1.Risk factors and preventive strategies of postoperative delirium in 209 patients with Stanford B aortic dissection: A retrospective cohort study
Na LI ; Xiang WEI ; Xin FENG ; Siqi CHEN ; Taiqiang CHEN
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2024;31(05):739-744
Objective To investigate the risk factors and prevention strategies of postoperative delirium in Stanford B aortic dissection. Methods Clinical data of the patients diagnosed with Stanford B aortic dissection and undergoing endovascular aortic repair from January 2020 to August 2021 in our department were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a non-delirium group and a delirium group according to the presence of postoperative delirium. The risk factors for postoperative delirium after Stanford type B aortic dissection and the protective effect of dexmedetomidine on delirium were analyzed. Results A total of 659 patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection were enrolled, including 540 males and 119 females with a median age of 58.00 (41.00, 75.00) years. There were 450 patients in the non-delirium group, and 209 patients in the delirium group. There was no statistical difference in gender, body mass index, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking and drinking history, cholesterol triglyceride level, or creatinine glomerular filtration rate (P>0.05). Age was an independent risk factor for postoperative delirium in Stanford type B aortic dissection (OR=1.392, 95%CI 1.008-1.923, P=0.044). Moreover, whether dexmedetomidine was used or not had no effect on the duration of postoperative delirium (χ2=4.662, P=0.588). Conclusion Age is an independent risk factor for postoperative delirium in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection. The incidence of postoperative delirium in young patients is lower than that in the patients with middle and elderly age, and it may be of reference value to prevent postoperative delirium. Dexmedetomidine has no significant effect on controlling the duration of postoperative delirium.
2.Efficacy and safety of denosumab combined with surgery in treatment of giant cell tumor of pelvis
Yi YANG ; Wei GUO ; Rongli YANG ; Xiaodong TANG ; Taiqiang YAN ; Tao JI ; Lu XIE ; Jie XU ; Zhongyan CHEN ; Haijie LIANG
Cancer Research and Clinic 2018;30(4):246-250,254
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of denosumab in treatment of patients with pelvic giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) during perioperative period. Methods This is a retrospective observational study. Twenty-three patients diagnosed with pelvic GCTB undergoing perioperative denosumab treatment in Musculoskeletal Tumor Center of Peking University People's Hospital from January 2014 to December 2016 were reviewed. The subjective adverse reactions and mandibular X-ray films were used to assess the drug safety. As for efficacy, imaging findings (including X-ray, CT, magnetic resonance imaging) were reviewed. MSTS-93 scoring system was applied in the postoperative functional assessment. Histological response rate, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate and event-free survival rate were all used to deficit the efficacy of denosumab in the treatment of pelvic GCTB combined with surgery. All the results of postoperative were compared statistically with pelvic GCTB patients who underwent surgery in the same hospital from 1999 to 2009. Results All the patients were firstly diagnosed as classic GCTB except for one case which was malignant pelvic GCTB. All patients received denosumab preoperatively and/or postoperatively, and the average number of medications was 8.43. According to the surgical patterns, patients were divided into intralesional surgery group (13 cases) and wide resection group (10 cases). The follow-up was 5-47 months(mean:27.30 months),recurrence was observed in 2 cases in the intralesional surgery group, none in the wide resection group. After drug administration, 13 cases were partial response, 7 cases were stable disease, the objective response rate was 65.0 % (13/20), and the histologically clearance rate of giant cells was 85.0 % (17/20). No case of osteonecrosis of the jaw was observed in this study, and all laboratory indicators were normal. The average postoperative MSTS-93 score was 26.87. Compared with pelvic GCTB patients who underwent surgical treatment from 1999 to 2009, in the intralesional surgery group, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate [15.4 % (2/13) vs. 30.8 % (4/13), P = 0.514], but the limb function was significantly increased (P= 0.002). Conclusions Denosumab combined with surgery plays an important role in the multidisciplinary treatment of pelvic GCTB. The neoadjuvant strategy can reduce patient's intraoperative blood loss by shrinking the tumor size which makes the intralesional curettage surgery possible, and also diminishing the recurrence rate. But more attention should be paid to secondary malignant GCTB during the use of denousmab.
3.Effect of denosumab combined with surgery on sacral giant cell tumor
Zhongyan CHEN ; Yi YANG ; Wei GUO ; Rongli YANG ; Xiaodong TANG ; Taiqiang YAN ; Tao JI ; Lu XIE ; Jie XU ; Jun WANG
Cancer Research and Clinic 2017;29(12):805-808,814
Objective To evaluate the clinical benefits of denosumab in treatment of sacral giant cell tumor of bone(GCTB) when used preoperatively or postoperatively along with surgery, and to analysis the improvement of sacral nerve function. Methods Thirty patients diagnosed as sacral GCTB in Musculoskeletal Tumor Center of Peking University People's Hospital from April 2014 to July 2016 were divided into control group (10 cases), post-operative group (9 cases), and neoadjuvant group (11 cases). Patients in the post-operative and neoadjuvant group were treated with 120 mg of subcutaneous denosumab every 4 weeks with loading doses on days 8 and 15 of the first cycle. Results Three patients in the control cohort 1 had recurrence (3/10), no recurrence occurred in the post-operative group (0/9), and 3 patients in the neoadjuvant group had recurrence(3/11).There were no significant differences in event-free survival(EFS) among the three groups (P = 0.133). The objective response rate (OTR) was 63.6 % (7/11) in the neoadjuvant group based on the RECIST 1.1 criteria for evaluating the efficacy of solid tumors. Five cases had significant pain improvement (defined 2 points improved) and had much better bladder and bowel functions. Four patients were able to have their indwelling catheters removed after neoadjuvant denosumab treatment. Conclusions Neoadjuvant therapy with denosumab can relieve the symptoms and neurologic deficits caused by nerve compression and can diminish the intraoperative blood loss. Surgical removal of the tumor is still the basic treatment of sacral GCTB.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail