Academic publishing is at a critical juncture. The challenges faced by the academics are mired in controversy. Among theseare three hotly debated concerns. First is the issue of whether technological innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI)improves research efficiency or if its use sacrifices research integrity.Another is the controversy between paywall publishingand open access. Lastly, adapting an appropriate business model for sustainability is a contentious issue and the choice betweena commercial or a university-based publishing platform is a difficult one.

Traditional models of scientific investigation relied on tedious intellectual calisthenics in all aspects of research —identifying research gaps, reviewing of published literature, devising valid methodology, collecting data, analysing results, and,finally, drawing conclusions. With the advent of powerful tools employing artificial intelligence, these heavy tasks are efficientlycarried out. The dilemma lies in determining which parts of the work can be attributed to the authors and which are ascribedto the output of large language models (LLMs) and other automated assistance employed.Despite requiring adequate vettingby experts of these AI-aided output, many in the scientific community still question these methods. Can research employingAI be considered honest work? Will full disclosure answer doubts as to the integrity of the scientific work?

Indeed, LLMs just gather information that is already out there, albeit more efficiently. After all, science progresses bystanding on the shoulder of giants. AI makes such work comprehensive and efficient. Standing on those proverbial shoulders,however, require access to prior work, hence our next challenge in academic publishing--open access versus paid access.Paywalls limit the benefits of valuable research to institutions and universities with the capacity to pay. Excluded from these arethose from low resourced countries, with nations from the global south being affected disproportionately. Additionally, whilenumerous authors appreciate the features of open access as it improves their impact and visibility, many feel unduly burdenedsince the cost of publishing in this format is passed on to them.

This brings us to our third issue: who bears the cost of academic publishing? Indeed, it is a lucrative industry, generatingan annual revenue of US$19 billion and an estimated 40 percent profit margin. Many, however, find fault in this businessmodel as concerns about the profit motives of the commercial publishers far overshadow their sustainability goals.

How do we navigate this landscape of controversies? We, at the ACTA, as part of the community of scholars, would needto clarify our mission. Our goals for this publication should be consistent with our values. These values, such as scientific rigor,integrity, and accountability, should be reflected in our policies. We should be cognizant of the role we play in national scientificdiscourse while we endeavor to make an impact in the global scene. We are accountable to our stakeholders — nurturingearly career scholars, supplying evidence to health policymakers, and being accountable to those who provide resources tosustain us. This stewardship is essential so that ACTA will stand shoulder to shoulder with the giants on which science buildsupon to benefit future generations.

Artificial Intelligence ; Commerce ; Costs And Cost Analysis ; Disclosure ; Drawing ; Efficiency ; Family Characteristics ; Forecasting ; Goals ; Gymnastics ; Health ; Health Resources ; Industry ; Intelligence ; Inventions ; Language ; Literature ; Methods ; Play And Playthings ; Policy ; Publications ; Publishing ; Research ; Residence Characteristics ; Role ; Science ; Shoulder ; Social Responsibility ; Universities ; Ursidae ; Volition ; Work ; World Health Organization

Walking through the wards of a crowded public hospital and seeing suffering and tragedy from easily preventable conditionsmakes one wonder what it takes for a facility to change the outcomes. The evidence is there, and guidelines have beendeveloped from it; yet practices remain difficult to change—whether in screening, prevention, treatment, or rehabilitation.

Recently, the Department of Health has put up a compendium of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) crafted accordingto the standards set by the Manual for Clinical Practice Guideline Development of DOH-Philhealth.Guidelines stipulatethat dissemination and implementation be considered, and applicability issues are discussed. The uptake of the guidelinesshould be evaluated, and facilitators and barriers should be identified. Thus, there is a need for implementation andapplicability studies to assess how effective guidelines are. For breast cancer, the Philippine Guidelines were published in 2022and updated in 2026.Identified as barriers against implementation are financial constraints and out-of-pocket costs. Actahas since responded to these concerns by publishing articles on financing cost assessment, and in this issue, by Mondragonand co-authors, an “Assessment of Out-of-Pocket Expenditure of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients in a Tertiary CancerCenter and Private Clinics in the Philippines.”

These types of studies are necessary in the translation of evidence to practice, allowing organizations to adopt, scale,and sustain recommendations to real-world settings.

Where CPGs on malnutrition cite resource constraints as the only significant barrier for implementation, the article byde Luna and co-authors on the “A Qualitative Program Evaluation Study on the Perceived Impact of Health and NutritionPrograms among Beneficiaries of a Civil Society Organization in the Philippines” in this issue of the Acta add fear ofsustainability by families and competition from readily accessible instant food of poor nutritional value as barriers in implementingsuch programs.

These studies help us go beyond information dissemination of evidence-based practice to create pathways for impactfulintegration of recommended interventions. Implementation studies sharpen our analysis and focus our efforts on strategies thatcan help pilot, roll out, and scale up guidelines.

New modalities to carry out recommendations can also be part of how guidelines are implemented in the communitysetting. Where the Philippine Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine (PARM) recommends early home-based rehabilitation,the Stroke Society of the Philippines recommends telerehabilitation to augment the efforts of care providers.The articleby Laxamana and co-authors in this issue on “The Acceptance of Stroke Telerehabilitation among Rehabilitation Providersand Consumers in Two Tertiary Hospitals in the Philippines” not only identifies but also provides suggestions to addressimplementation barriers.

We support and encourage articles on implementation science. These works provide tools to convert evidence into outcomes.These transform organizations and help us accomplish meaningful, lasting structural change that should come withoutany delay to provide relief to our patients in our crowded public wards.

Practice Guideline ; Program Evaluation ; Evaluation Studies As Topic ; Costs And Cost Analysis ; Organizations ; Residence Characteristics ; Health Services Needs And Demand

Walking through the wards of a crowded public hospital and seeing suffering and tragedy from easily preventable conditionsmakes one wonder what it takes for a facility to change the outcomes. The evidence is there, and guidelines have beendeveloped from it; yet practices remain difficult to change—whether in screening, prevention, treatment, or rehabilitation.

Recently, the Department of Health has put up a compendium of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) crafted accordingto the standards set by the Manual for Clinical Practice Guideline Development of DOH-Philhealth.Guidelines stipulatethat dissemination and implementation be considered, and applicability issues are discussed. The uptake of the guidelinesshould be evaluated, and facilitators and barriers should be identified. Thus, there is a need for implementation andapplicability studies to assess how effective guidelines are. For breast cancer, the Philippine Guidelines were published in 2022and updated in 2026.Identified as barriers against implementation are financial constraints and out-of-pocket costs. Actahas since responded to these concerns by publishing articles on financing cost assessment, and in this issue, by Mondragonand co-authors, an “Assessment of Out-of-Pocket Expenditure of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients in a Tertiary CancerCenter and Private Clinics in the Philippines.”

These types of studies are necessary in the translation of evidence to practice, allowing organizations to adopt, scale,and sustain recommendations to real-world settings.

Where CPGs on malnutrition cite resource constraints as the only significant barrier for implementation, the article byde Luna and co-authors on the “A Qualitative Program Evaluation Study on the Perceived Impact of Health and NutritionPrograms among Beneficiaries of a Civil Society Organization in the Philippines” in this issue of the Acta add fear ofsustainability by families and competition from readily accessible instant food of poor nutritional value as barriers in implementingsuch programs.

These studies help us go beyond information dissemination of evidence-based practice to create pathways for impactfulintegration of recommended interventions. Implementation studies sharpen our analysis and focus our efforts on strategies thatcan help pilot, roll out, and scale up guidelines.

New modalities to carry out recommendations can also be part of how guidelines are implemented in the communitysetting. Where the Philippine Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine (PARM) recommends early home-based rehabilitation,the Stroke Society of the Philippines recommends telerehabilitation to augment the efforts of care providers.The articleby Laxamana and co-authors in this issue on “The Acceptance of Stroke Telerehabilitation among Rehabilitation Providersand Consumers in Two Tertiary Hospitals in the Philippines” not only identifies but also provides suggestions to addressimplementation barriers.

We support and encourage articles on implementation science. These works provide tools to convert evidence into outcomes.These transform organizations and help us accomplish meaningful, lasting structural change that should come withoutany delay to provide relief to our patients in our crowded public wards.

Practice Guideline ; Program Evaluation ; Evaluation Studies As Topic ; Costs And Cost Analysis ; Organizations ; Residence Characteristics ; Health Services Needs And Demand

Costs And Cost Analysis ; Delivery Of Health Care

BACKGROUND

The Division of Colorectal Surgery at the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) conducts hundreds of surgeries annually for benign and malignant colorectal conditions. Since 2019, the Division has implemented an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program to improve patient outcomes. However, its impact on hospital costs—critical for a government hospital—has not yet been studied.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ERAS on healthcare costs for elective colorectal surgeries performed at PGH in 2021.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted on adult patients who underwent elective colorectal surgeries under the ERAS protocol in 2021. Medical and billing records were retrieved using the hospital’s electronic medical records (EMR) system, excluding cases with incomplete data. Procedures were categorized by type [stoma closure, colonic or rectal resection, reversal of Hartmann’s, or cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC)] and surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic). Costs were classified into diagnostics, facility fees, medications, surgery, and hospital supplies. ERAS compliance rates were extracted from the online ERAS Interactive Audit System (EIAS), and linear regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Among 114 elective colorectal surgeries, records for 90 cases were analyzed. Surgery-related expenses accounted for the highest mean hospital costs across all procedure types. An inverse correlation between ERAS compliance and total cost was observed for open surgeries, with statistically significant reductions in stoma closures and open colon resections (p-value: 0.0213 and 0.0134, respectively). However, minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) did not demonstrate cost reductions with increasing ERAS compliance, likely due to additional expenses associated with advanced equipment. Linear regression indicated that higher compliance rates generally led to decreased hospital costs.

