Objective To explore the risk prediction value of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(Gd-EOB-MRI)liver imaging reporting and data system version 2018(LI-RADS v2018)with contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)LI-RADS version 2017(LI-RADS v2017)in high-risk patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Methods The clinical and imaging data of 122 high-risk patients for HCC(with a total of 134 liver lesions)who underwent both Gd-EOB-MRI and CEUS examination at the same time and obtained pathological results within one month were retrospectively col-lected.The nodules were classified according to the CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 and CEUS LI-RADS v2017 criteria,and the LI-RADS classification results of the two imaging methods were subjected to Cohen's Kappa test.Using pathological results as the gold stand-ard,the diagnostic efficacy of LI-RADS v2018 and LI-RADS v2017 with LR-5 as the standard for HCC was calculated separately.Results The overall consistency between the Gd-EOB-MRI LI-RADS v2018 and CEUS LI-RADS v2017 classification standards was good(Kappa=0.691,P＜0.001).Using LR-5 as the standard for diagnosing HCC,the sensitivity of Gd-EOB-MRI and CEUS was 84.7％and 81.2％,the specificity was 79.6％and 73.5％,the positive predictive value was 87.8％and 84.1％,the negative predictive value was 75.0％and 69.2％,and the accuracy was 82.8％and 78.4％,respectively.There was no statistically significant difference in the diagnostic efficacy of the diagnosis of HCC by LR-5 between the two imaging methods(P＞0.05).Conclusion The Gd-EOB-MRI LI-RADS v2018 and CEUS LI-RADS v2017 classifica-tion standards show good overall agreement.The diagnostic efficacy of Gd-EOB-MRI for HCC using LR-5 classification is better than that of CEUS.

Objective To explore the risk prediction value of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(Gd-EOB-MRI)liver imaging reporting and data system version 2018(LI-RADS v2018)with contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)LI-RADS version 2017(LI-RADS v2017)in high-risk patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Methods The clinical and imaging data of 122 high-risk patients for HCC(with a total of 134 liver lesions)who underwent both Gd-EOB-MRI and CEUS examination at the same time and obtained pathological results within one month were retrospectively col-lected.The nodules were classified according to the CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 and CEUS LI-RADS v2017 criteria,and the LI-RADS classification results of the two imaging methods were subjected to Cohen's Kappa test.Using pathological results as the gold stand-ard,the diagnostic efficacy of LI-RADS v2018 and LI-RADS v2017 with LR-5 as the standard for HCC was calculated separately.Results The overall consistency between the Gd-EOB-MRI LI-RADS v2018 and CEUS LI-RADS v2017 classification standards was good(Kappa=0.691,P＜0.001).Using LR-5 as the standard for diagnosing HCC,the sensitivity of Gd-EOB-MRI and CEUS was 84.7％and 81.2％,the specificity was 79.6％and 73.5％,the positive predictive value was 87.8％and 84.1％,the negative predictive value was 75.0％and 69.2％,and the accuracy was 82.8％and 78.4％,respectively.There was no statistically significant difference in the diagnostic efficacy of the diagnosis of HCC by LR-5 between the two imaging methods(P＞0.05).Conclusion The Gd-EOB-MRI LI-RADS v2018 and CEUS LI-RADS v2017 classifica-tion standards show good overall agreement.The diagnostic efficacy of Gd-EOB-MRI for HCC using LR-5 classification is better than that of CEUS.

Objective: To investigate the detection of thyroid nodules and related risk factors in nuclear power workers, and to provide scientific evidence for thyroid protection of nuclear power workers. Methods: In December 2018, select 295 workers of a nuclear power production enterprise and 238 administrative staff of it, and select 250 staff members of a thermal power generation enterprise 70 kilometers away from the nuclear power station to conduct thyroid ultrasound examination and questionnaire survey for single factor. Analysis and further multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to study the risk factors of thyroid nodules in the population. Results: Women and smoking history were independent risk factors for the increased incidence of thyroid nodules in the study population; three shifts work pattern was an independent risk factor for the increased prevalence of thyroid nodules in nuclear power workers (P<0.05) , and other factors such as the history of nuclear exposure had no significant correlation with thyroid nodules (P>0.05) . Conclusion Nuclear exposure has little effect on the prevalence of thyroid nodules in nuclear power workers.

Objective Toinvestigatetheconsistencyofultrasoundand MSCTindiagnosing microvascularinvasion (MVI)in hepatocellularcarcinoma,andtocomparethediagnosticefficiencyofbothtwomethods.Methods TheultrasoundandMSCTdataof 82patientswithhepatocellularcarcinomawerecollected.Accordingtothepostoperativepathologicalresults,theconsistencyanddiagnostic efficiencyofultrasoundandMSCTindiagnosingMVIinhepatocellularcarcinomawerecompared.Results Accordingtothepostoperative pathologicalfindingsof82patients,30caseswerepositiveofMVI,while52caseswerenegative.ThepreoperativeMSCTandultrasound examinations had a strong consistency (Cohen’s Kappa＝0.829 ,P＜0.001 ).The sensitivity ,specificity and accuracy of preoperative ultrasoundinpredictingtheMVIinhepatocellularcarcinomawere76.67% (23/30),67.31% (35/52)and70.73% (58/82),respectively. Thesensitivity,specificityandaccuracyofpreoperativeMSCTinpredictinghepatocellularcarcinomaMVIwere83.33% (25/30),73.08%(38/52)and75.61% (63/82),respectively.Conclusion Preoperativeultrasoundand MSCThavegoodconsistencyandhighdiagnostic efficiencyindiagnosing MVIinhepatocellularcarcinoma.

PurposeTo evaluate the significance of ultrasonic elastography strain ratio, MRI and the combination of both in diagnosis of breast tumor.Materials and MethodsFifty-four cases with single breast tumor underwent preoperative ultrasound elasticity imaging and MRI. Accuracy of ultrasound elastography strain rate ratio (SRR) of the tumor and surrounding normal breast tissue was measured by quantitative ultrasound elastography, and its combination with MRI were analyzed. ResultsThere was signiifcant differences on SRR between the benign group and the malignant group (2.24±1.28vs 4.96±1.73, t=2.648,P<0.05). Optimal threshold of ultrasonic elastography SRR in differential diagnosis of breast benign from malignant tumor was 2.41 determined by ROC curve. The accuracy of SRR, MRI and the combination of both in differentiating benign from malignant breast tumor was 81.48% (44/54), 85.19% (46/54) and 96.30%(52/54), respectively. There was no statistic difference between SRR and MRI in diagnostic accuracy (χ2=0.267,P>0.05). Combined both had higher diagnosis accuracy when compared with SR and MRI separately (χ2=6.000 and 3.967,P<0.05).Conclusion Ultrasonic elastography strain ratio is accurate and objective in differentiating benign from malignant breast tumors. It is a valuable quantitative index in clinical practice. Moreover, SRR combined with MRI can reduce the misdiagnosis rate.