1.Development of clinical practice guidelines for the management of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy
Liang FU ; Yan HU ; Hongzhou LU ; Meijuan BAO ; Lin ZHANG ; Yinzhong SHEN ; Lijun ZHA ; Cheng′en PAN ; Huiwen LI ; Zheng ZHU ; Ning DONG ; Yanjuan GAN
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing 2016;32(19):1497-1501
Objective To develop the clinical practice guidelines for the management of medication adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in China. Methods The development methods included qualitative interview of 31 stakeholders, questionnaire survey of 423 PLHIV, adaptation of 30 clinical practice guidelines related to AIDS care, and overviews of reviews of 44 systematic reviews/Meta-analysis. Results 10 clinical practice guidelines and 10 systematic reviews/Meta-analysis were included. The clinical practice guidelines for the management of HAART were formed. Conclusions The formed clinical practice guidelines showed better applicability and higher general quality. It is recommended to use the guidelines in AIDS care.
2.Analysis of SCI-indexed biomedical journals:a comparison between China,Japan,India and South Korea
Danghui YU ; Huiliang GAN ; Yan SUN ; Cha YIN ; Xueli WEI ; Yanjuan ZHOU ; Zejun JIA
Journal of Navy Medicine 2015;(4):366-367
Objective To analyze the number and quality of biomedical journals of different countries,so as to evaluate the situation of their biomedical research.Methods We searched and analyzed the Journal citation report published by Thomson Reuters. The information of biomedical journals of four countries:China,Japan,India,and South Korea,was collected,and was subjected to statistical analysis.Results It was found that China had the least number of biomedical journals,and it accounted for the lowest ratio of its total journals.However,the quality of Chinese biomedical journals was in the lead among the four countries.The impact factor of Chinese journals was obviously higher than those of the other three groups.Compared with Japan,the numbers of Chinese biomedical journals was less for different academic areas.Conclusion China has comparatively small number of SCI-indexed biomedical journals, and the situation should be improved from both number and quality aspects,so that our biomedical journal become a part of the interna-tional biomedical publishing community.
3.Comparison of four staging systems in predicting outcomes and guiding option of treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Yanjuan ZHU ; Xiaohong CHEN ; Boheng ZHANG ; Shuangjian QIU ; Jia FAN ; Zhenggang REN ; Jinlin XIA ; Yanhong WANG ; Yuhong GAN ; Shenglong YE
Chinese Journal of Digestion 2010;30(6):374-377
Objective To compare the Barcelona clinic liver cancer staging classification (BCLC), the Japan integrated staging score (JIS), the cancer of the liver Italian program score (CLIP) and Chinese staging system in terms of their ability to predict outcomes and to guide option of therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in China.Methods Clinical data of 861 HCC patients from Zhongshan Hospital between 2001 and 2002 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified acccording to different staging systems. Survival for patients in different stages and the effects of therapeutic methods on survival time were compared. Results BCLC, JIS and Chinese staging system showed the ability in predicting survival for patients in different staging. CLIP failed to show significant difference in survival rates for each subgroup. There was no significant difference in survival rate between surgery and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)/transarterial embolization (TAE) for patients classified as BCLC stage C, CLIP scores more than 3 or Chinese stage Ⅲ a.The survival rate, however, was higher in patients received operation than those received TACE/TAE if they were classified as earlier stages. Conclusions The BCLC, JIS and Chinese staging systems show prospective ability for Chinese HCC patients in prediction outcomes, whereas the BCLC and the Chinese staging systems are better at both predicting outcomes and guiding the option of treatment.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail