Objective:To explore the influencing factors for pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients with a Gleason score of 3 + 3 undergoing targeted biopsy，and to establish a nomogram prediction model.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 191 patients with localized prostate cancer diagnosed with a Gleason score of 3 + 3 through targeted biopsies at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2020 to June 2024. The age of the patients was 67（61，73）years，with prostate-specific antigen（PSA）level of 7.44（5.53，10.19）ng/ml，prostate volume of 35.64（26.59，48.97）ml，and PSA density（PSAD）of 0.20（0.14，0.31）ng/ml 2. Among them，61 cases（31.94%）had a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System（PI-RADS）score of 3，104 cases（54.45%）had a score of 4，and 26 cases（13.61%）had a score of 5. The diameter of the main lesion was 10.75（7.86，14.00）mm. The lesions were located in the peripheral zone in 78 cases（40.84%），the transition zone in 99 cases（51.83%），and the anterior fibromuscular stroma in 14 cases（7.33%）. The lesions were found at the apex in 56 cases（29.32%），in the body in 120 cases（62.83%），and at the base in 15 cases（7.85%）. MRI revealed only one lesion with a PI-RADS score ≥ 3 in 131 cases，two suspected lesions in 43 cases，three suspected lesions in 12 cases，and four suspected lesions in 5 cases. Systematic biopsy was positive in 121 cases（63.4%）and negative in 70 cases（36.6%）. The lesions were confined to the left lobe in 63 cases（32.98%），right lobe in 68 cases（35.60%），and involved both lobes in 60 cases（31.41%）. The interval between biopsy and surgery was 9.0（7.0，14.0）days. Univariate analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney U tests or χ2 tests，and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of pathological upgrading. A nomogram model was constructed based on these independent predictors. The model’s discriminative ability was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic（ROC）curve（AUC），and internal validation of the model’s consistency was conducted using the bootstrap resampling method. Decision curve analysis（DCA）was performed to assess clinical utility. Results:Among the 191 cases，60（31.4%）had no pathological upgrading after surgery，while 131（68.6%）showed upgrading. Univariate analysis showed that the maximum diameter of the main lesion［9.0（6.0，13.2）mm vs. 11.0（8.4，14.0）mm］，number of suspicious lesions on MRI［1.0（1.0，1.0）vs. 1.0（1.0，2.0）］，number of positive systematic biopsy cores［1.0（0，2.0）vs. 1.0（0，3.0）］，percentage of positive systematic biopsy cores［0.08（0，0.17）vs. 0.12（0，0.25）］，number of positive targeted biopsy cores［2.0（1.0，3.0）vs. 3.0（1.0，4.0）］，percentage of positive targeted biopsy cores［0.37（0.24，0.75）vs. 0.50（0.38，0.85）］，level of the index lesion，location of the index lesion，and PI-RADS score were associated with pathological upgrading（ P < 0.05）. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PI-RADS score 4（ OR = 5.88，95% CI 2.41 - 14.35），number of suspicious lesions on MRI（ OR = 4.15，95% CI 1.88 - 9.17），location of the index lesion in the transition zone（ OR = 6.86，95% CI 2.81 - 16.73），and percentage of positive targeted biopsy cores（ OR = 4.37，95% CI 1.38 - 14.90）were independent risk factors for pathological upgrading（ P < 0.05）. The nomogram model constructed using these predictors had an AUC of 0.845. Internal validation using the Bootstrap method yielded an AUC value of 0.812，indicating high predictive accuracy of the model. The calibration curve indicated good calibration. Decision curve analysis showed that the threshold range for net benefit in the model was between 12% - 100%. Conclusions:The PI-RADS score 4，the number of lesions with PI-RADS ≥ 3，the location of the main lesion in the transition zone，and the percentage of positive needles in targeted biopsy are independent risk factors for pathological upgrading from Gleason score 3 + 3. The nomogram model constructed from these factors demonstrates good predictive performance and provides a reference for clinical decision-making.

Objective:To explore the influencing factors for pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients with a Gleason score of 3 + 3 undergoing targeted biopsy，and to establish a nomogram prediction model.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 191 patients with localized prostate cancer diagnosed with a Gleason score of 3 + 3 through targeted biopsies at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2020 to June 2024. The age of the patients was 67（61，73）years，with prostate-specific antigen（PSA）level of 7.44（5.53，10.19）ng/ml，prostate volume of 35.64（26.59，48.97）ml，and PSA density（PSAD）of 0.20（0.14，0.31）ng/ml 2. Among them，61 cases（31.94%）had a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System（PI-RADS）score of 3，104 cases（54.45%）had a score of 4，and 26 cases（13.61%）had a score of 5. The diameter of the main lesion was 10.75（7.86，14.00）mm. The lesions were located in the peripheral zone in 78 cases（40.84%），the transition zone in 99 cases（51.83%），and the anterior fibromuscular stroma in 14 cases（7.33%）. The lesions were found at the apex in 56 cases（29.32%），in the body in 120 cases（62.83%），and at the base in 15 cases（7.85%）. MRI revealed only one lesion with a PI-RADS score ≥ 3 in 131 cases，two suspected lesions in 43 cases，three suspected lesions in 12 cases，and four suspected lesions in 5 cases. Systematic biopsy was positive in 121 cases（63.4%）and negative in 70 cases（36.6%）. The lesions were confined to the left lobe in 63 cases（32.98%），right lobe in 68 cases（35.60%），and involved both lobes in 60 cases（31.41%）. The interval between biopsy and surgery was 9.0（7.0，14.0）days. Univariate analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney U tests or χ2 tests，and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of pathological upgrading. A nomogram model was constructed based on these independent predictors. The model’s discriminative ability was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic（ROC）curve（AUC），and internal validation of the model’s consistency was conducted using the bootstrap resampling method. Decision curve analysis（DCA）was performed to assess clinical utility. Results:Among the 191 cases，60（31.4%）had no pathological upgrading after surgery，while 131（68.6%）showed upgrading. Univariate analysis showed that the maximum diameter of the main lesion［9.0（6.0，13.2）mm vs. 11.0（8.4，14.0）mm］，number of suspicious lesions on MRI［1.0（1.0，1.0）vs. 1.0（1.0，2.0）］，number of positive systematic biopsy cores［1.0（0，2.0）vs. 1.0（0，3.0）］，percentage of positive systematic biopsy cores［0.08（0，0.17）vs. 0.12（0，0.25）］，number of positive targeted biopsy cores［2.0（1.0，3.0）vs. 3.0（1.0，4.0）］，percentage of positive targeted biopsy cores［0.37（0.24，0.75）vs. 0.50（0.38，0.85）］，level of the index lesion，location of the index lesion，and PI-RADS score were associated with pathological upgrading（ P < 0.05）. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PI-RADS score 4（ OR = 5.88，95% CI 2.41 - 14.35），number of suspicious lesions on MRI（ OR = 4.15，95% CI 1.88 - 9.17），location of the index lesion in the transition zone（ OR = 6.86，95% CI 2.81 - 16.73），and percentage of positive targeted biopsy cores（ OR = 4.37，95% CI 1.38 - 14.90）were independent risk factors for pathological upgrading（ P < 0.05）. The nomogram model constructed using these predictors had an AUC of 0.845. Internal validation using the Bootstrap method yielded an AUC value of 0.812，indicating high predictive accuracy of the model. The calibration curve indicated good calibration. Decision curve analysis showed that the threshold range for net benefit in the model was between 12% - 100%. Conclusions:The PI-RADS score 4，the number of lesions with PI-RADS ≥ 3，the location of the main lesion in the transition zone，and the percentage of positive needles in targeted biopsy are independent risk factors for pathological upgrading from Gleason score 3 + 3. The nomogram model constructed from these factors demonstrates good predictive performance and provides a reference for clinical decision-making.

