Objective To examine the causes of incision infections following lower extremity open fractures and develop a predictive model for assessing the risk.Methods A total of 104 patients with open fractures of the lower extremity,who received internal fixation from January 2022 to August 2023.According to whether there was incision infection after the operation,the patients were divided into infection group and non-infection group.The aim of the study was to analyze the distribution of pathogenic bacteria causing postoperative incision infections.Single-factor and multifactor Logistic regression analyses were employed to examine the factors influencing postoperative incisional infections.Subsequently,a risk prediction model for these infections was developed.The predictive capacity of this model was assessed using ROC curves.Results In the cohort of 104 patients with open fractures of the lower limb,the occurrence rate of postoperative incision infections was 19.23％.A total of 45 non-repeated pathogenic bacteria were isolated,among which gram-positive bacteria accounted for 53.33％,gram-negative bacteria 42.22％,fungi 4.44％.Gram-positive bacteria showed 100％resistance to ampicillin/sulbactam and penicillin,while resistance rates for erythromycin and clindamycin exceeded 90％.Among gram-negative bacteria,resistance rates to cefazolin,sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim,levofloxacin,ampicillin/sulbactam,ciprofloxacin,and gentamicin were all above 67％.Notably,resistance rates for cefazolin,sulfamethoxazole,and trimethoprim surpassed 90％.Univariate and multifactorial logistic stepwise regression analysis highlighted that time elapsed from injury to surgery,duration of surgery,length of hospital stay,perioperative prophylactic medication,and Gustilo classification were significant risk factors for postoperative incisional infections in patients with the condition(P＜0.05).The ROC curves illustrated that the risk prediction model accurately forecasted the incidence of postoperative incisional infections in patients with open fractures of the lower extremity,with an area under the curve of 0.861(95％ CI:0.811 to 0.911),boasting a sensitivity of 90.50％and a specificity of 72.92％.Conclusion The main pathogen of wound infection after open fracture of lower extremity is Gram-negative,the time from injury to operation,operation time,hospitalization time,prophylactic medication during perioperative period and GUSTILO classification were the influencing factors of postoperative wound infection.In addition,the establishment of risk prediction model has a good prediction effect on the incidence of postoperative wound infection in patients with this disease.

Objective:To analyze the clinical and prognostic characteristics of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) -related colitis.Methods:A retrospective observational research method was conducted. Clinical data from patients diagnosed with ICI-related colitis at Beijing Friendship Hospital between January 2016 and May 2024 were collected. Clinical severity was assessed using the common terminology criteria for adverse event (CTCAE) grading, Mayo Score, Truelove & Witts Score, and endoscopic severity was assessed using Mayo endoscopic score (MES), ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS), and MD Anderson Cancer Center endoscopic inflammation grading (MD grading). Spearman rank correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation between different scoring systems.Results:A total of 15 patients were included, with 10 males and 5 females, and the median age was 64.0 (55.5, 71.0) years. Thirteen patients were treated with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies, and 2 patients were treated with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibodies. The median onset time of the 15 patients was 66.5 (41.0, 168.0) days after ICI treatment. All patients had diarrhea, only 25% patients presented with abdominal pain, and 20%-33% patients had fever, abdominal distension, nausea, and vomiting. Most of the inflammatory indicators were non-specific. Among the 14 patients who underwent CT examinations, 2 patients had no abnormal manifestations, 10 patients had left colon involvement, mainly manifested as thickening of the colon wall, and 6 of these patients had full-thickness involvement. Among the 12 patients who underwent colonoscopy examination, except for one patient with no abnormalities, 11 patients had rectal and sigmoid colon involvement, the proportions of the descending colon, ascending colon, and terminal ileum involvement decreased successively, and the involved mucosa was mainly manifested as disappearance of vascular texture, mucosal congestion and edema, erosion to shallow ulcers, and lumen stenosis. The lesions in 5 patients were distributed continuously similar to ulcerative colitis, and the lesions in 6 patients were distributed segmentally, 1 of them had an isolated deep ulcer in the rectum under endoscopy. Correlation analysis revealed significant correlations between endoscopic scores (MES, UCEIS, and MD grading; all P < 0.001). Truelove & Witts score strongly correlated with the Mayo score ( ρ = 0.88, P < 0.001). Among clinical-endoscopic comparisons, the Mayo score exhibited the strong positive correlation with endoscopic scores (all P < 0.05), followed by the Truelove & Witts score (all P < 0.05), and CTCAE diarrhea grading only had positive correlation with MD grading ( P = 0.034). However, CTCAE colitis grading showed no significant correlation with endoscopic scores (all P > 0.05). During a mean follow-up of 13.5 months, 10 patients received corticosteroid therapy, and 5 received alternative treatments. Corticosteroid-treated patients showed favorable clinical responses, and rapid tapering feasible occurred in parts of mild-to-moderate patients without relapse. However, perforation occurred in 2 patients with small bowel involvement. Conclusions:The main clinical manifestations of patients with ICI-related colitis are diarrhea. Imaging studies suggest thickening of the colonic wall. Endoscopic findings show the highest involvement in the left colon. Truelove&Witts score and Mayo score is strongly correlated. Corticosteroid therapy exhibits a rapid response, and the prognosis of patients with small intestine involvement is poor.

