Objective To understand the current status of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods Clinical data of patients who underwent isolated CABG in Beijing Anzhen Hospital in 2023 were collected. All patients returned to our hospital approximately one year after surgery (10-13 months) for a lipid level recheck. We analyzed their LDL-C attainment status and influencing factors. Patients were categorized into two groups based on whether their LDL-C met the target: a LDL-C attainment group and a LDL-C non-attainment group. Results This study included 1456 patients who underwent CABG, including 320 females and 1136 males, with an average age of (61.41±9.12) years. One year post-surgery, 234 patients achieved the LDL-C target, with an attainment rate of 16.07%. The proportion of patients in the LDL-C attainment group who were ultra-high risk (77.35% vs. 92.06%, P＜0.001), female (16.24% vs. 23.08%, P=0.021), and those with comorbid hypertension (55.98% vs. 63.18%, P=0.038) was significantly lower than those in the LDL-C non-attainment group. Additionally, the baseline body mass index (BMI) [(25.37±3.24) kg/m2 vs. (26.03±3.56) kg/m2, P=0.017], total cholesterol levels [(3.30±0.84) mmol/L vs. (4.01±1.03) mmol/L, P＜0.001], LDL-C [(1.62±0.63) mmol/L vs. (2.25±0.85) mmol/L, P＜0.001], and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [(0.98±0.26) mmol/L vs. (1.02±0.24) mmol/L, P=0.049] upon admission in the attainment group were all lower than those in the non-attainment group. Moreover, the lipid-lowering drug usage rate in the attainment group (100.00% vs. 96.24%, P=0.003) and the proportion using two types of drugs together (25.21% vs. 10.72%, P＜0.001) were both higher than those in the non-attainment group, while the statin monotherapy rate was lower than that in the non-attainment group (74.79% vs. 85.19%, P＜0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that baseline BMI (OR=0.928, P=0.012) and baseline LDL-C levels (OR=0.207, P<0.001), patient cardiovascular risk stratification (OR=0.155, P<0.001) and lipid-lowering drug treatment regimen (OR=3.758, P<0.001) are significant factors affecting the LDL-C control status. Conclusion The LDL-C compliance rate of patients undergoing CABG is at a relatively low level 1 year after surgery. Patients with very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, high baseline LDL-C levels, and overweight or obesity should be strengthened lipid management. For these patients, the intensity of lipid-lowering drug use or combination medication should be increased upon discharge.

Objective:To evaluate the ability of ENDOANGEL artificial intelligence system to predict invasion depth and differentiation status of early gastric cancer using more diverse multi-center videos, and to test the performance of the new system upgraded from ENDOANGEL.Methods:Based on the completed 2020 man-machine competition for early gastric cancer diagnosis using single-center videos, the second man-machine competition was conducted in 2022, involving 30 endoscopists from 30 hospitals across 10 Chinese provinces. A multi-center video cohort was retrospectively collected from 12 institutions in 8 provinces/municipalities in China. The study proceeded in 3 stages. First, the ENDOANGEL was re-tested on multi-center videos, its performance on single and multi-center videos was compared, then the ENDOANGEL was upgraded to ENDOANGEL-2022. Second, the second man-machine competition was conducted between ENDOANGEL-2022 and 30 endoscopists using multi-center videos, and the performance between ENDOANGEL-2022, ENDOANGEL and endoscopists on multi-center videos were compared. Third, the ENDOANGEL-2022 was re-tested on the single-center videos previously collected in 2020, its performance on single and multi-center videos was also compared.Results:Compared with the performance on single-center videos, the sensitivity of ENDOANGEL for predicting submucosal invasion of early gastric cancer decreased significantly [18.18% (2/11) VS 70.00% (7/10), P=0.030], but demonstrated comparable ability to predict undifferentiated type of early gastric cancer ( P>0.05). On multi-center videos, in the respect of predicting submucosal invasion of early gastric cancer, the sensitivity of ENDOANGEL-2022 was higher than that of ENDOANGEL [40.00% (4/10) VS 18.18% (2/11), P=0.361], but inferior to that of 30 endoscopists [40.00% VS 52.04% (95% CI: 43.70%-60.38%), P<0.001]. The specificity of ENDOANGEL-2022 was lower than that of ENDOANGEL [82.86% (29/35) VS 100.00% (34/34), χ2=4.41, P=0.036] and higher than that of 30 endoscopists [82.86% VS 68.97% (95% CI: 60.83%-77.11%), P=0.018], the accuracy of ENDOANGEL-2022 was lower than that of ENDOANGEL [73.33% (33/45) VS 80.00% (36/45), χ2=0.56, P=0.455] and higher than that of 30 endoscopists [73.33% VS 65.30% (95% CI: 60.61%-69.99%), P=0.018]. In the respect of predicting undifferentiated type of early gastric cancer, the sensitivity of ENDOANGEL-2022 was higher than that of ENDOANGEL [71.43% (5/7) VS 57.14% (4/7), P>0.999] and 30 endoscopists [71.43% VS 63.11% (95% CI: 55.58%-70.64%), P=0.031], the specificity of ENDOANGEL-2022 was lower than that of ENDOANGEL [76.32% (29/38) VS 78.95% (30/38), χ2=0.08, P=0.783] and higher than that of 30 endoscopists [76.32% VS 65.27% (95% CI: 59.10%-71.44%), P=0.004],the accuracy of ENDOANGEL-2022 was similar to that of ENDOANGEL [75.56% (34/45) VS 75.56% (34/45), χ2=0.00, P>0.999] and higher than that of 30 endoscopists [75.56% VS 65.10% (95% CI: 59.96%- 70.24%), P<0.001]. Compared with performance in single center videos, the sensitivity [40.00% VS 60.00%(6/10), P=0.656], specificity [82.86% VS 93.75% (15/16), χ2=0.37, P=0.542] and accuracy [73.33% VS 80.77% (21/26), χ2=0.50, P=0.479] of ENDOANGEL-2022 for predicting submucosal invasion of early gastric cancer decreased; in predicting undifferentiated type of early gastric cancer, the sensitivity of ENDOANGEL-2022 increased [71.43% VS 37.50% (3/8), P=0.315], while the specificity [76.32% VS 100.00% (18/18), χ2=3.48, P=0.062] and accuracy [75.56% VS 80.77% (21/26), χ2=0.26, P=0.612] decreased. Conclusion:Multi-center cases introduce greater heterogeneity that may reduce artificial intelligence prediction accuracy, but the artificial intelligence system still outperforms endoscopists.

Objective:To construct and validate an artificial intelligence diagnostic system based on multi-feature integration for diagnosing gastric whitish neoplastic lesions under white-light endoscopy.Methods:Gastroscopic images from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University and the Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital were collected from November 2012 to July 2021. A total of 823 images of gastric whitish lesions from 267 patients were finally selected. Five white-light endoscopic features associated with gastric whitish lesions were selected through a literature search, including lesion location, boundary clarity, surface texture, roundness, and depression status. Images with manually annotated features were used to train machine learning models, with the optimal model selected as the multi-feature fitting diagnostic system, which assigned diagnostic weights to each feature. A conventional deep learning model was trained with the same dataset. The diagnostic performance of the two models were compared, and eight endoscopists of varying expertise were invited to participate in human-machine comparisons.Results:Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the multi-feature fitting diagnostic system were 82.11% (101/123), 78.43% (40/51), and 84.72% (61/72), respectively. Feature weights in descending order were depression (0.71), lesion location (0.11), surface roughness (0.08), boundary clarity (0.06), and subcircular shape (0.04). The diagnostic accuracy of the system was significantly higher than that of non-expert endoscopists (82.11% VS 74.31%, Z=-2.785, P=0.008) and comparable to that of expert endoscopists (82.11% VS 83.20%, Z=-0.696, P=0.700). There was no significant difference in accuracy between the multi-feature fitting diagnostic system and the traditional deep learning model [82.11% (101/123) VS 82.93% (102/123), P=1.000]. Conclusion:The feature-weighted artificial intelligence diagnostic system for gastric whitish neoplastic lesions demonstrates clinically relevant diagnostic accuracy under white-light endoscopy.

