1.Comparing mortality rates, risk, and trends of hip fracture and common cancers in Hong Kong, 2010–2020: A population-based study
Xiaowen ZHANG ; Chor-Wing SING ; Philip CM AU ; Kathryn Choon-Beng TAN ; Ian Chi-Kei WONG ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2025;11(1):15-21
Objectives:
Hip fracture is a global public concern exhibiting high mortality rates but often underrecognized. We compared the mortality rates, risk, and secular trend of hip fractures with common cancers in females and males, aiming to call attention to hip fractures.
Methods:
In 2010–2020, 193,767 patients with the first diagnosed hip fractures and the top 5 prevalent cancers in each sex and aged 50 years and above were included. Age-standardized mortality rates were adjusted to the WHO Standard Population and the sex-specific relative risk of mortality was computed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential confounders. The trend analyses used joinpoint regression to compute annual percent changes in age-standardized mortality rates.
Results
The 1-year and 5-year age-standardized mortality rates and sex-specific mortality risk of hip fracture are greater than those of breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 0.97) and thyroid cancer (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.64) in females and prostate cancer (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.58) in males. Moreover, mortality rates in lung cancer, male liver cancer, female breast cancer, and male prostate cancer have decreased in the past decade. For hip fracture, the mortality rates have significantly decreased in females, while in males, we observed only a decreasing trend in 1-year hip fracture mortality, not in 5-year Conclusions: Hip fractures exhibit higher mortality compared to female breast and thyroid cancers and male prostate cancer. More attention is needed to enhance the management and prevention of hip fractures.
2.Comparing mortality rates, risk, and trends of hip fracture and common cancers in Hong Kong, 2010–2020: A population-based study
Xiaowen ZHANG ; Chor-Wing SING ; Philip CM AU ; Kathryn Choon-Beng TAN ; Ian Chi-Kei WONG ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2025;11(1):15-21
Objectives:
Hip fracture is a global public concern exhibiting high mortality rates but often underrecognized. We compared the mortality rates, risk, and secular trend of hip fractures with common cancers in females and males, aiming to call attention to hip fractures.
Methods:
In 2010–2020, 193,767 patients with the first diagnosed hip fractures and the top 5 prevalent cancers in each sex and aged 50 years and above were included. Age-standardized mortality rates were adjusted to the WHO Standard Population and the sex-specific relative risk of mortality was computed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential confounders. The trend analyses used joinpoint regression to compute annual percent changes in age-standardized mortality rates.
Results
The 1-year and 5-year age-standardized mortality rates and sex-specific mortality risk of hip fracture are greater than those of breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 0.97) and thyroid cancer (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.64) in females and prostate cancer (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.58) in males. Moreover, mortality rates in lung cancer, male liver cancer, female breast cancer, and male prostate cancer have decreased in the past decade. For hip fracture, the mortality rates have significantly decreased in females, while in males, we observed only a decreasing trend in 1-year hip fracture mortality, not in 5-year Conclusions: Hip fractures exhibit higher mortality compared to female breast and thyroid cancers and male prostate cancer. More attention is needed to enhance the management and prevention of hip fractures.
3.Comparing mortality rates, risk, and trends of hip fracture and common cancers in Hong Kong, 2010–2020: A population-based study
Xiaowen ZHANG ; Chor-Wing SING ; Philip CM AU ; Kathryn Choon-Beng TAN ; Ian Chi-Kei WONG ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2025;11(1):15-21
Objectives:
Hip fracture is a global public concern exhibiting high mortality rates but often underrecognized. We compared the mortality rates, risk, and secular trend of hip fractures with common cancers in females and males, aiming to call attention to hip fractures.
Methods:
In 2010–2020, 193,767 patients with the first diagnosed hip fractures and the top 5 prevalent cancers in each sex and aged 50 years and above were included. Age-standardized mortality rates were adjusted to the WHO Standard Population and the sex-specific relative risk of mortality was computed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential confounders. The trend analyses used joinpoint regression to compute annual percent changes in age-standardized mortality rates.
Results
The 1-year and 5-year age-standardized mortality rates and sex-specific mortality risk of hip fracture are greater than those of breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 0.97) and thyroid cancer (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.64) in females and prostate cancer (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.58) in males. Moreover, mortality rates in lung cancer, male liver cancer, female breast cancer, and male prostate cancer have decreased in the past decade. For hip fracture, the mortality rates have significantly decreased in females, while in males, we observed only a decreasing trend in 1-year hip fracture mortality, not in 5-year Conclusions: Hip fractures exhibit higher mortality compared to female breast and thyroid cancers and male prostate cancer. More attention is needed to enhance the management and prevention of hip fractures.
4.Comparing mortality rates, risk, and trends of hip fracture and common cancers in Hong Kong, 2010–2020: A population-based study
Xiaowen ZHANG ; Chor-Wing SING ; Philip CM AU ; Kathryn Choon-Beng TAN ; Ian Chi-Kei WONG ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2025;11(1):15-21
Objectives:
Hip fracture is a global public concern exhibiting high mortality rates but often underrecognized. We compared the mortality rates, risk, and secular trend of hip fractures with common cancers in females and males, aiming to call attention to hip fractures.
