Objective: Based on the theoretical framework of Risk Perception-Efficacy Appraisal-Behavioral Response, the study aims to explore the group heterogeneity in high temperature health risk perception and behavioral responses among college students in Chongqing, so as to provide a scientific basis for implementing differentiated health interventions. Methods: A multi stage cluster sampling method was used to select 856 students from five universities in Chongqing. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire. One way analysis of variance and independent samples t-test were used to analyze individual differences, Pearson correlation analysis was employed to examine relationships between variables, multiple linear regression was used to identify influencing factors, a structural equation model was constructed to validate the theoretical pathways, and the Bootstrap method was applied to test mediating effects. Results: In the risk perception dimension, the severity score of high temperature health hazards among college students (3.28±0.89) was higher than that of susceptibility score (2.94±0.93). Efficacy appraisal showed that the response efficacy score was the highest (3.91±0.81). In behavioral responses, adaptive behaviors were most prominent (5.43±2.75), while emergency preparedness behaviors were the lowest (2.71±1.33). The structural equation model validated the pathway of "threat appraisal → efficacy appraisal → behavioral response" ( χ 2/df=2.49, RMSEA =0.05). Self efficacy played a fully mediating role between threat appraisal and behavioral response, with a mediation effect value of 0.10 (95% CI =0.02-0.19). K means cluster analysis categorized the subjects into three groups, with the core barriers to behavior being economic constraints (22.3%), lack of motivation (34.8%), and insufficient cognition (34.1%), respectively. Conclusions Decision making regarding high temperature health behaviors among college students follows psychological pathway of "cognition-appraisal-action" with self efficacy serving as a key mediating variable driving behavioral change. Targeted interventions should be implemented for groups with different characteristics.

Background Alzheimer's disease(AD)is the most common type of dementia.There has been an increasing trend in incidence rate.The drug therapy has been proven ineffective in improving the cognitive function of AD patients or delaying the disease progression,leading to perceived low adherence with treatment and low efficacy.Previous basic research shows that blue light irradiation is helpful to improve the cognitive function of AD model rats,but there is no corresponding clinical study on the improvement effect of blue light irradiation on cognitive function of AD patients.Objective To explore the efficacy of blue light irradiation in improving the cognitive function of AD patients,so as to provide references for cognitive stabilization or improvement of AD patients.Methods A sample of 155 patients who were hospitalized in Geriatric Department of Shenzhen Kangning Hospital from June 2019 to December 2023 and met the International Classification of Diseases,tenth edition(ICD-10)diagnostic criteria for AD were retrospectively selected.Among them,80 cases who received blue light irradiation combined with memantine therapy and conventional psychotherapy were the study group,and 75 cases who only received memantine therapy and conventional psychotherapy were the control group.Blue light irradiation therapy lasted for 4 weeks,5 times per week,with each session lasting for 30 min.Then Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE)and Activity of Daily Living Scale(ADL)were administered at the baseline and after treatment.Results After treatment,study group reported an increase in MMSE total score,orientation,immediate recall,attention/calculation,delayed recall and language dimension scores(Z=-6.931,-5.773,-4.123,-3.649,-3.508,-4.733,P<0.05),and a decrease in ADL total score(Z=-7.020,P<0.05)compared to baseline data.Analysis indicated that study group scored higher on MMSE total scale,orientation,immediate recall and language dimensions(Z=-2.784,-4.621,-2.483,-3.463,P<0.05),and lower on ADL total score(Z=-3.704,P<0.05)than those of control group after treatment.Conclusion Blue light irradiation for AD patients may improve their cognitive function and activities of daily living.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.

Objective:To carry out a study on the cost analysis of the clinical use of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis Technology for Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA-AI)to explore the cost differences and cost effects of Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA)examinations before and after the introduction of Artificial Intelligence(AI),and analyze the impact of the application of AI technology on the high-quality development of public hospitals.Methods:The operation cost method was used to measure the changes in the cost and efficiency of CCTA examinations before and after the application of AI technology in five sample hospitals in Beijing,and diagnostic accuracy was used as the effect value to calculate the cost effect of CCTA-AI diagnosis versus CCTA-manual diagnosis,and to analyze the main factors affecting the unit cost.Results:The average cost of examination in 5 sample hospitals after the application of AI-assisted diagnosis system was 1 074.90 yuan,and 1 266.61 yuan before the application,with a large difference between institutions.The cost-effectiveness analysis based on diagnostic accuracy showed that the AI group had an absolute advantage over the manual group,with a cost of 1 074 900 yuan for the AI group and an effectiveness of 855.05 persons,and a cost of 1 266 610 yuan for the physician group,with an effectiveness of 815.07 persons for the high-year-end physician group,and an effectiveness of 793.40 persons for the low-year-end physician group;0.46 man-hours could be saved for each patient examined;the unit cost of CCTA examination was affected by a number of factors,among which"the number of annual examinations"and"the number of CT units involved in CCTA examination"had the greatest influence on the unit cost of CCTA examination.Conclusion:The application of AI-assisted diagnostic technology can promote the improvement of quality and efficiency in public hospitals in a certain extent,and help optimize the overall distribution of medical resources at the system level.In the future,the cost analysis of AI technology should be further strengthened to comprehensively assess its actual contribution to the healthcare system.