OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of microribonucleic acid (miRNA) gene polymorphisms with the risk and clinicopathological characteristics of Crohn's disease (CD) and the influence of miRNA gene variants on the response to ustekinumab (UST) treatment among CD patients. METHODS: From January 2018 to February 2025, 312 patients diagnosed with CD and 527 gender- and age-matched normal controls were selected as the study subjects at the Department of Gastroenterology of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Genotypes of miR-155 (rs767649), miR-21 (rs13137), miR-124 (rs531564) and miR-146a (rs57095329, rs2431697) were determined with multiplex polymerase chain reaction-ligase detection reaction (PCR-LDR) technique. The patients were divided into different subgroups according to the Montreal Classification Criteria for CD. Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) and simplified endoscopic score for CD were respectively applied to assess the clinical and endoscopic disease activity of CD. Unconditional logistic regression model was employed to analyze the distribution of miRNA gene polymorphisms between the two groups, as well as their influence on the clinicopathological characteristics of CD patients. Among them, 185 CD patients received first-line UST treatment, with the first sufficient dose of UST (6 mg/kg) administered intravenously. Based on the changes in HBI at week 8, the response of patients to UST treatment was evaluated. Unconditional logistic regression model was employed to analyze the distribution of miRNA gene polymorphisms between clinically responsive group (the decline of HBI ≥ 3 scores compared to week 0) and non-responsive group. All of the P values were adjusted by Bonferroni correction. This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Ethics No.: 2025-K-12-01). RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the distribution of miRNA gene polymorphisms between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The variant genotype (TC+CC) of rs2431697 was more common among patients with terminal ileal-type and ileocolic-type CD than those with the colonic-type CD (OR = 4.98, 95%CI: 1.49~16.68, P = 0.009, adjusted P = 0.045). However, the opposite conclusion was drawn for the homozygous variant genotype (TT) of rs13137 and variant genotype (GC+CC) of rs531564 (OR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.18~0.76, P = 0.007, adjusted P = 0.035; OR = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.18~0.73, P = 0.004, adjusted P = 0.020). Compared to patients with non-stricturing and penetrating CD, the variant genotype (AG+GG) and variant allele (G) of rs57095329 were more common in those with stricturing and penetrating CD (OR = 4.06, 95%CI: 2.46~6.71, P < 0.001, adjusted P < 0.005; OR = 3.12, 95%CI: 2.06~4.73, P < 0.001, adjusted P < 0.005). However, the frequencies of variant genotype (AT+TT) and variant allele (T) of rs13137 were lower among patients with stricturing and penetrating CD than in those without (OR = 0.25, 95%CI: 0.15~0.41, P < 0.001, adjusted P < 0.005; OR = 0.45, 95%CI: 0.33~0.63, P < 0.001, adjusted P < 0.005). Additionally, the variant genotype (AG+GG) and variant allele (G) of rs57095329 were more common among those with moderately to severely endoscopic activity than those with mildly endoscopic activity (OR = 2.01, 95%CI: 1.19~3.42, P = 0.009, adjusted P = 0.045; OR = 2.04, 95%CI: 1.28~3.25, P = 0.003, adjusted P = 0.015). In total 117 cases had shown clinical response by week 8, while 68 cases showed no response. Compared with t he clinically non-responsive group, the variant genotype (TC+CC) and variant allele (C) of rs2431697 were more common in the clinically responsive group (OR = 3.86, 95%CI: 1.80~8.32, P = 0.001, adjusted P = 0.005; OR = 2.60, 95%CI: 1.34~5.06, P = 0.005, adjusted P = 0.025). However, the variant genotype (TA+AA) of rs767649 was less frequent in the clinically responsive group than the non-responsive group (OR = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.21~0.74, P = 0.004, adjusted P = 0.020). The same conclusion was drawn for the variant genotype (AT+TT) and variant allele (T) of rs13137 when the clinically responsive group was compared with the non-responsive group (OR = 0.30, 95%CI: 0.14~0.63, P = 0.002, adjusted P = 0.010; OR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.35~0.82, P = 0.005, adjusted P = 0.025). CONCLUSION Genetic polymorphisms of miRNAs are not associated with the risk of developing CD. The miR-146a (rs57095329) variant may increase the endoscopic activity of CD and the risk for stenosis or penetration. However, the miR-146a (rs2431697) variant may increase the risk of ileal involvement. The miR-21 (rs13137) variant may reduce the risk of ileal involvement and the risk of stenosis or penetration. The miR-124 (rs531564) variant may reduce the risk of ileal involvement. Among patients receiving UST treatment, the miR-146a (rs2431697) variant may increase the clinical response by week 8. However, both the miR-155 (rs767649) and miR-21 (rs13137) variants may decrease the clinical response by week 8.
Humans ; MicroRNAs/genetics* ; Crohn Disease/pathology* ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Middle Aged ; Asian People/genetics* ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Genotype ; Young Adult ; Case-Control Studies ; Adolescent ; East Asian People

Hemichorea, a hyperkinetic disorder characterized by involuntary, rapid, irregular movements on one side of the body, typically originates from cortical basal ganglia involvement, particularly the striatum. We present a 63-year-old Filipino female with poor glycemic control and known idiopathic myelofibrosis exhibiting chorea-ballism movements in the right distal and proximal extremities. Significant improvement in involuntary movements was observed upon optimal glycemic control and benzodiazepine therapy. This report underscores the noteworthy presentation of uncontrolled hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, while highlighting the potential contribution of myelofibrosis.

Human ; Female ; Middle Aged: 45-64 Yrs Old ; Primary Myelofibrosis ; Research Report ; Glycemic Control ; Hyperglycemia ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Self-assessment and metacognition can be practiced with an exam wrapper (EW). EW is a structured, metacognitive, and self-regulated learning strategy that involves guided self-reflection on an exam already taken to improve study habits. This research describes how internal medicine (IM) residents at two tertiary private hospitals performed in written examinations using an EW. The relationship between the residents' metacognition, the exam wrapper, and exam performance was also determined.

METHODS

This study employed a pre-experimental pre- and post-test design. The EW was constructed and tested for validity and reliability. It included (1) a description of study habits, (2) accuracy in self-efficacy perception and exam score prediction, (3) perceived reasons for exam mistakes, and (4) future study plans of residents. A complete enumeration of 24 IM residents was conducted. Respondents completed the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) at the beginning of the study. The intervention consisted of (1) residents taking Exam 1: Gastroenterology, followed by EW; (2) Exam 2: Endocrinology and EW; then (3) Exam 3: Oncology, EW, and MAI. Scores were compared using a paired t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). The relationships between metacognition scores, the EW, and exam performance were determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The final EW comprises 16 items, with overall indices of content validity ratio of 0.72 and item-rated content validity of 0.8. The internal consistency coefficient is 0.65 (Kuder-Richardson 20). Nineteen out of 24 residents (79.17%) completed the study. Mean exam percentage scores were 57.97%, 42%, and 51.16% for Exams 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Exam 2 differed significantly from the other two exams (p = 0 and p = 0.04). EWs for the first two exams were not significantly different and revealed: (1) top study habits included studying right before an exam and skimming the textbook; (2) 68.42% vs. 63.16% accuracy of selfefficacy perception; (3) 26.32% vs. 31.58% accuracy of grade estimation; (4) 31.58% vs. 26.32% accuracy of error analysis; (5) most errors were due to not reading about the topic, and (6) most planned to “read more." Mean MAI scores were 36.79 ± 9.10 (pretest) and 36.05 ± 9.44 (post-test) (p = 0.81). All correlations were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Residents performed poorly during exams, crammed their studies, preferred low-impact learning strategies, and lacked self-reflection skills and metacognition monitoring. Time issues related to reading or studying were common. There is no significant relationship between metacognition score and exam wrapper use or exam performance in IM residency trainees.

Human ; Metacognition ; Self-control ; Self-regulation

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify problems and highlight opportunities for pharmaceutical sciences research in the Philippine pharmaceutical industry's regulatory and clinical research sectors that might have been previously overlooked or underrepresented. It identified current issues that can be addressed by research covering four areas of pharmaceutical sciences: drug design and discovery, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies, formulation design and pharmaceutical technology, and regulatory science.

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative approach was used in this study. Data collection was facilitated by key informant interviews (KII) using a standardized interview guide with open-ended questions to identify the pharmaceutical science research needs of the specific sectors. A purposive sampling method was employed, with five key informants (KIs), including the company vice president, director, and top-level managers from different local and multinational pharmaceutical companies. ATLAS.ti software was utilized to facilitate thematic synthesis for qualitative data analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen common themes were identified from the KIs, such as (1) incomplete development of therapeutic compounds, (2) sustainability of raw materials supply, (3) regulation of herbal medicines versus food supplements, (4) mapping disease priorities through the Philippine pharmaceutical roadmap, (5) government incentives and policies to support research, (6) technical personnel, (7) suboptimal regulatory process, approvals, and implementation, (8) gap in utilization of acquired knowledge on regulations, (9) regulatory governance, (10) passive regulatory action on counterfeit drugs, (11) PIC/S GMP version 14 adaption, (12) formulation optimization, and (13) active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) sourcing and regulation. Based on insights from the International Pharmaceutical Federation regarding anticipated hurdles in pharmaceutical sciences over the next 5-10 years, priority research needs were identified through KIs' input. Relevant action plans were developed, including the creation of research proposals to isolate, purify, and determine chemical structures of natural products, as well as analyzing recent Philippine Health Statistics to help assess the appropriateness of new drug releases for patient needs. Other action plans include forecasting future disease burdens in the country, performing toxicology studies (Health-Based Evaluation Levels/No Observed Adverse Effect Level or HBEL/NOAEL) for common generic drugs, and ensuring that research efforts are directed toward addressing the Philippine pharmaceutical regulatory and clinical research sector's most pressing needs practically and feasibly.

CONCLUSION

This study offers valuable insights into pharmaceutical sciences research and development initiatives within the regulatory and clinical research sectors in the Philippine pharmaceutical industry. These findings have the potential to catalyze transformative advancements in healthcare delivery and outcomes, positioning the Philippines for global excellence and competitiveness.

Occupational Groups ; No-observed-adverse-effect Level ; Social Control, Formal ; Patients ; Pharmaceutical Preparations

BACKGROUND

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has instigated a profound public health crisis, particularly affecting professionals like dentists who, due to their close interaction with saliva—a potential viral reservoir—and the aerosols generated during specific procedures, face elevated risks of infection. To mitigate this, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Philippine Dental Association (PDA) have established guidelines for averting cross-infection in dental settings

OBJECTIVE

This study, conducted in an urbanized Metro Manila City, delves into the infection control practices of dentists amid the pandemic.

METHODS

Dentists from a Metro Manila city dental chapter were invited to participate in an online survey (Google Forms) consisting of participants' demographics, patient triage, engineering, administrative controls, disinfection personal hygiene, personal protective equipment (PPE), and waste management practices. Descriptive statistics, employing frequency distributions and percentages, summarized the dentists' adherence to infection control protocols.

RESULTS

Out of forty-nine respondents (49), the majority (92%) provided their teams' orientation on COVID-19 infection control protocols before reopening. Notably, 57% deferred elective procedures and 43% postponed aerosolgenerating procedures (AGPs). Only 39% utilized rubber dam isolation during AGPs. Most respondents reported full implementation of recommended administrative controls during the pandemic, with 92% isolating their treatment areas from other parts of the clinic. Most respondents adopted high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration units (82%) as one of their clinic’s engineering controls, and an extraoral vacuum machine, accounting for 71% of the respondents. The most common disinfection product used by the participants was alcohol, which was at 94%. Additionally, over 90% adhered to all recommended hand hygiene practices for both dental staff and patients. For the waste management protocols, only 55% of the respondents have their infectious waste collected by third-party Treatment Storage and Disposal (TSD) facilities.

CONCLUSION

The data shows that with the guidelines posted by both the PDA and CDC, the city’s dental practitioners could still provide services to the community in the safest manner at the time by being updated and following the infection control practices suggested by both organizations. Although some areas could have been improved, such as third-party waste management and the utilization of RT-PCR testing, some of these problems could have been attributed to the lack of availability in their areas.

Public Health ; Philippines ; Interprofessional Education ; World Health Organization ; Centers For Disease Control And Prevention, U.s. ; Centers For Disease Control And Prevention (u.s.)

BACKGROUND

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has instigated a profound public health crisis, particularly affecting professionals like dentists who, due to their close interaction with saliva—a potential viral reservoir—and the aerosols generated during specific procedures, face elevated risks of infection. To mitigate this, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Philippine Dental Association (PDA) have established guidelines for averting cross-infection in dental settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study, conducted in an urbanized Metro Manila City, delves into the infection control practices of dentists amid the pandemic.

METHODS

Dentists from a Metro Manila city dental chapter were invited to participate in an online survey (Google Forms) consisting of participants' demographics, patient triage, engineering, administrative controls, disinfection personal hygiene, personal protective equipment (PPE), and waste management practices. Descriptive statistics, employing frequency distributions and percentages, summarized the dentists' adherence to infection control protocols.

RESULTS

Out of forty-nine respondents (49), the majority (92%) provided their teams' orientation on COVID-19 infection control protocols before reopening. Notably, 57% deferred elective procedures and 43% postponed aerosolgenerating procedures (AGPs). Only 39% utilized rubber dam isolation during AGPs. Most respondents reported full implementation of recommended administrative controls during the pandemic, with 92% isolating their treatment areas from other parts of the clinic. Most respondents adopted high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration units (82%) as one of their clinic’s engineering controls, and an extraoral vacuum machine, accounting for 71% of the respondents. The most common disinfection product used by the participants was alcohol, which was at 94%. Additionally, over 90% adhered to all recommended hand hygiene practices for both dental staff and patients. For the waste management protocols, only 55% of the respondents have their infectious waste collected by third-party Treatment Storage and Disposal (TSD) facilities.

