1.The Kashima Scan Study 2: a protocol for a prospective observational cohort study of cerebral small vessel disease in neurologically healthy adults.
Kohei SUZUYAMA ; Yusuke YAKUSHIJI ; Akiko MATSUMOTO ; Toshihiro IDE ; Mikiko TOKIYA ; Atsushi OGATA ; Junko NAKAJIMA ; Tatsumi HIROTSU ; Shuhei IKEDA ; Tatsuya DOYAMA ; Masayasu MORIKAWA ; Yuta GOTO ; Yoshiko KATSUKI ; Kazuhiro KAWAMOTO ; Yoshimasa ODA ; Haruki KOIKE ; Hideo HARA
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 2025;30():52-52
BACKGROUND:
Our previous observational cohort study, the Kashima Scan Study (KSS), identified associations between lifestyle, cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) as detected by magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, and disease outcomes including cognitive impairment and vascular diseases. However, established modifiers of the outcomes such as genetic background, drinking and exercise habits, and socioeconomic status were not considered. Regarding genetic factors in particular, the ALDH2 rs671 variant, East Asian-specific diversity, and APOE status are expected to have strong effects. The aim of KSS-2 is to examine the interactions of genetic background, lifestyle factors including drinking habit, socioeconomic status, and/or SVD markers for cognitive impairment, vascular disease, and death.
METHOD:
The KSS-2 is a prospective regional observational study of a healthy Japanese cohort that will clarify lifestyle habits to better maintain brain health from midlife by genotype. Japanese adults who underwent brain health checkups at their own expense are enrolled and will be followed-up for 10 years. We will extend the protocol of the KSS to include genetic background and potential confounding factors, including lifestyle (including drinking and exercise habit) and socioeconomic status, and perform survival analyses. The study outcomes are cognitive impairment, vascular events, and death.
RESULTS:
We enrolled 908 healthy adults (mean age 64.2 years; range 35 to 84 years; 41% male) from September 1, 2018 until December 31, 2024.
CONCLUSION
This study will provide important insights into the development of individualized health intervention strategies.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases/diagnostic imaging*
;
Japan/epidemiology*
;
Life Style
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Prospective Studies
;
Observational Studies as Topic
2.Gingyo Gedokusan vs Oseltamivir for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Influenza and Influenza-like illness : An Open-label Prospective Study
Kentaro Iwata ; Wataru Igarashi ; Midori Honjo ; Takashi Nishimoto ; Kyoko Shinya ; Akiko Makino ; Kazuo Mitani ; Yoshiko Tatsumi ; Hiroyuki Ninomiya ; Kumi Higasa ; Seiichiro Usuki ; Hiroki Kagawa ; Daisuke Uchida ; Kohei Takimoto ; Rei Suganaga ; Hiroo Matsuo ; Yuichiro Oba ; Mami Horigome ; Hideaki Oka ; Goh Ohji ; Yasuhisa Abe ; Hiroyuki Yoshida ; Shohiro Kinoshita ; Midori Hirai
General Medicine 2013;14(1):13-22
Background: Gingyo-gedoku-san (GGGS) is an herbal medicine approved for upper respiratory infections in Japan. We conducted an open-label, multi-center, prospective trial, comparing GGGS with oseltamivir in patients with influenza and influenza-like illness (ILI) as a pilot study.
Methods: Subjects were healthy persons aged between 16 and 40, and were enrolled from January 12, 2010 to March 24, 2011. Fifteen patients were enrolled in this trial (8 and 7 for GGGS and oseltamivir, respectively). RT-PCR was positive for pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in 10 patients. The patients were provided with either GGGS or oseltamivir for 5 days. The primary outcome was mortality and/or hospitalization 7 days after the initial diagnosis. Body temperature and other clinical characteristics were also evaluated.
Results: All patients recovered from illness without complication or hospitalization. The mean time to resolve symptoms for the GGGS and oseltamivir groups was 3.9 days and 3.3 days, respectively (p=0.43). The GGGS group appeared to have a smaller symptom score AUC than the oseltamivir group, (p=0.26). Time to recover activity level appeared to be shorter in the GGGS group (p=0.10), with shorter time to recover health status (p=0.02). Sub-group analysis on patients with positive PCR showed similar results between the two groups.
Conclusion: GGGS was associated with symptom improvements resembling oseltamivir for both influenza and ILI. Randomized controlled trials involving larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail