Objective:To formulate a community teacher standard for the training of general practitioner program (direction in hospice care).Methods:This was a qualitative study. Twenty-nine experts in general practice and hospice care from various teaching hospitals and community health service centers were invited to participate in two rounds of Delphi consultation from April to August 2022. Based on the results of the consultation, a standard for community faculty training in comprehensive care and end-of-life care for general practitioners was formulated, and the weight coefficients of the indicators were calculated.Results:Of the 29 experts, 11 (37.9%) were male, their age was (52.9±8.9) years, and their working life was (17.0±7.2) years. In the two rounds of expert consultation, the expert positive coefficient was 100.0% (29/29) and 96.6% (28/29), the expert authority coefficient was 0.789 and 0.851, and the expert opinion coordination coefficient W of the importance of all indicators was 0.124 and 0.131, respectively ( χ2=123.01, 131.71, P<0.05). Finally, a set of community-based teacher standard for general practitioner specialty training (direction in hospice care) was established, which consisted of 4 first-level indicators and 30 second-level indicators. The four first-level indicators were basic literacy, clinical qualification and ability, teaching qualification and ability, and scientific research ability, all with the weight coefficients of 0.254, 0.254, 0.252 and 0.240, respectively. Conclusion:The standard of teachers in the community base of general practitioner specialty training (direction in hospice care) established in this study is more scientific, which is conducive to the comprehensive evaluation of teachers in the community training base.

Objective:To develop accreditation standards for clinical faculty in general practitioner specialized training of hospice care.Methods:This was a qualitative study. Twenty nine experts in fields of general practice and hospice care were invited for two rounds of Delphi consultation from April 2022 to August 2022. Based on the consultation results, the accreditation standards for clinical faculty in general practitioner training bases of hospice care specialty was preliminarily developed.Results:The mean age of the consulting experts was (52.9±8.9) years with a mean working year of (17.0±7.2), and 69.0% (20/29) of them held senior professional titles. In the two rounds of consultation, the expert positive coefficient was 100.0% (29/29) and 96.6% (28/29), the expert authority coefficient was 0.765 and 0.813, and the expert opinion coordination coefficient W for the importance of all indicators was 0.112 and 0.196, respectively. The expert opinions tended to be consistent. Finally, a set of clinical base faculty standards for general specialty training was developed, which consisted of 4 first-level indicators and 24 second-level indicators. The 4 first-level indicators were basic literacy, clinical qualification and ability, teaching qualification and ability, scientific research ability, with the weight coefficients of 0.253, 0.255, 0.254 and 0.241, respectively. Conclusion:The standards for clinical teaching faculty in general practitioner specialty training base of hospice care has been established in this study, which is conducive to the comprehensive quality evaluation for training faculty.

Objective:To construct a set of admission evaluation indicators for terminal patients in community hospice wards.Methods:This qualitative study employed a mixed-methods approach. From January to June 2023, 10 physicians working in community hospice wards in Shanghai participated in one-on-one, semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Based on the interview findings and literature review, a preliminary set of admission evaluation indicators was drafted. Subsequently, from July to December 2023, 18 national experts in hospice/palliative care were selected for a two-round Delphi expert consultation to refine the indicators. The final indicator system was established based on the consultation results, and the weight coefficients for each indicator were determined.Results:Sixteen experts completed both rounds of consultation. The experts had a mean age of (52.0±8.3) years and a mean working experience of (14.4±6.8) years. The response rates for the two rounds were 88.9% and 100.0%, respectively. The authority coefficients were 0.875 and 0.894, and the Kendall′s W coordination coefficients were 0.338 (χ2=471.737, P<0.001) and 0.349 (χ2=398.230, P<0.001), respectively. After two rounds of Delphi consultation, a final admission evaluation indicator system was established, comprising 4 first-level indicators and 63 second-level indicators. The first-level indicators and their weight coefficients were: Underlying Disease (0.256 7), Survival Prognosis (0.256 7), Holistic Needs (0.256 6), and Social Environment (0.240 0). Conclusion:The admission evaluation indicator system for terminal patients in community hospice wards developed in this study facilitates the standardized development of community hospice/palliative care services and contributes to providing high-quality care for patients and their families.

This report evaluates the preliminary outcomes of a "six-in-one" integrated cough and asthma center developed under a dual-contract physician model at the Changfeng Community Health Service Center in Putuo District, Shanghai. By combining the efforts of family doctors and medical specialists, the center integrated six core functions-clinical treatment, prevention, nursing, rehabilitation, pharmacy, and nutrition-into a seamless management system covering screening, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up. Supported by specialist guidance and teaching clinics, the model significantly enhanced comprehensive respiratory disease management capabilities within the community setting. The initiative not only improved patient health outcomes but also strengthened multidisciplinary collaboration and resource efficiency, offering a replicable example for improving chronic disease management in primary care through integrated and coordinated service delivery.

Obesity, as a chronic recurrent disease, has become a major public health challenge in China. To implement the requirements of the Healthy China Initiative (2019—2030), under domestic guidelines or consensus statements on overweight and obesity, and in alignment with the latest scientific advances globally, the Quality control protocol for adult overweight and obesity screening in health management (examination) institutions (2025 edition) was developed. This protocol was drafted by the Health Management Center of Shanghai Changzheng Hospital and formulated through multiple rounds of deliberation by experts in China’s health examination quality control field. The protocol establishes unified standards for screening facilities, personnel qualifications, and measurement or testing procedures. It defines specific screening items, outlines a standardized screening pathway, and sets requirements for the final medical review, ensuring the scientific validity, effectiveness, and safety of the screening process. The implementation of this protocol will enhance the consistency of weight management practices for adults across health examination institutions and strengthen the quality control of overweight and obesity screening programs.

Objective To explore the influencing factors of coronary artery lesion severity in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods Clinical data of ACS patients admitted to Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from December 2017 to December 2019 were consecutively collected. The modified Gensini score was used to assess the severity of coronary artery lesions. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with coronary artery lesion severity. Results A total of 1 689 ACS patients were included, with an average age of (64.04±11.45) years; 1 353 (80.11%) were male, and the mean modified Gensini score was (8.12±4.03). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that sex (β＝0.97, P＝0.001), age (β＝0.03, P＝0.021), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; β＝－0.03, P＜0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; β＝0.58, P＜0.001), apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1; β＝－1.28, P＝0.012), lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a); β＝0.001, P＝0.033], and glycated hemoglobin A_1C (HbA_1C; β＝0.45, P＜0.001) were independent influencing factors of the modified Gensini score. Conclusions Metabolic indicators, including Apo A1, LDL-C, HbA_1C, and Lp(a), may serve as risk factors for coronary artery lesion severity in ACS patients, with Apo A1 demonstrating the strongest impact.

Objective:To formulate a community teacher standard for the training of general practitioner program (direction in hospice care).Methods:This was a qualitative study. Twenty-nine experts in general practice and hospice care from various teaching hospitals and community health service centers were invited to participate in two rounds of Delphi consultation from April to August 2022. Based on the results of the consultation, a standard for community faculty training in comprehensive care and end-of-life care for general practitioners was formulated, and the weight coefficients of the indicators were calculated.Results:Of the 29 experts, 11 (37.9%) were male, their age was (52.9±8.9) years, and their working life was (17.0±7.2) years. In the two rounds of expert consultation, the expert positive coefficient was 100.0% (29/29) and 96.6% (28/29), the expert authority coefficient was 0.789 and 0.851, and the expert opinion coordination coefficient W of the importance of all indicators was 0.124 and 0.131, respectively ( χ2=123.01, 131.71, P<0.05). Finally, a set of community-based teacher standard for general practitioner specialty training (direction in hospice care) was established, which consisted of 4 first-level indicators and 30 second-level indicators. The four first-level indicators were basic literacy, clinical qualification and ability, teaching qualification and ability, and scientific research ability, all with the weight coefficients of 0.254, 0.254, 0.252 and 0.240, respectively. Conclusion:The standard of teachers in the community base of general practitioner specialty training (direction in hospice care) established in this study is more scientific, which is conducive to the comprehensive evaluation of teachers in the community training base.

