Breast cancer is one of the common malignant tumors among women worldwide,and with advances in screening and diagnostic technology,more and more breast cancer patients are being diagnosed at an early stage.Adjuvant treatment options for different types of early-stage breast cancer vary.In recent years,the development of treatment strategies has focused on maximizing the efficacy of treatment while avoiding over-treatment based on the patient's individual risk profile.For hormone receptor(HR)-positive breast cancer,the introduction of cell cyclin-dependent kinase(CDK)4/6 inhibitors has significantly improved the prognosis of intermediate-and high-risk patients.Meanwhile,chemotherapy de-escalation strategies based on genetic testing are also advancing.However,controversies remain regarding which patients can benefit from CDK4/6 inhibitor-enhanced therapy and whether premenopausal patients with intermediate-risk classification from multi-gene assays can gain benefits from chemotherapy.In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HR)-positive breast cancer,anti-HER2 targeted therapies and novel antibody-drug conjugate provide more effective treatment options.However,how to screen the optimal population for dual-targeted therapy is still under exploration,and currently there is no consensus on how to select subsequent intensified regimens for patients who fail to achieve pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy.For triple-negative breast cancer,while traditional adjuvant therapy has been continuously optimized,the application of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases has also made significant progress.Nevertheless,the definition of the optimal population to benefit from immunotherapy and the optimization strategy of immunotherapy are still key areas of ongoing research.This review summarized the advancements and controversies in adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer,aiming to provide references for current clinical practice and insights for future research directions.

Objective To observe the clinical,CT and MRI manifestations of CIC-rear ranged sarcoma(CRS).Methods Eight patients with single CRS lesion ranged from 3.79 to 98.81 cm and the median of 21.37 cm were retrospectively enrolled,6 lesions located in deep soft tissue and 2 located in the femur.The clinical and imaging data were observed.Results All 8 CRS lesions presented as rapidly growing local masses,including 6 solid cystic soft tissue lesions and 2 non enlarged bone lesions with osteolytic bone destruction,which were all lobulated lesions with uneven equal-low density/slightly high T1 and slightly high T2 signals,with multiple focal map like necrosis.Diffusion weighted imaging showed lesions with limited diffusion and invasion of adjacent tissue,and"ice melting sign"was observed in 4 cases.After administration of contrast agents,the solid components of lesions enhanced unevenly and moderately or significantly and sustainedly,with slightly more pronounced enhancement at the edges,abundant blood vessels were visible inside and at the edges."Vascular floating sign"was noticed in 2 cases.Conclusion The clinical,CT and MRI manifestations of CRS had certain characteristics.

Objective:To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL).Methods:A retrospective case series study was conducted. Clinical data of patients diagnosed with T-LBL at the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from January 2013 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and their clinical characteristics and prognosis were statistically analyzed.Results:A total of 22 T-LBL patients were included. Among them, there were 19 males (86.4%) and 3 females (13.6%), and the median age at onset was 19.5 (15, 28) years old. Based on Ann Arbor staging, 3 cases (13.6%) were classified as stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ, while 19 cases (86.4%) were stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ; 10 cases (45.5%) presented with B symptoms, 12 cases (54.5%) without B symptoms; 16 cases (72.7%) showed elevated lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) level. At onset, 7 patients (31.8%) had mediastinal masses, 3 patients (13.6%) had central nervous system involvement, and 17 patients (77.3%) had bone marrow involvement. The overall response rate (ORR) and complete remission rate among the 22 patients were 81.82% (18/22) and 31.82% (7/22), respectively. The ORR was 84.21% (16/19) in 19 patients treated with ALL-like regimens. Among 3 patients treated with NHL-like regimens, 1 case achieved complete remission and 1 case achieved partial remission. Seven patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with a median overall survival (OS) time of 22 months; the median OS time of patients without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was 14 months. The 3-year OS rates in the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation group and group without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were 64.30% and 16.00%, and the difference in OS between the two groups was statistically significant ( P = 0.043). Two patients with disease progression prior to transplantation died of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections after transplantation. Conclusions:T-LBL is rare, and it is a highly aggressive tumor that predominantly occurs in adolescent males. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can prolong OS, reduce relapse and improve the prognosis of patients.

The in-depth research of artificial intelligence in the medical field has greatly improved the workflow and diagnostic ability of diagnostic radiology.This article focuses on artificial intelligence technology in the field of interventional medicine,and enumerates its potential application scenarios,including improving image analysis capabilities to assist diagnosis and predict treatment response.It also describes the challenges that need to be overcome for practical application.Finally,with the continuous development of artificial intelligence in interventional medicine,artificial intelligence will further optimize the channels of interventional medicine and bring revolutionary changes to the clinical practice of interventional medicine.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.03.002.].

Objective To investigate the association between plasma atherogenic index of plasma(AIP)and metabolism-associated steatotic liver disease(MASLD),and to evaluate the potential value of AIP as a predictive marker for MASLD risk.Methods We enrolled a total of 4 850 health check-up participants from The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between June 2021 and May 2023.The participants were divided into quartiles(Q1-Q4)according to their AIP level.Biochemical indicators and MASLD prevalence were compared across groups.Logistic regression,subgroup analysis,and restricted cubic splines(RCS)were used to explore the relationship between AIP and MASLD.Results Among the 4 850 participants,the prevalence of MASLD was 26.08％(1 265/4 850).MASLD prevalence increased across AIP quartiles:4.0％,13.8％,30.8％,and 55.6％in Q1-Q4,respectively(P＜0.001).Compared with Q1,Q2-Q4 groups showed higher proportions of males,BMI,smokers,overweight/obesity,central obesity,prediabetes,hypertension,serum uric acid,and fatty liver index(FLI)(all P＜0.001).Lipid profiles worsened with increased AIP:total cholesterol,triglycerides,and LDL-C increased,while HDL-C decreased(P＜0.001).RCS analysis demonstrated a significant linear relationship between AIP and MASLD risk.After adjusting for confounders,the participants in Q4 had an 8.71-fold higher risk of MASLD than those in Q1(OR:8.71,95％CI:6.20-12.23,P＜0.001).A composite model incorporating AIP,BMI,and FLI showed superior discriminative performance(AUC:0.883,95％CI:0.873-0.892).Interaction analysis suggested that AIP had significant interactions with BMI,hypertension,and prediabetes(P＜0.05).In individuals without these metabolic abnormalities,the association between AIP and MASLD was more pronounced.Conclusion Elevated AIP was significantly associated with an increased risk of MASLD,with a stronger association observed in individuals with normal BMI,blood pressure,and blood glucose levels,suggesting that AIP may serve as a potential indicator for early screening of MASLD.

Objective To investigate the association between plasma atherogenic index of plasma(AIP)and metabolism-associated steatotic liver disease(MASLD),and to evaluate the potential value of AIP as a predictive marker for MASLD risk.Methods We enrolled a total of 4 850 health check-up participants from The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between June 2021 and May 2023.The participants were divided into quartiles(Q1-Q4)according to their AIP level.Biochemical indicators and MASLD prevalence were compared across groups.Logistic regression,subgroup analysis,and restricted cubic splines(RCS)were used to explore the relationship between AIP and MASLD.Results Among the 4 850 participants,the prevalence of MASLD was 26.08％(1 265/4 850).MASLD prevalence increased across AIP quartiles:4.0％,13.8％,30.8％,and 55.6％in Q1-Q4,respectively(P＜0.001).Compared with Q1,Q2-Q4 groups showed higher proportions of males,BMI,smokers,overweight/obesity,central obesity,prediabetes,hypertension,serum uric acid,and fatty liver index(FLI)(all P＜0.001).Lipid profiles worsened with increased AIP:total cholesterol,triglycerides,and LDL-C increased,while HDL-C decreased(P＜0.001).RCS analysis demonstrated a significant linear relationship between AIP and MASLD risk.After adjusting for confounders,the participants in Q4 had an 8.71-fold higher risk of MASLD than those in Q1(OR:8.71,95％CI:6.20-12.23,P＜0.001).A composite model incorporating AIP,BMI,and FLI showed superior discriminative performance(AUC:0.883,95％CI:0.873-0.892).Interaction analysis suggested that AIP had significant interactions with BMI,hypertension,and prediabetes(P＜0.05).In individuals without these metabolic abnormalities,the association between AIP and MASLD was more pronounced.Conclusion Elevated AIP was significantly associated with an increased risk of MASLD,with a stronger association observed in individuals with normal BMI,blood pressure,and blood glucose levels,suggesting that AIP may serve as a potential indicator for early screening of MASLD.

Breast cancer is one of the common malignant tumors among women worldwide,and with advances in screening and diagnostic technology,more and more breast cancer patients are being diagnosed at an early stage.Adjuvant treatment options for different types of early-stage breast cancer vary.In recent years,the development of treatment strategies has focused on maximizing the efficacy of treatment while avoiding over-treatment based on the patient's individual risk profile.For hormone receptor(HR)-positive breast cancer,the introduction of cell cyclin-dependent kinase(CDK)4/6 inhibitors has significantly improved the prognosis of intermediate-and high-risk patients.Meanwhile,chemotherapy de-escalation strategies based on genetic testing are also advancing.However,controversies remain regarding which patients can benefit from CDK4/6 inhibitor-enhanced therapy and whether premenopausal patients with intermediate-risk classification from multi-gene assays can gain benefits from chemotherapy.In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HR)-positive breast cancer,anti-HER2 targeted therapies and novel antibody-drug conjugate provide more effective treatment options.However,how to screen the optimal population for dual-targeted therapy is still under exploration,and currently there is no consensus on how to select subsequent intensified regimens for patients who fail to achieve pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy.For triple-negative breast cancer,while traditional adjuvant therapy has been continuously optimized,the application of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases has also made significant progress.Nevertheless,the definition of the optimal population to benefit from immunotherapy and the optimization strategy of immunotherapy are still key areas of ongoing research.This review summarized the advancements and controversies in adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer,aiming to provide references for current clinical practice and insights for future research directions.

