Gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) is a common and lethal manifestation of advanced gastric cancer, with a median survival of only 5-11 months. This consensus was developed by 30 experts from Asia (China, Japan, Korea, and Singapore) using the Delphi method and the GRADE evidence grading system. A total of 29 statements were formulated, covering the diagnosis and assessment of GCPM, indications for laparoscopic exploration and NIPS (normothermic intraperitoneal and systemic treatment), treatment regimens, prevention and management of complications, criteria for conversion surgery, and postoperative intraperitoneal therapy. The consensus aims to standardize clinical practice and improve the prognosis of patients with GCPM.

Patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC) have a poor prognosis. Surgery or systemic treatment alone hardly improves the prognosis and overall survival (OS). A newly developed comprehensive treatment involving a combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been used to treat patients with PM from GC. The Peritoneal Dissemination Center of Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital in Japan has been committed to treating patients with PM from GC. Selected patients undergo laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (LHIPEC), preoperative intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy that includes intravenous and oral chemotherapy prior to surgery. CRS plus HIPEC is then performed to achieve complete cytoreduction. Postoperative IP chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy is also administered to nearly all patients. The results demonstrate that comprehensive treatment, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy and CRS plus HIPEC, can significantly improve the prognosis and OS of selected patients with PM from GC.

Patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC) have a poor prognosis. Surgery or systemic treatment alone hardly improves the prognosis and overall survival (OS). A newly developed comprehensive treatment involving a combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been used to treat patients with PM from GC. The Peritoneal Dissemination Center of Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital in Japan has been committed to treating patients with PM from GC. Selected patients undergo laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (LHIPEC), preoperative intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy that includes intravenous and oral chemotherapy prior to surgery. CRS plus HIPEC is then performed to achieve complete cytoreduction. Postoperative IP chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy is also administered to nearly all patients. The results demonstrate that comprehensive treatment, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy and CRS plus HIPEC, can significantly improve the prognosis and OS of selected patients with PM from GC.

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the value of routine haematoxylin-eosin(HE) stain for submucosal lymphatic vessel infiltration in early gastric cancer.

METHODSFour thousand four hundred and twenty early gastric cancer patients underwent D2 operation. Submucosal lymphatic vessel was detected by routine HE stain. The results were compared with pathological lymph node metastasis.

RESULTSIn early gastric cancer, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predicting value (PPV), and negative predicting value (NPV) of routine HE stain for submucosal lymphatic vessel infiltration were 54.5%, 82.0%, 78.9%, 27.4%, and 93.5% respectively. In early gastric cancer limited in mucosa, these indexes were 14.5%, 98.0%, 95.8%, 15.8%, and 97.8% respectively. In early gastric cancer infiltrated to submucosa, they were 60.3%, 57.8%, 58.3%, 28.1%, and 84.2% respectively. There were significant differences of submucosal lymphatic vessel infiltration with lymph node metastasis (P< 0.001), but no significant difference with survival rate. The 5-year survival rates of submucosal lymphatic vessel infiltration positive and negative group were 84.4% and 87.3%, median survival time was 6998 d and 7237 d, and mean survival time was 6163.9 d and 6042.6 d respectively (P=0.2495).

CONCLUSIONThe accuracy of routine HE stain is too low, thus it is not suitable for diagnosing submucosal lymphatic vessel infiltration in early gastric cancer.

Adenocarcinoma ; pathology ; Female ; Gastric Mucosa ; pathology ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; pathology ; Lymphatic Vessels ; pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Staining and Labeling ; Stomach Neoplasms ; pathology

No abstract available.
Matrix Metalloproteinases* ; Stomach Neoplasms ; Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1 ; Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-2