Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of the Corheart 6 left ventricular assist system in patients with end-stage heart failure. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on patients with end-stage heart failure who were treated with Corheart 6 left ventricular assist system from March 2022 to June 2024 in 4 hospitals in Jiangsu Province. The efficacy of the device was evaluated by comparing changes in clinical indicators at preoperative, discharge, 3-month postoperative, and 6-month postoperative timepoints, including the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD). The safety of the device was assessed by analyzing the intraoperative position and orientation of the blood pump inlet cannula, as well as the incidence of adverse events. Results In this study, 39 patients were collected, including 34 males and 5 females with a mean age of (56.4±12.5) years, ranging from 20 to 75 years. There was no operative death. There was no death in postoperative 3 months with a survival rate of 100.0%. There were 3 deaths in 6 months postoperatively, with a survival rate of 92.3%. All patients had a preoperative NYHA cardiac function classification of class Ⅳ. The NYHA cardiac function class of the patients improved (P<0.05) at discharge, 3 and 6 months after surgery when compared to the preoperative period. LVEF was significantly higher at 3 months after surgery than that during the preoperative period (P<0.05). LVEDD was significantly smaller at discharge, 3 and 6 months after surgery than that during the preoperative period (P<0.05). The safety evaluation's findings demonstrated that all 39 patients' intraoperative blood pump inlet tubes were oriented correctly, the artificial blood vessel suture sites were appropriate, there were no instances of device malfunction or pump thrombosis, or instances of bleeding or hemolysis, and the rate of the remaining adverse events was low. Conclusion With a low rate of adverse events and an excellent safety profile, the Corheart 6 left ventricular assist system can efficiently enhance cardiac function in patients with end-stage heart failure. It also has considerable clinical uses.

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteral lithotripsy(FURL)and non-retrograde percutaneous nephrolithotomy(NR-PCNL)for treating1.5-2.0 cm upper ureteral stones.Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 130 patients with upper ureteral stones treated between October 2022 and October 2024.Sixty-two patients underwent FURL and 68 underwent NR-PCNL.Comparisons included operative time,pre-and postoperative changes in white blood cells(WBC),hemoglobin(Hb),and creatinine(Cr),postoperative C-reactive protein(CRP)levels,stone-free rate after primary surgery,postoperative hospitalization duration,pain scores,complications,and need for auxiliary treatments.Results Compared to the FURL group,the NR-PCNL group demonstrated advantages in operative time[54.0(44.3,69.3)min vs.82.5(66.0,101.0)min,Z=-5.565,P<0.001],WBC elevation[1.9(0.5,3.5)×109/L vs.4.5(3.0,6.0)×109/L,Z=-4.528,P<0.001],and secondary surgery rate[0%(0/68)vs.14.5%(9/62),P<0.001].The FURL group showed lower Hb reduction[3.0(2.0,6.3)g/L vs.8.0(5.0,11.0)g/L,Z=-4.262,P<0.001],less postoperative Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)pain scores[1.0(1.0,2.0)points vs.2.0(1.0,2.0)points,Z=-2.840,P=0.005],and shorter hospitalization duration[2.0(1.0,2.0)d vs.3.0(2.0,3.0)d,Z=-5.815,P<0.001].No significant differences were observed in Cr elevation,CRP levels,stone-free rate after primary surgery,complications,or analgesic requirements(P≥0.05).Conclusions Both NR-PCNL and FURL are safe and effective for 1.5-2.0 cm upper ureteral stones.FURL offers better patient comfort,while NR-PCNL shows superior overall safety.

Objective:To evaluate the immunogenicity and immune persistence of human rabies vaccine (Vero cell) in healthy people aged 10-17 years and compare it with a group of adults aged 18-60 years.Methods:This study was conducted between July 2021 and November 2022 with Shangyu district and Shengzhou city of Shaoxing city, Zhejiang Province selected as the research sites. Zagreb regimen (2-1-1 schedule) and Essen regimen (1-1-1-1-1 schedule) were used for rabies vaccine administration. Serum samples were collected at different time points before and after immunization to compare the differences in seropositivity rates and geometric mean concentrations (GMC) between the 10-17 age group and the 18-60 age group.Results:A total of 1 200 healthy participants aged 10-60 were included, with 157 individuals (13.1%) in the 10-17 age group and 1 043 individuals (86.9%) in the 18-60 age group. Both groups displayed a nearly 100% seropositivity rate at 3, 6 and 12 months, and the participants in the same age group had similar antibody levels. The GMC of antibodies gradually increased after vaccination and peaked on 14 d. The 10-17 age group showed higher GMC of antibodies than the 18-60 age group at 14 d after the first dose (Zagreb regimen: 81.85 IU/ml vs 63.15 IU/ml, t=2.411, P=0.018; Essen regimen: 86.61 IU/ml vs 69.24 IU/ml, t=3.906, P<0.001). Similar differences were observed in the GMC of antibodies at 14 d and 3 months after the full vaccination course, but these differences gradually decreased and disappeared at 6 and 12 months after vaccination. Conclusions:Human rabies vaccine (Vero cell) has lasting immune protection in all participants within one year after vaccination, with no significant differences between the two vaccination regimens. Participants aged 10-17 have higher antibody levels compared to adults aged 18-60, but there is no significant difference in immune persistence between the two age groups.

Objective To explore the indication, surgical technique, and clinical efficacy of the cross bar based on the Nuss procedure in pectus excavatum. Methods The clinical data of patients who underwent cross bar based on the Nuss procedure from August 2023 to August 2024 in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Results A total of 88 patients including 85 males and 3 females with a mean age of (17.56±5.20) years were enrolled. All operations were performed successfully without intraoperative cardiac injury, pericardial injury or diaphragmatic injury. The mean operation time was (147.65±47.75) min. The mean blood loss was (13.30±9.06) mL. The mean postoperative hospitalization stay was (4.81±1.55) days, without perioperative death. Six (6.82%) patients developed early postoperative complications, including 3 patients of pleural effusion, 1 patient of subcutaneous hematoma, 1 patient of suffocation and 1 patient of bar rotation. The postoperative outcomes were excellent in 71 (80.68%) patients, good in 16 (18.18%) patients and moderate in 1 (1.13%) patient. The excellent and good rate was 98.86%. Conclusion The cross bar technique is safe and convenient, with satisfactory results. It is worth promoting in clinical application.

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-retrograde intubation combined with selectively tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy(NR-ST-PCNL).Methods A retrospective analysis included 213 patients with upper urinary tract stones and hydronephrosis(renal pelvic separation>10 mm)undergoing PCNL at our hospital from October 2023 to June 2025.Patients were divided into Group A(non-retrograde intuba-tion,n=109)and Group B(retrograde intubation,n=104).Primary endpoint was postoperative complications and secondary endpoints included operative time,stone-free rate(SFR),visual analog scale(VAS)pain scores,postoperative hospital stay,and hospitalization costs.Results Group A demonstrated significantly lower rates of postoperative complications[7.3%(8/109)vs.18.2%(19/104),P=0.017],shorter operative time[51.00(37.00,65.00)min vs.71.50(55.00,90.75)min,P<0.001],lower postoperative VAS scores[1.00(0.00,1.00)vs.1.00(0.00,2.00),P=0.008],shorter hospital stay[3.00(2.00,3.00)days vs.4.00(4.00,4.00)days,P<0.001],and lower hospitalization costs[17 028.00(15 178.05,17 934.50)RMB vs.20 653.00(19 176.25,22 630.00)RMB,P<0.001]compared with Group B.There was no significant difference in SFR between groups(P>0.05).Conclusion For patients with upper urinary tract stones and renal pelvic separation>10 mm,NR-ST-PCNL performed by experienced surgeons achieves comparable stone clearance to conventional techniques while reducing complication risk,shortening operative and hospitalization times,and lowering costs.It represents a safe,efficient,and optimized clinical approach.

