Renal allograft biopsy (biopsy) remains the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of renal dysfunction after kidney transplantation. Puncture biopsy after kidney transplantation could be divided into indicative biopsy and protocol biopsy according to renal function of the patients. Indicative biopsy is mainly applied to diagnose postoperative complications of kidney transplantation, evaluate the severity of disease and guide subsequent treatment. Protocol biopsy is primarily employed to regular monitor renal allograft function of kidney transplant recipients and exclude subclinical rejection and other complications. Due to the willingness of patients and other reasons, protocol biopsy has not been widely applied in China. Currently, indicative biopsy is the main biopsy pattern. At present, the indications of puncture of indicative biopsy, the timing and necessity of puncture of protocol biopsy remain controversial. In this article, the classification of puncture biopsy after kidney transplantation and research progress on tissue biomarkers based on biopsy were reviewed, aiming to assist clinical diagnosis and targeted treatment of complications after kidney transplantation and provide reference for further improving the survival of renal allografts and recipients.

Kidney transplantation is more efficacious compared with other organ transplantations. Nevertheless, postoperative complications, such as renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), severely affect the survival rate and quality of life of recipients. How to mitigate the IRI of renal allografts has become one of the key topics in the field of kidney transplantation. At present, ischemic preconditioning enables renal allografts to adapt to ischemia, which is one of the effective methods to prevent the progression of IRI. However, the underlying mechanism remains elusive. In this article, the application of ischemic preconditioning in IRI, the regulation mechanism of ischemic preconditioning on the IRI of renal allografts at the cellular level and intracellular signaling pathway, and clinical application value and prospect of ischemic preconditioning were reviewed, aiming to provide reference for alleviating the IRI of renal allografts, enhancing the survival rate of the recipients and renal allografts and improving the quality of life of recipients.

Objective To investigate the role and mechanism of growth differentiation factor (GDF) 15 in ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) during kidney transplantation. Methods Nine wild type donor mice and 9 wild type recipient mice were selected. The renal graft of 3 recipient mice were harvested at 4, 24 and 72 h after transplantation. GDF family transcriptome analysis was carried out, and the expression of GDF15 in renal tissues of each group were detected. Five wild type donor mice, 5 GDF15 knockout donor mice and 10 wild type recipient mice were selected. According to the experimental scheme, the mice were divided into wild type sham operation group, wild type transplantation group, GDF15 knockout sham operation group and GDF15 knockout transplantation group. Serum and renal tissue samples were extracted 72 h after transplantation. The renal function, renal tubular injury, inflammatory cell infiltration, inflammatory factors, Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and nuclear factor (NF)-κB expression level were compared in each group. Nine wild type donor mice, 9 GDF15 knockout donor mice and 18 wild type recipient mice were selected. According to the experimental scheme, the mice were divided into wild type transplantation group and GDF15 knockout transplantation group, and the survival rate of two group after kidney transplantation was observed. Results Transcriptome sequencing of renal graft tissues indicated that GDF15 was the most up-regulated GDF family gene, which was mainly expressed in renal tubules. Compared with the sham operation group, the renal function of mice was declined in the transplantation group. Compared with the wild type transplantation group, the serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels of mice were significantly up-regulated in the GDF15-knockout transplantation group (both P < 0.05). The 1-week survival rate of mice was 87.6% in the wild type transplantation group and 41.8% in the GDF15 knockout transplantation group. In the GDF15 knockout transplantation group, the expression level of kidney injury molecule (KIM)-1 was up-regulated, and the renal tubule injury score was increased. In the wild type transplantation group, the renal tubules were dissolved or necrotized, and tubular formation was seen in the extramedullary and cortex area, whereas tubular necrosis and tubular formation were more evident in the GDF15 knockout transplantation group. The expression levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO) and F4/80 were up-regulated in the transplantation group, and the inflammatory cell infiltration was aggravated in the GDF15 knockout transplantation group. Compared with the sham operation group, the expression levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6 in the transplantation group were up-regulated. Compared with the wild type transplantation group, the expression levels of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 were also up-regulated in the GDF15 knockout transplantation group (all P < 0.05). In the transplantation group, the expression levels of TLR4 and NF-κB in the renal graft tissues were higher than those in the sham operation group. In the GDF15 knockout transplantation group, the expression levels of TLR4 and NF-κB in the renal graft tissues were higher compared with those in the wild type transplantation group. Conclusions GDF15 may alleviate the IRI of renal graft probably via inhibiting the TLR4-NF-κB signaling pathway.

Allografts ; COVID-19 ; China/epidemiology* ; Disease Outbreaks ; Humans ; Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects* ; SARS-CoV-2

Objective: To explore the clinical features, diagnosis and prognosis of renal transplant recipients with NCP. Method: The clinical data of 2 cases of kidney transplant recipients with NCP were retrospectively analyzed. Based onclinical manifestations, blood routine, inflammatory factors, cell immunity, chest CT andtherapeutic effects, the diagnosis and treatment of NCP in kidney transplant recipients (5th edition) were compared to that ofordinary NCP patients. Both recipients developed onset of low andmoderate fever, with no cough or fatigue at the initial stage. Blood routine indicated a normal range of leukocytes,buta significant decrease in lymphocyte counts, increased C-reactive protein (CRP) , and slightly higher procalcitonin (PCT) . The cellular immunity was extremely low, and the chest CT showed multiple patchy ground glass shadows in both lungs. Result: After 1 week of onset, both patients had significant disease progression. The pathogenesis and imaging changes were highly similar tothatreported in ordinary NCP patients.Two patients were givensymptomatic supportive treatment by antiviral agents, stop uses ofimmunosuppression agents, small amount of hormone maintenance, intravenous drip of gamma globulin andrespiratory support toavoid secondary infections. At present, the condition of both patients is obviously improved, and renal function is stable. One of them has recovered and was discharged. Conclusion The clinical manifestations of NCP in renal transplant recipients were generally consistent with that of ordinary NCP patients. Although there is no established method for the treatment of NCP, it is effective by stopping uses of immunosuppressive agents, maintaining small and medium doses of hormones, actively restoring immunity, and providing respiratory support in a timely manner.

Objective:To discuss the method and strategy of selecting reviewers for nursing journals.Methods:Through the review practice of different review conclusions, this paper analyzed the reasons for the differences in review conclusions.Results:The methods and suggestions for selecting reviewers included more detailed research direction of reviewers and more comprehensive distribution of research direction; complementary "academic school" and "clinical school" in the same research direction; certain reserved candidates in hot research areas; full consideration of the energy and time of reviewers who hold concurrent administrative positions.Conclusion:The selection of reviewers of nursing journals should follow the characteristics of disciplines and fully consider the distribution of reviewers with different characteristics, so as to make the review process more professional and reliable.

Objective:To explore the methods to improve the ability of editors of nursing journals to recognize new clinical nursing techniques and methods.Methods:Aanalyzed the difficulties in the recognition of new nursing technology innovation points, and summarized the methods of improving the recognition ability of nursing journal editors.Results:It was difficult to identify the new technology of nursing that the presentation of innovation points was inappropriate, inaccurate and there were differences in the definition and application of new technology and new method in different levels of medical units. To improve the identification ability of new technology innovation, nursing editors must fully understand the new information and development trend of specialized field industry and specialized technology, and the application of clinical nursing technology in different levels of medical units.Conclusion:The editors of nursing journals should strive to overcome the difficulties in the identification of new nursing technology in the paper, improve the innovative appreciation ability of the paper, and assist the authors to enhance the innovative value of the paper.

Objective:To summarize the diagnosis, treatment and outcome of recurrent focal segmental glomurular sclerosis(FSGS)after kidney transplantation and explore the predictive value of risk grade assessment of peripheral circulating permeability factor for recurrent FSGS.Methods:Retrospective analysis was performed for pathological history, biopsy finding before and after transplantation, blood level of FSGS biomarkers of two patients with recurrent FSGS. Then the relationship was analyzed between the risk grade assessment of peripheral circulating permeability factor and recurrent FSGS.Results:Both patients belonged to primary FSGS with >10g/24h urine protein. The recurrence of FSGS after transplantation was confirmed by renal biopsy. After plasma exchange, rituximab and Tripterygium wilfordii, 24-hour urine protein content declined, general edema subsided significantly and renal function stabilized.Conclusions:After renal transplantation, plasma exchange and rituximab can effectively alleviate the symptoms of recurrent FSGS. And assessing risk level of peripheral circulating permeability factor panel may have value in predicting the recurrent risk of FSGS

Objective:To explore the clinical features, diagnosis and prognosis of renal transplant recipients with COVID-19.Methods:The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed for 2 kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19. Based upon clinical manifestations, blood routine, inflammatory factors, cell immunity, chest computed tomography(CT)and therapeutic efficacies, the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients(Interim Edition V)were compared to that of ordinary COVID-19 patients. Both recipients had an onset of low/moderate fever. There was no initial symptom of cough or fatigue. Blood routine indicated a normal count of leukocytes, a marked lymphocytopenia, elevated C-reactive protein(CRP)and slightly higher procalcitonin(PCT). Cellular immunity was extremely low and chest CT showed multiple patchy ground-glass opacities in both lungs.Results:After 1 week of onset, both patients had a marked disease progression. The pathogenesis and imaging changes were highly similar to those reported for ordinary COVID-19 patients. For preventing secondary infections, both received symptomatic supportive measures of antiviral agents, withdrawing immunosuppressants, tapering of hormone maintenance dose, intravenous drip of gamma globulin and respiratory supports. Currently the conditions of both patients obviously improved and renal function was stable. One case recovered and was discharged.Conclusions:The clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in renal transplant recipients are generally consistent with that of ordinary COVID-19 patients. Although there is no established treatment for COVID-19, withdrawing immunosuppressants, maintaining small and medium doses of hormones, actively restoring immunity and providing respiratory supports in a timely manner are effective.

Objective To investigate the potential dosimetric advantages of half jaw volumetric modulated arc therapy ( H-VMAT) applied to the Oropharyngeal Cancer, comparing with full jaw VMAT (F-VMAT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy ( IMRT ). Methods Planning CT images of 10 oropharyngeal cancer patients were retrospectively chosen and transferred to Eclipse treatment planning system v. 11. 0 (Varian Medical Systems, Pala Alto, USA), based on which H-VMAT, W-VMAT, and IMRT plans were created. Two full arcs (360°) were adopted for VMAT planning, and the 7 beams were equally distributed for IMRT planning. The optimization constraints remained the same for the three kinds of plans. The dosimetric parameters such as D2 , D98 , D50 , HI, and CI were evaluated for PGTV, PCTV1, PCTV2, PGTVln, and PCTVln. In addition, the maximum dose (Dmax) and D1 cc(minimum dose received by 1cc) of the brainstem and spinal cord were analyzed respectively. The mean dose ( Dmean ) to the parotids, oral cave, larynx, and cervical normal tissues were also reviewed. The monitor units ( MU) for all treatment plans were recorded. Results Comparisons of the three planning techniques showed that H-VAMT improved the HI and CI of the targets (except PCTV2) significantly (HI: F =3. 959, 6. 764, 10. 581, 6. 770, 13. 040, P<0. 05;CI:F=6. 594, 4. 138, 0. 842, 4. 031, 5. 388, P<0. 05);reduced Dmax(F=4. 509, 20. 331, P<0. 05) and D1 cc for brainstem and spinal cord (F=27. 432, 26. 314, P<0. 05) significantly;reduced Dmean(F=4. 279, 29. 498, 19. 295, P<0. 05) to the normal tissues of the mouth, throat and neck significantly. The V50 of the mouth and throat were slightly lower in IMRT plans (F=8. 140, P<0. 05). IMRT was slightly better than W-VMAT in sparing oral cavity and larynx, but the dose distribution was the worst. The H-VMAT plans showed the best dose distribution in the cervical normal tissues, especially for the lower and posterior parts, where IMRT plans displayed high dose curves. Conclusions H-VMAT is dosimetrically superior than W-VMAT and IMRT for oropharyngeal cancer, which could be considered for clinical applications.