Objective:To evaluate the clinical feasibility of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation following transvenous lead extraction (TLE).Methods:This was a retrospective study. Consecutive patients who underwent S-ICD implantation at Peking University People′s Hospital between June 2015 and October 2023 were enrolled. Patients were divided into the TLE group and the newly implanted group based on whether they received TLE prior to S-ICD implantation. Baseline characteristics, S-ICD indication, defibrillation threshold test results, complications, and postoperative follow-up data were collected and compared between the two groups.Results:A total of 27 patients were included, aged (49.2±14.2) years, including 19 males. There were 12 patients in the TLE group and 15 in the newly implanted group. Compared with the TLE group, patients in the newly implanted group were younger ((43.3±13.7) years vs. (55.6±12.0) years, P=0.013). The main S-ICD indication in the TLE group was high infection risk (9/12), whereas in the newly implanted group it was younger age (11/15). All patients underwent successful S-ICD implantation, with 18 patients completing defibrillation threshold testing (all successful). Additionally, the TLE group had longer follow-up duration than the newly implanted group (42 (19, 60) months vs. 12 (3, 28) months, P=0.001). No complications or deaths occurred during follow-up, with normal device function in both groups. A total of 17 ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation events were recorded, of which 7 met defibrillation criteria and all received effective therapy. Conclusion:S-ICD demonstrates safety and efficacy as a therapeutic option for patients after TLE, with comparable device functionality and follow-up outcomes to patients with newly implanted S-ICD.

Objectives:To analyze the clinical characteristics,strategies,success and complication rates of lead extraction and re-implantation during the upgrade of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices(CIED)in non-infectious patients.Methods:This retrospective study collected and analyzed the baseline clinical data and surgical data of 66 non-infected patients who had their existing CIEDs(including cardiac pacemaker,implantable cardioverter defibrillator[ICD],cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker[CRT-P])upgraded to ICD or CRT-P or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator(CRT-D)or subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator(S-ICD)in Peking University People's Hospital from March 2018 to March 2024.We analyzed the strategies of lead extraction and reimplantation as well as the operation success rate and complication rate.Results:Among the 66 patients,preoperative imaging revealed that 12 patients(18.2%)had severe stenosis/occlusion of the venous access route,with lead wear/perforation in 26 patients(39.4%).32 patients(48.5%)underwent transvenous lead extraction(TLE),of which all leads were removed in 27 patients(84.4%),and only non-functional leads were removed in 5 patients(15.6%).The success rate of the TLE procedure was 100%and no complication occurred.Among the 66 patients,functional leads retained and new leads were implanted on the same side in 28 patients(42.4%),all leads were removed and new leads were reimplanted on the opposite side in 22 patients(33.3%),only non-functional leads were removed and new leads were reimplanted on the same side in 5 patients(7.6%),all leads were removed and new leads were reimplanted on the same side in 5 patients(7.6%),and 6 patients(9.1%)had the leads abandoned and then were re-implanled.The success rate of the upgrade surgery was 100%,no complications were reported.Conclusions:When the existing CIEDs(including cardiac pacemaker,ICD,CRT-P)of non-infected patients are upgraded to ICD,CRT-P,CRT-D or S-ICD,lead extraction and reimplantation are safe and feasible,and reimplantation can be performed on the ipsilateral or contralateral side.

Objective:To screen the risk factors for non-complete procedural success of transvenous lead extraction(TLE),and to establish a prediction model based on the results and evaluate its predictive efficacy.Methods:A total of 1 029 patients who underwent TLE in Peking University People's Hospital from January 2014 to December 2020 were enrolled and divided into training set(n=720)and validation set(n=309)using the random number method.There were no statistically significant differences among the variables in the training set and the validation set.The training set was divided into the complete procedural success(CPS)group(n=664)and the non-CPS group(n=56).Univariate analysis was employed to screen the relevant indicators of non-CPS,followed by binary logistic regression analysis to identify the independent risk factors of non-CPS.Subsequently,a predictive model and nomogram were constructed.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis was applied to evaluate the ability of the model to distinguish non-CPS from TLE patients in the training set and validation set.The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to assess the consistency between the predicted risk and the actual risk of the model.Results:Univariate analysis showed that the relevant variables with P<0.1 including the age at the first implantation of the lead,the number of leads extracted,the oldest dwell time of lead extracted,the presence of abandoned leads,non-manual traction for lead extracted,the number of extracted leads>3,bilateral lead implantation,and the indications for TLE.The binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of abandoned leads(OR=2.252,95%CI:1.111-4.564,P=0.024),the oldest dwell time of the extracted leads(OR=1.009,95%CI:1.005-1.012,P<0.001),and the number of extracted leads>3(OR=3.177,95%CI:1.306-7.733,P=0.011)were independent risk factors for non-CPS of TLE.ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the ROC curve(AUC)of the training set was 0.80(95%CI:0.75-0.85,P<0.001).The AUC of the validation set was 0.81(95%CI:0.72-0.90,P<0.001).The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test indicated that the P values of both the training set(P=0.089)and the validation set(P=0.136)were greater than 0.05.Conclusions:The presence of abandoned leads,the oldest dwell time of lead extracted,and the number of extracted leads>3 are independent risk factors for non-CPS in patients undergoing TLE.The nomogram model based on the above factors has satisfactory predictive ability.

