1.Influencing factors on the success rate of patient-derived gastrointestinal malignant tumor organoid culture
Qian LIU ; Yajing LIU ; Sihan ZHAO ; Yuqi SUN ; Zequn LI ; Xiaodong LIU ; Yulong TIAN ; Shougen CAO ; Pu CHEN ; Yanbing ZHOU
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2025;40(6):473-480
Objective:To explore the factors influencing the success rate of culturing patient-derived gastric and colorectal cancer organoids.Methods:From Feb 2022 to Oct 2023, 398 tumor tissue specimens from patients who underwent gastric cancer and colorectal cancer resection at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, were used for organoid culture. The clinicopathological factors affecting the success rate of organoid culture were analyzed.Results:The overall success rate of organoid culture in this group was 75.1% (299/398), with the success rate of gastric cancer organoid culture being 79.8%(154/193) and that of colorectal cancer being 70.7% (145/205). Different clinicopathological T stage ( χ2=4.765, P<0.05),histological type ( χ2=11.248, P<0.05), and tumor regression grade (TRG) grade after neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( χ2=7.797, P<0.05) were related to the success rate of organoid culture . Multivariate analysis showed that the TRG grade was an independent influencing factor( P=0.040). For colorectal cancer, different pathological T stage ( χ2=5.108, P<0.05), histological type ( χ2=11.270, P<0.05), and TRG grade after neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( χ2=6.797, P<0.05) were related to the success rate of organoidculture . Different from gastric cancer, the results of multivariate analysis of colorectal cancer showed that the histological type was an independent influencing factor ( P=0.018). Conclusions:The pathologic T stage, histological type of tumors, and TRG of cancer patients all have a significant impact on the success rate of establishing tumor organoids. Among them, the TRG grade is an independent influencing factor for the culture of gastric cancer organoids, and the histological type is an independent influencing factor for colorectal cancer organoids.
2.Effects of robotic and laparoscopic radical gastrectomy on short-term efficacy and prognosis in obese patients with gastric cancer
Cheng MENG ; Qin YU ; Zequn LI ; Xiaodong LIU ; Yulong TIAN ; Yuqi SUN ; Shougen CAO ; Yanbing ZHOU
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2025;40(8):624-630
Objective:To compare the effects of robotic and laparoscopic radical gastrectomy on short-term clinical outcomes and long-term prognosis in obese patients with gastric cancer.Methods:Clinical data from 231 obese gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic radical gastrectomy at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between Jan 2015 and Dec 2022 was analyzed. After propensity score matching, the patients were divided into robotic surgery group ( n=79) and laparoscopic surgery group ( n=79). The short-term clinical outcomes and long-term prognosis were compared. Results:Compared with the laparoscopic group, the robotic group had a significantly greater number of dissected lymph nodes [(32±13) vs. (26±11), t=2.797, P=0.006], shorter operation time [(245±65) min vs. (272±62) min, t=-2.669, P=0.008], less intraoperative blood loss[(84±69) vs. (119±56) ml, t=-3.502, P=0.001], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(8.2±3.5) vs. (9.6±4.2) d, t=-2.363, P=0.019], and higher hospitalization cost [(102,139±18,303) vs. (77,857±18,325) yuan, t=8.333, P<0.001]. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were comparable between the robotic and laparoscopic groups (77.2% vs. 74.7%, P=0.684; and 73.4% vs. 68.4%, P=0.491, respectively). Conclusions:Robotic radical gastrectomy is a safe and feasible alternative for obese gastric cancer patients in experienced hands. It offers advantages in short-term clinical outcomes, however, it fails to provide a significant long-term survival benefit.
3.Comparison of short-term and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy
Gan LIU ; Qi LIU ; Yulong TIAN ; Shougen CAO ; Xiaodong LIU ; Zequn LI ; Xiaojie TAN ; Cheng MENG ; Yuqi SUN ; Yanbing ZHOU
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2025;40(8):607-612
Objective:To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Methods:Data from 321 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by robotic ( n=109) and laparoscopic ( n=212) radical gastrectomy at our center between May 2017 and Sep 2022 was collected. After 1∶1 propensity score matching, 106 patients from each group were included in the final analysis to compare short-term clinical outcomes and long-term prognostic indicators. Results:The robotic group had a significantly lower overall complication rate (13.2% vs. 28.3%, χ2=6.453, P=0.007) and surgery-related complication rate (8.5% vs. 17.9%, χ2=3.333, P=0.043) than the laparoscopic group. The robotic group also retrieved more total lymph nodes (35.3±4.9 vs. 31.4±6.3, t=4.863, P<0.001) and supra-pancreatic lymph nodes (13.1±3.4 vs. 10.1±2.1, t=5.258, P<0.001). Additionally, the robotic group had a shorter operative time [(218±47) min vs. (267±71) min, t=-6.001, P<0.001], less intraoperative blood loss [(47±12) ml vs. (71±17) ml, t=-5.424, P<0.001], and faster postoperative recovery. The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in the robotic group compared to the laparoscopic group (75.5% vs. 62.3%, P=0.017). Conclusion:Compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy, robotic gastrectomy allows for a more lymph nodes harvest, significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss and complication rates and significantly improves recurrence-free survival.
4.Erratum: Author correction to "Structurally defined tandem-responsive nanoassemblies composed of dipeptide-based photosensitive derivatives and hypoxia-activated camptothecin prodrugs against primary and metastatic breast tumors" Acta Pharm Sin B 12 (2022) 952-966.
Mengchi SUN ; Hailun JIANG ; Tian LIU ; Xiao TAN ; Qikun JIANG ; Bingjun SUN ; Yulong ZHENG ; Gang WANG ; Yang WANG ; Maosheng CHENG ; Zhonggui HE ; Jin SUN
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 2025;15(11):6091-6092
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.08.008.].
5.Analysis of the efficacy and influencing factors of radiotherapy after keloid surgery
Xiaoxiao ZHOU ; Dongmei WU ; Yulong TIAN ; Qingyuan DUAN ; Minjie LI
China Modern Doctor 2025;63(2):9-11,23
Objective To explore the efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy at different time intervals after surgery for keloid,and to analyze the factors affecting the efficacy.Methods A total of 76 patients who underwent 20 Gy/5 postoperative radiotherapy regimen in the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2021 to June 2023 were selected as study subjects,and a total of 100 keloids were divided into effective group(n=79)and recurrence group(n=21).Regular follow-up and record of the patients after radiotherapy treatment effect and adverse effects,and multivariate Logistic was used to analyze factors of recurrence in keloid patients.Results Multivariate Logistic regression analysis found that postoperative radiotherapy time and scar incision length were related to recurrence after treatment,radiotherapy within 7h of surgery was an independent risk factor for recurrence after treatment(OR>1,P=0.022),and scar incision≤5cm was an independent protective factor for recurrence after treatment(OR<1,P=0.028).Conclusion Surgical excision combined with hypofractionated radiotherapy is one of the effective measures to prevent and treat keloid recurrence,though keloids on the trunk may need more effective treatment options.The recurrence rate of radiotherapy initiated 7-48h after surgery is relatively the lowest,and it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
6.Efficacy and safety of using an enteral immunonutrition formula in the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for Chinese patients with gastrointestinal cancers undergoing surgery: A randomized, open-label, multicenter trial (healing trial).
Jianchun YU ; Gang XIAO ; Yanbing ZHOU ; Yingjiang YE ; Han LIANG ; Guole LIN ; Qi AN ; Xiaodong LIU ; Bin LIANG ; Baogui WANG ; Weiming KANG ; Tao YU ; Yulong TIAN ; Chao WANG ; Xiaona WANG
Chinese Medical Journal 2025;138(21):2847-2849
7.Practical exploration on the responsibilities and operation specifications of assistants in robotic radical gastrectomy
Yulong TIAN ; Yuqi SUN ; Xiaoning KANG ; Yan WANG ; Shougen CAO ; Xiaodong LIU ; Zequn LI ; Gan LIU ; Xiaojie TAN ; Cheng MENG ; Haitao JIANG ; Zhaojian NIU ; Yanbing ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2025;28(8):937-941
Robot-assisted surgery with its advantages such as three-dimensional high-definition vision, dexterous robotic arms, and tremor filtration, is increasingly being applied to complex radical gastrectomy. However, the role of the surgical assistant remains crucial during the procedure. The assistant is responsible for tasks outside the console, including adjusting robotic arms, changing instruments, exposing the surgical field, and addressing unexpected situations. The technical proficiency of the assistant and their collaboration efficiency with the primary surgeon directly impact the smoothness of surgery and patients' outcomes. With the expansion of robot-assisted surgical indications, the establishment of a standardized training system and the optimization of team collaboration models have become urgent challenges to address. This article draws on the author's practical experience as an assistant in robot-assisted gastric cancer surgeries, conducting an in-depth analysis of the responsibilities and operational skills of surgical assistants in robot-assisted procedures. The aim is to develop a relatively comprehensive set of operational guidelines for surgical assistants in robot-assisted radical gastrectomy, providing valuable references for enhancing the overall efficiency of surgical teams and improving surgical outcomes.
8.Practical exploration on the responsibilities and operation specifications of assistants in robotic radical gastrectomy
Yulong TIAN ; Yuqi SUN ; Xiaoning KANG ; Yan WANG ; Shougen CAO ; Xiaodong LIU ; Zequn LI ; Gan LIU ; Xiaojie TAN ; Cheng MENG ; Haitao JIANG ; Zhaojian NIU ; Yanbing ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2025;28(8):937-941
Robot-assisted surgery with its advantages such as three-dimensional high-definition vision, dexterous robotic arms, and tremor filtration, is increasingly being applied to complex radical gastrectomy. However, the role of the surgical assistant remains crucial during the procedure. The assistant is responsible for tasks outside the console, including adjusting robotic arms, changing instruments, exposing the surgical field, and addressing unexpected situations. The technical proficiency of the assistant and their collaboration efficiency with the primary surgeon directly impact the smoothness of surgery and patients' outcomes. With the expansion of robot-assisted surgical indications, the establishment of a standardized training system and the optimization of team collaboration models have become urgent challenges to address. This article draws on the author's practical experience as an assistant in robot-assisted gastric cancer surgeries, conducting an in-depth analysis of the responsibilities and operational skills of surgical assistants in robot-assisted procedures. The aim is to develop a relatively comprehensive set of operational guidelines for surgical assistants in robot-assisted radical gastrectomy, providing valuable references for enhancing the overall efficiency of surgical teams and improving surgical outcomes.
9.Analysis of the efficacy and influencing factors of radiotherapy after keloid surgery
Xiaoxiao ZHOU ; Dongmei WU ; Yulong TIAN ; Qingyuan DUAN ; Minjie LI
China Modern Doctor 2025;63(2):9-11,23
Objective To explore the efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy at different time intervals after surgery for keloid,and to analyze the factors affecting the efficacy.Methods A total of 76 patients who underwent 20 Gy/5 postoperative radiotherapy regimen in the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2021 to June 2023 were selected as study subjects,and a total of 100 keloids were divided into effective group(n=79)and recurrence group(n=21).Regular follow-up and record of the patients after radiotherapy treatment effect and adverse effects,and multivariate Logistic was used to analyze factors of recurrence in keloid patients.Results Multivariate Logistic regression analysis found that postoperative radiotherapy time and scar incision length were related to recurrence after treatment,radiotherapy within 7h of surgery was an independent risk factor for recurrence after treatment(OR>1,P=0.022),and scar incision≤5cm was an independent protective factor for recurrence after treatment(OR<1,P=0.028).Conclusion Surgical excision combined with hypofractionated radiotherapy is one of the effective measures to prevent and treat keloid recurrence,though keloids on the trunk may need more effective treatment options.The recurrence rate of radiotherapy initiated 7-48h after surgery is relatively the lowest,and it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
10.Influencing factors on the success rate of patient-derived gastrointestinal malignant tumor organoid culture
Qian LIU ; Yajing LIU ; Sihan ZHAO ; Yuqi SUN ; Zequn LI ; Xiaodong LIU ; Yulong TIAN ; Shougen CAO ; Pu CHEN ; Yanbing ZHOU
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2025;40(6):473-480
Objective:To explore the factors influencing the success rate of culturing patient-derived gastric and colorectal cancer organoids.Methods:From Feb 2022 to Oct 2023, 398 tumor tissue specimens from patients who underwent gastric cancer and colorectal cancer resection at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, were used for organoid culture. The clinicopathological factors affecting the success rate of organoid culture were analyzed.Results:The overall success rate of organoid culture in this group was 75.1% (299/398), with the success rate of gastric cancer organoid culture being 79.8%(154/193) and that of colorectal cancer being 70.7% (145/205). Different clinicopathological T stage ( χ2=4.765, P<0.05),histological type ( χ2=11.248, P<0.05), and tumor regression grade (TRG) grade after neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( χ2=7.797, P<0.05) were related to the success rate of organoid culture . Multivariate analysis showed that the TRG grade was an independent influencing factor( P=0.040). For colorectal cancer, different pathological T stage ( χ2=5.108, P<0.05), histological type ( χ2=11.270, P<0.05), and TRG grade after neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( χ2=6.797, P<0.05) were related to the success rate of organoidculture . Different from gastric cancer, the results of multivariate analysis of colorectal cancer showed that the histological type was an independent influencing factor ( P=0.018). Conclusions:The pathologic T stage, histological type of tumors, and TRG of cancer patients all have a significant impact on the success rate of establishing tumor organoids. Among them, the TRG grade is an independent influencing factor for the culture of gastric cancer organoids, and the histological type is an independent influencing factor for colorectal cancer organoids.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail