate of 100%.The total score of GPs' willingness to enhance their working competence was 258.45±80.93,and the mean score of the three dimensions was 6.63±2.08.The score for the general practice theory was the highest (6.92±1.95),while that for general practice humanity was the lowest (6.44±2.34) among the three dimensions.The score of willingness to enhance working efficiency differed across different age ranges (P<0.001),professional titles (P<0.001),years of work (P<0.001),and educational backgrounds of GPs (P=0.039).Those with the age younger than 30 years old,junior professional titles,less than 5 years of work experience,and a college degree or below had the highest willingness score to enhance their working competence.Among the top three secondary indicators of willingness score in each dimension,the top three methods of working competence enhancement were community general practice and specialized healthcare services combined with outpatient learning,flexible further training,and continuing education courses.Conclusions There is an urgent need for young GPs in community healthcare centers in Shanghai to enhance their working competence.Targeted enhancement plans can be provided to different groups of GPs with different characteristics through community general practice and specialized healthcare services combined with outpatient learning,flexible further training,and continuing education courses,which can further enhance the ability and quality of the GP team.
Humans ; China ; General Practitioners/psychology* ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Community Health Centers ; Clinical Competence ; Female ; Adult ; Male ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Middle Aged

Objective To investigate the key factors influencing the implementation of long-acting injection-promoting policies and propose effective improving paths.Methods Qualitative interviews were carried out for stakeholders involved in the promotion of long-acting injections,based on the consolidated framework for implementation research.Additionally,countermeasures for identified barriers were proposed based on expert recommendations for implementation changes.Results A total of 46 health administrators,healthcare workers,and patients in Beijing were interviewed.The study identified several barriers in the strength and quality of evidence,adaptability,relative advantage,complexity and cost,patient needs and resources,external collaboration,external policies and incentives,organizational structural characteristics,and self-efficacy.Conclusions From the perspectives and experiences of stakeholders,the promotion of long-acting injections has shown initial success but still faces multiple obstacles.It is recommended that efforts should be made to coordinate and adapt policies,improve and incentivize relative organizations,and continuously strengthen the advocacy and education for individuals.
Humans ; Beijing ; Delayed-Action Preparations ; Health Personnel ; Health Policy ; Injections

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome are significant public health concerns and social issues. Key players in efforts to stop HIV/AIDS as a public threat are healthcare personnel. Research has shown that negative attitudes of healthcare workers towards HIV can negatively influence their practices and these are associated with their level of knowledge about the disease.

This study aims to investigate the baseline knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare workers towards HIV/AIDS and to determine the association between profession and level of knowledge, attitudes and practices among healthcare workers in a tertiary pediatric government hospital.

This study utilized an analytical cross-sectional research design. Data were collected through a written questionnaire administered to 213 healthcare personnel, who were selected via stratified random sampling from January to April 2024. Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) scores were evaluated using Bloom’s cut-off points. Scores below 60% were classified as low level of knowledge, negative attitude, and poor practice. Scores from 60-79% were classified as moderate level of knowledge, neutral attitude and fair practice. Lastly, scores between 80-100% were classified as high level of knowledge, positive attitude and good practice. Descriptive and inferential statistics, specifically Fisher’s test were used whenever appropriate.

Among 213 study participants, 140 (65.73%) demonstrated a high level of knowledge towards HIV/AIDS among doctors, nurses, medical technologists, and radiologic technologists. There were 161 (75.59%) who exhibited positive attitude towards HIV/AIDS and worked as pharmacists, physical therapists, and dentists. About 154 (72.30%) reported having fair practices on HIV/AIDS.

The healthcare workers in our study have a high level of knowledge, positive attitude, and fair practices towards HIV/AIDS with significant differences between professions. There is a significant association between professions with the level of knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards HIV. Doctors, nurses, medical technologists, and radiologic technologists have higher level of knowledge on HIV/AIDS. Positive attitude was higher among pharmacists, physical therapists, and dentists. Lastly, good practices were highest among midwives.

BACKGROUND

Stress is a pervasive occupational hazard among healthcare workers, particularly in tertiary government hospitals with heavy workloads, limited resources, and emotionally demanding care. Chronic stress contributes to burnout, reduced job performance, and poorer patient outcomes, posing significant workforce and public health concerns. Despite post-pandemic recovery initiatives, evidence remains limited on how healthcare workers experience and manage stress in routine, non-crisis settings in Philippine tertiary hospitals. This study aimed to examine the relationship between perceived stress, clinicodemographic and lifestyle factors among employees of a tertiary government hospital.

An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 173 stratified randomly selected employees of Luis Hora Memorial Regional Hospital (LHMRH), Mountain Province. A validated self-administered electronic questionnaire assessed clinicodemographic characteristics, lifestyle behaviors, and the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale. Anthropometric measures, including body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio, supplemented self-reported data. Descriptive statistics summarized participant characteristics, and linear regression identified factors associated with perceived stress.

Most employees demonstrated suboptimal adherence to Lifestyle Medicine pillars, particularly nutrition (0.6% met recommendations), physical activity (61.8% low), and sleep quality (83.3% fair/poor). The overall perceived stress level was moderate (mean = 18.19). Linear regression revealed that bronchial asthma (p = 0.003), poor sleep quality (p < 0.001), and alcohol dependence (p = 0.023) were significantly associated with higher stress, while nutrition, physical activity, and social support were not.

Healthcare workers at LHMRH experience moderate stress primarily linked to poor sleep, alcohol dependence, and bronchial asthma. Targeted wellness programs promoting sleep hygiene, responsible alcohol use, and chronic disease management are recommended to strengthen workforce resilience and align with the Mental Health Act and Civil Service Commission directives.

Human ; World Health Organization ; Research Personnel

BACKGROUND: Supporting the mental health of researchers is essential to maintaining human resources and advancing science. This study investigated the association between Japanese medical researchers' perceptions of research evaluation processes and their psychological well-being. METHODS: We performed a web-based self-administered questionnaire survey. The questionnaires were distributed to each academic society through the Japanese Association of Medical Sciences from December 2022 to January 2023. These questionnaires targeted medical researchers. Exposure was the medical researchers' perceptions of quantitative indicators for evaluating medical research and researchers. The outcome was psychological well-being, measured using the Japanese version of the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5). Multivariable-adjusted logistic regressions were conducted to investigate the association between individual attitudes toward research evaluation and psychological well-being. Stratified analyses by research fields, i.e., clinical, basic, and social medicine, were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 3,139 valid responses were collected. After excluding 176 responses from research fields of other than clinical, basic, or social medicine, 2,963 researchers (2,185 male, 737 female, and 41 other) were analyzed. Prevalence of poor well-being (WHO-5 score <13) was 28.3% in the researchers. The highest number of medical researchers was in clinical medicine (n = 500) followed by basic medicine (n = 217) and social medicine (n = 121). Medical researchers who considered research funding slightly important/not important for researcher evaluation had poorer psychological well-being than those who considered it especially important (slightly important: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.71; not important: aOR 1.53, 95%CI 1.10-2.12). This tendency was stronger among basic medical researchers than clinical or social medical researchers. The research field significantly modified the relationship between research funding received and interaction with poor psychological well-being both additively (P = 0.030) and multiplicatively (P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS The discrepancy between medical researchers' attitudes toward research evaluation and the current state of research evaluation in their research community may worsen their psychological well-being. The influence of this discrepancy differs among clinical, basic, and social medicine. Appropriate evaluation of medical research and researchers in each field can facilitate improving their psychological well-being via the resolution of this discrepancy.
Humans ; Japan ; Female ; Male ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Adult ; Research Personnel/statistics & numerical data* ; Middle Aged ; Biomedical Research ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Mental Health ; Psychological Well-Being ; East Asian People