Objective:To evaluate the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of locally advanced gastric cancer with serosa-invasion.Methods:This study is a retrospective cohort study. The clinical and pathological data of 495 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with serosa-invasion who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in Department of General Surgery, the First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University from October 2012 to October 2018 was analyzed retrospectively. There were 356 males and 139 females with an age ( M(IQR)) of 59 (16) years (range: 18 to 75 years). Observation indicators included postoperative results and long-term prognosis. The survival curve was drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate prognostic analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results:Among the 495 patients, a total of 57 patients (11.5%) were lost to follow-up, with a follow-up time of 89 (40) months (range: 23 to 134 months). The 5-year disease-free survival rate (DFS) and the 5-year overall survival rate (OS) were 56.0% and 58.2%, respectively. The 5-year DFS for patients with stage ⅡB, ⅢA, ⅢB, ⅢC were 71.2%, 60.5%, 51.6%, 33.3%, respectively. The 5-year OS for patients with stage ⅡB, ⅢA, ⅢB, ⅢC were 71.2%, 62.2%, 54.1%, 39.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age >65 years (DFS: HR=1.402, 95% CI: 1.022 to 1.922, P=0.036; OS: HR=1.461, 95% CI: 1.057 to 2.019, P=0.022), lymph node dissection number less than 25 (DFS: HR=1.348, 95% CI: 1.019 to 1.779, P=0.036; OS: HR=1.376, 95% CI: 1.035 to 1.825, P=0.028), pathological stage Ⅲ (DFS: HR=2.131, 95% CI: 1.444 to 3.144, P<0.01; OS: HR=2.079, 95% CI: 1.406 to 3.074, P<0.01), and no postoperative chemotherapy (DFS: HR=3.127, 95% CI: 2.377 to 4.113, P<0.01; OS: HR=3.768, 95% CI: 2.828 to 5.020, P<0.01) were independent prognostic factors for the decrease in DFS and OS rates. Conclusions:Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer with serosa-invasion could achieve satisfactory long-term oncological outcomes. More lymph node dissection and standardized postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy are expected to further improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with serous invasion after laparoscopic radical surgery.

Objective:To evaluate the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of locally advanced gastric cancer with serosa-invasion.Methods:This study is a retrospective cohort study. The clinical and pathological data of 495 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with serosa-invasion who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in Department of General Surgery, the First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University from October 2012 to October 2018 was analyzed retrospectively. There were 356 males and 139 females with an age ( M(IQR)) of 59 (16) years (range: 18 to 75 years). Observation indicators included postoperative results and long-term prognosis. The survival curve was drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate prognostic analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results:Among the 495 patients, a total of 57 patients (11.5%) were lost to follow-up, with a follow-up time of 89 (40) months (range: 23 to 134 months). The 5-year disease-free survival rate (DFS) and the 5-year overall survival rate (OS) were 56.0% and 58.2%, respectively. The 5-year DFS for patients with stage ⅡB, ⅢA, ⅢB, ⅢC were 71.2%, 60.5%, 51.6%, 33.3%, respectively. The 5-year OS for patients with stage ⅡB, ⅢA, ⅢB, ⅢC were 71.2%, 62.2%, 54.1%, 39.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age >65 years (DFS: HR=1.402, 95% CI: 1.022 to 1.922, P=0.036; OS: HR=1.461, 95% CI: 1.057 to 2.019, P=0.022), lymph node dissection number less than 25 (DFS: HR=1.348, 95% CI: 1.019 to 1.779, P=0.036; OS: HR=1.376, 95% CI: 1.035 to 1.825, P=0.028), pathological stage Ⅲ (DFS: HR=2.131, 95% CI: 1.444 to 3.144, P<0.01; OS: HR=2.079, 95% CI: 1.406 to 3.074, P<0.01), and no postoperative chemotherapy (DFS: HR=3.127, 95% CI: 2.377 to 4.113, P<0.01; OS: HR=3.768, 95% CI: 2.828 to 5.020, P<0.01) were independent prognostic factors for the decrease in DFS and OS rates. Conclusions:Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer with serosa-invasion could achieve satisfactory long-term oncological outcomes. More lymph node dissection and standardized postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy are expected to further improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with serous invasion after laparoscopic radical surgery.

Objective:To investigate the influencing factors for gastrointestinal leakage and its occurrence time after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Methods:The retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 3 135 patients with gastric cancer who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from January 2004 to December 2022 were collected. There were 2 174 males and 961 females, aged (57±11)years. Gastrointestinal leakage occurring within 4 days after surgery was defined as early gastrointestinal leakage, and gastrointestinal leakage occuring more than 4 days after surgery was defined as late gastrointestinal leakage. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and t test was used for comparison between groups. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M( Q1, Q3), and Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between groups. Count data were represented as absolute numbers, and chi-square test or Fisher exact pro-bability was used for comparison between groups. Comparison of ordinal data was conducted using the nonparameter rank sum test. Logistic regression model was used for univariate analysis, and Logistic forward stepwise regression model was used for multivariate analysis. Results:(1) Clinico-pathological characteristics of patients with and without postoperative gastrointestinal leakage. Of the 3 135 patients, there were 3 056 patients without gastrointestinal leakage and 79 patients with gastrointestinal leakage after operation, and there were significant differences in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgical resection range, volume of intraoperative blood loss and surgeon′s experience between them ( P<0.05). (2) Postoperative gastro-intestinal leakage and treatment. Of the 79 patients with postoperative gastrointestinal leakage, there were 36 patients with esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage (2 patients combined with jejunal anastomotic leakage), 29 patients with duodenal stump leakage, 11 patients with gastrojejunal anas-tomotic leakage, 2 patients with esophagogastric anastomotic leakage and 1 patient with gastroduo-denal anastomotic leakage. The same patient could be combined with more than one kind of gastro-intestinal leakage. Thirty-four patients were improved after conservative treatment, 31 patients were improved after puncture drainage or endoscopic interventional therapy, and 14 patients were treated with secondary surgery. Among the patients who underwent secondary surgery, 5 patients died during perioperative period. The time to occurrence of postoperative gastrointestinal leakage of 79 patients was 5(4, 8)days, with the earliest occurrence at 1 day after operation, and the latest occurrence at 16 days after operation. (3) Analysis of influencing factors for the occurrence time of postopera-tive gastrointestinal leakage. Results of multivariate analysis showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy, total gastrectomy and surgeon′s experience ≤50 patients were independent risk factors for early gastrointestinal leakage after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer ( odds ratio=4.262, 2.179, 5.015, 95% confidence interval as 1.386-13.110, 1.026-4.627, 2.378-10.537, P<0.05). Age>60 years, total gastrectomy, volume of intraoperative bleeding loss>200 mL were independent risk factors for late gastrointestinal leakage after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer ( odds ratio=3.031, 2.804, 2.223, 95% confidence interval as 1.631-5.631, 1.535-5.122, 1.190-4.151, P<0.05). Conclusions:Most patients with gastrointestinal leakage after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer can be cured by non-surgical methods. Neoadjuvant chemo-therapy and surgeon′s experience ≤ 50 patients are independent risk factors for early gastrointes-tinal leakage after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy. Age >60 years and volume of intraopera-tive blood loss >200 mL are independent risk factors for late gastrointestinal leakage after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy. Total gastrectomy is an independent risk factor for both early and late gastrointestinal leakage after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Objective:To investigate the influencing factors for gastrointestinal leakage and its occurrence time after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Methods:The retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 3 135 patients with gastric cancer who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from January 2004 to December 2022 were collected. There were 2 174 males and 961 females, aged (57±11)years. Gastrointestinal leakage occurring within 4 days after surgery was defined as early gastrointestinal leakage, and gastrointestinal leakage occuring more than 4 days after surgery was defined as late gastrointestinal leakage. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and t test was used for comparison between groups. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M( Q1, Q3), and Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between groups. Count data were represented as absolute numbers, and chi-square test or Fisher exact pro-bability was used for comparison between groups. Comparison of ordinal data was conducted using the nonparameter rank sum test. Logistic regression model was used for univariate analysis, and Logistic forward stepwise regression model was used for multivariate analysis. Results:(1) Clinico-pathological characteristics of patients with and without postoperative gastrointestinal leakage. Of the 3 135 patients, there were 3 056 patients without gastrointestinal leakage and 79 patients with gastrointestinal leakage after operation, and there were significant differences in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgical resection range, volume of intraoperative blood loss and surgeon′s experience between them ( P<0.05). (2) Postoperative gastro-intestinal leakage and treatment. Of the 79 patients with postoperative gastrointestinal leakage, there were 36 patients with esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage (2 patients combined with jejunal anastomotic leakage), 29 patients with duodenal stump leakage, 11 patients with gastrojejunal anas-tomotic leakage, 2 patients with esophagogastric anastomotic leakage and 1 patient with gastroduo-denal anastomotic leakage. The same patient could be combined with more than one kind of gastro-intestinal leakage. Thirty-four patients were improved after conservative treatment, 31 patients were improved after puncture drainage or endoscopic interventional therapy, and 14 patients were treated with secondary surgery. Among the patients who underwent secondary surgery, 5 patients died during perioperative period. The time to occurrence of postoperative gastrointestinal leakage of 79 patients was 5(4, 8)days, with the earliest occurrence at 1 day after operation, and the latest occurrence at 16 days after operation. (3) Analysis of influencing factors for the occurrence time of postopera-tive gastrointestinal leakage. Results of multivariate analysis showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy, total gastrectomy and surgeon′s experience ≤50 patients were independent risk factors for early gastrointestinal leakage after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer ( odds ratio=4.262, 2.179, 5.015, 95% confidence interval as 1.386-13.110, 1.026-4.627, 2.378-10.537, P<0.05). Age>60 years, total gastrectomy, volume of intraoperative bleeding loss>200 mL were independent risk factors for late gastrointestinal leakage after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer ( odds ratio=3.031, 2.804, 2.223, 95% confidence interval as 1.631-5.631, 1.535-5.122, 1.190-4.151, P<0.05). Conclusions:Most patients with gastrointestinal leakage after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer can be cured by non-surgical methods. Neoadjuvant chemo-therapy and surgeon′s experience ≤ 50 patients are independent risk factors for early gastrointes-tinal leakage after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy. Age >60 years and volume of intraopera-tive blood loss >200 mL are independent risk factors for late gastrointestinal leakage after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy. Total gastrectomy is an independent risk factor for both early and late gastrointestinal leakage after minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Objective:To investigate the short-term outcomes of totally robotic surgical system and robotic surgical system assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 290 patients who under-went robotic surgical system radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from January 2018 to November 2021 were collected. There were 208 males and 82 females, aged 58 (range, 24?84)years. Of the 290 patients, 125 patients undergoing totally robotic surgical system radical gastrectomy combined with reconstruction of digestive tract were divided into the totally robot group, and 165 patients undergoing robotic surgical system radical gastrectomy combined with a small midline incision-assisted reconstruction of digestive tract were divided into the robotic-assisted group. Observation indicators: (1) surgical and postoperative situations; (2) postoperative complications. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was conducted using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range), and comparison between groups was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Comparison of ordinal data was conducted using the non-parameter rank sum test. Count data were described as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Results:(1) Surgical and postoperative situations. The operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, length of incision, duration of postoperative analgesic using, time to postoperative gastric tube removal, time to postoperative initial water intake, time to postoperative first anal flatus, duration of post-operative hospital stay were (246±43)minutes, (104±51)mL, 4(range, 3?6)cm, (2.2±0.5)days, 36(range, 10?112)hours, 62(range, 32?205)hours, 63(range, 18?138)hours, 8(range, 6?50)days in patients of the totally robot group, versus (296±59)minutes, (143±87)mL, 6(range, 3?13)cm, (3.6±0.7)days, 42(range, 12?262)hours, 90(range, 18?262)hours, 80(range, 16?295)hours, 9(range, 6?63)days in patients of the robotic-assisted group, showing significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups ( t=8.04, 4.42, Z=?13.98, t=18.46, Z=?5.47, ?5.87, ?6.14, ?4.04, P<0.05). (2) Post-operative complications. Cases with systemic related complications and cases with pulmonary infection were 7 and 4 in patients of the totally robot group, versus 31 and 16 in patients of the robotic-assisted group, showing significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups ( χ2=10.86, 4.68, P<0.05). Further analysis showed that there were significant differences in age ≥60 years, body mass index ≥25 kg/m 2, tumor diameter ≥3 cm, TNM staging as stage Ⅲ of cases with postoperative complications between the totally robot group and the robotic-assisted group ( odds ratio=0.44, 0.17, 0.40, 0.31, 95 confidence interval as 0.20?1.00, 0.03?0.88, 0.18?0.89, 0.11?0.84, P<0.05). Conclusion:Totally robotic surgical system radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer is safe and feasible with advantages of minimal trauma and quick recovery, especially for patients as age ≥60 years, body mass index ≥25 kg/cm 2, tumor diameter ≥3 cm and TNM stage Ⅲ in complication controlling.

