Cervical spinal cord injury without fracture-dislocation (CSCIWFD) is referred to as a special type of cervical spinal cord injury characterized by traumatic spinal cord dysfunction and no significant bony structural abnormalities on imagines. Duo to the high risk of missed diagnosis during the initial consultation, CSCIWFD may lead to progressive neurological deterioration or even complete paralysis, severely impacting patients′ prognosis. Currently, there are no established consensuses over the diagnosis and treatment of CSCIWFD, such as the lack of evidence-based standards for indications of non-surgical treatment and risk of secondary neurological injury, as well as debates over the optimal timing for surgical intervention and indications for different surgical approaches. To address these issues, the Spine Trauma Group of the Orthopedic Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts in the relevant fields to formulate Diagnosis and treatment guideline for acute cervical spinal cord injury without fracture- dislocation in adults ( version 2025) . Based on evidence-based medicine and the principles of scientific rigor and clinical applicability, the guidelines proposed 11 recommendations covering terminology, diagnosis, evaluation treatment, and rehabilitation, etc., aiming to standardize the management of CSCIWFD.

Cervical spinal cord injury without fracture-dislocation (CSCIWFD) is referred to as a special type of cervical spinal cord injury characterized by traumatic spinal cord dysfunction and no significant bony structural abnormalities on imagines. Duo to the high risk of missed diagnosis during the initial consultation, CSCIWFD may lead to progressive neurological deterioration or even complete paralysis, severely impacting patients′ prognosis. Currently, there are no established consensuses over the diagnosis and treatment of CSCIWFD, such as the lack of evidence-based standards for indications of non-surgical treatment and risk of secondary neurological injury, as well as debates over the optimal timing for surgical intervention and indications for different surgical approaches. To address these issues, the Spine Trauma Group of the Orthopedic Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts in the relevant fields to formulate Diagnosis and treatment guideline for acute cervical spinal cord injury without fracture- dislocation in adults ( version 2025) . Based on evidence-based medicine and the principles of scientific rigor and clinical applicability, the guidelines proposed 11 recommendations covering terminology, diagnosis, evaluation treatment, and rehabilitation, etc., aiming to standardize the management of CSCIWFD.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) combined with lower cervical fracture is often categorized into unstable fracture, with a high incidence of neurological injury and a high rate of disability and morbidity. As factors such as shoulder occlusion may affect the accuracy of X-ray imaging diagnosis, it is often easily misdiagnosed at the primary diagnosis. Non-operative treatment has complications such as bone nonunion and the possibility of secondary neurological damage, while the timing, access and choice of surgical treatment are still controversial. Currently, there are no clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of AS combined with lower cervical fracture with or without dislocation. To this end, the Spinal Trauma Group of Orthopedics Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts to formulate Clinical guidelines for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis combined with lower cervical fracture in adults ( version 2024) in accordance with the principles of evidence-based medicine, scientificity and practicality, in which 11 recommendations were put forward in terms of the diagnosis, imaging evaluation, typing and treatment, etc, to provide guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of AS combined with lower cervical fracture.

Spinal surgical site infection (SSI), especially deep SSI after internal fixation is difficult in treatment, with long course of disease and poor prognosis. At present, there are many controversies in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal SSI, with unsatisfactory overall efficacy of its diagnosis and treatment. Besides, no diagnosis and treatment guideline based on evidence-based medicine has been in existence. To this end, the Spinal Infection Group of the Orthopedic Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association and the Spinal Infection Group of the Spinal Surgery Branch of the Chinese Rehabilitation Medicine Association jointly organized relevant experts to formulate Evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of surgical site infection in spinal trauma ( version 2024) based on an evidence-based approach. A total of 10 recommendations were proposed on the diagnosis and treatment of spinal SSI, so as to provide a clinical reference for the diagnosis and treatment of spinal SSI.

Objective:To investigate the safety and efficacy of posterior apical total intervertebral release (IVR) combined with posterior column osteotomy (PCO) in the treatment of rigid scoliosis.Methods:This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiographic data of 27 patients with rigid scoliosis who underwent posterior total IVR combined with PCO in the apical region from July 2017 to September 2023. There were 10 males and 17 females with an age of 19.3±8.8 years (range 11-48 years). Among them, there were 16 cases of idiopathic scoliosis, 7 cases of neuromuscular scoliosis, 1 case of congenital scoliosis, 1 case of Marfan syndrome with scoliosis, 1 case of neurofibromatosis with scoliosis, and 1 case of osteogenesis imperfecta with scoliosis. The mean Cobb angle of the main curve was 75.4°±13.7° (range 58.7°-110.2°) preoperatively. The mean flexibility of the main curvature is 15.7%±4.7% (range 2.5%-24.3%). Preoperative computer tomography showed that the area of the IVR channel in the convex and concave side of the apical region was 128.1±23.3 mm 2 and 89.5±18.6 mm 2, respectively. The area of the convex IVR was significantly higher than that of the concave IVR. Results:All 27 patients underwent surgery successfully. Total IVR was performed at an average of 3.4±0.7 levels in the apical region. SPO and Ponte osteotomy were performed at 2.7±0.7 and 4.9±1.1 levels, respectively. The mean fusion segment is 11.2±2.0. The operation time, estimated blood loss, and follow-up time were 7.5±0.9 hours (range 6.0-9.8 hours), 1 103.7±845.1 ml (range 300-4 500 ml), and 20.0±14.2 months (range 5-56 months), respectively. The preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up's mean coronal Cobb angles of the main curve were 75.4°±13.7°, 18.2°±6.5° and 18.6°±6.5°, respectively. The mean correction rate was 75.7%±5.3%. In cases of thoracolumbar kyphosis, the preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up mean sagittal Cobb angles were 47.2°±4.7°, 22.8°±9.1° and 23.8°±8.9°, respectively. The mean correction rate was 49.5%±18.9%. The mean axial vertebral rotation (AVR) in the IVR region was 24.6°±7.6° preoperatively and was corrected to 11.6°±5.6° postoperatively. The mean correction rate for AVR was 54.0%±11.3%. The coronal, sagittal Cobb angles and AVR postoperatively were significantly lower than those preoperatively ( P<0.001). This case series reported 4 cases of postoperative pleural effusion and 1 case of pulmonary infection, and all of them were cured through conservative treatment. One patient developed incision infection 2 months postoperatively and recovered through debridement surgery. Two patients had proximal junctional kyphosis, one of them underwent revision surgery, and another case was treated with braces. Conclusion:Posterior multi-segment total IVR combined with PCO is a safe and effective surgical procedure for the treatment of rigid scoliosis. The procedure of total IVR was recommended as a supplement for better release of the rigid spine when traditional release methods are not effective.

Spinal surgical site infection (SSI), especially deep SSI after internal fixation is difficult in treatment, with long course of disease and poor prognosis. At present, there are many controversies in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal SSI, with unsatisfactory overall efficacy of its diagnosis and treatment. Besides, no diagnosis and treatment guideline based on evidence-based medicine has been in existence. To this end, the Spinal Infection Group of the Orthopedic Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association and the Spinal Infection Group of the Spinal Surgery Branch of the Chinese Rehabilitation Medicine Association jointly organized relevant experts to formulate Evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of surgical site infection in spinal trauma ( version 2024) based on an evidence-based approach. A total of 10 recommendations were proposed on the diagnosis and treatment of spinal SSI, so as to provide a clinical reference for the diagnosis and treatment of spinal SSI.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) combined with spinal fractures with thoracic and lumbar fracture as the most common type shows characteristics of unstable fracture, high incidence of nerve injury, high mortality and high disability rate. The diagnosis may be missed because it is mostly caused by low-energy injury, when spinal rigidity and osteoporosis have a great impact on the accuracy of imaging examination. At the same time, the treatment choices are controversial, with no relevant specifications. Non-operative treatments can easily lead to bone nonunion, pseudoarthrosis and delayed nerve injury, while surgeries may be failed due to internal fixation failure. At present, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of AS combined with thoracic and lumbar fracture. In this context, the Spinal Trauma Academic Group of Orthopedics Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts to formulate the Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of adult ankylosing spondylitis combined with thoracolumbar fracture ( version 2023) by following the principles of evidence-based medicine and systematically review related literatures. Ten recommendations on the diagnosis, imaging evaluation, classification and treatment of AS combined with thoracic and lumbar fracture were put forward, aiming to standardize the clinical diagnosis and treatment of such disorder.

The acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults have a higher rate of neurological injury and early death compared with atlas or axial fractures alone. Currently, the diagnosis and treatment choices of acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults are controversial because of the lack of standards for implementation. Non-operative treatments have a high incidence of bone nonunion and complications, while surgeries may easily lead to the injury of the vertebral artery, spinal cord and nerve root. At present, there are no evidence-based Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults. To provide orthopedic surgeons with the most up-to-date and effective information in treating acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults, the Spinal Trauma Group of Orthopedic Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts in the field of spinal trauma to develop the Evidence-based guideline for clinical diagnosis and treatment of acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults ( version 2023) by referring to the "Management of acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults" published by American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS)/Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) in 2013 and the relevant Chinese and English literatures. Ten recommendations were made concerning the radiological diagnosis, stability judgment, treatment rules, treatment options and complications based on medical evidence, aiming to provide a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of acute combination fractures of the atlas and axis in adults.

Objective:To explore the teaching effect of 3D simulated wound model combined with problem -based learning (PBL) teaching in the standardized residency training of plastic surgery department. Methods:Totally 90 residents trained in the plastic surgery department of Changhai Hospital of Naval Medical University from June 2016 to September 2019 as the research objects were divided into control group and experimental group in average. The control group received traditional teaching and the experimental group accepted the 3D simulated wound model combined with PBL teaching. Then the out -department examination results and questionnaires evaluation were compared between the two groups. SPSS 19.0 was used to conduct t test on the experimental data. Results:The theoretical and practical scores of residents in the experimental group [(49.23±7.25) points and (36.38±5.29)] points were significantly better than those in the control group [(44.43±5.57) points and (28.94±6.97)] points ( P<0.05). In the questionnaire, the scores of active learning initiative, practical operation ability and clinical strain capacity of residents in the experimental group were all higher than those in the control group ( P<0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in teamwork ability between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:The 3D simulated wound model combined with PBL teaching can be used in the teaching of standardized residency training of plastic surgery. Compared with traditional teaching, this teaching method has significant advantages and is worthy of promotion.

According to the pathological characteristics of symptomatic chronic thoracic and lumbar osteoporotic vertebral fracture (SCOVF), the different clinical treatment methods are selected, including vertebral augmentation, anterior-posterior fixation and fusion, posterior decompression fixation and fusion, and posterior correction osteotomy. However, there is still a lack of a unified understanding on how to choose appropriate treatment method for SCOVF. In order to reflect the new treatment concept and the evidence-based medicine progress of SCOVF in a timely manner and standardize its treatment, the clinical guideline for surgical treatment of SCOVF is formulated in compliance with the principle of scientificity, practicability and advancement and based on the level of evidence-based medicine.