Objective To observe the clinical,CT and MRI manifestations of CIC-rear ranged sarcoma(CRS).Methods Eight patients with single CRS lesion ranged from 3.79 to 98.81 cm and the median of 21.37 cm were retrospectively enrolled,6 lesions located in deep soft tissue and 2 located in the femur.The clinical and imaging data were observed.Results All 8 CRS lesions presented as rapidly growing local masses,including 6 solid cystic soft tissue lesions and 2 non enlarged bone lesions with osteolytic bone destruction,which were all lobulated lesions with uneven equal-low density/slightly high T1 and slightly high T2 signals,with multiple focal map like necrosis.Diffusion weighted imaging showed lesions with limited diffusion and invasion of adjacent tissue,and"ice melting sign"was observed in 4 cases.After administration of contrast agents,the solid components of lesions enhanced unevenly and moderately or significantly and sustainedly,with slightly more pronounced enhancement at the edges,abundant blood vessels were visible inside and at the edges."Vascular floating sign"was noticed in 2 cases.Conclusion The clinical,CT and MRI manifestations of CRS had certain characteristics.

Objective:To compare the impact of different treatment strategies on the survival outcomes in rectal cancer patients with poor response to neoadjuvant therapy, and to explore the survival-related influencing factors.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Between January 2018 and November 2022, the clinical, pathological, and follow-up data of 106 rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and were evaluated as grade 4 or 5 based on the Magnetic Resonance Tumor Regression Grade (mrTRG) from the rectal cancer database at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively collected. Based on the post-neoadjuvant therapy assessment, patients were classified into three groups: the chemotherapy-radiotherapy group (23 patients), the consolidation therapy group (18 patients), and the standard treatment group (65 patients). General condition, pathological findings, selection of neoadjuvant therapy, comorbidities, as well as 3-year expected DMFS and OS were observed in the three groups.Results:All 106 patients were followed up, with a median follow-up time of 28 (21, 38) months. The overall 3-year DMFS rate was 60%, and the 3-year OS rate was 74%. The 3-year DMFS in the standard treatment and consolidation therapy groups were 74% and 72%, respectively; the 3-year OS were 84%, 81%, respectively. The Log-rank test showed that there was no significant difference in the 3-year expected DMFS and OS between the standard treatment group and the consolidation therapy group (both P>0.05), but both groups had better survival outcomes than the chemotherapy-radiotherapy group (10% and 39%, respectively; all P<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the chemotherapy-radiotherapy only regimen was an independent risk factor for DMFS (HR=12.425, 95% CI: 4.436–34.594, P<0.001), and the independent risk factors for OS were chemotherapy-radiotherapy only regimen (HR=8.991, 95%CI:2.220–36.403, P=0.002) and age≥65 years (HR=3.495, 95%CI: 1.017–12.009, P=0.047). Stratified analysis showed that chemotherapy-radiotherapy only regimen was the independent risk factors for DMFS and OS in patients with extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) positive ( n=66) and mesorectal fascial invasion (MRF) positive (n=56) (all P<0.05). Whether consolidation therapy was added to the standard neoadjuvant treatment regimen was not an independent factor affecting 3-year expected DMFS or OS in rectal cancer patients with poor response to neoadjuvant therapy. Further comparisons between the standard neoadjuvant treatment and consolidation therapy groups showed no statistically significant differences in spincter-preservation rate or postoperative complication rates (both P>0.05). However, the consolidation therapy group had a longer interval between the end of radiotherapy and surgery [80.1 (50.8, 109.4) days vs. 61.8 (48.8, 74.8) days, P<0.001], and a higher incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse effects ([10/18] vs. 26.2% [17/65], P=0.018). Conclusion:In rectal cancer patients with poor response to neoadjuvant therapy and clear adverse prognostic features before surgery (locally advanced stage, MRF positive or EMVI positive), the addition of short- or long-course chemotherapy-based systemic therapy does not provide short- or long-term survival benefits. Moreover, an extended chemotherapy duration increases the incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse effects.