CONCLUSION

Standardized care through ERAS has been associated with cost savings compared to traditional perioperative management. This study supports the conclusion that higher ERAS compliance can reduce hospital costs in open colorectal surgeries. However, the higher costs of MIS procedures, driven by equipmentrelated expenses, may offset potential savings from ERAS adherence. Further research is warranted to explore the cost implications of ERAS in MIS cases.

Costs And Cost Analysis ; Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

The pharmaceutical subsystem is a complex interrelationship among different stakeholders that ensure access to safe, effective, and quality pharmaceutical products in the market. Understanding the availability and affordability as key areas for access to medicines is essential to appreciate the strategies needed to strengthen the pharmaceutical subsystem.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the availability and affordability of essential antihypertensive medicines in public primary care facilities and private retail drugstores in a 4th class municipality. Further, the study determined the price comparisons of these essential antihypertensive medicines with international reference prices.

METHODS

This is a quantitative, cross-sectional study design which employed a modified WHO/HAI methodology to quantify antihypertensive medicines’ availability and affordability in public and private primary care drug facilities. Selection of medicines was based on a criteria applicable for the primary care setting. Availability was measured through visual inspection of the selected medicines in the facility, affordability was estimated through the selling price of medicines in the public and private facilities, respectively, and was divided by the local minimum wage of the municipality. Median price ratio was computed using the local median prices over the MSH 2015 international reference prices adjusted for inflation.

RESULTS

Availability of essential antihypertensive medicines was found to be 12.96% in public facilities and 60.32% in private facilities (p=0.0002). Only amlodipine is observed to be available in both public (83.33%) and private (85.71%) facilities, while only metoprolol 50 mg tab (33.33%) and amlodipine 5 mg tab (83.33%) were available in public facilities. All medicines are below 1 MPR, but carvedilol 6.25 mg (1 tab BID: 1.32; 2 tabs BID: 2.65), 25 mg (BID: 2.65), and enalapril 5 mg (BID: 1.14; TID: 1.70) treatment regimens are unaffordable compared to a worker’s day wage.

CONCLUSION

Availability of essential antihypertensive medicines is diverse comparing public and private facilities. There is a need to increase the availability of antihypertensive medicines in public facilities as this is an important quality measure of primary care services. Public facilities can leverage on the availability of medicines in private pharmacies by forming Primary Care Provider Networks. While most medicines were deemed affordable in the private setting, there are still drugs such as carvedilol and enalapril, that need to be regulated. There is a need to strengthen the local pharmaceutical subsystem because it is essential to ensure safe, effective, and quality medicines in the local health system through adequate mobilization of resources.

Human ; Access To Medicines ; Health Services Accessibility ; Affordability ; Costs And Cost Analysis

BACKGROUND

The Division of Colorectal Surgery at the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) conducts hundreds of surgeries annually for benign and malignant colorectal conditions. Since 2019, the Division has implemented an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program to improve patient outcomes. However, its impact on hospital costs—critical for a government hospital—has not yet been studied.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ERAS on healthcare costs for elective colorectal surgeries performed at PGH in 2021.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted on adult patients who underwent elective colorectal surgeries under the ERAS protocol in 2021. Medical and billing records were retrieved using the hospital’s electronic medical records (EMR) system, excluding cases with incomplete data. Procedures were categorized by type [stoma closure, colonic or rectal resection, reversal of Hartmann’s, or cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC)] and surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic). Costs were classified into diagnostics, facility fees, medications, surgery, and hospital supplies. ERAS compliance rates were extracted from the online ERAS Interactive Audit System (EIAS), and linear regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Among 114 elective colorectal surgeries, records for 90 cases were analyzed. Surgery-related expenses accounted for the highest mean hospital costs across all procedure types. An inverse correlation between ERAS compliance and total cost was observed for open surgeries, with statistically significant reductions in stoma closures and open colon resections (p-value: 0.0213 and 0.0134, respectively). However, minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) did not demonstrate cost reductions with increasing ERAS compliance, likely due to additional expenses associated with advanced equipment. Linear regression indicated that higher compliance rates generally led to decreased hospital costs.

CONCLUSION

Standardized care through ERAS has been associated with cost savings compared to traditional perioperative management. This study supports the conclusion that higher ERAS compliance can reduce hospital costs in open colorectal surgeries. However, the higher costs of MIS procedures, driven by equipmentrelated expenses, may offset potential savings from ERAS adherence. Further research is warranted to explore the cost implications of ERAS in MIS cases.

Costs And Cost Analysis ; Colorectal Surgery

OBJECTIVES

o demonstrate the utility of the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) as a viable alternative to free tissue transfer for reconstruction of large cervicofacial defects.

METHODS

Design:Case Report

Setting:Tertiary National University Hospital

Patient: One

RESULTS

A 43-year-old woman with a giant cavernous hemangioma measuring 21.43 x 9.91 x 20.75cm underwent tumor resection and immediate reconstruction using SCAIF. Following preoperative embolization and complete tumor excision, an 11 x 15cm cervicofacial defect was successfully reconstructed using SCAIF. The patient experienced post-operative complications including multiple wound dehiscences and hypertrophic scar formation but achieved significant functional and aesthetic improvement. At three months follow up, the patient reported cessation of bleeding episodes, improved feeding capacity, and enhanced quality of life despite persistent tracheostomy dependence. Plans for secondary surgery include scar revision, commissuroplasty, and intralesional steroid injections.

CONCLUSION

The supraclavicular artery island flap presents a practical, cost-effective alternative to free tissue transfer for extensive cervicofacial reconstruction, particularly in resource-limited environments or in patients where free tissue transfer is contraindicated. Advantages include good color match, wide arc of rotation, and ease of harvest. Despite potential complications, it offers excellent functional and aesthetic outcomes with acceptable donor site morbidity.

Human ; Female ; Young Adult: 19-24 Yrs Old ; Aids-related Complex ; Neoplasms ; Costs And Cost Analysis ; General Surgery ; Environment ; Research Report ; Steroids ; Tracheostomy ; Hospitals

Objectives: This study aims to analyze the cost of patient care among ORL-HNS patients admitted in a tertiary, teaching government hospital in a low- to middle-income country. Methods: This is a prevalence-based, prospective, bottom-up, cost-of-illness analysis among patients of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery in a tertiary training government hospital admitted from July 2021 to March 2022. The value assessment method used is the human capital approach. The societal perspective is used for analysis to estimate and reflect payer (insurance providers) and patient perspectives. Results: A total of one hundred fifty seven (157) patients were admitted for elective surgery under the service of ORL-HNS consisting of 75 females and 82 males. The average total overall cost was $3,851.10 (Php 199, 870.50 ± 164, 725.60). The total direct health care cost for all patients within the study period amounted to $3,712.18 (Php 192, 662.22 ± 159, 548.60) while the direct non-health care cost was $58.60. The workforce cost (58.5%) and medication cost (18.8%) comprised the majority of in-patient expenses with a mean cost of $2,221.36 (Php 37,083.66) and $714.51 (Php 44,363.14), respectively. In this study, an average of $80.29 was lost due to illness and hospitalization (± $81.74). The total PHIC coverage pays a range from zero to 67.5% with an average coverage of only 17%. Conclusion Our analysis has shown that workforce and medication expenses are the main cost drivers for the direct healthcare costs among Otolaryngology patients admitted for elective procedures. Stakeholders, such as the otolaryngologists and hospitals should coordinate closely to create a more encompassing coverage of Philhealth to prevent patients from suffering from financial crises due to their illness.
Costs and Cost Analysis ; Otolaryngology ; Philippines

Objective: This paper aims to provide a better understanding of the different engagement, cost, and resource considerations in developing and implementing mHealth solutions in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: First, six participants completed a form to document the estimated costs of developing a pseudo mobile application with features to mitigate the pandemic. Second, ten key informant interviews determined the facilitators, barriers, and resource requirements in developing mHealth tools. Results: The average cost estimate to develop and roll out a mobile application with public health and epidemiology features is Php 4,018,907 (US $78,650). The analysis of the interviews resulted in 12 themes organized in three domains: 1) facilitators and barriers in developing and sustaining mHealth solutions; 2) costs of sustaining mHealth technologies; and 3) factors affecting the costs of development and maintenance of mHealth technologies. Conclusion While differences in the cost estimates are evident, it provides a ballpark figure and the different factors that implementers need to sustain and maintain an mHealth solution. This paper hopes to inform policies and practices in engaging technology solution partners and in scaling up mHealth technologies.
Telemedicine ; COVID-19 ; Costs and Cost Analysis