CONCLUSION

The data shows that with the guidelines posted by both the PDA and CDC, the city’s dental practitioners could still provide services to the community in the safest manner at the time by being updated and following the infection control practices suggested by both organizations. Although some areas could have been improved, such as third-party waste management and the utilization of RT-PCR testing, some of these problems could have been attributed to the lack of availability in their areas.

Human ; Male ; Female ; Adult: 25-44 Yrs Old ; Middle Aged: 45-64 Yrs Old ; Aged: 65-79 Yrs Old ; World Health Organization ; Residence Characteristics ; Quarantine ; Public Health ; Centers For Disease Control And Prevention (u.s.) ; Covid-19 ; Centers For Disease Control And Prevention, U.s.

Introduction: Current education on diabetes self-management is time-consuming as it is conducted face-to-face. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of diabetes education via mobile application on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Methodology: This was a double-blinded randomized controlled study conducted in the Department of Endocrinology, Hospital Pulau Pinang and Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun. Participants were stratified randomized according to HbA1c to intervention group (using T-Manis) and control group. The primary objective was to assess the difference in HbA1c between the groups. Secondary objectives were to assess the difference in body weight, hospitalization related to diabetes, diabetes knowledge between groups and usability and satisfaction of T-Manis. Laboratory investigations and questionnaires were conducted at baseline, 4 months and 8 months. Results: A total of 112 participants were randomized into two groups each with 56 participants. Mean age was 51 years with similar diabetes duration of 16 years in both groups. Participants comprised of 61.6% females with ethnic distribution of 49.1% Malay, 30.4% Chinese, 19.6% Indian and 0.9% Siamese. Baseline HbA1c levels were comparable between intervention and control groups (10.04% versus 9.91%; mean difference 0.13%; 95% CI −0.56 to 0.81; p = 0.718). At 4 months, HbA1c of the intervention group demonstrated a significant reduction compared to the control group (8.93% versus 9.80%; mean difference −0.86; 95% CI −1.59 to −0.14; p = 0.02). Sustained reduction of HbA1c in the intervention group was observed at 8 months (mean difference −1.01; 95% CI −1.85 to −0.16; p = 0.02). Baseline body weight was 77 kg, with no betweengroup differences in body weight, hospitalization related to diabetes and diabetes knowledge scores, although diabetes knowledge scores improved at 4 months in the intervention group. 89.3% of participants reported satisfaction with T-Manis Conclusion The T-Manis mobile application aided in significantly improving glycemic control with high user satisfaction, supporting its feasibility as an adjunct to standard diabetes care.
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Glycemic Control ; Mobile Applications ; Pangolins

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant comorbidity associated with adverse tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes and remains an ongoing clinical challenge. Chronic hyperglycemia impairs host immune responses, particularly macrophage function, leading to delayed bacillary clearance. This contributes to poorer outcomes, including delayed sputum conversion, prolonged treatment duration, relapse, and increased mortality. Poor glycemic control is a key modifiable factor influencing these outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of glycemic control at diagnosis on TB treatment outcomes in a Malaysian cohort. Methodology: A retrospective cross-sectional audit was conducted using the TB clinic registry at Hospital Sungai Buloh from 2022 to 2025. Adult patients (≥18 years) with confirmed TB (any form) and DM (Type 1 or Type 2) with complete records were included. Of 241 patients screened, 131 were included after exclusions due to incomplete records (29.9%), transfer (29.9%), loss to follow-up (19.9%), and drug-resistant TB (2.9%). Data collected included demographics, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at diagnosis, sputum conversion duration, treatment duration, type of DM therapy, and clinical outcomes. Results: The cohort had a mean age of 53 years, with 97% having Type 2 DM. Mean HbA1c at diagnosis was 10.5%. Poorer glycemic control was associated with delayed sputum conversion. Patients who achieved sputum conversion by 8 weeks had an average HbA1c of 9.6%, compared to 11.8% in those with delayed conversion. Longer treatment duration was associated with higher HbA1c (mean 10.5, 8.6, and 11.8% for 6-, 12-, and 18-month regimens, respectively). Relapse analysis demonstrated a trend towards higher HbA1c with increasing relapse episodes (11.2, 13.75, and 14.5% for one, two, and three relapses, respectively). Overall mortality was 17% (22/131), with markedly higher mean HbA1c in deceased patients compared to survivors (16.0% vs 10.5%). Conclusion Poor glycemic control at TB diagnosis is associated with delayed sputum conversion, prolonged treatment duration, and increased mortality. These findings are consistent with regional evidence, including a South Asian systematic review (Gautam et al., 2021), demonstrating higher mortality and treatment failure in patients with TB and DM. Early and aggressive optimization of glycemic control, alongside standard anti-TB therapy, is essential to improve outcomes.
Humans ; Glycemic Control ; Retrospective Studies ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Treatment Outcome ; Tuberculosis

