The country’s cardiology centers have been producing subspecialists in the field of Invasive and Interventional Cardiology. To date, 11 hospitals and/or medical centers are involved in training these subspecialists in a 1 to 2-year program. And to this date, there have been no uniform standards and guidelines as to what comprises the basic and/or acceptable training outcomes for the interventionalist in training. This paper describes the development of the core curriculum for an interventional cardiovascular training program to prepare its trainees to be competent in performing invasive diagnostic and interventional cardiovascular procedures as part of comprehensive patient care. The task force for the core curriculum of the interventional training program gathered several officers and leaders of the PSCCI, the training heads of the various interventional programs in the country, as well as experts in the field of cardiology education. Through a series of meetings, consultations, and workshops, the task force laid out the template on which all the training programs would be based. Such a framework considered the international standards regarding minimum caseloads for interventional training and the peculiar situation of each training institution. International standards like the Core Cardiovascular Training Statement (COCATS 4) Task Force 10: Training in Cardiac Catheterizations and the 2020 EAPCI Core Curriculum for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions served as the reference framework for key recommendations. A consensus was achieved that upheld the highest standards of competence without disenfranchising certain institutions due to intricacies and uniqueness of hospital set-up and training situation.

Training ; Education ; Curriculum

BACKGROUND: The leading cause of mortality in the country is heart disease with a rate of 94.5 deaths per 100,000 Filipinos. Multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD) patients carry an increased procedural risk especially those with increased lesion complexity or unfavorable anatomy.
OBJECTIVE: The study aims to determine the variables that will predict procedural success and clinical outcome among MV-CAD patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
SETTING: Philippine Heart Center, Quezon City, Philippines
METHODOLOGY: This retrospective cohort study obtained data from the four-year Philippine Heart Center Registry consisting of 1,030 patients who underwent Multi-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (MVPCI) from January 2009 to January 2012 at the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.
RESULTS: Significant predictors for improved procedural success and reduced risk for major cardiovascular events was evident in male patients, those with mild diastolic dysfunction (grade I or II) and patients on statin therapy. The variables with unfavorable procedural and clinical outcome are female patients, those with unstable angina, STEMI, heart failure, COPD, the need for IABP counterpulsation and a left main artery coronary lesion.
CONCLUSION: The results reflect a local "real-life scenario" providing important information on the predictors of outcome among Filipino patients with multi-vessel disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The information obtained is clinically relevant for both cardiologist and interventionist providing an important risk stratification and contributing to the holistic delivery of cardiovascular care.

Human ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Coronary Artery Disease ; St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Angina, Unstable ; Heart Failure ; Cardiac Catheterization ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive