Objective To assess the clinical and safety outcomes of endovascular therapy(EVT)administered beyond 24 h after the onset of symptoms in patients with acute ischemic stroke(AIS)resulting from middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic occlusion.Methods We enrolled consecutive AIS patients with middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic occlusion who received EVT in our hospital between January 2020 and June 2023 and divided them into two groups based on the time from AIS onset to EVT:EVT≤24 h group and EVT＞24 h group.The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)scores after surgery,90-day functional independence(defined as mRS 0-2),symptomatic ICH(sICH),postoperative acute thrombosis,as well as mortality,were analyzed in the two groups of patients.Results A total of 161 patients were recruited,with 106 cases in the EVT≤24 h group and 55 cases in the EVT＞24 h group.The NIHSS scores declined after EVT in both groups(P＜0.01).The NIHSS scores after surgery were lower in the EVT≤24 h group(median:4.5 vs.7.0,P＜0.05).90-day functional independence(45.3％vs.30.9％,95％CI:0.93-3.68),sICH(5.7％vs.9.1％,95％CI:0.18-2.06),postoperative acute thrombosis(6.6％vs.3.6％,95％CI:0.37-9.34),and mortality(3.8％vs.1.8％,95％CI:0.23-19.42)did not differ significantly between the groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion Our findings support EVT feasibility in selected patients with middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic occlusion beyond 24 h.Prospective studies are warranted for confirmation.

It is an unshirkable historical mission for Chinese researchers to achieve the strategic goal of building a strong science and technology power by 2035. Since the reform and opening-up, China has made significant progress in innovation and transformation. However, there still remain challenges such as insufficient vitality in the innovation ecosystem, dependence on foreign countries for key technologies, high research investment with low output, and a lack of sustained momentum in innovation transformation. The root of these issues lies a "Wall" on scientific and technological innovation and transformation of China. To break it down, it is essential to strengthen fundamental researches to tap into the "source of innovation", establish our confidence in science and technology, create "Chinese originality", promote interdisciplinary integration to expand the "blue ocean of innovation", identify key leverage points for transformation to achieve a "critical leap", improve institutional mechanisms and foster an "innovation-friendly ecosystem". Only with these measures, shall we break down the "Wall" blocking innovation and transformation in China!

Objective:To compare the efficacy of biplanar fixation combined with bone grafting and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture .Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 28 patients with critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture, admitted to Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 2020 and December 2022, including 3 males and 25 females, aged 70-91 years [(79.4±6.3)years]. T score for bone mineral density was -2.5~-4.1 SD［（-3.3±0.6）SD］. All the patients were found with type A2.2-A3.3 fracture based on AO classification, and were complicated with trochanteric lateral wall fracture. Among them, 16 patients underwent biplanar fixation combined with bone grafting (biplanar fixation group), while 12 underwent PFNA internal fixation (PFNA group). All the patients received anti-osteoporosis therapy after surgery. The two groups were compared in terms of the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin levels at 3 days postoperatively, and time to weight-bearing. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Harris hip scores at 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up and the incidence of complications were also detected in the two groups.Results:All the patients were followed up for 12-16 months [(14.1±1.4)months]. In the biplanar fixation group, the operative time was (75.1±15.3)minutes, significantly longer than (45.6±14.2)minutes in the PFNA group ( P<0.01); the intraoperative blood loss was (234.1±11.8)ml, significantly more than (170.0±13.4)ml in the PFNA group ( P<0.01); the hemoglobin level at 3 days postoperatively was (82.6±9.3)g/L in the biplanar fixation group, higher than (64.8±6.8)g/L in the PFNA group ( P<0.01). The time to weight-bearing was (1.1±0.7)weeks in the biplanar fixation group, significantly shorter than (3.2±1.2)weeks in the PFNA group ( P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in VAS scores and Harris hip scores at 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). The VAS scores and Harris hip scores in the two groups were gradually improved with the prolongation of postoperative time ( P<0.05 or 0.01). No complications such as neurovascular injuries were observed in either group. One patient in the biplanar fixation group developed lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with a complication rate of 6.3%, while 2 patients in the PFNA group developed lower extremity DVT and 4 hypostatic pneumonia, with a complication rate of 50.0% ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with PFNA internal fixation, biplanar fixation with bone grafting has the advantages of less postoperative blood loss, earlier weight-bearing exercises and lower incidence of complications in the treatment of critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture, despite longer operative time and more intraoperative blood loss.

For middle-aged and elderly patients with conditions such as spinal fractures and degenerative spinal diseases, spinal internal fixation is a core surgical procedure for reconstructing spinal stability, heavily relying on the biomechanical stability provided by pedicle screw systems. Whereas, these patients are often complicated by osteoporosis that can significantly compromise the stability of the bone-pedicle screw interface, leading to a marked increase in pedicle screw loosening and surgical failure rates. The bone cement-augmented pedicle screw technique, which involves injecting bone cement into the vertebral body or screw trajectory to optimize the mechanical properties of the bone-pedicle screw composite, has been proven to significantly enhance fixation strength and effectively prevent screw-related failures, thereby reducing the incidence of internal fixation failure in high-risk populations undergoing spinal fusion. However, the widespread clinical application of this technique has faced challenges such as inaccurate clinical decision-making (indication and contraindication selection), non-standardized operative practices, and insufficient awareness of complication prevention, resulting in considerable variability in clinical outcomes and even severe complications. To address this, Prof. Luo Fei from First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University initiated the project and the Chinese Association Orthopaedic Surgeons organized relevant experts to develop the Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for bone cement-augmented pedicle screw technique ( version 2025), based on current evidence. The guidelines put forward 8 recommendations regarding the clinical value, scope of application, and operational standards of the technique, aiming to provide evidence-based medical support and technical standardization for clinical decision-making.

Objective:To compare postoperative inflammatory markers and surgical outcomes between open reduction and internal fixation versus double reverse traction closed reduction and percutaneous internal fixation for tibial plateau fractures.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted of the data of 229 patients with tibial plateau fracture who had been admitted to Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2023 to December 2023. There were 155 males and 74 females with an age of (48.7±10.9) years. According to the surgical methods, the patients were divided into 2 groups. A conventional group of 87 cases were treated by open reduction and internal fixation while a minimally invasive group of 142 cases treated with double reverse traction closed reduction and percutaneous internal fixation. The 2 groups were compared in terms of hematological indexes [white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count (NEUT), lymphocyte count (LYM), monocyte count (Mono), platelet count (PLT), and albumin (ALB)] and composite inflammatory indexes [neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI)] before operation and on the first day after operation, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, fracture healing time, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score and incidence of thrombosis.Results:There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or treatment variables between the 2 groups, indicating comparability ( P > 0.05). All the 229 patients were followed up for (16.5±2.8) months. In each group, comparisons between preoperation and postoperation showed that LYM and ALB significantly decreased while WBC, NEUT, Mono, PLT, NLR, PLR, SII and SIRI significantly increased on the first day after operation ( P < 0.05). Preoperatively, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of hematological or composite inflammatory indexes ( P > 0.05). On the first day after operation, there was no significant difference in WBC, NEUT, LYM, ALB or NLR between the 2 groups ( P > 0.05), but Mono, PLT, PLR, SII and SIRI in the minimally invasive group were significantly lower than those in the conventional group ( P < 0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, fracture healing time, HSS knee score and incidence of thrombosis in the minimally invasive group were significantly better than those in the conventional group ( P < 0.05). Conclusion:In the treatment of tibial plateau fractures, compared with conventional open reduction and internal fixation, double reverse traction closed reduction and percutaneous internal fixation shows obvious advantages in reducing inflammatory indicators and leads to better surgical outcomes.

It is an unshirkable historical mission for Chinese researchers to achieve the strategic goal of building a strong science and technology power by 2035. Since the reform and opening-up, China has made significant progress in innovation and transformation. However, there still remain challenges such as insufficient vitality in the innovation ecosystem, dependence on foreign countries for key technologies, high research investment with low output, and a lack of sustained momentum in innovation transformation. The root of these issues lies a "Wall" on scientific and technological innovation and transformation of China. To break it down, it is essential to strengthen fundamental researches to tap into the "source of innovation", establish our confidence in science and technology, create "Chinese originality", promote interdisciplinary integration to expand the "blue ocean of innovation", identify key leverage points for transformation to achieve a "critical leap", improve institutional mechanisms and foster an "innovation-friendly ecosystem". Only with these measures, shall we break down the "Wall" blocking innovation and transformation in China!

Objective:To compare the efficacy of biplanar fixation combined with bone grafting and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture .Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 28 patients with critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture, admitted to Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 2020 and December 2022, including 3 males and 25 females, aged 70-91 years [(79.4±6.3)years]. T score for bone mineral density was -2.5~-4.1 SD［（-3.3±0.6）SD］. All the patients were found with type A2.2-A3.3 fracture based on AO classification, and were complicated with trochanteric lateral wall fracture. Among them, 16 patients underwent biplanar fixation combined with bone grafting (biplanar fixation group), while 12 underwent PFNA internal fixation (PFNA group). All the patients received anti-osteoporosis therapy after surgery. The two groups were compared in terms of the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin levels at 3 days postoperatively, and time to weight-bearing. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Harris hip scores at 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up and the incidence of complications were also detected in the two groups.Results:All the patients were followed up for 12-16 months [(14.1±1.4)months]. In the biplanar fixation group, the operative time was (75.1±15.3)minutes, significantly longer than (45.6±14.2)minutes in the PFNA group ( P<0.01); the intraoperative blood loss was (234.1±11.8)ml, significantly more than (170.0±13.4)ml in the PFNA group ( P<0.01); the hemoglobin level at 3 days postoperatively was (82.6±9.3)g/L in the biplanar fixation group, higher than (64.8±6.8)g/L in the PFNA group ( P<0.01). The time to weight-bearing was (1.1±0.7)weeks in the biplanar fixation group, significantly shorter than (3.2±1.2)weeks in the PFNA group ( P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in VAS scores and Harris hip scores at 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). The VAS scores and Harris hip scores in the two groups were gradually improved with the prolongation of postoperative time ( P<0.05 or 0.01). No complications such as neurovascular injuries were observed in either group. One patient in the biplanar fixation group developed lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with a complication rate of 6.3%, while 2 patients in the PFNA group developed lower extremity DVT and 4 hypostatic pneumonia, with a complication rate of 50.0% ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with PFNA internal fixation, biplanar fixation with bone grafting has the advantages of less postoperative blood loss, earlier weight-bearing exercises and lower incidence of complications in the treatment of critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture, despite longer operative time and more intraoperative blood loss.

For middle-aged and elderly patients with conditions such as spinal fractures and degenerative spinal diseases, spinal internal fixation is a core surgical procedure for reconstructing spinal stability, heavily relying on the biomechanical stability provided by pedicle screw systems. Whereas, these patients are often complicated by osteoporosis that can significantly compromise the stability of the bone-pedicle screw interface, leading to a marked increase in pedicle screw loosening and surgical failure rates. The bone cement-augmented pedicle screw technique, which involves injecting bone cement into the vertebral body or screw trajectory to optimize the mechanical properties of the bone-pedicle screw composite, has been proven to significantly enhance fixation strength and effectively prevent screw-related failures, thereby reducing the incidence of internal fixation failure in high-risk populations undergoing spinal fusion. However, the widespread clinical application of this technique has faced challenges such as inaccurate clinical decision-making (indication and contraindication selection), non-standardized operative practices, and insufficient awareness of complication prevention, resulting in considerable variability in clinical outcomes and even severe complications. To address this, Prof. Luo Fei from First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University initiated the project and the Chinese Association Orthopaedic Surgeons organized relevant experts to develop the Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for bone cement-augmented pedicle screw technique ( version 2025), based on current evidence. The guidelines put forward 8 recommendations regarding the clinical value, scope of application, and operational standards of the technique, aiming to provide evidence-based medical support and technical standardization for clinical decision-making.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) are both chronic progressive respiratory diseases that cannot be completely cured. COPD is characterized by irreversible airflow limitation, chronic airway inflammation, and gradual decline in lung function, whereas PH is characterized by pulmonary vasoconstriction, remodeling, and infiltration of inflammatory cells. These diseases have similar pathological features, such as vascular hyperplasia, arteriolar contraction, and inflammatory infiltration. Despite these well-documented observations, the exact mechanisms underlying the occurrence and development of COPD and PH remain unclear. Evidence that mitochondrial dynamics imbalance is one major factor in the development of COPD and PH. Mitochondrial dynamics is precisely regulated by mitochondrial fusion proteins and fission proteins. When mitochondrial dynamics equilibrium is disrupted, it causes mitochondrial and even cell morphological dysfunction. Mitochondrial dynamics participates in various pathological processes for heart and lung disease. Mitochondrial dynamics may be different in the early and late stages of COPD and PH. In the early stages of the disease, mitochondrial fusion increases, inhibiting fission, and thereby compensatorily increasing adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production. With the development of the disease, mitochondria decompensation causes excessive fission. Mitochondrial dynamics is involved in the development of COPD and PH in a spatiotemporal manner. Based on this understanding, treatment strategies for mitochondrial dynamics abnormalities may be different at different stages of COPD and PH disease. This article will provide new ideas for the potential treatment of related diseases.
Humans ; Mitochondrial Dynamics/physiology* ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/metabolism* ; Hypertension, Pulmonary/metabolism* ; Mitochondria/metabolism* ; Animals

OBJECTIVE: To review and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of minimally invasive treatment techniques for tibial plateau fractures (TPFs), as well as the research progress and limitations. METHODS: The relevant domestic and international research literature on the minimally invasive treatment of TPFs in recent years was reviewed. The advantages, disadvantages, and clinical efficacy of various technologies were summarized and analyzed, and an outlook on future development trends was provided. RESULTS: Surgery remains the primary method for treating displaced TPFs. Although traditional open reduction and internal fixation has advantages such as direct reduction and simplicity of procedure, it has gradually fallen out of favor with clinical orthopedic doctors due to extensive soft tissue removal, excessive bleeding, tissue adhesion, and postoperative complications such as skin infection, fracture nonunion, and joint dysfunction. As medical technology continues to develop, minimally invasive surgery and precise diagnosis and treatment are gradually being introduced to orthopedic trauma. Guided by concepts such as "minimally invasive treatment", "homeopathic repositioning of fractures", and "internal compression fixation", many traction reduction devices, internal fixation devices, minimally invasive reduction techniques, and computer-aided navigation technologies have been widely used in the clinical treatment of TPFs. This has greatly helped to overcome the challenges of intraoperative reduction, secondary reduction loss, and postoperative functional impairment and effectively promoting the adoption of minimally invasive treatment techniques in the clinical treatment of TPFs. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive treatment techniques have made significant progress in the clinical treatment of TPFs, particularly with regard to the reduction, and have demonstrated unique advantages. While relevant research results have received international recognition, there is still a need for orthopedic scholars to conduct real-world research to further explore the underlying principles and mechanisms of action.
Humans ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/instrumentation* ; Tibial Fractures/surgery* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation* ; Tibial Plateau Fractures