Objective To summarize the changing prevalence of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacterales based on the data of CHINET Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Program from 2015 to 2021 for improving antimicrobial treatment in clinical practice.Methods Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using a commercial automated susceptibility testing system according to the unified CHINET protocol.The results were interpreted according to the breakpoints of the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute(CLSI)M100 31st ed in 2021.Results Over the seven-year period(2015-2021),the overall prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales(CRE)was 9.43％(62 342/661 235).The prevalence of CRE strains in Klebsiella pneumoniae,Citrobacter freundii,and Enterobacter cloacae was 22.38％,9.73％,and 8.47％,respectively.The prevalence of CRE strains in Escherichia coli was 1.99％.A few CRE strains were also identified in Salmonella and Shigella.The CRE strains were mainly isolated from respiratory specimens(44.23±2.80)％,followed by blood(20.88±3.40)％and urine(18.40±3.45)％.Intensive care units(ICUs)were the major source of the CRE strains(27.43±5.20)％.CRE strains were resistant to all the β-lactam antibiotics tested and most non-β-lactam antimicrobial agents.The CRE strains were relatively susceptible to tigecycline and polymyxins with low resistance rates.Conclusions The prevalence of CRE strains was increasing from 2015 to 2021.CRE strains were highly resistant to most of the antibacterial drugs used in clinical practice.Clinicians should prescribe antimicrobial agents rationally.Hospitals should strengthen antibiotic stewardship in key clinical settings such as ICUs,and take effective infection control measures to curb CRE outbreak and epidemic in hospitals.

Objective To summarize the changing prevalence of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacterales based on the data of CHINET Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Program from 2015 to 2021 for improving antimicrobial treatment in clinical practice.Methods Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using a commercial automated susceptibility testing system according to the unified CHINET protocol.The results were interpreted according to the breakpoints of the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute(CLSI)M100 31st ed in 2021.Results Over the seven-year period(2015-2021),the overall prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales(CRE)was 9.43％(62 342/661 235).The prevalence of CRE strains in Klebsiella pneumoniae,Citrobacter freundii,and Enterobacter cloacae was 22.38％,9.73％,and 8.47％,respectively.The prevalence of CRE strains in Escherichia coli was 1.99％.A few CRE strains were also identified in Salmonella and Shigella.The CRE strains were mainly isolated from respiratory specimens(44.23±2.80)％,followed by blood(20.88±3.40)％and urine(18.40±3.45)％.Intensive care units(ICUs)were the major source of the CRE strains(27.43±5.20)％.CRE strains were resistant to all the β-lactam antibiotics tested and most non-β-lactam antimicrobial agents.The CRE strains were relatively susceptible to tigecycline and polymyxins with low resistance rates.Conclusions The prevalence of CRE strains was increasing from 2015 to 2021.CRE strains were highly resistant to most of the antibacterial drugs used in clinical practice.Clinicians should prescribe antimicrobial agents rationally.Hospitals should strengthen antibiotic stewardship in key clinical settings such as ICUs,and take effective infection control measures to curb CRE outbreak and epidemic in hospitals.

Objective:To explore the improvement rate of the cognitive function of computerized cognitive remediation therapy (CCRT) on patients with schizophrenia and the clinical effect of CCRT in patients with different levels of cognitive impairment.Methods:A random number table was used to divide 311 patients with schizophrenia into CCRT group ( n=196) and work and amusement therapy (WAT) group ( n=115). The independently developed CCRT and operational music and dance therapy were given for 12 weeks to two treatment groups respectively. All patients were assessed using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) before and after treatment. According to the total score of MCCB at baseline, the patient′s cognition function was divided into 4 levels: severe cognitive impairment, moderate cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment and normal cognitive function. According to the change of MCCB total score, the efficacy of the treatment was divided into 3 levels: no improvement (≤0 points), improvement (0-9.57 points), superior improvement (>9.57 points). The improvement rate of cognitive function between two treatment groups was compared. Results:In the CCRT group, there were 19 cases with superior improvement, 105 cases with improvement, and 46 cases with no improvement. In the WAT group, there were 7 cases with superior improvement, 39 cases with improvement, and 41 cases with no improvement. The improvement of cognitive function of CCRT group was better than that of WAT group, and the difference was statistically significant ( Z=2.978, P=0.003). The patients with serious cognitive impairment in the CCRT group had a higher improvement rate than those in the WAT group ( Z=1.860, P=0.032). The patients with moderate cognitive impairment in the CCRT group had a lower no improvement rate than those in the WAT ( Z=-1.817, P=0.035).The patients with mild cognitive impairment in the CCRT group had a lower no improvement rate ( Z=-3.294, P=0.001) and higher improvement rate and superior improvement rate ( Z=2.084, P=0.019; Z=1.969, P=0.025) than those in the WAT group. There was no statistically significant difference in improvement rate between patients with normal cognitive function in the CCRT group and in the WAT group ( P>0.05).The patients with improvement and superior improvement of cognition were combined as responder, and the two treatment groups were compared. The patients with mild cognitive impairment in the CCRT group had a higher improvement rate than those in the WAT group (77.2%（44/57） vs. 41.4%（12/29），χ2=10.853， P=0.001). However, for patients with serious and moderate cognitive impairment or with normal cognitive function at baseline, rates of improvement after treatment did not differ significantly between CCRT group and WAT group. According to Cohen′s d, the level of effect size in cognition improvement after CCRT treatment in patients with different cognitive dysfunction level was: mild cognitive impairment (0.59)>moderate cognitive impairment (0.48)>normal cognitive function (-0.12)>serious cognitive impairment (-0.24). Conclusions:Schizophrenic patients treated with CCRT had a higher improvement rate of cognitive function than those with WAT, and the improvement rate of cognitive function is higher in patients with mild cognitive impairment after CCRT treatment.

Objective:To explore the improvement rate of the cognitive function of computerized cognitive remediation therapy (CCRT) on patients with schizophrenia and the clinical effect of CCRT in patients with different levels of cognitive impairment.Methods:A random number table was used to divide 311 patients with schizophrenia into CCRT group ( n=196) and work and amusement therapy (WAT) group ( n=115). The independently developed CCRT and operational music and dance therapy were given for 12 weeks to two treatment groups respectively. All patients were assessed using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) before and after treatment. According to the total score of MCCB at baseline, the patient′s cognition function was divided into 4 levels: severe cognitive impairment, moderate cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment and normal cognitive function. According to the change of MCCB total score, the efficacy of the treatment was divided into 3 levels: no improvement (≤0 points), improvement (0-9.57 points), superior improvement (>9.57 points). The improvement rate of cognitive function between two treatment groups was compared. Results:In the CCRT group, there were 19 cases with superior improvement, 105 cases with improvement, and 46 cases with no improvement. In the WAT group, there were 7 cases with superior improvement, 39 cases with improvement, and 41 cases with no improvement. The improvement of cognitive function of CCRT group was better than that of WAT group, and the difference was statistically significant ( Z=2.978, P=0.003). The patients with serious cognitive impairment in the CCRT group had a higher improvement rate than those in the WAT group ( Z=1.860, P=0.032). The patients with moderate cognitive impairment in the CCRT group had a lower no improvement rate than those in the WAT ( Z=-1.817, P=0.035).The patients with mild cognitive impairment in the CCRT group had a lower no improvement rate ( Z=-3.294, P=0.001) and higher improvement rate and superior improvement rate ( Z=2.084, P=0.019; Z=1.969, P=0.025) than those in the WAT group. There was no statistically significant difference in improvement rate between patients with normal cognitive function in the CCRT group and in the WAT group ( P>0.05).The patients with improvement and superior improvement of cognition were combined as responder, and the two treatment groups were compared. The patients with mild cognitive impairment in the CCRT group had a higher improvement rate than those in the WAT group (77.2%（44/57） vs. 41.4%（12/29），χ2=10.853， P=0.001). However, for patients with serious and moderate cognitive impairment or with normal cognitive function at baseline, rates of improvement after treatment did not differ significantly between CCRT group and WAT group. According to Cohen′s d, the level of effect size in cognition improvement after CCRT treatment in patients with different cognitive dysfunction level was: mild cognitive impairment (0.59)>moderate cognitive impairment (0.48)>normal cognitive function (-0.12)>serious cognitive impairment (-0.24). Conclusions:Schizophrenic patients treated with CCRT had a higher improvement rate of cognitive function than those with WAT, and the improvement rate of cognitive function is higher in patients with mild cognitive impairment after CCRT treatment.

Objective To evaluate upfront common bile duct suturing against T-tube drainage after exploration in the treatment of common bile duct stone.Methods 253 cases of extrahepatic bile duct stones treated at our department from 2008 June to 2012 January were randomly divided into primary suture group and T tube drainage group,by t test or analysis of variance independent sample comparison.Results All operations were successful.Postoperative bile leakage was observed in 2 patients in group A and 4 in group B respectively(P ＞ 0.05),there was no reoperations in the two groups.In group B retrograde biliary tract infection developed in one and was cured by biliary tract flush combined with antibiotics administration.The abdominal drainage was bile tainted fluid about 5-10 ml a day in bile leakage cases in both groups and healed itself in 3-4 days without fever,jaundice symptoms.There was no other severe complications such as pancreatitis.The postoperative biliary complication rate (P =0.802),operative time (P =0.137),intraoperative blood loss (P =0.069) and liver function recovery(ALT P =0.087,AST P =0.752,TBIL P =0.459,DBIL P =0.217,ALP P =0.576,GGT P =0.362) was not significantly different between the two groups.In group A postoperative flatus passing (P =0.037),postoperative fluid volume (P =0.008),postoperative hospital stay(P =0.015) were better than that in T-tube drainage group.At 3 to 12 months follow-up,no patients were found to have residual stones and biliary stricture in group A and group B.Conclusions With the definite indication and proficient surgical technology,primary suture of common bile duct after exploration is a safe and effective way after treatment of choledocholithiasis.

A new-designed axial flow blood pump, dived by magnetic coupling and using internal hollow brushless DC motor and inlet and outlet in line with impeller, was tested in mimic circuit. The results showed good performance of the new pump and indicated that its hydrodynamic characteristic can meet the demands of clinical extracorporeal circulation and auxiliary circulation.
Assisted Circulation ; instrumentation ; Equipment Design ; Extracorporeal Circulation ; instrumentation ; Hydrodynamics ; Magnetics

Objective To discuss the clinical effect of combination therapy under the theory of "treating soft tissue for bone disease" on knee osteoarthritis.Methods The 160 cases were randomly divided into control group(80 cases) and experimental group(80 cases).The control group was treated by diclofenac sodium sustained release capsules(per os) and sodium hyaluronate(intra-joint injection).The experimental group was treated by traction,steaming and washing,massage,needle-knife therapy,manipulation on soft tissues for loosening the joint,and orthepedic insoles.The course of treatment was 3 weeks.The effect was evaluated according to Lysholm Score,knee movement and subjective satisfaction after the follow-up for 6 months.Results Of the 154 cases completed the study(control group 75 cases and experimental group 79 cases),the Lysholm Score and knee movement had a very significant improvement(P