Introduction: Insulin deintensification is an emerging strategy to reduce hypoglycemia and treatment burden in patients on multiple daily injection (MDI ≥3), with potential to improve adherence and glycemic control. However, evidence in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains limited. This study evaluated its effectiveness and identified factors associated with achieving adequate glycemic control following deintensification among patients with poorly controlled T2DM attending Malaysian primary care. Methodology: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 107 T2DM patients with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >9%, attending Enhanced Diabetic Clinic at Cheras Health Clinic between 2021 and 2025. All patients on basal-bolus insulin (BBI) underwent deintensification. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with achieving adequate glycemic control (HbA1c <7.5%). Changes in HbA1c following deintensification were assessed using paired t-tests. Results: Overall, 50.5% of patients achieved adequate glycemic control. Hypoglycemia events (AOR 9.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–58.3; p = 0.015), MDI (AOR 9.6, 95% CI 1.4–67.1; p = 0.023) and Diabetes Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic (DMTAC) visits (AOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0– 1.2; p = 0.039) were significantly associated with achieving HbA1c <7.5%. Conversely, patients transitioned from BBI to premixed regimens were less likely to achieve HbA1c <7.5% (AOR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05–0.93, p = 0.039). All insulin deintensification strategies were associated with significant HbA1c improvements with transitioned from BBI to premixed human insulin (mean difference -2.54%, 95% CI 1.77–3.31, p <0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.09), BBI to premixed analogue insulin (mean difference -3.38%, 95% CI 2.26– 4.49, p <0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.62), BBI to basal insulin (mean difference -3.67%, 95% CI 1.79–5.54, p = 0.004, Cohen’s d = 2.05). Conclusion Insulin deintensification is an effective strategy for improving glycemic control in poorly controlled T2DM. These findings highlight the importance of deintensification with careful consideration of hypoglycemia, MDI-related treatment burden, and patient engagement through regular DMTAC visits, which are integral to achieving optimal outcomes and support a personalized approach to diabetes management in primary care.
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Glycemic Control ; Retrospective Studies ; Primary Health Care ; Insulins

Introduction: Improving glycemic control while minimizing unnecessary insulin exposure is an important goal in diabetes management. The Rapid Optimization Clinic (ROC) was established as a structured multidisciplinary service to support therapy individualization, close follow-up, and timely insulin deintensification. This audit evaluated early changes in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and insulin treatment burden following ROC care over 3 months. Methodology: We conducted a retrospective audit of routine clinical data from patients with diabetes managed in the ROC at a district hospital. Baseline and 3-month HbA1c and insulin data were extracted from non-electronic clinic records. Insulin dose was standardized as total daily dose (TDD) in units/kg/day. Insulin deintensification was evaluated primarily by change in TDD from baseline to 3 months and by the proportion of patients who discontinued insulin during follow-up. Paired analyses were performed for patients with complete baseline and follow-up data for each outcome. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range, as appropriate. Exploratory analyses were undertaken to assess whether available patient factors were associated with HbA1c improvement. Results: Twenty-three patients were included. Paired HbA1c data were available for 12 patients, whereas paired TDD data were available for 21 patients. Mean HbA1c decreased from 10.78 ± 2.59% at baseline to 8.42 ± 2.29% at 3 months, representing a mean reduction of 2.36 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09–4.62; p = 0.043). Mean TDD decreased from 0.434 ± 0.248 to 0.286 ± 0.313 units/kg/day, corresponding to a mean reduction of 0.148 units/kg/day (95% CI 0.077–0.219; p <0.001). Insulin was discontinued in 9 of 21 patients (42.9%). No clear association was observed between HbA1c improvement and age, sex, or number of visits. Interpretation is limited by the small sample size, reflecting the early phase of a newly established clinic. Conclusion In this early audit, ROC care was associated with clinically meaningful improvement in glycemic control and significant insulin deintensification over 3 months. These findings support the potential role of a structured multidisciplinary optimization clinic in delivering individualized diabetes care and facilitating safe reduction of insulin burden.
Humans ; Glycemic Control ; Retrospective Studies ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Insulins