Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of esomeprazole combined with Biling Weitong granules in the treatment of epigastric pain syndrome(EPS).Methods A total of 114 patients with EPS treated in the First Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology from January to June 2024 were selected and divided into control group and observation group according to random number table method,with 57 cases in each group.The control group was given oral esomeprazole magnesium enteric-coated tablets,and the observation group was given Biling Weitong granules on the basis of control group,the courses of treatment lasted for 8 weeks.The peripheral blood gastrin-17(G-17)level,the comprehensive score of middle and upper abdominal pain and/or burning sensation and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between two groups.Results After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment,the comprehensive scores of two groups were significantly lower than before treatment(P＜0.05),and the comprehensive scores of observation group were significantly lower than those of control group(P＜0.05).After 8 weeks of treatment,the effective rate of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group(x2=7.600,P=0.006).After 8 weeks of treatment,the G-17 levels in both groups were significantly lower than before treatment(P＜0.05),and the G-17 level in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between two groups(x2=0.326,P=0.568).Conclusion Esomeprazole combined with Biling Weitong granules is more significant in improving the clinical symptoms of EPS patients,with higher treatment efficiency and good safety,which is worthy of clinical recommendation.

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of esomeprazole combined with Biling Weitong granules in the treatment of epigastric pain syndrome(EPS).Methods A total of 114 patients with EPS treated in the First Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology from January to June 2024 were selected and divided into control group and observation group according to random number table method,with 57 cases in each group.The control group was given oral esomeprazole magnesium enteric-coated tablets,and the observation group was given Biling Weitong granules on the basis of control group,the courses of treatment lasted for 8 weeks.The peripheral blood gastrin-17(G-17)level,the comprehensive score of middle and upper abdominal pain and/or burning sensation and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between two groups.Results After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment,the comprehensive scores of two groups were significantly lower than before treatment(P＜0.05),and the comprehensive scores of observation group were significantly lower than those of control group(P＜0.05).After 8 weeks of treatment,the effective rate of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group(x2=7.600,P=0.006).After 8 weeks of treatment,the G-17 levels in both groups were significantly lower than before treatment(P＜0.05),and the G-17 level in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between two groups(x2=0.326,P=0.568).Conclusion Esomeprazole combined with Biling Weitong granules is more significant in improving the clinical symptoms of EPS patients,with higher treatment efficiency and good safety,which is worthy of clinical recommendation.

Objective:To explore the effect of multidisciplinary team (MDT) model on prognosis of patients with traumatic amputation.Methods:A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 54 patients with traumatic amputation admitted to Chongming Branch of Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from July 2014 to June 2019. There were 41 males and 13 females, aged 39-72 years with an average age of 52.7 years. A total of 29 patients treated using MDT model intervention were served as observation group, and 25 patients treated using routine responsibility system holistic nursing as control group. The self rating anxiety scale (SAS) score, self rating depression scale (SDS) score and improved Barthel index were compared between the two groups on the day of admission and at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after operation.Results:There was no significant difference in SAS, SDS and improved Barthel index between the two groups on the day of admission ( P>0.05). At 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after operation, the SAS score in observation group was respectively (52.5±7.6)points, (48.3±7.1)points and (41.3±6.1)points, lower than those in control group [(58.0±12.0)points, (54.4±10.7)points and (50.4±9.3)points]; the SDS scores in observation group was respectively (52.6±8.8)points, (47.9±7.6)points, (43.8±5.7)points, lower than those in control group [(58.4±12.4)points, (53.2±10.9)points, (49.5±8.7)points]; the Barthel index score in observation group was respectively (57.2±8.9)points, (80.7±7.7)points, (94.7±3.9)points, higher than those in control group [(50.4±11.4)points, (70.9±9.5)points, (85.6±6.8)points] (all P<0.05). Conclusion:For patients with traumatic amputation, MDT model is conducive to reducing anxiety and depression of patients, can improve the quality of life, and is worthy of clinical application.

Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with improved snare for colorectal polyps and submucosal tumors.Methods The clinical data such as clinical pathological characteristics, en bloc resection rate, curative resection rate, complications and follow-up results of 20 patients with colorectal polyps or submucosal tumors, who were treated by ESD, were retrospectively analyzed.Results 20 patients (total 24 lesions) with colorectal polyps or submucosal tumors were performed ESD operation successfully, in which 16 cases (total 20 lesions) were treated by ESD with improved snare (the trial group), 4 cases were treated by ESD with HOOK knife (the control group).The surgical success rate was 100.0% (24/24), the en blot resection rate was 100.0% (24/24). The mean polyps diameter in the trial group was (2.4 ± 0.9) cm (1.2~4.0 cm), while that in the control group was (2.2 ± 0.6) cm (1.5~3.0 cm). The mean procedure time in the trial group was (83.3 ± 23.9) min (45.0~120.0 min), while the control group was (66.2 ± 15.4) min (45.0~80.0 min), compared with the control group, the trial group need more times to complete the operation. The postoperative pathology as follows: 15 cases were adenoma (including 3 cases of adenoma with partial gland high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia), 1 case was hyperplastic polyp, 1 case was high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 2 cases were neuroendocrine tumor (total 4 lesions) 1 case was stromal tumor. Except for 1 case of stromal tumor from the muscularis propria was taken full thickness resection, no patient appeared complications such as hemorrhage, perforation, infection. No patient need intraoperative and postoperative surgical treatment.Conclusion Improved snare can be used to endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal polyps and submucosal tumors safely and effectively, expanded the use and indications of snare in endoscopic resection, but need more times to completed the operation.