Objective:To explore the method of establishing a modified demyelination and myelination regeneration model induced by dicyclohexanone oxalyl dihydrazone (CPZ) in mice with multiple sclerosis (MS), and to analyze the image markers of demyelination and myelination regeneration in mouse MS model.Methods:After the intragastrically administered with sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMCNa) for one week, a total of 30 C57BL/6 male mice were randomly divided into the control group ( n=10), the demyelination group ( n=10), and the remyelination group ( n=10). The mice of the control group were immediately performed MR scanning and pathological specimen obtaining; the mice in the demyelination group were administered with intragastrical CPZ-CMCNa once a day for 6 weeks for inducing demyelination, then received MR scanning and specimen obtaining with the same protocols used in control group; the mice in the remyelination group were administered with intragastrical CPZ-CMCNa once a day for six weeks for demyelination, then CPZ was withdrawn and normal diet was given for another four weeks. Then MR scanning and specimen obtaining were performed with the same protocols used in the other two groups. Regions of interest (ROIs) were set at the rostrum of corpus callosum (rCC), the bilateral normal appearing white matters (NAWM) of the rostrum of corpus callosum, and the bilateral cerebral cortex (Cx). The normalized T 2WI (T 2-normalized), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) values were compared among the three groups by one-way ANOVA. Results:The demyelination and remyelination mice model of MS were successfully established. The T 2-normalized values of rCC in control group, demyelination group and remyelination group were 0.47±0.03, 0.72±0.04, 0.54±0.04, respectively, with statistically significant difference found ( F=90.511, P<0.05). Post-hoc multiple comparisons showed significant differences among those groups ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference of T 2-normalized value in NAWM and Cx among the three groups ( P>0.05). Moreover, there were significant differences in the FA values (0.36±0.04, 0.29±0.03, and 0.32±0.05), the MD values [(0.572±0.015), (0.598±0.034), and (0.626±0.043)×10 -3 mm 2/s], the AD values [(0.79±0.04), (0.77±0.06), and (0.83±0.04)×10 -3 mm 2/s], and the RD values [(0.46±0.02), (0.51±0.03), and (0.53±0.05)×10 -3 mm 2/s] of rCC of the control group, the demyelination group, and the remyelination group (all P<0.05). Significant difference was found in FA values between the demyelination group and the control group ( P<0.05), and in MD values between the remyelination group and the control group ( P<0.05), as well as in AD values between the remyelination group and the demyelination group ( P<0.05). There were also significant differences in RD values between the remyelination group and the control group, and the demyelination group and the control group (all P<0.05). However, no significant difference was found in all diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics of NAWM and Cx among the three groups (all P>0.05). The LFB-eosin staining showed that the myelin sheath of rCC was lost in the demyelination group, and the rCC was partially regenerated and repaired in the remyelination group. Conclusion:The modified CPZ-CMCNa model can selectively induce demyelination and remyelination of rCC, and the changes of demyelination and remyelination of rCC in the modified CPZ-CMCNa model can be quantitatively detected by T 2WI combined with DTI, which might provide related theoretical basis for the study on dynamic changes of MS lesions.

Objective:To review the clinical efficacy and safety of the FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin, fluorouracil) regimen in treatment of pancreatic cancer.Methods:The clinical data of 31 patients with pancreatic cancer who were treated with the FOLFIRINOX regimen from July 2016 to December 2019 at the Department of General Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. For the 20 males and 11 females who were enrolled into this study, their age ranged from 29 to 80 years (mean 56.9 years). The FOLFIRINOX regimen was used as neoadjuvant therapy in 12 patients, postoperative therapy in 10 patients with liver-metastases, and postoperative adjuvant therapy in 9 patients (as second-line chemotherapy in 7 patients and as first-line chemotherapy in 2 patients). The clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of chemotherapy were evaluated.Results:In this study, 8 patients received the modified FOLFIRINOX regimen. Of the remaining 23 patients who received the standard FOLFIRINOX regimen, 10 (43.3%) were converted to the modified regimen because of adverse events. On clinical efficacy evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy: 5 patients achieved partial remission (PR), 3 stable disease (SD) and 4 progression disease (PD). The disease control rate (DCR) was 66.7% (8/12). For 10 patients got remission of abdominal pain, 5 patients underwent surgical resection. For the 10 patients with liver-metastases, 6 achieved PR, 1 SD, 3 PD. For 7 patients got disease control. For 8 patients had remission of abdominal pain, 1 patient underwent surgical resection. For the 7 patients who received second-line chemotherapy, 2 achieved PR and 5 PD. No tumor recurrence or metastases were found in the two patients after the first-line chemotherapy. Adverse events above grade three in all the patients included neutropenia in 12 patients (38.7%), leukopenia in 7 patients (22.6%) and thrombocytopenia in 1 patient (3.2%).Conclusions:The FOLFIRINOX regimen was efficacious with a high DCR rate and controllable adverse events. Balancing its efficacy and safety showed this regimen to be beneficial to patients with pancreatic cancer.

Minimally invasive surgery experienced a rapid development in the past thirty years, of which the laparoscopy has been widely used in gastrointestinal surgery. Lymph node dissection is one of the difficulties of laparoscopic radical resection of gastric cancer. The lymph node dissection along the left gastroepiploic vessels is a difficult part, which usually causes bleeding and splenic injury. This article mainly introduce the indications, contraindications, surgical preparations, the difficulties and techniques during the lymph nodes dissection when the operator stood on the left side of the patients, and perioperative complications of lymph nodes dissection along the left gastroepiploic vessels.

Objective To investigate the feasibility,safety and efficacy of endovascular recanalization of the symptomatic occlusion of large intracranial artery in anterior circulation.Methods From October 2015 to December 2017,13 patients with symptomatic non-acute occlusion of large intracranial artery in anterior circulation were enrolled into this study and underwent endovascular recanalization.The initial procedural results,including the rate of successful recanalization and perioprocedural complications,and angiographic and clinical follow-up results were collected.The functional outcome was evaluated at discharge and 90 days.Results Recanalization was successful in 11 out of 13 patients.Perioperative complications occurred in 8 cases,including distal embolization in 7 cases (3 with symptom and 4 without),in which intracerebral hemorrhage associated with embolectomy was found in 1 case;and distal embolization concomitant with artery dissection in 1 case.At discharge,the symptoms of 10 out of 11 patients with successful recanalization were improved and 1 was unchanged;one of 2 patients with recanalization failure was aggravated and 1 was unchanged.After the procedure,1 patient with successful recanalization,but complicated with intracerebral hemorrhage associated with embolectomy was lost at follow-up,thus angiographic follow-up was available in the remaining 10 patients.Of the 10 patients,1 patient developed in-stent restenosis at 12 months and 9 patients had no hemodynamic stenosis/reocclusion.The clinical follow-up was available in 12 patients.No recurrence of TIA or stroke was found in 9 cases with successful recanalization except for 1 case who developed in-stent stenosis and suffered from TIA.At the follow-up of 90 days,l0 patients with successful recanalization showed good function (mRS∶0-2),2 patients with recanalization failure were deteriorated.Conclusions In strictly selected patients with symptomatic non-acute occlusion of large intracranial artery in anterior circulation,endovascular recanalization was feasible and safe,which may improve patients' symptoms in a short term and reduce the recurrence rate of stroke,but its definite efficacy needs to be confirmed by studies with larger sample and longer follow-up.

Objective To analyze the clinical experience of laparoscopic surgery for giant liver hemangiomas.Methods The clinical data of 40 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for giant liver hemangiomas from August 2012 to January 2018 in the China-Japan Friendship Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.The diameters of the liver hemangiomas were more than 10 cm for all the patients.The liver functions of all the patients were Child-Pugh class A.The follow-up was up to the end of February 2018.Results Laparoscopic treatment of giant liver hemangioma was successfully performed in 37 patients.Three patients were converted to open hepatectomy.The mean diameter of the giant liver hemangiomas was (10.8± 1.3) cm (ranged 10.0～15.0 cm).The mean operative time for laparoscopic therapy was (154.7±68.0) min (range 70～ 390 min).The mean intraoperative blood loss was 200 (100 ～ 400) ml.20 patients received autologous blood transfusion.Of these 2 patients received in addition allogeneic blood transfusion.The postoperative hospital stay was (6.9t2.0) days (range 4～14 days).Postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients (8.1％).Two patients developed postoperative pleural effusion and one pelvic effusion.Two patients responded well to puncture drainage and one to conservation management.There was no postoperative hemorrhage,bile leakage or air embolism.All patients were followed-up and no liver hemangioma recurrence was detected.Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery was a safe and efficacious procedure in selected patients with giant liver hemangioma.