Methods:
In 2010–2020, 193,767 patients with the first diagnosed hip fractures and the top 5 prevalent cancers in each sex and aged 50 years and above were included. Age-standardized mortality rates were adjusted to the WHO Standard Population and the sex-specific relative risk of mortality was computed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential confounders. The trend analyses used joinpoint regression to compute annual percent changes in age-standardized mortality rates.
Results
The 1-year and 5-year age-standardized mortality rates and sex-specific mortality risk of hip fracture are greater than those of breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 0.97) and thyroid cancer (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.64) in females and prostate cancer (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.58) in males. Moreover, mortality rates in lung cancer, male liver cancer, female breast cancer, and male prostate cancer have decreased in the past decade. For hip fracture, the mortality rates have significantly decreased in females, while in males, we observed only a decreasing trend in 1-year hip fracture mortality, not in 5-year Conclusions: Hip fractures exhibit higher mortality compared to female breast and thyroid cancers and male prostate cancer. More attention is needed to enhance the management and prevention of hip fractures.
5.Comparing mortality rates, risk, and trends of hip fracture and common cancers in Hong Kong, 2010–2020: A population-based study
Xiaowen ZHANG ; Chor-Wing SING ; Philip CM AU ; Kathryn Choon-Beng TAN ; Ian Chi-Kei WONG ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2025;11(1):15-21
Objectives:
Hip fracture is a global public concern exhibiting high mortality rates but often underrecognized. We compared the mortality rates, risk, and secular trend of hip fractures with common cancers in females and males, aiming to call attention to hip fractures.
Methods:
In 2010–2020, 193,767 patients with the first diagnosed hip fractures and the top 5 prevalent cancers in each sex and aged 50 years and above were included. Age-standardized mortality rates were adjusted to the WHO Standard Population and the sex-specific relative risk of mortality was computed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential confounders. The trend analyses used joinpoint regression to compute annual percent changes in age-standardized mortality rates.
Results
The 1-year and 5-year age-standardized mortality rates and sex-specific mortality risk of hip fracture are greater than those of breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 0.97) and thyroid cancer (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.64) in females and prostate cancer (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.58) in males. Moreover, mortality rates in lung cancer, male liver cancer, female breast cancer, and male prostate cancer have decreased in the past decade. For hip fracture, the mortality rates have significantly decreased in females, while in males, we observed only a decreasing trend in 1-year hip fracture mortality, not in 5-year Conclusions: Hip fractures exhibit higher mortality compared to female breast and thyroid cancers and male prostate cancer. More attention is needed to enhance the management and prevention of hip fractures.
6.Astrocytic dopamine D1 receptor modulates glutamatergic transmission and synaptic plasticity in the prefrontal cortex through d-serine.
Yanan YIN ; Jian HU ; Haipeng WU ; Xinyu YANG ; Jingwen QI ; Lang HUANG ; Zhengyi LUO ; Shiyang JIN ; Nengyuan HU ; Zhoucai LUO ; Tong LUO ; Hao CHEN ; Xiaowen LI ; Chunhua YUAN ; Shuji LI ; Jianming YANG ; Yihua CHEN ; Tianming GAO
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 2025;15(9):4692-4710
The prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a pivotal role in orchestrating higher-order emotional and cognitive processes, a function that depends on the precise modulation of synaptic activity. Although pharmacological studies have demonstrated that dopamine signaling through dopamine D1 receptor (DRD1) in the PFC is essential for these functions, the cell-type-specific and molecular mechanisms underlying the neuromodulatory effects remain elusive. Using cell-type-specific knockout mice and patch-clamp recordings, we investigated the regulatory role of DRD1 on neurons and astrocytes in synaptic transmission and plasticity. Furthermore, we explored the mechanisms by which DRD1 on astrocytes regulate synaptic transmission and plasticity at the cellular level, as well as emotional and cognitive functions at the behavioral level, through two-photon imaging, microdialysis, high-performance liquid chromatography, transcriptome sequencing, and behavioral testing. We found that conditional knockout of the Drd1 in astrocytes (CKOAST) increased glutamatergic synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation (LTP) in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), whereas Drd1 deletion in pyramidal neurons did not affect synaptic transmission. The elevated level of d-serine in the mPFC of CKOAST mice increased glutamatergic transmission and LTP through NMDA receptors. In addition, CKOAST mice exhibited abnormal emotional and cognitive function. Notably, these behavioral changes in CKOAST mice could be reversed through the administration of d-serine degrease to the mPFC. These results highlight the critical role of the astrocytic DRD1 in modulating mPFC synaptic transmission and plasticity, as well as higher brain functions through d-serine, and may shed light on the treatment of mental disorders.