Objective: To evaluate the application of blood conservation measures in obstetric patients with different red blood cell transfusion volumes and to assess the impact of different transfusion volumes on postpartum outcomes. Methods: A retrospective investigation was conducted on 448 obstetric patients who received blood transfusions at the Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January 2016 to December 2022. Patients were divided into four groups (1-2 units group, 3-4 units group, 5-6 units group, and >6 units group) based on the volumes of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused during and within 7 days after delivery. The maternal physiological indicators, pre- and postpartum laboratory test indicators, obstetric complications, application of blood conservation measures, use of blood products, and postpartum outcomes were reviewed. The clinical characteristics, application of blood conservation measures, and their impact on postpartum outcomes were compared among different transfusion groups. Results: There were statistically significant differences in the multivariate logistic analysis of history of previous cesarean section (OR=1.781), eclampsia/pre-eclampsia/(OR=1.972) and postpartum blood loss>1 000 mL（OR=1.699）(P<0.05) among different transfusion groups. In terms of blood conservation measures, the more RBCs transfused, the higher the rate of mothers receiving blood conservation measures such as balloon occlusion, arterial ligation, autologous blood transfusion with a cell saver, and hysterectomy. With the increase in the volume of RBCs transfusion, the demand for fresh frozen plasma（FFP）, cryoprecipitate, and platelet transfusions also increased. The hospitalization days for the four groups of parturients were 6.0 (4.0-9.0), 7.5 (5.0-14.8), 7.0 (4.5-13.0) and 11.0 (9.0-20.5), respectively (P<0.05) and the rates of ICU transfer were 2.0% (5/250), 9.4% (12/128),18.2% (6/33) and 51.4% (19/37), respectively (P<0.05). Both increased significantly with the increase in the volume of RBCs transfusion, and the differences between groups were statistically significant. Conclusion: Parturients who received higher volume of RBCs had multiple risks factors for bleeding before childbirth, had higher postpartum blood loss, and had a higher rate of application of various blood conservation measures. In addition, an increase in the volume of RBCs transfusion may have adverse effects on postpartum recovery.

Objective:To evaluate the ability of ENDOANGEL artificial intelligence system to predict invasion depth and differentiation status of early gastric cancer using more diverse multi-center videos, and to test the performance of the new system upgraded from ENDOANGEL.Methods:Based on the completed 2020 man-machine competition for early gastric cancer diagnosis using single-center videos, the second man-machine competition was conducted in 2022, involving 30 endoscopists from 30 hospitals across 10 Chinese provinces. A multi-center video cohort was retrospectively collected from 12 institutions in 8 provinces/municipalities in China. The study proceeded in 3 stages. First, the ENDOANGEL was re-tested on multi-center videos, its performance on single and multi-center videos was compared, then the ENDOANGEL was upgraded to ENDOANGEL-2022. Second, the second man-machine competition was conducted between ENDOANGEL-2022 and 30 endoscopists using multi-center videos, and the performance between ENDOANGEL-2022, ENDOANGEL and endoscopists on multi-center videos were compared. Third, the ENDOANGEL-2022 was re-tested on the single-center videos previously collected in 2020, its performance on single and multi-center videos was also compared.Results:Compared with the performance on single-center videos, the sensitivity of ENDOANGEL for predicting submucosal invasion of early gastric cancer decreased significantly [18.18% (2/11) VS 70.00% (7/10), P=0.030], but demonstrated comparable ability to predict undifferentiated type of early gastric cancer ( P>0.05). On multi-center videos, in the respect of predicting submucosal invasion of early gastric cancer, the sensitivity of ENDOANGEL-2022 was higher than that of ENDOANGEL [40.00% (4/10) VS 18.18% (2/11), P=0.361], but inferior to that of 30 endoscopists [40.00% VS 52.04% (95% CI: 43.70%-60.38%), P<0.001]. The specificity of ENDOANGEL-2022 was lower than that of ENDOANGEL [82.86% (29/35) VS 100.00% (34/34), χ2=4.41, P=0.036] and higher than that of 30 endoscopists [82.86% VS 68.97% (95% CI: 60.83%-77.11%), P=0.018], the accuracy of ENDOANGEL-2022 was lower than that of ENDOANGEL [73.33% (33/45) VS 80.00% (36/45), χ2=0.56, P=0.455] and higher than that of 30 endoscopists [73.33% VS 65.30% (95% CI: 60.61%-69.99%), P=0.018]. In the respect of predicting undifferentiated type of early gastric cancer, the sensitivity of ENDOANGEL-2022 was higher than that of ENDOANGEL [71.43% (5/7) VS 57.14% (4/7), P>0.999] and 30 endoscopists [71.43% VS 63.11% (95% CI: 55.58%-70.64%), P=0.031], the specificity of ENDOANGEL-2022 was lower than that of ENDOANGEL [76.32% (29/38) VS 78.95% (30/38), χ2=0.08, P=0.783] and higher than that of 30 endoscopists [76.32% VS 65.27% (95% CI: 59.10%-71.44%), P=0.004],the accuracy of ENDOANGEL-2022 was similar to that of ENDOANGEL [75.56% (34/45) VS 75.56% (34/45), χ2=0.00, P>0.999] and higher than that of 30 endoscopists [75.56% VS 65.10% (95% CI: 59.96%- 70.24%), P<0.001]. Compared with performance in single center videos, the sensitivity [40.00% VS 60.00%(6/10), P=0.656], specificity [82.86% VS 93.75% (15/16), χ2=0.37, P=0.542] and accuracy [73.33% VS 80.77% (21/26), χ2=0.50, P=0.479] of ENDOANGEL-2022 for predicting submucosal invasion of early gastric cancer decreased; in predicting undifferentiated type of early gastric cancer, the sensitivity of ENDOANGEL-2022 increased [71.43% VS 37.50% (3/8), P=0.315], while the specificity [76.32% VS 100.00% (18/18), χ2=3.48, P=0.062] and accuracy [75.56% VS 80.77% (21/26), χ2=0.26, P=0.612] decreased. Conclusion:Multi-center cases introduce greater heterogeneity that may reduce artificial intelligence prediction accuracy, but the artificial intelligence system still outperforms endoscopists.

Objective:To construct and validate an artificial intelligence diagnostic system based on multi-feature integration for diagnosing gastric whitish neoplastic lesions under white-light endoscopy.Methods:Gastroscopic images from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University and the Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital were collected from November 2012 to July 2021. A total of 823 images of gastric whitish lesions from 267 patients were finally selected. Five white-light endoscopic features associated with gastric whitish lesions were selected through a literature search, including lesion location, boundary clarity, surface texture, roundness, and depression status. Images with manually annotated features were used to train machine learning models, with the optimal model selected as the multi-feature fitting diagnostic system, which assigned diagnostic weights to each feature. A conventional deep learning model was trained with the same dataset. The diagnostic performance of the two models were compared, and eight endoscopists of varying expertise were invited to participate in human-machine comparisons.Results:Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the multi-feature fitting diagnostic system were 82.11% (101/123), 78.43% (40/51), and 84.72% (61/72), respectively. Feature weights in descending order were depression (0.71), lesion location (0.11), surface roughness (0.08), boundary clarity (0.06), and subcircular shape (0.04). The diagnostic accuracy of the system was significantly higher than that of non-expert endoscopists (82.11% VS 74.31%, Z=-2.785, P=0.008) and comparable to that of expert endoscopists (82.11% VS 83.20%, Z=-0.696, P=0.700). There was no significant difference in accuracy between the multi-feature fitting diagnostic system and the traditional deep learning model [82.11% (101/123) VS 82.93% (102/123), P=1.000]. Conclusion:The feature-weighted artificial intelligence diagnostic system for gastric whitish neoplastic lesions demonstrates clinically relevant diagnostic accuracy under white-light endoscopy.

Objective:To construct an intelligent endoscopic image analysis system that could monitor the blind spot of the upper gastrointestinal tract, and to test its performance.Methods:A total of 87 167 upper gastrointestinal endoscopy images (dataset 1) including 75 551 for training and 11 616 for testing, and a total of 2 414 pharyngeal images (dataset 2) including 2 233 for training and 181 for testing were retrospectively collected from the Digestive Endoscopy Center of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University between 2016 to 2020. A 27-category-classification model for blind spot monitoring in the upper gastrointestinal tract (model 1, which distinguished 27 anatomical sites such as the pharynx, esophagus, and stomach) and a 5-category-classification model for blind spot monitoring in the pharynx (model 2, which distinguished palate, posterior pharyngeal wall, larynx, left and right pyriform sinuses) were constructed. The above models were trained and tested based on dataset 1 and 2, respectively, and trained based on the EfficientNet-B4, ResNet50 and VGG16 models of the keras framework. Thirty complete upper gastrointestinal endoscopy videos were retrospectively collected from the Digestive Endoscopy Center of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University in 2021 to test model 2 blind spot monitoring performance.Results:The cross-sectional comparison results of the accuracy of model 1 in identifying 27 anatomical sites of the upper gastrointestinal tract in images showed that the mean accuracy of EfficientNet-B4, ResNet50, and VGG16 were 90.90%, 90.24%, and 89.22%, respectively, with the EfficientNet-B4 model performance the best, and the accuracy of EfficientNet-B4 model for each site ranged from 80.49% to 97.80%. The cross-sectional comparison results of the accuracy of model 2 in identifying the 5 anatomical sites of the pharynx in the images showed that the mean accuracy of EfficientNet-B4, ResNet50, and VGG16 were 99.40%, 98.56%, and 97.01%, respectively, in which the EfficientNet-B4 model had the best performance, and the accuracy of EfficientNet-B4 model for each site ranged from 96.15% to 100.00%. The overall accuracy of model 2 in identifying the 5 anatomical sites of the pharynx in the video was 97.33% (146/150).Conclusion:The intelligent endoscopic image analysis system based on deep learning can monitor blind spots in the upper gastrointestinal tract, coupled with pharyngeal blind spot monitoring and esophagogastroduodenal blind spot monitoring functions. The system shows high accuracy in both images and videos, which is expected to have a potential role in clinical practice and assisting endoscopists to achieve full observation of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Objective:To develop an artificial intelligence model based on multi-modal endoscopic images for identifying gastric neoplasms and to compare its diagnostic efficacy with traditional models and endoscopists.Methods:A total of 3 267 images of gastric neoplasms and non-neoplastic lesions under white light (WL) endoscopy and weak magnification (WM) endoscopy from 463 patients at the Digestive Endoscopy Center of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from March 2018 to December 2019 were utilized. Two single-modal models (WL model and WM model) were constructed based on WL and WM images separately. WL and WM images of corresponding lesions were combined into image pairs for creating a multi-modal (MM) characteristics integration model. A test set consisting of 696 images of 102 lesions from 97 patients from March 2020 to March 2021 was used to compare the diagnostic efficacy of the single-modal models and a multi-modal model for gastric neoplastic lesions at both the image and the lesion levels. Additionally, video clips of 80 lesions from 80 patients from January 2022 to June 2022 were employed to compare diagnostic efficacy of the WM model, the MM model and 7 endoscopists at the lesion level for gastric neoplasms.Results:In the image test set, the sensitivity and accuracy of MM model were 84.96% (576/678), and 86.89% (1 220/1 289), respectively, for diagnosing gastric neoplasms at the image level, which were superior to 63.13% (113/179) and 80.59% (353/438) of WM model ( χ2=42.81, P<0.001; χ2=10.33, P=0.001), and also better than those of WL model [70.47% (74/105), χ2=13.52, P<0.001; 67.82% (175/258), χ2=57.27, P<0.001]. The MM model showed a sensitivity of 87.50% (28/32), a specificity of 88.57% (62/70), and an accuracy of 88.24% (90/102) at the lesion level. The specificity ( χ2=22.99, P<0.001) and accuracy ( χ2=19.06, P<0.001) were significantly higher than those of WL model; however, there was no significant difference compared with those of the WM model ( P>0.05). In the video test, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the MM model at the lesion level were 95.00% (19/20), 93.33% (56/60) and 93.75% (75/80). These results were significantly better than those of endoscopists, who had a sensitivity of 77.14% (108/140), a specificity of 79.29% (333/420), and an accuracy of 78.75% (441/560), with significant differences ( χ2=18.62, P<0.001; χ2=35.07, P<0.001; χ2=53.12, P<0.001), and was higher than the sensitivity of advanced endoscopists [83.33% (50/60)] with significant difference ( χ2=4.23, P=0.040). Conclusion:The artificial intelligence model based on multi-modal endoscopic images for the diagnosis of gastric neoplasms shows high efficacy in both image and video test sets, outperforming the average diagnostic performance of endoscopists in the video test.

Objective:To construct an artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis system to recognize the characteristics of Helicobacter pylori ( HP) infection under endoscopy, and evaluate its performance in real clinical cases. Methods:A total of 1 033 cases who underwent 13C-urea breath test and gastroscopy in the Digestive Endoscopy Center of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2020 to March 2021 were collected retrospectively. Patients with positive results of 13C-urea breath test (which were defined as HP infertion) were assigned to the case group ( n=485), and those with negative results to the control group ( n=548). Gastroscopic images of various mucosal features indicating HP positive and negative, as well as the gastroscopic images of HP positive and negative cases were randomly assigned to the training set, validation set and test set with at 8∶1∶1. An artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis system for identifying HP infection was developed based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and long short-term memory network (LSTM). In the system, CNN can identify and extract mucosal features of endoscopic images of each patient, generate feature vectors, and then LSTM receives feature vectors to comprehensively judge HP infection status. The diagnostic performance of the system was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results:The diagnostic accuracy of this system for nodularity, atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, xanthoma, diffuse redness + spotty redness, mucosal swelling + enlarged fold + sticky mucus and HP negative features was 87.5% (14/16), 74.1% (83/112), 90.0% (45/50), 88.0% (22/25), 63.3% (38/60), 80.1% (238/297) and 85.7% (36 /42), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of the system for predicting HP infection was 89.6% (43/48), 61.8% (34/55), 74.8% (77/103), and 0.757, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the system was equivalent to that of endoscopist in diagnosing HP infection under white light (74.8% VS 72.1%, χ2=0.246, P=0.620). Conclusion:The system developed in this study shows noteworthy ability in evaluating HP status, and can be used to assist endoscopists to diagnose HP infection.

Objective:To assess the diagnostic efficacy of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic image assisted diagnosis system (ENDOANGEL-LD) based on artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting gastric lesions and neoplastic lesions under white light endoscopy.Methods:The diagnostic efficacy of ENDOANGEL-LD was tested using image testing dataset and video testing dataset, respectively. The image testing dataset included 300 images of gastric neoplastic lesions, 505 images of non-neoplastic lesions and 990 images of normal stomach of 191 patients in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from June 2019 to September 2019. Video testing dataset was from 83 videos (38 gastric neoplastic lesions and 45 non-neoplastic lesions) of 78 patients in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from November 2020 to April 2021. The accuracy, the sensitivity and the specificity of ENDOANGEL-LD for image testing dataset were calculated. The accuracy, the sensitivity and the specificity of ENDOANGEL-LD in video testing dataset for gastric neoplastic lesions were compared with those of four senior endoscopists.Results:In the image testing dataset, the accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity of ENDOANGEL-LD for gastric lesions were 93.9% (1 685/1 795), 98.0% (789/805) and 90.5% (896/990) respectively; while the accuracy, the sensitivity and the specificity of ENDOANGEL-LD for gastric neoplastic lesions were 88.7% (714/805), 91.0% (273/300) and 87.3% (441/505) respectively. In the video testing dataset, the sensitivity [100.0% (38/38) VS 85.5% (130/152), χ2=6.220, P=0.013] of ENDOANGEL-LD was higher than that of four senior endoscopists. The accuracy [81.9% (68/83) VS 72.0% (239/332), χ2=3.408, P=0.065] and the specificity [ 66.7% (30/45) VS 60.6% (109/180), χ2=0.569, P=0.451] of ENDOANGEL-LD were comparable with those of four senior endoscopists. Conclusion:The ENDOANGEL-LD can accurately detect gastric lesions and further diagnose neoplastic lesions to help endoscopists in clinical work.