Objective:To develop accreditation standards for clinical faculty in general practitioner specialized training of hospice care.Methods:This was a qualitative study. Twenty nine experts in fields of general practice and hospice care were invited for two rounds of Delphi consultation from April 2022 to August 2022. Based on the consultation results, the accreditation standards for clinical faculty in general practitioner training bases of hospice care specialty was preliminarily developed.Results:The mean age of the consulting experts was (52.9±8.9) years with a mean working year of (17.0±7.2), and 69.0% (20/29) of them held senior professional titles. In the two rounds of consultation, the expert positive coefficient was 100.0% (29/29) and 96.6% (28/29), the expert authority coefficient was 0.765 and 0.813, and the expert opinion coordination coefficient W for the importance of all indicators was 0.112 and 0.196, respectively. The expert opinions tended to be consistent. Finally, a set of clinical base faculty standards for general specialty training was developed, which consisted of 4 first-level indicators and 24 second-level indicators. The 4 first-level indicators were basic literacy, clinical qualification and ability, teaching qualification and ability, scientific research ability, with the weight coefficients of 0.253, 0.255, 0.254 and 0.241, respectively. Conclusion:The standards for clinical teaching faculty in general practitioner specialty training base of hospice care has been established in this study, which is conducive to the comprehensive quality evaluation for training faculty.

Objective:To construct a set of admission evaluation indicators for terminal patients in community hospice wards.Methods:This qualitative study employed a mixed-methods approach. From January to June 2023, 10 physicians working in community hospice wards in Shanghai participated in one-on-one, semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Based on the interview findings and literature review, a preliminary set of admission evaluation indicators was drafted. Subsequently, from July to December 2023, 18 national experts in hospice/palliative care were selected for a two-round Delphi expert consultation to refine the indicators. The final indicator system was established based on the consultation results, and the weight coefficients for each indicator were determined.Results:Sixteen experts completed both rounds of consultation. The experts had a mean age of (52.0±8.3) years and a mean working experience of (14.4±6.8) years. The response rates for the two rounds were 88.9% and 100.0%, respectively. The authority coefficients were 0.875 and 0.894, and the Kendall′s W coordination coefficients were 0.338 (χ2=471.737, P<0.001) and 0.349 (χ2=398.230, P<0.001), respectively. After two rounds of Delphi consultation, a final admission evaluation indicator system was established, comprising 4 first-level indicators and 63 second-level indicators. The first-level indicators and their weight coefficients were: Underlying Disease (0.256 7), Survival Prognosis (0.256 7), Holistic Needs (0.256 6), and Social Environment (0.240 0). Conclusion:The admission evaluation indicator system for terminal patients in community hospice wards developed in this study facilitates the standardized development of community hospice/palliative care services and contributes to providing high-quality care for patients and their families.

This report evaluates the preliminary outcomes of a "six-in-one" integrated cough and asthma center developed under a dual-contract physician model at the Changfeng Community Health Service Center in Putuo District, Shanghai. By combining the efforts of family doctors and medical specialists, the center integrated six core functions-clinical treatment, prevention, nursing, rehabilitation, pharmacy, and nutrition-into a seamless management system covering screening, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up. Supported by specialist guidance and teaching clinics, the model significantly enhanced comprehensive respiratory disease management capabilities within the community setting. The initiative not only improved patient health outcomes but also strengthened multidisciplinary collaboration and resource efficiency, offering a replicable example for improving chronic disease management in primary care through integrated and coordinated service delivery.