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-retrograde intubation combined with selectively tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy(NR-ST-PCNL).Methods A retrospective analysis included 213 patients with upper urinary tract stones and hydronephrosis(renal pelvic separation>10 mm)undergoing PCNL at our hospital from October 2023 to June 2025.Patients were divided into Group A(non-retrograde intuba-tion,n=109)and Group B(retrograde intubation,n=104).Primary endpoint was postoperative complications and secondary endpoints included operative time,stone-free rate(SFR),visual analog scale(VAS)pain scores,postoperative hospital stay,and hospitalization costs.Results Group A demonstrated significantly lower rates of postoperative complications[7.3%(8/109)vs.18.2%(19/104),P=0.017],shorter operative time[51.00(37.00,65.00)min vs.71.50(55.00,90.75)min,P<0.001],lower postoperative VAS scores[1.00(0.00,1.00)vs.1.00(0.00,2.00),P=0.008],shorter hospital stay[3.00(2.00,3.00)days vs.4.00(4.00,4.00)days,P<0.001],and lower hospitalization costs[17 028.00(15 178.05,17 934.50)RMB vs.20 653.00(19 176.25,22 630.00)RMB,P<0.001]compared with Group B.There was no significant difference in SFR between groups(P>0.05).Conclusion For patients with upper urinary tract stones and renal pelvic separation>10 mm,NR-ST-PCNL performed by experienced surgeons achieves comparable stone clearance to conventional techniques while reducing complication risk,shortening operative and hospitalization times,and lowering costs.It represents a safe,efficient,and optimized clinical approach.

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteral lithotripsy(FURL)and non-retrograde percutaneous nephrolithotomy(NR-PCNL)for treating1.5-2.0 cm upper ureteral stones.Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 130 patients with upper ureteral stones treated between October 2022 and October 2024.Sixty-two patients underwent FURL and 68 underwent NR-PCNL.Comparisons included operative time,pre-and postoperative changes in white blood cells(WBC),hemoglobin(Hb),and creatinine(Cr),postoperative C-reactive protein(CRP)levels,stone-free rate after primary surgery,postoperative hospitalization duration,pain scores,complications,and need for auxiliary treatments.Results Compared to the FURL group,the NR-PCNL group demonstrated advantages in operative time[54.0(44.3,69.3)min vs.82.5(66.0,101.0)min,Z=-5.565,P<0.001],WBC elevation[1.9(0.5,3.5)×109/L vs.4.5(3.0,6.0)×109/L,Z=-4.528,P<0.001],and secondary surgery rate[0%(0/68)vs.14.5%(9/62),P<0.001].The FURL group showed lower Hb reduction[3.0(2.0,6.3)g/L vs.8.0(5.0,11.0)g/L,Z=-4.262,P<0.001],less postoperative Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)pain scores[1.0(1.0,2.0)points vs.2.0(1.0,2.0)points,Z=-2.840,P=0.005],and shorter hospitalization duration[2.0(1.0,2.0)d vs.3.0(2.0,3.0)d,Z=-5.815,P<0.001].No significant differences were observed in Cr elevation,CRP levels,stone-free rate after primary surgery,complications,or analgesic requirements(P≥0.05).Conclusions Both NR-PCNL and FURL are safe and effective for 1.5-2.0 cm upper ureteral stones.FURL offers better patient comfort,while NR-PCNL shows superior overall safety.

Objective:To evaluate the immunogenicity and immune persistence of human rabies vaccine (Vero cell) in healthy people aged 10-17 years and compare it with a group of adults aged 18-60 years.Methods:This study was conducted between July 2021 and November 2022 with Shangyu district and Shengzhou city of Shaoxing city, Zhejiang Province selected as the research sites. Zagreb regimen (2-1-1 schedule) and Essen regimen (1-1-1-1-1 schedule) were used for rabies vaccine administration. Serum samples were collected at different time points before and after immunization to compare the differences in seropositivity rates and geometric mean concentrations (GMC) between the 10-17 age group and the 18-60 age group.Results:A total of 1 200 healthy participants aged 10-60 were included, with 157 individuals (13.1%) in the 10-17 age group and 1 043 individuals (86.9%) in the 18-60 age group. Both groups displayed a nearly 100% seropositivity rate at 3, 6 and 12 months, and the participants in the same age group had similar antibody levels. The GMC of antibodies gradually increased after vaccination and peaked on 14 d. The 10-17 age group showed higher GMC of antibodies than the 18-60 age group at 14 d after the first dose (Zagreb regimen: 81.85 IU/ml vs 63.15 IU/ml, t=2.411, P=0.018; Essen regimen: 86.61 IU/ml vs 69.24 IU/ml, t=3.906, P<0.001). Similar differences were observed in the GMC of antibodies at 14 d and 3 months after the full vaccination course, but these differences gradually decreased and disappeared at 6 and 12 months after vaccination. Conclusions:Human rabies vaccine (Vero cell) has lasting immune protection in all participants within one year after vaccination, with no significant differences between the two vaccination regimens. Participants aged 10-17 have higher antibody levels compared to adults aged 18-60, but there is no significant difference in immune persistence between the two age groups.

Objective:To evaluate the immunogenicity, safety, and immune persistence of the sequential booster with the recombinant protein-based COVID-19 vaccine (CHO cell) in healthy people aged 18-84 years.Methods:An open-label, multi-center trial was conducted in October 2021. The eligible healthy individuals, aged 18-84 years who had completed primary immunization with the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine 3 to 9 months before, were recruited from Shangyu district of Shaoxing and Kaihua county of Quzhou, Zhejiang province. All participants were divided into three groups based on the differences in prime-boost intervals: Group A (3-4 months), Group B (5-6 months) and Group C (7-9 months), with 320 persons per group. All participants received the recombinant COVID-19 vaccine (CHO cell). Blood samples were collected before the vaccination and after receiving the booster at 14 days, 30 days, and 180 days for analysis of GMTs, antibody positivity rates, and seroconversion rates. All adverse events were collected within one month and serious adverse events were collected within six months. The incidences of adverse reactions were analyzed after the booster.Results:The age of 960 participants was (52.3±11.5) years old, and 47.4% were males (455). The GMTs of Groups B and C were 65.26 (54.51-78.12) and 60.97 (50.61-73.45) at 14 days after the booster, both higher than Group A′s 44.79 (36.94-54.30) ( P value<0.05). The GMTs of Groups B and C were 23.95 (20.18-28.42) and 27.98 (23.45-33.39) at 30 days after the booster, both higher than Group A′s 15.71 (13.24-18.63) ( P value <0.05). At 14 days after the booster, the antibody positivity rates in Groups A, B, and C were 91.69% (276/301), 94.38% (302/320), and 93.95% (295/314), respectively. The seroconversion rates in the three groups were 90.37% (272/301), 93.75% (300/320), and 93.31% (293/314), respectively. There was no significant difference among these rates in the three groups (all P values >0.05). At 30 days after the booster, antibody positivity rates in Groups A, B, and C were 79.60% (238/299), 87.74% (279/318), and 90.48% (285/315), respectively. The seroconversion rates in the three groups were 76.92% (230/299), 85.85% (273/318), and 88.25% (278/315), respectively. There was a significant difference among these rates in the three groups (all P values <0.001). During the sequential booster immunization, the incidence of adverse events in 960 participants was 15.31% (147/960), with rates of about 14.38% (46/320), 17.50% (56/320), and 14.06% (45/320) in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions was 8.02% (77/960), with rates of about 7.50% (24/320), 6.88% (22/320), and 9.69% (31/320) in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. No serious adverse events related to the booster were reported. Conclusion:Healthy individuals aged 18-84 years, who had completed primary immunization with the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine 3 to 9 months before, have good immunogenicity and safety profiles following the sequential booster with the recombinant COVID-19 vaccine (CHO cell).

ObjectiveTo observe the effect of deep muscle stimulation on muscle structure and function in children with spastic cerebral palsy. MethodsFrom January, 2023 to March, 2024, 30 children with spastic cerebral palsy in Beijing Bo'ai Hospital were randomly divided into control group (n = 15) and intervention group (n = 15). Both groups received conventional rehabilitation therapy, while the intervention group added deep muscle stimulation, for four weeks. Before and after training, the gastrocnemius muscle was examined by ultrasound diagnosis system in two aspects: transverse incision and longitudinal incision. Indicators included fascicle length, muscular thickness, cross sectional area and pennation angle. The modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) was used to assess the muscle tension of the lower extremity of the affected side. The standing, walking, running and jumping function were evaluated by Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) D and E areas. ResultsAfter training, the fascicule length and pennation angle improved significantly in both groups (|t| > 6.329, P < 0.001), and they were better in the intervention group than in the control group (|t| > 2.347, P < 0.05); the scores of MAS decreased in both groups (t > 2.432, P < 0.05), and were better in the intervention group than in the control group (t = 2.140, P < 0.05); the scores of GMFM D and E areas significantly decreased in both groups (|t| > 8.473, P < 0.001), and were better in the intervention group than in the control group (|t| > 2.191, P < 0.05). ConclusionDeep muscle stimulation could improve the fascicule length and pennation angle, and improve the spasticity and motor function of lower extremities in children with spastic cerebral palsy.