Objective:To screen the risk factors for non-complete procedural success of transvenous lead extraction(TLE),and to establish a prediction model based on the results and evaluate its predictive efficacy.Methods:A total of 1 029 patients who underwent TLE in Peking University People's Hospital from January 2014 to December 2020 were enrolled and divided into training set(n=720)and validation set(n=309)using the random number method.There were no statistically significant differences among the variables in the training set and the validation set.The training set was divided into the complete procedural success(CPS)group(n=664)and the non-CPS group(n=56).Univariate analysis was employed to screen the relevant indicators of non-CPS,followed by binary logistic regression analysis to identify the independent risk factors of non-CPS.Subsequently,a predictive model and nomogram were constructed.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis was applied to evaluate the ability of the model to distinguish non-CPS from TLE patients in the training set and validation set.The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to assess the consistency between the predicted risk and the actual risk of the model.Results:Univariate analysis showed that the relevant variables with P<0.1 including the age at the first implantation of the lead,the number of leads extracted,the oldest dwell time of lead extracted,the presence of abandoned leads,non-manual traction for lead extracted,the number of extracted leads>3,bilateral lead implantation,and the indications for TLE.The binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of abandoned leads(OR=2.252,95%CI:1.111-4.564,P=0.024),the oldest dwell time of the extracted leads(OR=1.009,95%CI:1.005-1.012,P<0.001),and the number of extracted leads>3(OR=3.177,95%CI:1.306-7.733,P=0.011)were independent risk factors for non-CPS of TLE.ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the ROC curve(AUC)of the training set was 0.80(95%CI:0.75-0.85,P<0.001).The AUC of the validation set was 0.81(95%CI:0.72-0.90,P<0.001).The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test indicated that the P values of both the training set(P=0.089)and the validation set(P=0.136)were greater than 0.05.Conclusions:The presence of abandoned leads,the oldest dwell time of lead extracted,and the number of extracted leads>3 are independent risk factors for non-CPS in patients undergoing TLE.The nomogram model based on the above factors has satisfactory predictive ability.

Objectives:To analyze the clinical characteristics,strategies,success and complication rates of lead extraction and re-implantation during the upgrade of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices(CIED)in non-infectious patients.Methods:This retrospective study collected and analyzed the baseline clinical data and surgical data of 66 non-infected patients who had their existing CIEDs(including cardiac pacemaker,implantable cardioverter defibrillator[ICD],cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker[CRT-P])upgraded to ICD or CRT-P or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator(CRT-D)or subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator(S-ICD)in Peking University People's Hospital from March 2018 to March 2024.We analyzed the strategies of lead extraction and reimplantation as well as the operation success rate and complication rate.Results:Among the 66 patients,preoperative imaging revealed that 12 patients(18.2%)had severe stenosis/occlusion of the venous access route,with lead wear/perforation in 26 patients(39.4%).32 patients(48.5%)underwent transvenous lead extraction(TLE),of which all leads were removed in 27 patients(84.4%),and only non-functional leads were removed in 5 patients(15.6%).The success rate of the TLE procedure was 100%and no complication occurred.Among the 66 patients,functional leads retained and new leads were implanted on the same side in 28 patients(42.4%),all leads were removed and new leads were reimplanted on the opposite side in 22 patients(33.3%),only non-functional leads were removed and new leads were reimplanted on the same side in 5 patients(7.6%),all leads were removed and new leads were reimplanted on the same side in 5 patients(7.6%),and 6 patients(9.1%)had the leads abandoned and then were re-implanled.The success rate of the upgrade surgery was 100%,no complications were reported.Conclusions:When the existing CIEDs(including cardiac pacemaker,ICD,CRT-P)of non-infected patients are upgraded to ICD,CRT-P,CRT-D or S-ICD,lead extraction and reimplantation are safe and feasible,and reimplantation can be performed on the ipsilateral or contralateral side.

Objective:To evaluate the clinical feasibility of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation following transvenous lead extraction (TLE).Methods:This was a retrospective study. Consecutive patients who underwent S-ICD implantation at Peking University People′s Hospital between June 2015 and October 2023 were enrolled. Patients were divided into the TLE group and the newly implanted group based on whether they received TLE prior to S-ICD implantation. Baseline characteristics, S-ICD indication, defibrillation threshold test results, complications, and postoperative follow-up data were collected and compared between the two groups.Results:A total of 27 patients were included, aged (49.2±14.2) years, including 19 males. There were 12 patients in the TLE group and 15 in the newly implanted group. Compared with the TLE group, patients in the newly implanted group were younger ((43.3±13.7) years vs. (55.6±12.0) years, P=0.013). The main S-ICD indication in the TLE group was high infection risk (9/12), whereas in the newly implanted group it was younger age (11/15). All patients underwent successful S-ICD implantation, with 18 patients completing defibrillation threshold testing (all successful). Additionally, the TLE group had longer follow-up duration than the newly implanted group (42 (19, 60) months vs. 12 (3, 28) months, P=0.001). No complications or deaths occurred during follow-up, with normal device function in both groups. A total of 17 ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation events were recorded, of which 7 met defibrillation criteria and all received effective therapy. Conclusion:S-ICD demonstrates safety and efficacy as a therapeutic option for patients after TLE, with comparable device functionality and follow-up outcomes to patients with newly implanted S-ICD.

Objectives:To investigate the impact of reassessment and individualized reimplantation strategies on clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections following transvenous lead extraction (TLE).Methods:Patients who underwent TLE due to CIED infections at Peking University People's Hospital from January 2015 to January 2021 were included.Reimplantation decisions,including whether to reimplant and the type and location of the new device,were made based on patient history,infection type,and cardiac examination results.The reimplantation rate,device type,implantation site,and complications were recorded and analyzed.Results:A total of 993 patients were included in this study,of which 840 cases (84.6％) were pocket infections.Among the removed devices,827 cases (83.3％) were pacemakers.The clinical success rate of TLE was 98.3％ (976 cases),the perioperative mortality rate was 0.9％ (9 cases) .Excluding the perioperative death cases,out of 984 survived patients after reassessment,186 patients (18.9％) had no indication for reimplantation,69 patients (7.0％) refused reimplantation,and 729 patients (74.1％) opted for reimplantation.An individualized reimplantation strategy was developed according to their clinical situation.Devices were implanted in 703 patients (71.4％) on the contralateral side to reduce the risk of reinfection;leadless pacemakers (LP) were implanted in 24 patients (2.4％),and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) were implanted in 2 patients (0.2％),based on specific indications.The rate of simultaneous reimplantation during TLE was 19.4％ (191/984),primarily among pacemaker-dependent patients with pocket infections.70 patients (7.1％) underwent device upgrade or downgrade.During a mean of (3.9±2.6) years follow-up,the all-cause mortality rate were 8.9％ (88 cases),and the pocket infection rate after reimplantation was 1.5％ (15 cases ) .Conclusions:Individualized reassessment after TLE for CIED infection patients can help optimize reimplantation decision-making and avoid unnecessary reimplantations and associated complications.The choice of reimplantation strategy should be strictly based on the clinical situations.Devices should preferably be re-implanted on the contralateral side to reduce reinfection risk.LP and S-ICD are suitable for patients with specific indications.Simultaneous reimplantation during TLE is feasible for some patients with pocket infections but further studies are required to evaluate the safety of this approach.

Objectives:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator(S-ICD)after transvenous lead extraction(TLE)in ICD patients without pacing indications. Methods:All patients who underwent TLE at Peking University People's Hospital from June 2018 to October 2023 were consecutively included.TLE indication,S-ICD implantation indication,defibrillation threshold(DFT)test,complications and postoperative follow-up were collected and analyzed. Results:A total of 11 patients with TV-ICD underwent S-ICD implantation after TLE,eight patients were males and median age were 56(44,65)years.The indications for TLE were infection and lead dysfunction.Nine patients were implanted with S-ICD for secondary prevention,and the most common cause of implantation was ion channelopathies(5 cases).The operative time for S-ICD was 51(48,58)minutes and no perioperative complications were noted.Eight patients underwent DFT testing,and 100%were successful.During a median follow up of 30(9,39)months,a total of six appropriate treatments occurred in two patients,and no complications occurred,including inappropriate treatment,ineffective treatment,infection,lead malfunction and death. Conclusions:Our study provides evidence for S-ICD implantation as a replacement after TV-ICD removal.The S-ICD implantation after TLE is safe and effective.

Objectives:To investigate the impact of reassessment and individualized reimplantation strategies on clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections following transvenous lead extraction (TLE).Methods:Patients who underwent TLE due to CIED infections at Peking University People's Hospital from January 2015 to January 2021 were included.Reimplantation decisions,including whether to reimplant and the type and location of the new device,were made based on patient history,infection type,and cardiac examination results.The reimplantation rate,device type,implantation site,and complications were recorded and analyzed.Results:A total of 993 patients were included in this study,of which 840 cases (84.6％) were pocket infections.Among the removed devices,827 cases (83.3％) were pacemakers.The clinical success rate of TLE was 98.3％ (976 cases),the perioperative mortality rate was 0.9％ (9 cases) .Excluding the perioperative death cases,out of 984 survived patients after reassessment,186 patients (18.9％) had no indication for reimplantation,69 patients (7.0％) refused reimplantation,and 729 patients (74.1％) opted for reimplantation.An individualized reimplantation strategy was developed according to their clinical situation.Devices were implanted in 703 patients (71.4％) on the contralateral side to reduce the risk of reinfection;leadless pacemakers (LP) were implanted in 24 patients (2.4％),and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) were implanted in 2 patients (0.2％),based on specific indications.The rate of simultaneous reimplantation during TLE was 19.4％ (191/984),primarily among pacemaker-dependent patients with pocket infections.70 patients (7.1％) underwent device upgrade or downgrade.During a mean of (3.9±2.6) years follow-up,the all-cause mortality rate were 8.9％ (88 cases),and the pocket infection rate after reimplantation was 1.5％ (15 cases ) .Conclusions:Individualized reassessment after TLE for CIED infection patients can help optimize reimplantation decision-making and avoid unnecessary reimplantations and associated complications.The choice of reimplantation strategy should be strictly based on the clinical situations.Devices should preferably be re-implanted on the contralateral side to reduce reinfection risk.LP and S-ICD are suitable for patients with specific indications.Simultaneous reimplantation during TLE is feasible for some patients with pocket infections but further studies are required to evaluate the safety of this approach.

Objective:To evaluate the safety of leadless pacemaker implantation in super-elderly patients.Methods:Eleven patients with average age of 90 (86, 92) years who underwent leadless pacemaker implantation in the Department of Cardiology, Peking University People′s Hospital from March 2021 to May 2022 were included. The clinical data and implantation information were collected. The complications (cardiac tamponade, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, pulmonary embolism, pacemaker reinfection, femoral vein hematoma) and death of patients were documented at 24 h, 3 d, and 1, 3, 6 months after pacemaker implantation.Results:There were 9 males and 2 females with the body mass index of 21(19, 23)kg/m 2. The underlying diseases were hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous cerebral infarction and moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation in 9, 9, 9, 6, 4, 4, 4 patients, respectively. The left ventricular ejection fraction was 49% (45%, 52%), the hemoglobin concentration was 118 (114, 122)g/L, 4 patients were taking anticoagulant drugs, and 6 patients were taking antiplatelet drugs. Eight patients were newly implanted with a leadless pacemaker, 2 patients were implanted after removal the old ones, and 1 case was implanted at the same time as removal. The implantation time was 45(40, 47) minutes, the X-ray exposure time was 14 (13, 15) minutes, the release time was 1 (1, 2), the threshold value was 0.50(0.38, 0.75)V/0.24 ms, the impedance was 730 (700, 770) Ω, and the perceived R-wave amplitude 8.2(6.7, 12.8) mV. During the follow-up period of 8 (6, 10) months, no patient had pacemaker dysfunction; and the threshold, R wave sensing, and impedance were stable and maintained within the normal range. No cardiac tamponade, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, pulmonary embolism, pacemaker reinfection or death occurred perioperatively and during the follow-up period; 1 patient had hematoma after femoral vein puncture, which improved after compression treatment. Conclusion:This single-center and small-sample study shows that leadless pacemaker implantation is safe for super-elderly patients.