7.Effect and mechanism of Sitravatinib combined with Niraparib on proliferation,apoptosis and autophagy in mucosal melanoma cell lines
Zijin HU ; Yan KONG ; Xiaowen WU ; Qian GUO ; Jun GUO
Basic & Clinical Medicine 2024;44(3):295-302
Objective To investigate the effect of anti-angiogenic drug Sitravatinib combined with poly(adenosine diphosphate[ADP]-ribose)polymerase inhibitor(PARPi)Niraparib on mucosal melanoma cell lines and its possible mechanism.Methods The CCK8 assay was used to detect the maximal half inhibitory concentration(IC50)of Sitravatinib and Niraparib targeting at mucosal melanoma(MM)cell lines.CompuSyn was used to detect the Combination Index(CI)in different concentrations of the two drugs.Flow cytometry was used to detect the effect of drugs on cell apoptosis.Colony formation assay was used to detect the effect of drugs on cell proliferation.Western blot was used to detect the protein expressions and RT-qPCR was used to detect mRNA expression.Results CI values was respectively 0.19 and 0.15 for Sitravatinib(2 μmol/L)in combination with Niraparib(20 μmol/L)in a human vaginal maligant melanoma cell line(HMVII)and a metastasis inguinal lymph node of vulvar malignant melanoma cell line(GAK).Compared with the control group and single-drug groups,the cell proliferation of the combination group was significantly reduced(P<0.05 or P<0.01 or P<0.001).The cell apoptosis rate was signifi-cantly increased(P<0.01 or P<0.001).The protein and mRNA expression of apoptosis-related biomarkers signifi-cantly increased(P<0.001);In addition,the protein and mRNA expression of cell autophagy biomarkers signifi-cantly increased(P<0.01 or P<0.001).The protein expression of DNA damage marker significantly increased.Moreover,compared with the control group,The expression of radiation sensitive protein 51(RAD51)recombinase in the Sitravatinib single-drug group and combination group significantly reduced.As the dose of Sitravatinib gradu-ally increased up to 2 μmol/L,the protein and mRNA expression of RAD51 both significantly reduced(P<0.05 or P<0.01),the mRNA expression of BRCA1 and BRCA2 also significantly reduced(P<0.05 or P<0.01 or P<0.001).Conclusions Sitravatinib combined with Niraparib inhibits the proliferation of mucosal melanoma cells,induces cell apoptosis and promotes autophagy.The mechanism is potentially related to the inhibition of ho-mology-dependent recombination repairs(HRR).
8.Hip fracture is associated with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study
Suhas KRISHNAMOORTHY ; Casey Tze-Lam TANG ; Warrington Wen-Qiang HSU ; Gloria Hoi-Yee LI ; Chor-Wing SING ; Xiaowen ZHANG ; Kathryn Choon-Beng TAN ; Bernard Man-Yung CHEUNG ; Ian Chi-Kei WONG ; Annie Wai-Chee KUNG ; Ching-Lung CHEUNG
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2024;10(2):60-65
Objectives:
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) shares a complex relationship with bone metabolism and few studies investigated the effect of impaired bone health on the risk of T2DM. This study was conducted to investigate the association between hip fractures and the risk of incident T2DM.
Methods:
This is a retrospective cohort study using data from the real-world hip fracture cohort. Hong Kong Chinese patients aged ≥ 65 years without T2DM who were admitted to public hospitals due to a fall between 2008 and 2015 were included in the study. Patients who sustained falls with and without hip fractures were matched by propensity score (PS) at a 1:1 ratio. Competing risk regression was used to evaluate the association between hip fracture and incident T2DM, with death being the competing event.
Results:
A total of 23,314 hip fracture cases were matched to 23,314 controls. The median follow-up time was 5.09 years. The incidence rate of T2DM was 11.947 and 14.505 per 1000 person-years for the hip fracture and control group respectively. After accounting for the competing risk of death, the hip fracture group had a significantly lower risk of developing T2DM (HR: 0.771, 95% CI: 0.719–0.827). Similar results were observed in all subgroups after stratification by age and sex.
Conclusions
Hip fracture was found to be associated with a reduced risk of T2DM. These findings provide insight into the topic of bone and glucose metabolism and prompt further research in evaluating the role of bone health in the management of T2DM.
10.An engineered xCas12i with high activity, high specificity, and broad PAM range.
Hainan ZHANG ; Xiangfeng KONG ; Mingxing XUE ; Jing HU ; Zikang WANG ; Yinghui WEI ; Haoqiang WANG ; Jingxing ZHOU ; Weihong ZHANG ; Mengqiu XU ; Xiaowen SHEN ; Fengcai YIN ; Zhiyuan AI ; Guangyan HUANG ; Junhui XIA ; Xueqiong SONG ; Hengbin LI ; Yuan YUAN ; Jinhui LI ; Na ZHONG ; Meiling ZHANG ; Yingsi ZHOU ; Hui YANG
Protein & Cell 2023;14(7):538-543

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail