Immune checkpoint inhibitors can induce a rare but fatal complication known as hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis(HLH). However, reports of ICI-related HLH in breast cancer are extremely limited, and no cases induced by the combination of toripalimab with chemotherapy have been documented. This article reports a case of a breast cancer patient who developed persistent high fever 13 days after receiving toripalimab combined with chemotherapy. Diagnostic evaluations met the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria. Following methylprednisolone pulse therapy, the patient's symptoms improved rapidly, with subsequent consolidation treatment involving low-dose etoposide. Follow-up examinations one month after discharge showed normal results. This case suggests that toripalimab may induce HLH in breast cancer patients and that initial treatment with glucocorticoids alone can be effective. It provides a reference for the early clinical identification and management of such severe immune-related adverse events.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) originator and biosimilars in the treatment of Crohn′s disease (CD).Methods:From January 2020 to January 2023, the clinical data of 73 patients who were diagnosed as CD and received ADA treatment at the Department of Gastroenterology, the Tenth People′s Hospital of Tongji University were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 30 patients received ADA originator treatment (National Medicine Approval Number SJ20181019; originator group), 23 patients received biosimilar A treatment (Medicine Medicine Approval Number S20190038; biosimilar A group), and 20 patients received biosimilar B (Medicine Medicine Approval Number S20190043; biosimilar B group). At 12 and 48 weeks after treatment, the clinical data of clinical remission (Crohn′s disease activity index(CDAI) score <150), clinical response (CDAI score decreased ≥ 70 from baseline), endoscopic remission (simple endoscopic score for Crohn′s disease (SES-CD) ≤ 2 or Rutgeerts score ≤ 1), endoscopic response (SES-CD decreased > 50% from baseline), and adverse drug reaction (ADR) were collected. Chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test was used for statistical analysis.Results:After 12 weeks of ADA treatment, the overall clinical remission rate was 69.9% (51/73), which of the biosimilar A group was 69.6% (16/23), the biosimilar B group was 75.0% (15/20), and the originator group was 66.7% (20/30). The overall clinical response rate was 83.6% (61/73), which of the biosimilar A group was 82.6% (19/23), the biosimilar B group was 80.0% (16/20), and the originator group was 86.7% (26/30). The overall endoscopic remission rate was 42.5% (31/73), which of the biosimilar A group was 52.2% (12/23), the biosimilar B group was 45.0% (9/20), and the originator group was 33.3% (10/30). The overall endoscopic response rate was 63.0% (46/73), which of the biosimilar A group was 73.9% (17/23), the biosimilar B group was 70.0% (14/20), and the originator group was 50.0% (15/30). And in the above data, there were no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups (all P>0.05). After 48 weeks of treatment, the overall clinical remission rate was 54.2% (32/59), which of the biosimilar A group was 8/18, the biosimilar B group was 9/15, and the originator group was 57.7% (15/26). The overall clinical response rate was 71.2% (42/59), which of the biosimilar A group was 10/18, the biosimilar B group was 12/15, and the originator group was 76.9% (20/26). The overall endoscopic remission rate was 25.4% (15/59), which of the biosimilar A group was 5/18, the biosimilar B group was 3/15, and the originator group was 26.9% (7/26). The overall endoscopic response rate was 40.7% (24/59), which of the biosimilar A group was 7/18, the biosimilar B group was 5/15, and the originator group was 46.2% (12/26). And in the above data, there were no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups (all P>0.05). The overall incidence of ADR was 32.9% (24/73), which of the biosimilar A group was 30.4% (7/23), the biosimilar B group was 30.0% (6/20), and the originator group was 36.7% (11/30); and there was no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups ( P=0.847). Conclusion:ADA biosimilars A and B demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety to the originator medication in the treatment of CD.

Spine fracture and dislocation are common traumatic spinal conditions that often require surgical intervention due to compromised spinal stability. Surgical approaches include anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior spinal procedures. According to the specific surgical requirements, patients may be placed in the prone position or repositioned between prone and supine positions during surgery. Intraoperative repositioning has become an essential step in patient positioning. However, during repositioning, patients with spinal fracture and dislocation are at increased risk for complications such as hemodynamic instability, nerve injury, and pressure injuries to the skin and soft tissue. Notably, due to the instability of the spinal cord, even minor manipulations can further exacerbate the damage, potentially leading to severe outcomes like paraplegia. Although the current clinical guidelines provide instructive recommendations for standard position, there remains no specific protocols for intraoperative repositioning in patients with spine fracture and dislocation. With a concern for the lack of clinical studies on positioning techniques, risk prevention, and operational norms for special patients, no applicable guidelines or standards are available. A consensus was required to provide clinical reference, meet the requirements of surgical treatment, and minimize the safety risks of patients caused by improper placement of positions. Professional Committee of Operating Room Nursing of Shaanxi Nursing Association organized experts in nursing management and operating room nursing from major hospitals across China to formulate Expert consensus on intraoperative repositioning for patients with spinal fracture and dislocation ( version 2025). The consensus provides 11 recommendations covering pre-repositioning preparation, intraoperative maneuvers, and post-repositioning observation, aiming to provide references for clinical standardization of the intraoperative repositioning process and protection of patients′ safety.

Spine fracture and dislocation are common traumatic spinal conditions that often require surgical intervention due to compromised spinal stability. Surgical approaches include anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior spinal procedures. According to the specific surgical requirements, patients may be placed in the prone position or repositioned between prone and supine positions during surgery. Intraoperative repositioning has become an essential step in patient positioning. However, during repositioning, patients with spinal fracture and dislocation are at increased risk for complications such as hemodynamic instability, nerve injury, and pressure injuries to the skin and soft tissue. Notably, due to the instability of the spinal cord, even minor manipulations can further exacerbate the damage, potentially leading to severe outcomes like paraplegia. Although the current clinical guidelines provide instructive recommendations for standard position, there remains no specific protocols for intraoperative repositioning in patients with spine fracture and dislocation. With a concern for the lack of clinical studies on positioning techniques, risk prevention, and operational norms for special patients, no applicable guidelines or standards are available. A consensus was required to provide clinical reference, meet the requirements of surgical treatment, and minimize the safety risks of patients caused by improper placement of positions. Professional Committee of Operating Room Nursing of Shaanxi Nursing Association organized experts in nursing management and operating room nursing from major hospitals across China to formulate Expert consensus on intraoperative repositioning for patients with spinal fracture and dislocation ( version 2025). The consensus provides 11 recommendations covering pre-repositioning preparation, intraoperative maneuvers, and post-repositioning observation, aiming to provide references for clinical standardization of the intraoperative repositioning process and protection of patients′ safety.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease caused by antiphospholipid antibodies. Recent studies have found that neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) play an important role in the pathogenesis of APS. This article mainly introduces the formation, detection and research progress of NET in APS. Additionally, it summarizes the relevant drug targets for APS treatment based on NET, aiming to provide a reference for further research on APS.

Objective:To analyze the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of patients with sensory neuronopathies (SNN), and to evaluate the significance of electrophysiological markers in the diagnosis and assessment of disease progression.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical manifestations, electrophysiological characteristics, and spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of 8 cases diagnosed with SNN at the Third Central Hospital of Tianjin between 2015 and 2023. The neurophysiological examination mainly included limb nerve conduction study (NCS), same core needle electrode electromyography, somatosensory evoked potential (SEP), skin sympathetic reflex (SSR), and contact heat evoked potential (CHEP).Results:Among the 8 cases with SNN, 7 cases exhibited asymmetrical onset and a non-length-dependent pattern. All the 8 cases presented with severe deep sensory ataxia, accompanied by superficial sensory abnormalities and tendon areflexia. Paraneoplastic SNN were the most prevalent etiological subtype (4 cases), all of whom presented peripheral neuropathy as the initial symptom. Among these 4 cases, malignancies were identified in 3 cases and 3 cases presented with anti-Hu antibodies. Among the remaining 4 patients, 2 cases were autoimmune and the other 2 cases were idiopathic. NCS results of the 8 cases revealed decrease or absence of sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitudes, with normal sensory conduction velocities. Six cases showed abnormal SEP, including 2 cases of central damage and 4 cases of peripheral damage, 5 cases had abnormal SSR, and 2 cases exhibited abnormal CHEP. Motor nerve conduction studies were normal in all 8 cases. Six patients underwent spinal MRI, and 4 exhibited abnormal signals in dorsal columns.Conclusions:The hallmark clinical manifestation of SNN is sensory ataxia, characterized by substantial impairment of superficial sensation, typically manifesting in a non-length-dependent distribution. Beyond the widespread and significant reduction in SNAP amplitudes, SNN may also exhibit additional electrophysiological impairments, such as those observed in SEP, SSR and CHEP.SEP combined with spinal cord MRI can improve the detection rate for damages in the central sensory conduction pathway.

Objective:To summarize and analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss（SSHL） accompanying diabetes mellitus, to explore whether diabetes affects the treatment outcomes during hospitalization, and to identify the factors influencing the efficacy of SSHL patients with diabetes. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 939 patients with SSHL. The baseline characteristics, and onset conditions of the diabetes group（79 cases） and the non-diabetes group（860 cases） were compared. Propensity score matching（PSM） was applied in a 1︰ 2 ratio to match initial hearing levels with baseline characteristics such as age, sex, and BMI, resulting in 73 diabetes cases and 144 non-diabetes cases for treatment efficacy comparison. For the analysis of prognostic factors, a logistic regression model was established based on the treatment outcomes of 217 patients with SSHL. Results:The proportion of SSHL patients accompanying diabetes was 8.40%（79/939）. Compared to non-diabetic patients, those with diabetes were older（median age of 53 years in the diabetes group and 39 years in the non-diabetes group） and had a higher proportion of hypertension（43.04% vs 12.67%）, with significant difference observed（P<0.05）. After PSM, the treatment efficacy during hospitalization was better in the diabetes group than in the non-diabetes group（58.90% vs 47.92%）, although the difference was not statistically significant（P>0.05）. The prognosis of patients with SSNHL accompanied by diabetes was analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model that included age, HDL-C, and INR as variables; however, no statistically significant differences were found（P>0.05）. Conclusion:Patients with SSHL accompanying diabetes are generally older with a higher incidence of hypertension. The presence of diabetes does not affect the treatment outcomes during hospitalization.
Humans ; Propensity Score ; Retrospective Studies ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/therapy* ; Hearing Loss, Sudden/therapy* ; Middle Aged ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Male ; Female ; Prognosis ; Adult ; Logistic Models ; Diabetes Complications ; Aged ; Treatment Outcome

Mechanical pain is one of the most common causes of clinical pain, but there remains a lack of effective treatment for debilitating mechanical and chronic forms of neuropathic pain. Recently, neurotoxin GsMTx4, a selective mechanosensitive (MS) channel inhibitor, has been found to be effective, while the underlying mechanism remains elusive. Here, with multiple rodent pain models, we demonstrated that a GsMTx4-based 17-residue peptide, which we call P10581, was able to reduce mechanical hyperalgesia and neuropathic pain. The analgesic effects of P10581 can be as strong as morphine but is not toxic in animal models. The anti-hyperalgesic effect of the peptide was resistant to naloxone (an μ-opioid receptor antagonist) and showed no side effects of morphine, including tolerance, motor impairment, and conditioned place preference. Pharmacological inhibition of TRPV4 by P10581 in a heterogeneous expression system, combined with the use of Trpv4 knockout mice indicates that TRPV4 channels may act as the potential target for the analgesic effect of P10581. Our study identified a potential drug for curing mechanical pain and exposed its mechanism.

Objective:To explore the operioperative and long-term outcomes of inflatable mediastinoscopic resection of esophageal carcinoma (IVMTE) and minimally invasive Mckeown resection of esophageal carcinoma (MIME) in early esophageal cancer.Methods:This is a retrospective cohort study. A retrospectively analysis was conducted on 176 patients with cT1N0M0 esophageal cancer who underwent IVMTE or MIME at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated with Anhui Medical University from April 2017 to April 2019. There were 128 males and 48 females, aged (66.4±7.7) years (range: 45 to 87 years). General data, perioperative outcomes, pathological data of the tumors, and complications were recorded. Independent sample t-test, χ2 test, or Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the data between the two groups. Propensity score matching was performed with gender, age, tumor location, differentiation degree, pT stage, pN stage, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, smoking history, and alcohol history were considered as covariates. The IVMTE group and MIME group were matched in a 1∶2 ratio using nearest neighbor match method with a caliper value of 0.02. Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves, with Log-rank test for univariate survival analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was applied to analyze prognostic factors for overall survival, and subgroup stratification analysis was performed for pT stage. Results:After matching, the MIME group consisted of 54 cases, and the IVMTE group consisted of 27 cases. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender, age, smoking history, alcohol history, ASA classification, tumor location, and other factors. The IVMTE group had shorter surgery time ( M(IQR), 220 (45) minutes vs. 245 (56) minutes, Z=2.950, P=0.003) and less intraoperative blood loss (100 (50) ml vs. 125 (100) ml, Z=2.193, P=0.028) compared to the MIME group. There were no differences between the two groups in the number and quantity of lymph node stations dissected, and the IVMTE group was not at a disadvantage in terms of the number of lymph nodes dissected around the recurrent laryngeal nerve (all P>0.05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were not significantly different between the two groups (all P>0.05). Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in OS and RFS rates between the pT1 and pT2 subgroups (all P>0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that ASA classification ( HR=2.516, 95% CI: 1.126 to 5.624, P=0.025), pN stage ( HR=2.485, 95% CI: 0.984 to 6.274, P=0.046), and whether adjuvant therapy was given postoperatively ( HR=2.915, 95% CI: 1.304 to 6.515, P=0.009) were independent risk factors affecting 5-year OS rate. For 5-year RFS, pT stage ( HR=0.403, 95% CI: 0.194 to 0.838, P=0.011), pN stage ( HR=5.219, 95% CI: 2.401 to 11.346, P<0.01), and whether adjuvant therapy was given postoperatively ( HR=5.644, 95% CI: 2.691 to 11.838, P<0.01) were independent risk factors, while the surgical approach was not an independent risk factor affecting patient prognosis. Conclusion:The short-term and long-term effect of IVMTE in the treatment of early esophageal cancer is good, and it can achieve effects comparable to MIME.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) originator and biosimilars in the treatment of Crohn′s disease (CD).Methods:From January 2020 to January 2023, the clinical data of 73 patients who were diagnosed as CD and received ADA treatment at the Department of Gastroenterology, the Tenth People′s Hospital of Tongji University were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 30 patients received ADA originator treatment (National Medicine Approval Number SJ20181019; originator group), 23 patients received biosimilar A treatment (Medicine Medicine Approval Number S20190038; biosimilar A group), and 20 patients received biosimilar B (Medicine Medicine Approval Number S20190043; biosimilar B group). At 12 and 48 weeks after treatment, the clinical data of clinical remission (Crohn′s disease activity index(CDAI) score <150), clinical response (CDAI score decreased ≥ 70 from baseline), endoscopic remission (simple endoscopic score for Crohn′s disease (SES-CD) ≤ 2 or Rutgeerts score ≤ 1), endoscopic response (SES-CD decreased > 50% from baseline), and adverse drug reaction (ADR) were collected. Chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test was used for statistical analysis.Results:After 12 weeks of ADA treatment, the overall clinical remission rate was 69.9% (51/73), which of the biosimilar A group was 69.6% (16/23), the biosimilar B group was 75.0% (15/20), and the originator group was 66.7% (20/30). The overall clinical response rate was 83.6% (61/73), which of the biosimilar A group was 82.6% (19/23), the biosimilar B group was 80.0% (16/20), and the originator group was 86.7% (26/30). The overall endoscopic remission rate was 42.5% (31/73), which of the biosimilar A group was 52.2% (12/23), the biosimilar B group was 45.0% (9/20), and the originator group was 33.3% (10/30). The overall endoscopic response rate was 63.0% (46/73), which of the biosimilar A group was 73.9% (17/23), the biosimilar B group was 70.0% (14/20), and the originator group was 50.0% (15/30). And in the above data, there were no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups (all P>0.05). After 48 weeks of treatment, the overall clinical remission rate was 54.2% (32/59), which of the biosimilar A group was 8/18, the biosimilar B group was 9/15, and the originator group was 57.7% (15/26). The overall clinical response rate was 71.2% (42/59), which of the biosimilar A group was 10/18, the biosimilar B group was 12/15, and the originator group was 76.9% (20/26). The overall endoscopic remission rate was 25.4% (15/59), which of the biosimilar A group was 5/18, the biosimilar B group was 3/15, and the originator group was 26.9% (7/26). The overall endoscopic response rate was 40.7% (24/59), which of the biosimilar A group was 7/18, the biosimilar B group was 5/15, and the originator group was 46.2% (12/26). And in the above data, there were no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups (all P>0.05). The overall incidence of ADR was 32.9% (24/73), which of the biosimilar A group was 30.4% (7/23), the biosimilar B group was 30.0% (6/20), and the originator group was 36.7% (11/30); and there was no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups ( P=0.847). Conclusion:ADA biosimilars A and B demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety to the originator medication in the treatment of CD.