Objective:To explore the strategy of prostate biopsy in patients with prostate specific antigen(PSA)gray zone based on prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS).Methods:The clinical data of 427 patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The median age was 66 (61, 72) years old. The median PSA was 6.62 (5.46, 8.19) ng/ml. The median PSA density (PSAD) was 0.15 (0.11, 0.21) ng/ml 2. The median prostate volume (PV) was 43.68 (31.12, 56.82) ml. PSA velocity (PSAV) data were available in 65 patients with negative MRI examination(PI-RADS <3), and the median PSAV was 1.40 (0.69, 2.89) ng/(ml· year). Among the patients with positive MRI(PI-RADS≥3), there were 174 patients with only 1 lesion and 83 patients with ≥2 lesions. A total of 170 patients with negative MRI underwent systematic biopsy, and 257 patients with positive MRI underwent systematic combined targeted biopsy. The PI-RADS score, regions of interest(ROI), PSAD, f/tPSA and PSAV were analyzed to explore the biopsy strategy for patients with PSA gray area based on bpMRI imaging. Results:Of the 427 patients included in the study, 194 were positive and 233 were negative. Among the patients with positive biopsy pathology, 140 cases were clinically significant prostate cancer (CsPCa). Among the MRI-negative patients, there were 33 cases with PSAV ≥1.4 ng/(ml·year), and 10 cases of prostate cancer and 6 cases of CsPCa were detected by systematic biopsy.In 32 cases with PSAV <1.4 ng/(ml·year), 3 cases of prostate cancer and 0 case of CsPCa were detected by systematic biopsy. The sensitivity of systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer and CsPCa in patients with PSAV≥1.4 ng/(ml·year) were 76.9% (10/13) and 100.0% (6/6) respectively, the specificity were 55.8% (29/52) and 54.2% (32/59) respectively, the negative predictive value were 90.6% (29/32) and 100.0% (32/32) respectively, and the positive predictive value were 30.3% (10/33) and 18.2% (6/33) respectively. In MRI-positive patients with PI-RADS 3, the prostate cancer detection rates of targeted biopsy combined with systematic biopsy, systematic biopsy and targeted biopsy were 41.7% (45/108), 32.4% (35/108) and 35.2% (38/108), respectively ( P=0.349). The detection rates of CsPCa were 27.8% (30/108), 21.3% (23/108) and 25.0% (27/108), respectively ( P=0.541). In patients with PI-RADS 4-5 and PSAD > 0.15 ng/ml 2, the detection rates of CsPCa in targeted biopsy combined with systematic biopsy, systematic biopsy and targeted biopsy were 67.8% (61/90), 58.9% (53/90) and 67.8% (61/90), respectively ( P=0.354). Conclusions:For MRI-negative patients, all CsPCa could be detected by perineal systematic biopsy when PSAV ≥1.4 ng/(ml·year), and active observation could be performed when PSAV <1.4 ng/(ml·year). For MRI-positive patients, targeted combined systemic biopsy was required when PI-RADS score was 3, and targeted biopsy only could be performed when PI-RADS score ≥4 and PSAD >0.15 ng/ml 2, otherwise targeted combined systemic biopsy was required.

Objective:To investigate the value of bi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) in diagnosis and treatment of hematospermia.Methods:The clinical data and bpMRI of 182 patients with hematospermia (hematospermia group) and 51 patients without urinary system diseases (control group) were retrospectively analyzed. Both the control group and the hematospermia group underwent semen quality analysis, blood routine, urine routine, coagulation function, serum PSA test, and bpMRI examination before treatment. There were no significant differences in age [40(33, 50)years vs. 39(31, 53) years, Z=-0.77, P=0.43], body mass index [23.9(22.0, 25.7)kg/m2 vs. 24.5(22.3, 26.1) kg/m 2, Z=-0.50, P=0.62], smoking rate [24.7%(45/182) vs. 27.5%(14/51), χ2=0.16, P=0.69], alcohol consumption rate [29.1%(53/182) vs. 29.4%(15/51), χ2=0.002, P=0.97], and comorbid hypertension [20.9%(38/182) vs. 17.6%(9/51), χ2=0.26, P=0.61] between the hematospermia group and the control group. There was a statistically significant difference in PSA levels between the hematospermia group and the control group [2.82(2.08, 3.68)ng/ml vs 1.59(0.88, 2.28) ng/ml, Z=6.08, P=0.03].The median duration of illness in the hematospermia group was 10(5, 15) months, the median number of red blood cells reported in semen analysis was 17(10, 23)/HP, 59(32.4%) cases had infections in urine routine results, 15(8.2%) cases had infections in blood routine results, and 19(10.4%) cases had coagulation abnormalities. Hematospermia patients can be divided into five categories based on their causes: 105 cases of infection and inflammation, 42 cases of obstruction, 19 cases of tumors, 8 cases of systemic diseases, and 8 cases of iatrogenic factors and trauma. The treatment option was based on etiology: ①Infections, Inflammation, Systemic Diseases, Iatrogenic Factors, and Trauma: Remove the underlying cause and observe or watchful waiting. ②Recurrence of Systemic Diseases, Infections, and Inflammation: Treat the underlying cause with appropriate medication, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), α-receptor blockers, etc. If there is an infection, administer oral antibiotics for 1-2 weeks. ③Obstruction and Tumors: Perform seminal vesiculoscopy surgery or radical prostatectomy. The efficacy evaluation was porfeomed after 12 months of treatment. Cure: Hematospermia symptoms disappear, with no recurrence. Effective: Symptoms significantly improve, no visible hematospermia, semen analysis shows marked improvement in red blood cells, and neither clinical symptoms nor semen analysis worsen. Not Cured: Visible hematospermia persists, and semen analysis shows no change in red blood cells compared to before treatment. Recurrence: Clinical symptoms improve but significant visible hematospermia reappears, and semen analysis shows red blood cell count >5/HP. Results:The proportion of patients with PI-RADS scores ≥ 3 in the hematospermia group was higher than that in the control group [29.1%(53/182)vs. 13.7%(7/51), χ2=4.94, P=0.03], and the difference was statistically significant. Comparing the imaging characteristics and related parameters of two groups of bpMRI, the results showed that the length and width of the left and right seminal vesicles in the hematospermia group were greater than those in the control group. The length of the left seminal vesicle was [29.9(25.9, 33.4)mm vs. 23.0(21.2, 25.4)mm, Z=7.30, P<0.01], the width of the left seminal vesicle was[20.4(17.8, 23.5)mm vs. 17.2(15.1, 18.5)mm, Z=5.85, P<0.01], the length of the right seminal vesicle was [28.9(24.8, 32.4)mm vs. 23.4(21.5, 28.1)mm, Z=4.68, P<0.01], and the width of the right seminal vesicle was[19.8(17.7, 23.1)mm vs. 17.2(15.1, 18.6)mm, Z=5.45, P<0.01]. The differences were statistically significant. After 12 months of follow-up, 152(83.5%) cases were cured, 21(11.5%) cases were defined as effective, 4(2.2%) cases were not cured, and 5(2.7%) cases had recurrence. Conclusions:The bpMRI examination can clearly identify the location of the hematospermia lesion and the timing of the bleeding. Based on the results of bpMRI, determining the cause and selecting the appropriate treatment strategy is reliable, convenient, and effective.

Objective:To explore the clinical characteristics and outcomes of type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and compare with type 1 AIP.Methods:Clinical data of the patients diagnosed with type 2 AIP by the International Consensus on diagnostic criteria of AIP at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2001 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, and type 1 AIP patients diagnosed in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1985 to December 2016 were collected as controls. The clinical symptoms, treatments and follow-ups were analyzed.Results:A total of 25 patients with type 2 AIP were included, of which 16 cases (64.0%) were pathologically confirmed cases (13 cases by endoscopic ultrasound puncture, 2 cases by surgery, and 1 case by interventional puncture), and 9 cases (36.0%) were suspected. The average age of onset was 40 years old. Most patients ( n=23, 92.0%) had abdominal pain along with emaciation to a various degree. Among them, 3 cases primarily presented as acute pancreatitis. Two cases were diagnosed after surgery for pancreatic masses. Eighteen cases were complicated with inflammatory bowel disease, including 16 cases with ulcerative colitis, one case with Crohn's disease, and one case with indeterminate colitis. All patients had typical imaging manifestations, including 13 cases (52.0%) with diffuse pancreatic enlargement, 12 cases (48.0%) with focal or multifocal pancreatic lesions, and 5 cases (20.0%) with simultaneous focal pancreatic masses and diffuse enlargement. All patients had normal serum IgG4 levels, anti-neutropil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) positivity rate was 35.3% (6/17), and anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) positivity rate was 29.2% (7/24). Two surgical patients recovered well after surgery, and the other patients all achieved clinical and imaging relief after hormone therapy, and no recurrence was seen during follow-up. Compared with type 1 AIP, type 2 AIP had younger onset age, main manifestation as abdominal pain without jaundice, rare involvement with extra-pancreatic organs, the lesions mainly located in the intestine and normal IgG4 level with statistically significant differences. The recurrence rate of type 2 AIP was lower than that of type 1 AIP (0 vs 16%). Conclusions:Type 2 AIP has different clinical characteristics from type 1 AIP. Due to the lack of specific serum markers, the diagnosis is more difficult. It responds well to glucocorticoids and has a low recurrence rate.

Osteoporosis and knee osteoarthritis often co-occur and are closely related in terms of epidemiology， clinical symptoms， pathogenesis and other aspects. Therefore， it is necessary to manage the co-morbidity and treat the two as a whole. Based on the overall relationship between wei （痿） and bi （痹） in TCM， it is believed that osteoporosis and knee osteoarthritis have marrow loss and bone atrophy as the core pathogenesis of co-morbidity， and microfractures as the central pathological link. The overall treatment is rooted in boosting kidney， supplementing marrow and strengthening the bones. According to the pathological manifestations of microfractures in the process of co-morbidity， and the different deficiency and excess characteristics of wei and bi， it can be divided into three types， "wei emerging with mild bi"， "wei and bi progressing simultaneously"， and "emphasis on both wei and bi"， for treatment. In terms of "wei emerging with mild bi"， that is the early stage of osteoporosis， the traditional Daoyin （导引） is the main therapy. For "wei and bi progressing simultaneously"， it can be divided into three stages further， including the onset stage， remission stage， and recovery stage of knee pain， treated with Taohong Siwu Decoction （桃红四物汤）， Bushen Huoxue Formula （补肾活血方） and self-made Bushen Qianggu Formula （补肾强骨方） as the main formula respectively. For "emphasis on both wei and bi"， the proven formula， Qianggu Zhitong Formula （强骨止痛方）， is taken as the main prescription.

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 5 516 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer(PCa) at our hospital. Among these, 52 patients aged ≤ 50 years were defined as the early-onset group.For the control group, 228 patients aged >50 years were randomly selected at a ratio of 1∶4.4. The early-onset group predominantly presented with elevated PSA levels at diagnosis and had a lower positive rate of digital rectal examination. There were no significant differences in clinical and pathological characteristics between the early-onset group and the control group. Young PCa patients in the low to intermediate risk categories had similar survival prognosis to older patients. However, young patients with high-risk prostate cancer had 5-year progression-free survival rate of 38.4% compared to 55.6% for older patients, and 5-year cancer-specific survival rate of 70.1% compared to 84.1% for older patients, indicating that high-risk young patients exhibited poorer oncological outcomes.

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 5 516 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer(PCa) at our hospital. Among these, 52 patients aged ≤ 50 years were defined as the early-onset group.For the control group, 228 patients aged >50 years were randomly selected at a ratio of 1∶4.4. The early-onset group predominantly presented with elevated PSA levels at diagnosis and had a lower positive rate of digital rectal examination. There were no significant differences in clinical and pathological characteristics between the early-onset group and the control group. Young PCa patients in the low to intermediate risk categories had similar survival prognosis to older patients. However, young patients with high-risk prostate cancer had 5-year progression-free survival rate of 38.4% compared to 55.6% for older patients, and 5-year cancer-specific survival rate of 70.1% compared to 84.1% for older patients, indicating that high-risk young patients exhibited poorer oncological outcomes.

Objective:To investigate the value of bi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) in diagnosis and treatment of hematospermia.Methods:The clinical data and bpMRI of 182 patients with hematospermia (hematospermia group) and 51 patients without urinary system diseases (control group) were retrospectively analyzed. Both the control group and the hematospermia group underwent semen quality analysis, blood routine, urine routine, coagulation function, serum PSA test, and bpMRI examination before treatment. There were no significant differences in age [40(33, 50)years vs. 39(31, 53) years, Z=-0.77, P=0.43], body mass index [23.9(22.0, 25.7)kg/m2 vs. 24.5(22.3, 26.1) kg/m 2, Z=-0.50, P=0.62], smoking rate [24.7%(45/182) vs. 27.5%(14/51), χ2=0.16, P=0.69], alcohol consumption rate [29.1%(53/182) vs. 29.4%(15/51), χ2=0.002, P=0.97], and comorbid hypertension [20.9%(38/182) vs. 17.6%(9/51), χ2=0.26, P=0.61] between the hematospermia group and the control group. There was a statistically significant difference in PSA levels between the hematospermia group and the control group [2.82(2.08, 3.68)ng/ml vs 1.59(0.88, 2.28) ng/ml, Z=6.08, P=0.03].The median duration of illness in the hematospermia group was 10(5, 15) months, the median number of red blood cells reported in semen analysis was 17(10, 23)/HP, 59(32.4%) cases had infections in urine routine results, 15(8.2%) cases had infections in blood routine results, and 19(10.4%) cases had coagulation abnormalities. Hematospermia patients can be divided into five categories based on their causes: 105 cases of infection and inflammation, 42 cases of obstruction, 19 cases of tumors, 8 cases of systemic diseases, and 8 cases of iatrogenic factors and trauma. The treatment option was based on etiology: ①Infections, Inflammation, Systemic Diseases, Iatrogenic Factors, and Trauma: Remove the underlying cause and observe or watchful waiting. ②Recurrence of Systemic Diseases, Infections, and Inflammation: Treat the underlying cause with appropriate medication, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), α-receptor blockers, etc. If there is an infection, administer oral antibiotics for 1-2 weeks. ③Obstruction and Tumors: Perform seminal vesiculoscopy surgery or radical prostatectomy. The efficacy evaluation was porfeomed after 12 months of treatment. Cure: Hematospermia symptoms disappear, with no recurrence. Effective: Symptoms significantly improve, no visible hematospermia, semen analysis shows marked improvement in red blood cells, and neither clinical symptoms nor semen analysis worsen. Not Cured: Visible hematospermia persists, and semen analysis shows no change in red blood cells compared to before treatment. Recurrence: Clinical symptoms improve but significant visible hematospermia reappears, and semen analysis shows red blood cell count >5/HP. Results:The proportion of patients with PI-RADS scores ≥ 3 in the hematospermia group was higher than that in the control group [29.1%(53/182)vs. 13.7%(7/51), χ2=4.94, P=0.03], and the difference was statistically significant. Comparing the imaging characteristics and related parameters of two groups of bpMRI, the results showed that the length and width of the left and right seminal vesicles in the hematospermia group were greater than those in the control group. The length of the left seminal vesicle was [29.9(25.9, 33.4)mm vs. 23.0(21.2, 25.4)mm, Z=7.30, P<0.01], the width of the left seminal vesicle was[20.4(17.8, 23.5)mm vs. 17.2(15.1, 18.5)mm, Z=5.85, P<0.01], the length of the right seminal vesicle was [28.9(24.8, 32.4)mm vs. 23.4(21.5, 28.1)mm, Z=4.68, P<0.01], and the width of the right seminal vesicle was[19.8(17.7, 23.1)mm vs. 17.2(15.1, 18.6)mm, Z=5.45, P<0.01]. The differences were statistically significant. After 12 months of follow-up, 152(83.5%) cases were cured, 21(11.5%) cases were defined as effective, 4(2.2%) cases were not cured, and 5(2.7%) cases had recurrence. Conclusions:The bpMRI examination can clearly identify the location of the hematospermia lesion and the timing of the bleeding. Based on the results of bpMRI, determining the cause and selecting the appropriate treatment strategy is reliable, convenient, and effective.

Objective:To investigate the role of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in differentiating between autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic cancer (PC).Methods:Data of 133 patients with AIP and 113 patients with PC who underwent EUS because of obstructive jaundice at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2013 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed in the study, and were randomly divided into either a derivation sample or a validation sample using 1∶1 allocation according to the random number. In the derivation sample, 10 EUS characteristics were used to construct a prediction model to distinguish between AIP and PC, in which predictors were identified by multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis and predictive efficacy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. The predictive efficacy was assessed in the validation sample. In view of the subjectivity in the judgment of diffuse/focal hypoechogenicity, 2 prediction models were designed in order to avoid bias.Results:By multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis, diffuse hypoechogenicity ( OR=591.0, 95% CI: 98.8->999.9, P<0.001) and vessel involvement ( OR=11.9, 95% CI: 1.4-260.2, P=0.023) were identified as statistically significant predictors for distinguishing AIP from PC. EUS characteristics excluding diffuse/focal hypoechogenicity were stepped by logistic regression, which showed that hyperechoic foci/strands ( OR=177.3, 95% CI: 18.7->999.9, P<0.001), pancreatic duct dilation ( OR=60.5, 95% CI: 6.2->999.9, P=0.004), bile duct wall thickening ( OR=35.4, 95% CI: 3.7->999.9, P=0.009), lymphadenopathy ( OR=16.8, 95% CI: 1.7-475.2, P=0.038) and vessel involvement ( OR=22.7, 95% CI: 2.0-725.7, P=0.028) were statistically significant predictors to distinguish the two diseases. Both prediction models were built in the derivation sample, with area under the ROC curve of 0.995 and 0.979 respectively. In the validation sample, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of both prediction models were all >90% by using the optimal cutoff value. Even for discrimination between focal AIP and PC, sensitivity and accuracy of both models were >90%, and specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were all >85%. Conclusion:The 2 prediction models have good differential predictive value, and EUS is a useful tool to differentiate between AIP and PC.