Objective:To investigate the impact of different treatment sequences of immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the first-line therapy on the prognosis of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods:Clinical data of 112 patients with stage III NSCLC treated at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected, with follow-up continued until December 31, 2023. According to the sequence of CRT and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy, patients were divided into 3 groups: ICIs simultaneous with CRT (sICR, n=20), chemotherapy combined with ICIs followed by CRT (CI-CR, n=53), and CRT followed by consolidative ICIs (CR-I, n=39). Analyses were performed before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Survival outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank tests, and prognostic factors were identified through multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results:The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort were 30.1 months (95% CI: 21.4-38.9) and 12.8 months (95% CI: 9.14-16.1), respectively. Before PSM: No significant differences were observed in OS and PFS among the 3 groups ( χ2=0.18, 1.05; P=0.669, 0.305). However, OS in the sICR and CR-I groups was significantly better than that in the CI-CR group ( χ2=4.43, 6.11; P=0.035, 0.013). After PSM: Each group included 17 patients. There were no significant differences in OS or PFS among the 3 groups ( χ2=2.50, 2.74; P=0.287, 0.254), and pairwise comparisons also showed no significant differences. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that clinical stage ( HR=3.392, 95% CI: 1.215-9.470, P=0.020), number of immunotherapy cycles ( HR=0.312, 95% CI: 0.100-0.972, P=0.044), and treatment response ( HR=6.566, 95% CI: 1.705-25.284, P=0.006) were independent prognostic factors for OS. After PSM, the numbers of patients with grade ≥2 treatment-related adverse events were 13 in the sICR group, 10 in the CI-CR group, and 9 in the CR-I group, with no significant differences among them ( χ2=2.181, P=0.336). Conclusions:First-line immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy showed favorable clinical efficacy in locally advanced NSCLC compared to other studies, but the treatment sequence did not significantly affect prognosis. It is recommended that immunotherapy be administered for at least four cycles.

Objective:To investigate the impact of different treatment sequences of immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the first-line therapy on the prognosis of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods:Clinical data of 112 patients with stage III NSCLC treated at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected, with follow-up continued until December 31, 2023. According to the sequence of CRT and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy, patients were divided into 3 groups: ICIs simultaneous with CRT (sICR, n=20), chemotherapy combined with ICIs followed by CRT (CI-CR, n=53), and CRT followed by consolidative ICIs (CR-I, n=39). Analyses were performed before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Survival outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank tests, and prognostic factors were identified through multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results:The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort were 30.1 months (95% CI: 21.4-38.9) and 12.8 months (95% CI: 9.14-16.1), respectively. Before PSM: No significant differences were observed in OS and PFS among the 3 groups ( χ2=0.18, 1.05; P=0.669, 0.305). However, OS in the sICR and CR-I groups was significantly better than that in the CI-CR group ( χ2=4.43, 6.11; P=0.035, 0.013). After PSM: Each group included 17 patients. There were no significant differences in OS or PFS among the 3 groups ( χ2=2.50, 2.74; P=0.287, 0.254), and pairwise comparisons also showed no significant differences. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that clinical stage ( HR=3.392, 95% CI: 1.215-9.470, P=0.020), number of immunotherapy cycles ( HR=0.312, 95% CI: 0.100-0.972, P=0.044), and treatment response ( HR=6.566, 95% CI: 1.705-25.284, P=0.006) were independent prognostic factors for OS. After PSM, the numbers of patients with grade ≥2 treatment-related adverse events were 13 in the sICR group, 10 in the CI-CR group, and 9 in the CR-I group, with no significant differences among them ( χ2=2.181, P=0.336). Conclusions:First-line immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy showed favorable clinical efficacy in locally advanced NSCLC compared to other studies, but the treatment sequence did not significantly affect prognosis. It is recommended that immunotherapy be administered for at least four cycles.

Studies have suggested that the nucleus accumbens (NAc) is implicated in the pathophysiology of major depression; however, the regulatory strategy that targets the NAc to achieve an exclusive and outstanding anti-depression benefit has not been elucidated. Here, we identified a specific reduction of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in the subset of dopamine D1 receptor medium spiny neurons (D1-MSNs) in the NAc that promoted stress susceptibility, while the stimulation of cAMP production in NAc D1-MSNs efficiently rescued depression-like behaviors. Ketamine treatment enhanced cAMP both in D1-MSNs and dopamine D2 receptor medium spiny neurons (D2-MSNs) of depressed mice, however, the rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine solely depended on elevating cAMP in NAc D1-MSNs. We discovered that a higher dose of crocin markedly increased cAMP in the NAc and consistently relieved depression 24 h after oral administration, but not a lower dose. The fast onset property of crocin was verified through multicenter studies. Moreover, crocin specifically targeted at D1-MSN cAMP signaling in the NAc to relieve depression and had no effect on D2-MSN. These findings characterize a new strategy to achieve an exclusive and outstanding anti-depression benefit by elevating cAMP in D1-MSNs in the NAc, and provide a potential rapid antidepressant drug candidate, crocin.

Objective:To explore the impacts of two radiotherapy modalities, elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved-field irradiation (IFI), on the prognosis of patients with clinical T 1~4N 0M 0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive (chemotherapy) radiotherapy. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the prognosis of 324 patients with clinical T 1-4N 0M 0 ESCC, focusing on the impacts of ENI and IFI on the prognosis of these patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed based on the different composition ratios of the two groups, and stratified analysis was conducted for patients of different stages. Results:All the patients presented a median overall survival (OS) of 33.1 months (95% CI: 28.1-38.1) and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 22.3 months (95% CI: 18.2-26.4). There were 97 patients in the ENI group and 227 patients in the IFI group. The ENI group exhibited higher OS and PFS than the IFI group ( χ2 = 4.31, 4.10, P < 0.05). After 1∶1 PSM analysis, each of the groups contained 75 cases. Multivariate analysis revealed that independent factors affecting patient OS included patient age, gross tumor volume (GTV), and irradiation modality ( χ2 = 7.93, 5.88, 4.59, P < 0.05) and PFS ( χ2 = 7.10, 5.26, 3.39, P < 0.05). Further stratified analysis indicated that ENI yielded significantly better efficacy than IFI for patients with cT 1 and T 2stage ESCC ( χ2 = 9.41, 7.88, P < 0.05). However, this advantage was not found in T 3 and T 4 patients ( P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of radiation esophagitis and radiation pneumonia between both groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusions:Patients with clinical T 1-4N 0M 0 ESCC who undergone definitive (chemotherapy) radiotherapy may benefit from ENI, particularly those in the cT 1 and cT 2 stages, for whom ENI is recommended for definitive radiotherapy.

Objective:To explore the impacts of two radiotherapy modalities, elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved-field irradiation (IFI), on the prognosis of patients with clinical T 1~4N 0M 0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive (chemotherapy) radiotherapy. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the prognosis of 324 patients with clinical T 1-4N 0M 0 ESCC, focusing on the impacts of ENI and IFI on the prognosis of these patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed based on the different composition ratios of the two groups, and stratified analysis was conducted for patients of different stages. Results:All the patients presented a median overall survival (OS) of 33.1 months (95% CI: 28.1-38.1) and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 22.3 months (95% CI: 18.2-26.4). There were 97 patients in the ENI group and 227 patients in the IFI group. The ENI group exhibited higher OS and PFS than the IFI group ( χ2 = 4.31, 4.10, P < 0.05). After 1∶1 PSM analysis, each of the groups contained 75 cases. Multivariate analysis revealed that independent factors affecting patient OS included patient age, gross tumor volume (GTV), and irradiation modality ( χ2 = 7.93, 5.88, 4.59, P < 0.05) and PFS ( χ2 = 7.10, 5.26, 3.39, P < 0.05). Further stratified analysis indicated that ENI yielded significantly better efficacy than IFI for patients with cT 1 and T 2stage ESCC ( χ2 = 9.41, 7.88, P < 0.05). However, this advantage was not found in T 3 and T 4 patients ( P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of radiation esophagitis and radiation pneumonia between both groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusions:Patients with clinical T 1-4N 0M 0 ESCC who undergone definitive (chemotherapy) radiotherapy may benefit from ENI, particularly those in the cT 1 and cT 2 stages, for whom ENI is recommended for definitive radiotherapy.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and prognostic factors of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy as the first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA/M ESCC).Methods:A single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted for the recent efficacy, survival, prognostic factors, post-treatment failure modes, and treatment-related adverse reactions of 57 LA/M ESCC patients eligible for enrollment.Results:The entire group of patients had 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) of 86.0%, 57.5%, and 53.9%, respectively and 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 61.4%, 31.0%, and 31.0%, respectively. The median OS was not reached, and the median PFS was 15.0 (95% CI: 10.77-19.23) months. These patients had an overall response rate (ORR) of 80.7% (46/57) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 94.7% (54/57). As indicated by the result of the multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors affecting the OS of the patients included their age, clinical stage, number of immunotherapy cycles, and recent efficacy ( HR = 0.25, 2.58, 0.35, 4.05, P < 0.05), and the independent factors influencing the PFS of the patients included their clinical stage and recent efficacy ( HR = 2.27, 1.97, P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the effects of irradiation ranges and the combination modes of immunologic drugs and chemoradiotherapy on both OS and PFS of the patients ( P > 0.05). A total of 32 patients suffered post-treatment failure. After the second treatment, they had 1- and 2-year OS of 55.7% and 25.3%, respectively, with median OS of 14.0 (95% CI: 5.17-22.83) months. A total of 26 cases experienced treatment-associated adverse reactions of grades 2 or higher during and after treatment. Conclusions:The combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy is effective and safe as the first-line treatment for LA/M ESCC patients. The post-treatment failure modes still include local recurrence and distant metastasis. Therefore, such combination merits further investigation.

Objective:To investigate the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and influencing factors of intensity-modulated radiotherapy±chemotherapy (IMRT±C) for the upper thoracic esophageal cancer.Methods:The medical records of 168 patients with cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer who met the inclusion criteria from January 2011 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The RFS was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate prognostic analysis was performed by Cox models. The recurrence factors were identified by the Logistics model. Results:The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 67.8%, 38.0%, and 20.4%, respectively, and the median RFS was 21.9 months. The locoregional recurrence rate was 47.6%(80/168). The recurrence sites were local esophagus ( n=63), regional lymph nodes ( n=7), and local esophagus+ regional lymph node recurrence ( n=10). Multivariate analysis showed that hoarseness, cTstaging, combined with chemotherapy, 95%PTV 1 exposure dose and GTV average exposure dose were the influencing factors of RFS ( P=0.029, <0.001, 0.031, 0.038, 0.020). Logistics model showed that cTstaging, cNstaging, short-term efficacy, irradiationmethod, GTV maximum transverse diameter and PTV average exposure dose were the influencing factors of recurrence ( P=0.046, 0.022, 0.001, <0.001, 0.012, 0.001). Conclusions:Patients with cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer treated with radical IMRT combined with/without chemotherapy have a higher locoregional recurrence rate, and the recurrence rate is mainly the esophagus. The independent factors that affect RFS are different from the risk factors of recurrence.

The waste water-based epidemiology is an important technique to fight against drug abuse by analyzing the concentration of illicit drugs in urban sewage, which can monitor the abuse of drugs.An SPE-UPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the analysis of 12 common drugs and their metabolites involving amphetamine and morphine.It was shown that the best result was achieved when hydrochloric acid/ acetonitrile (5∶95) was added to acidify the sample during the concentration process, guaranteeing the anti-across contamination of the analysis of organic nitrogen basic trace components, and improve the stability, specificity, and accuracy of the method.The optimized method meets the analytical requirements of complex sewage samples, and has been successfully applied to the assessment of urban drug abuse through sewage analysis.

Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal injection of different doses of aflibercept for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) with serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED) resistant to ranibizumab.Methods:A non-randomized controlled clinical study was conducted.Seventy-three eyes of 73 patients with PCV and serous PED resistant to ranibizumab were enrolled at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2019 to December 2020.All patients were treated by intravitreal injection of 2 mg or 4 mg aflibercept according to patients' willingness.2 mg aflibercept or 4 mg aflibercept was intravitreally injected monthly for three consecutive months following pro re nata (PRN) regimen in 2 mg aflibercept group (38 eyes) and 4 mg aflibercept group (35 eyes), respectively.PED height and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured by optical coherence tomography, and the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was examined with a visual acuity chart and converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) unit before injection and 1 month, 2, 3, 6 months from the first injection.Intraocular pressure and treatment-related adverse events were recorded.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by an Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (No.2021-KY-1252).Written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to entering study cohort.Results:Thirty-three patients (86.84%) in 2 mg aflibercept group and 30 patients (85.71%) in 4 mg aflibercept group finished the treatment and follow-up, respectively. The PED, BCVA and CMT before treatment and at the end of follow-up were (379.24±95.50) and (280.09±120.50)μm, 0.68±0.27 and 0.51±0.19, (393.96±100.81) and (291.70±44.09)μm in 2 mg aflibercept group, respectively, showing statistically significant differences (all at P<0.05).The PED, BCVA and CMT before treatment and at the end of follow-up were (393.07±93.76) and (278.63±145.07)μm, 0.66±0.31 and 0.48±0.22, (377.43±79.61) and (284.67±84.88)μm in 4 mg aflibercept group, respectively, with statistically significant differences (all at P<0.05).The CMT value in 4 mg aflibercept group was significantly lower than that in the 2 mg aflibercept group in one month after injection ( P<0.05).No severe ocular and systemic adverse events were found during the follow-up, such as retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, cataract, and persistent high intraocular pressure. Conclusions:Both 2 mg and 4 mg aflibercept can effectively treat ranibizumab-resistant PCV with serous PED, and improve the anatomical structure of retina and BCVA.4 mg aflibercept can accelerate the recovery of PED and CMT.

Objective:To analyze the therapeutic effects and prognosis after radiotherapy (chemotherapy) of patients with postoperative recurrent esophageal cancer.Methods:This study analyzed 501 patients with postoperative recurrent esophageal cancer who were treated in the Radiotherapy Department of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and met enrollment conditions. Among them, 274 patients received concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The analyses in this study focused on the survival after the retreatment, postoperative recurrence patterns, prognosis of retreatment, and prognostic factors affecting the retreatment. Meanwhile, statistical analysis was conducted using the software SPSS Statistics 19.0.Results:The time of postoperative recurrence was 0.3-87.4 months, with a median number of 11.6 months. The median survival time was 12.1 months after the retreatment. Among all the patients, 344 patients suffered from only local recurrence, while the remaining 157 patients experienced distant metastasis. According to multivariate analysis result, independent prognostic factors included gender, pN stage, lymph node positive logarithmic ratio (LODDS), the number of chemotherapy cycles, time of recurrence, and distant metastasis ( P < 0.05). Meanwhile, prognostic factors affecting the 344 patients with only local recurrence included the time of recurrence, the number of chemotherapy cycles, and prescription dose ( χ2=22.605, 13.957, 10.446; P< 0.05). The remaining 157 patients suffered from distant metastasis. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of them were 43.3%, 9.1%, and 5.5%, respectively, and those of the patients with only local recurrence were 53.6%, 22.6%, and 16.4%, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (χ 2=10.786, P< 0.05). Conclusions:Radiotherapy (chemotherapy) is safe and effective for the treatment of recurrent esophageal cancer. However, it features poor prognosis for male patients with a late pN stage, a high LODDS, the number of chemotherapy cycles ≤ 2, the time of recurrence≤ 24 months, and distant metastasis.