Objective To examine the causes of incision infections following lower extremity open fractures and develop a predictive model for assessing the risk.Methods A total of 104 patients with open fractures of the lower extremity,who received internal fixation from January 2022 to August 2023.According to whether there was incision infection after the operation,the patients were divided into infection group and non-infection group.The aim of the study was to analyze the distribution of pathogenic bacteria causing postoperative incision infections.Single-factor and multifactor Logistic regression analyses were employed to examine the factors influencing postoperative incisional infections.Subsequently,a risk prediction model for these infections was developed.The predictive capacity of this model was assessed using ROC curves.Results In the cohort of 104 patients with open fractures of the lower limb,the occurrence rate of postoperative incision infections was 19.23％.A total of 45 non-repeated pathogenic bacteria were isolated,among which gram-positive bacteria accounted for 53.33％,gram-negative bacteria 42.22％,fungi 4.44％.Gram-positive bacteria showed 100％resistance to ampicillin/sulbactam and penicillin,while resistance rates for erythromycin and clindamycin exceeded 90％.Among gram-negative bacteria,resistance rates to cefazolin,sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim,levofloxacin,ampicillin/sulbactam,ciprofloxacin,and gentamicin were all above 67％.Notably,resistance rates for cefazolin,sulfamethoxazole,and trimethoprim surpassed 90％.Univariate and multifactorial logistic stepwise regression analysis highlighted that time elapsed from injury to surgery,duration of surgery,length of hospital stay,perioperative prophylactic medication,and Gustilo classification were significant risk factors for postoperative incisional infections in patients with the condition(P＜0.05).The ROC curves illustrated that the risk prediction model accurately forecasted the incidence of postoperative incisional infections in patients with open fractures of the lower extremity,with an area under the curve of 0.861(95％ CI:0.811 to 0.911),boasting a sensitivity of 90.50％and a specificity of 72.92％.Conclusion The main pathogen of wound infection after open fracture of lower extremity is Gram-negative,the time from injury to operation,operation time,hospitalization time,prophylactic medication during perioperative period and GUSTILO classification were the influencing factors of postoperative wound infection.In addition,the establishment of risk prediction model has a good prediction effect on the incidence of postoperative wound infection in patients with this disease.

Objective:To analyze the clinical and prognostic characteristics of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) -related colitis.Methods:A retrospective observational research method was conducted. Clinical data from patients diagnosed with ICI-related colitis at Beijing Friendship Hospital between January 2016 and May 2024 were collected. Clinical severity was assessed using the common terminology criteria for adverse event (CTCAE) grading, Mayo Score, Truelove & Witts Score, and endoscopic severity was assessed using Mayo endoscopic score (MES), ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS), and MD Anderson Cancer Center endoscopic inflammation grading (MD grading). Spearman rank correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation between different scoring systems.Results:A total of 15 patients were included, with 10 males and 5 females, and the median age was 64.0 (55.5, 71.0) years. Thirteen patients were treated with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies, and 2 patients were treated with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibodies. The median onset time of the 15 patients was 66.5 (41.0, 168.0) days after ICI treatment. All patients had diarrhea, only 25% patients presented with abdominal pain, and 20%-33% patients had fever, abdominal distension, nausea, and vomiting. Most of the inflammatory indicators were non-specific. Among the 14 patients who underwent CT examinations, 2 patients had no abnormal manifestations, 10 patients had left colon involvement, mainly manifested as thickening of the colon wall, and 6 of these patients had full-thickness involvement. Among the 12 patients who underwent colonoscopy examination, except for one patient with no abnormalities, 11 patients had rectal and sigmoid colon involvement, the proportions of the descending colon, ascending colon, and terminal ileum involvement decreased successively, and the involved mucosa was mainly manifested as disappearance of vascular texture, mucosal congestion and edema, erosion to shallow ulcers, and lumen stenosis. The lesions in 5 patients were distributed continuously similar to ulcerative colitis, and the lesions in 6 patients were distributed segmentally, 1 of them had an isolated deep ulcer in the rectum under endoscopy. Correlation analysis revealed significant correlations between endoscopic scores (MES, UCEIS, and MD grading; all P < 0.001). Truelove & Witts score strongly correlated with the Mayo score ( ρ = 0.88, P < 0.001). Among clinical-endoscopic comparisons, the Mayo score exhibited the strong positive correlation with endoscopic scores (all P < 0.05), followed by the Truelove & Witts score (all P < 0.05), and CTCAE diarrhea grading only had positive correlation with MD grading ( P = 0.034). However, CTCAE colitis grading showed no significant correlation with endoscopic scores (all P > 0.05). During a mean follow-up of 13.5 months, 10 patients received corticosteroid therapy, and 5 received alternative treatments. Corticosteroid-treated patients showed favorable clinical responses, and rapid tapering feasible occurred in parts of mild-to-moderate patients without relapse. However, perforation occurred in 2 patients with small bowel involvement. Conclusions:The main clinical manifestations of patients with ICI-related colitis are diarrhea. Imaging studies suggest thickening of the colonic wall. Endoscopic findings show the highest involvement in the left colon. Truelove&Witts score and Mayo score is strongly correlated. Corticosteroid therapy exhibits a rapid response, and the prognosis of patients with small intestine involvement is poor.

OBJECTIVE:As one of the serious complications after total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty,periprosthetic joint infection has always been the focus of joint surgeons.Albumin/globulin ratio is emerging as a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of albumin/globulin ratio in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection. METHODS:A systematic search was conducted in PubMed,Embase,and Cochrane Library databases on July 29,2023.The literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,and the literature related to diagnostic trials of albumin/globulin ratio was included in this study.QUADAS-2 method was used to evaluate the quality of the included articles.Bivariate mixed-effect model was applied to combine the sensitivity,specificity,likelihood ratio,and diagnostic odds ratio of the included articles,and the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve were integrated to specifically evaluate the accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.Subgroup analysis was used to explore the sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS:We included eight eligible diagnostic studies,all of which were of medium to high quality.The sensitivity and specificity of the combined diagnosis were 0.78(95%CI:0.66-0.86)and 0.83(95%CI:0.78-0.88),respectively.The combined positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.63(95%CI:3.43-6.22)and 0.27(95%CI:0.17-0.42),respectively.The combined diagnostic scores and diagnostic odds ratio were 2.85(95%CI:2.23-3.48)and 17.35(95%CI:9.29-32.45),respectively.The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88(95%CI:0.85-0.90). CONCLUSION:The albumin/globulin ratio is of guiding significance in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.However,it is not universal in clinical practice,so it should be combined with specific clinical practice.In addition,there are relatively few studies on the threshold of albumin/globulin ratio,different sampling types,different laboratory detection methods,and different races,so more prospective clinical trials with large samples,multi-centers,and scientific design should be carried out for verification in the future.

Background::Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have shown similar worsening epidemic patterns globally and shared various overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms. However, evidence on the relationship between NAFLD and IBD risk is lacking. We aimed to investigate the associations between long-term risk of incident IBD and NAFLD in a large prospective cohort.Methods::Participants from the United Kingdom Biobank cohort (https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/) who were free of IBD and alcoholic liver disease at baseline were enrolled. Baseline non-alcoholic fatty liver degree was measured by the well-established fatty liver index (FLI). The outcomes of interest included incident IBD, ulcerative colitis (UC), and Crohn’s disease (CD). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results::Among 418,721 participants (mean FLI: 48.11 ± 30.11), 160,807 (38.40%) participants were diagnosed as NAFLD at baseline. During a median of 12.4 years’ follow-up, 2346 incident IBD cases (1545 UC, 653 CD, and 148 IBD-unclassified) were identified. Due to limited events, those IBD-unclassified were combined in UC or CD when examining the associated risk of UC or CD, separately. Compared with the lowest quartile of FLI, the highest quartile showed a separately 36.00%, 25.00%, and 58.00% higher risk of incident IBD (HR Q4 vs. Q1 =1.36, 95% CI: 1.19-1.55, Ptrend <0.001), UC (HR Q4 vs. Q1 =1.25, 95% CI: 1.07-1.46, Ptrend=0.047), and CD (HR Q4 vs. Q1 =1.58, 95% CI: 1.26-1.97, Ptrend <0.001) after multivariable adjustment. Compared with non-NAFLD, NAFLD participants had a significantly higher risk of incident IBD (HR=1.13, 95% CI: 1.04-1.24) and CD (HR =1.36, 95% CI: 1.17-1.58). Conclusions::Higher degree of non-alcoholic fatty liver is associated with increased risk of incident IBD. Interventions aimed at improving NAFLD may be a potential targeted strategy for the detection and treatment of IBD.

Objective To explore the application value of combined detection of serum neutrophil gelati-nase-associated lipocalin(NGAL)and calprotectin in patients with fracture in early infection after joint re-placement surgery.Methods A total of 206 fracture patients who underwent joint replacement surgery in a hospital from July 2021 to July 2022 were selected as the study objects,and divided into infection group(n=29)and non-infection group(n=177)according to whether infection occurred after joint replacement surgery.Serum NGAL and calprotectin levels were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,and the influencing factors of infection after joint replacement surgery in fracture patients were analyzed by multivari-ate Logistic regression.The receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of serum NGAL and calprotectin combined detection in early infection after joint replacement surgery in frac-ture patients.Results The proportion of diabetes mellitus and erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR)in infec-tion group were significantly higher than those in non-infection group,while albumin was significantly lower than that in non-infection group,with statistical significance(P＜0.05).The levels of serum NGAL and cal-protectin in postoperative infection group were significantly higher than those in postoperative non-infection group,with statistical significance(P＜0.05).Serum NGAL,calprotectin,ESR and diabetes mellitus were risk factors for early infection after joint replacement surgery,while serum albumin was protective factor(P＜0.05).The area under the curve for the diagnosis of early infection after joint replacement surgery in patients with fracture was 0.838,0.813 and 0.934,respectively,and the combination of serum NGAL,calprotectin,and both were superior to the diagnosis of serum NG AL and calprotectin alone(Z=2.720,2.357,P=0.007,0.018).Conclusion The combined detection of serum NGAL and calprotectin has better diagnostic efficacy for early infection after joint replacement surgery in fracture patients,and has certain application value for clinical prognosis.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution (OSS) for bowel preparation.Methods:A multi-center, randomized, single-blinded, positive-controlled and non-inferiority clinical study was conducted. Participants were randomized to receive two bottles of OSS or 4-liter polyethylene glycol (Ⅲ) (PEG) regimen. The primary indicator was efficacy for bowel preparation. Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) ≥2 scores in each segment was determined as effective. Secondary endpoints included subjects' compliance, colonoscopy bubble evaluation, time interval of defecation after medication, time interval of defecation type Ⅶ (Bristol stool classification), the number of defecation, and the positive rate of colonoscopy (detection rate of polyps, non-polyp eminence, ulcers, etc.) were also recorded. The safety was evaluated by the incidence of adverse events and severe adverse events.Results:A total of 240 subjects from 4 hospitals were enrolled in the study, with 120 subjects in the experimental group (the OSS group) and 120 subjects in the control group (the PEG group). The full analysis set (FAS) showed that the bowel preparation success rates were 92.44% (110/119) in the OSS group and 91.60% (109/119) in the PEG group ( χ2=0.058, P=0.809) . The total BBPS score and the scores of each bowel segment were all higher in the OSS group than those in the PEG group ( P<0.05) in both FAS and per protocol set (PPS) except the score of left colon in the FAS. The satisfaction rate of bubble evaluation in the OSS group was higher ( 95.80% VS 89.08%, P=0.025). The compliance, positive rate of colonoscopy and safety of the two groups were comparable. Conclusion:Compared with 4-liter PEG regimen, OSS regimen shows similar bowel preparation quality, superior anti-foaming effect with acceptable safety.

Objective:To compare the efficacy of oral sulfate solution (OSS) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) electrolyte powder for colonoscopy bowel preparation.Methods:A total of 283 randomized patients from 9 centers in China taking OSS ( n=143) or PEG ( n=140) using two-day split bowel preparation regimen received colonoscopy and assessment. The primary index was the bowel preparation success rate [global Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS)≥ 6 by independent assessment center]. Secondary indices included BBPS global and segmental scores, investigator satisfaction (5-point Likert scale) with the quality of bowel preparation, patient satisfaction assessed by questionnaires, and patient tolerance assessed by Sharma scale. Compliance and safety were compared between the two groups. Results:The bowel preparation success rates were 100.0% for OSS and 99.3% for PEG [adjusted difference 0.7% (95% CI: -5.3% - 6.7%), P<0.001 for non-inferiority]. The BBPS global score in OSS group was significantly higher than that in PEG group (8.1 VS 7.7, P<0.001). The segment BBPS scores were also higher in OSS group than those in PEG group for all 3 segments (right colon: 2.4 VS 2.3, P=0.002; transverse colon: 2.8 VS 2.7, P=0.018; left colon: 2.8 VS 2.7, P=0.007). Investigator Likert score in the OSS group was significantly higher than that in the PEG group (2.6 VS 2.3, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in compliance between OSS and PEG, except for the second dose (90.9% VS 82.6%, P=0.039). There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction, Sharma score or proportion of patients with tolerance-related symptoms between the two groups. Safety was comparable between the two groups, and all adverse events were mild to moderate. Conclusion:OSS has comparable efficacy with PEG, with higher BBPS scores in all segments, better investigator satisfaction, better compliance in split dose, and comparable patient tolerance and safety.

Objective:To evaluate the effects of single spay of L-menthol (NPO-11) on suppressing gastric peristalsis during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and the influencing factor.Methods:This study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-parallel controlled study. The eligible patients were randomly divided into two groups by randomized blocks. Patients received local spray of either NPO-11 (160 mg L-menthol) or placebo 20 mL during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The gastric peristalsis was recorded and evaluated before, 2 minutes after and at the end of endoscopy. The complexity of the procedure was evaluated by the researchers. The influencing factors for antiperistaltic effect of NPO-11 were analyzed.Results:A total of 220 patients were enrolled from five research centers. There were 109 cases in the NPO-11 group and 111 cases in the placebo group. The baseline data of the two groups were similar and comparable. The proportion of patients with grade 1 peristalsis at 2 minutes after the treatment and at the end of endoscopy was significantly higher in the NPO-11 group than that in the placebo group [40.37% (44/109) VS 16.22% (18/111), χ2=15.93, P<0.001]. Compared with the placebo group, the proportions of weak peristalsis (grade 1 and 2) were higher in the NPO-11 group at 2 minutes after the treatment [67.89% (74/109) VS 46.85% (52/111)] and at the end of endoscopy [79.82% (87/109) VS 48.65% (54/111)]. Subgroup analysis showed that the inhibitory effect of NPO-11 on gastric peristalsis was more significant in Helicobacter pylori antibody positive group. Conclusion:Local spray of NPO-11 can effectively inhibit gastric peristalsis during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and its effect is more significant in Helicobacter pylori antibody positive group. It could be recommended for no obvious adverse reactions , its safety, and the convenient procedure.