1.China guideline for the screening, early detection and early treatment of gastric cancer (2022, Beijing).
Jie HE ; Wan Qing CHEN ; Zhao Shen LI ; Ni LI ; Jian Song REN ; Jin Hui TIAN ; Wen Jing TIAN ; Fu Lan HU ; Ji PENG
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2022;44(7):634-666
Gastric cancer (GC) is a major digestive tract malignancy in China, which seriously threatens the health of Chinese population. A large number of researches have demons-trated that screening, early detection and early treatment are effective in reducing the incidence and mortality of GC. The development of the guideline for GC screening, early detection and early treatment in line with epidemic characteristics of GC in China will greatly promote the homogeneity and standardization, and improve the effect of GC screening. This guideline was commissioned by the Bureau of Disease Control and Prevention of the National Health Commission. The National Cancer Center of China initiated and convened a working group comprising multidisciplinary experts. Following the World Health Organization Handbook for Guideline Development, this guideline combined the most up-to-date evidence of GC screening, China's national conditions, and practical experience in cancer screening. This guideline provided evidence-based recommendations with respect to the screening population, technology and procedure management, aiming to improve the effect of GC screening and provide scientific evidence for the GC prevention and control in China.
Beijing
;
China/epidemiology*
;
Early Detection of Cancer/methods*
;
Humans
;
Mass Screening
;
Stomach Neoplasms/prevention & control*
2.Changing pattern and safety of pretransplant malignancy in kidney transplant recipients
Tae Hyun BAN ; Woo Yeong PARK ; Kyubok JIN ; Seungyeup HAN ; Byung Ha CHUNG ; Sun Cheol PARK ; Bum Soon CHOI ; Cheol Whee PARK ; Sang Seob YUN ; Yong Soo KIM ; Chul Woo YANG
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice 2019;38(4):509-516
BACKGROUND: Cancer rates are increasing not only in the general population but also in patients with end-stage renal disease. We investigated the changing pattern of pretransplant malignancy in kidney transplant recipients over 5 decades.METHODS: We reviewed 3,748 kidney transplant recipients between 1969 and 2016. We divided patients into three groups (1969–1998, 1999–2006, 2007–2016) based on the era of the cancer screening system used throughout the nation. We analyzed the incidence and pattern of pretransplant malignancy among the three groups. We also evaluated recurrent and de novo malignancy in these patients compared to patients without pretransplant malignancy.RESULTS: A total of 72 patients exhibited pretransplant malignancy (1.9%). There were no cases of pretransplant cancer until 1998, but the rate of pretransplant malignancy gradually increased to 1.1% during 1999–2006 and further increased to 4.3% thereafter. The most frequent types of pretransplant malignancy changed from the bladder, liver, and stomach cancers to thyroid cancer and renal cell carcinoma. There were no de novo cases, but there were three cases of recurrent cancer in patients with pretransplant malignancy; the recurrence rate among kidney transplant recipients with pretransplant malignancy was not significantly different from the incidence rate of de novo malignancy among kidney transplant recipients without pretransplant malignancy (4.2% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.48).CONCLUSION: The incidence of pretransplant malignancy in kidney transplantation candidates is gradually increasing, and recent increases were accompanied by changes in cancer types. Pretransplant malignancy may not be a hindrance to kidney transplantation because of the low incidence of posttransplant recurrence and de novo malignancy.
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
;
Early Detection of Cancer
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Kidney Failure, Chronic
;
Kidney Transplantation
;
Kidney
;
Liver
;
Recurrence
;
Stomach Neoplasms
;
Thyroid Neoplasms
;
Transplant Recipients
;
Urinary Bladder
3.Clinicopathological Characteristics of Asymptomatic Young Patients with Gastric Cancer Detected during a Health Checkup
Hyoung Ho MOON ; Hyoun Woo KANG ; Seong Joon KOH ; Ji Won KIM ; Cheol Min SHIN
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2019;74(5):281-290
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Korean National Cancer Screening Program recommends biennial gastric cancer screening for patients aged ≥40 years. This study compared the characteristics of asymptomatic young gastric cancer patients aged <40 years, whose cancer was detected during a health checkup (screening group), with those whose disease was detected because of symptoms (diagnostic group).METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from 84 subjects who underwent a gastroduodenoscopy before the age of 40 years and who were diagnosed with gastric cancer from January 2006 to February 2017 in three tertiary centers in Korea. The clinicopathological characteristics, including age, sex, stage, location, pathology, and survival, were compared according to the purpose of endoscopy (screening group, n=23 vs. diagnostic group, n=61).RESULTS: The median age of the screening group was higher than that of the diagnostic group (37 vs. 35 years, p=0.027), as was the proportion of early gastric cancer cases (78.3% vs. 29.5%, p<0.01), curative endoscopic treatment or operation rate (95.7% vs. 52.5%, p<0.01), and the overall survival (p<0.01). Poorly differentiated or signet ring cell carcinoma was less common in the screening group than in the diagnostic group (56.5% vs. 83.6%, p=0.006). The sex ratio, smoking status, family history of gastric cancer, Helicobacter pylori infection status, and tumor location were similar in the two groups.CONCLUSIONS: Screening gastroduodenoscopy may enable the early detection of gastric cancer and prolong survival in patients <40 years of age.
Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell
;
Early Detection of Cancer
;
Endoscopy
;
Helicobacter pylori
;
Humans
;
Korea
;
Mass Screening
;
Pathology
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Sex Ratio
;
Smoke
;
Smoking
;
Stomach Neoplasms
;
Young Adult
4.Advances in serum biomarkers for early diagnosis of gastric cancer.
Yunzhu ZHANG ; Chunpeng ZHU ; Xinliang LU
Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences 2019;48(3):326-333
Early diagnosis is the key to improve the prognosis of gastric cancer. How to screen out high-risk subjects of gastric cancer in population is a hot spot. Serum-based early detection of gastric cancer is suitable for high-risk population screening, which is more convenient and safer. This article reviews the diagnostic value of serum biomarkers for gastric cancer, including serum DNA methylation, various RNAs, pepsinogen, gastrin, osteopontin, MG7-Ag and CA724. Until now, there is still lack of ideal biomarkers for gastric cancer, and searching for specific RNAs may be promising for early diagnosis and screening of gastric cancer.
Biomarkers, Tumor
;
blood
;
Early Detection of Cancer
;
trends
;
Humans
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Stomach Neoplasms
;
blood
;
diagnosis
5.Clinicopathological Characteristics of Asymptomatic Young Patients with Gastric Cancer Detected during a Health Checkup
Hyoung Ho MOON ; Hyoun Woo KANG ; Seong Joon KOH ; Ji Won KIM ; Cheol Min SHIN
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2019;74(5):281-290
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Korean National Cancer Screening Program recommends biennial gastric cancer screening for patients aged ≥40 years. This study compared the characteristics of asymptomatic young gastric cancer patients aged <40 years, whose cancer was detected during a health checkup (screening group), with those whose disease was detected because of symptoms (diagnostic group). METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from 84 subjects who underwent a gastroduodenoscopy before the age of 40 years and who were diagnosed with gastric cancer from January 2006 to February 2017 in three tertiary centers in Korea. The clinicopathological characteristics, including age, sex, stage, location, pathology, and survival, were compared according to the purpose of endoscopy (screening group, n=23 vs. diagnostic group, n=61). RESULTS: The median age of the screening group was higher than that of the diagnostic group (37 vs. 35 years, p=0.027), as was the proportion of early gastric cancer cases (78.3% vs. 29.5%, p<0.01), curative endoscopic treatment or operation rate (95.7% vs. 52.5%, p<0.01), and the overall survival (p<0.01). Poorly differentiated or signet ring cell carcinoma was less common in the screening group than in the diagnostic group (56.5% vs. 83.6%, p=0.006). The sex ratio, smoking status, family history of gastric cancer, Helicobacter pylori infection status, and tumor location were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Screening gastroduodenoscopy may enable the early detection of gastric cancer and prolong survival in patients <40 years of age.
Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell
;
Early Detection of Cancer
;
Endoscopy
;
Helicobacter pylori
;
Humans
;
Korea
;
Mass Screening
;
Pathology
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Sex Ratio
;
Smoke
;
Smoking
;
Stomach Neoplasms
;
Young Adult
6.Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors
Clinical Endoscopy 2019;52(4):314-320
The incidence of asymptomatic and incidentally found upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors (SETs) is increasing with the implementation of national cancer screening and the development of high-resolution endoscopy in Korea. However, endoscopy alone cannot be used to determine whether SETs are benign or malignant. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is used to further characterize these lesions through the examination of their layered structure, internal echogenicity, size, and relationship to the extramural structure. These provide additional information on whether the lesion is benign or malignant. Nevertheless, the sensitivity and specificity of EUS alone in predicting malignancy is unsatisfactory. Recent guidelines have recommended deciding the timing of EUS-fine needle aspiration and biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) for SETs based on tumor size, malignant features on endoscopy, and high-risk features on EUS. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA/B is reportedly influenced by factors including needle size, number of needle passes, use of suction, use of a stylet in the needle assembly, fanning technique, availability of an on-site cytopathologist, and experience of the endosonographer. Therefore, according to the characteristics of the SETs, various subsequent methods and techniques should be appropriately employed to improve the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA/B.
Biopsy
;
Early Detection of Cancer
;
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
;
Endoscopy
;
Incidence
;
Korea
;
Needles
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Stomach
;
Suction
;
Ultrasonography
7.Characteristics analysis of early gastric cancer under white light endoscopy.
Xin LIU ; Jing ZHANG ; Ye WANG ; He Jun ZHANG ; Shi Gang DING ; Li Ya ZHOU
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) 2019;51(2):302-306
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate endoscopic features of early gastric cancer and clinical features of the patients, which may be helpful to provide reasonable suggestions for physicians to diagnose early gastric cancer during preliminary screening of white light gastroscopy.
METHODS:
A total of 271 patients who received endoscopic submucosal dissection or surgical operation to confirm early gastric cancer in Peking University Third Hospital from Apr. 2009 to Jun. 2017 were included for the retrospective review. Clinical information was collected, including gender, age, symptoms, family history and physical examination. The endoscopic characteristics of lesions under white light endoscopy were analyzed, including endoscopic long diameter, location, texture, spontaneous bleeding, mucosal color and morphology. The pathologic long diameter, infiltration depth and differentiation degree of early gastric cancer were also summarized.
RESULTS:
The study included 271 patients and 279 lesions. Among the 271 cases, 190 were male, 81 were female, average age was (63.7±12.4) years. There were 88 cases (32.5%) and 61 cases (22.5%) with the symptom of abdominal pain and discomfort respectively. The patients with family history of gastric cancer were 20 (7.4%). Abdominal physical examinations of the patients were mostly normal, accounting for 86.0% (233/271). Total detection rate of helicobacter pylori (HP) was 34.2% (79/231), with the highest rate 45.5% (10/22) in 2011 and the lowest rate 28.1% (9/32) in 2014. Among the 279 lesions, the mean endoscopic long diameter was (2.01±1.20) cm. The lesions were mainly single, accounting for 97.0% (263/271). There were 114 cases (40.9%), 62 cases (22.2%), 54 cases (19.4%) in the antrum, angular sulcus and cardia of stomach respectively. The lesions were mostly fragile, accounting for 45.5% (56/123). Most lesions had spontaneous bleeding, accounting for 52.3% (146/279). The mucosal color was mostly normal, accounting for 72.8% (203/279). The most common macroscopic morphology was IIa+IIc type (100 cases, 35.8%) and the lesions usually had mucous membrane damage like erosion and shallow ulcer (127 cases,45.5%). Among the 279 lesions, the mean pathologic long diameter was (2.05±1.48) cm. Intramucosal carcinoma accounted for 61.6% (172/279) and moderate differentiated gastric cancers accounted for 52.8% (131/248).
CONCLUSION
In order to improve diagnosis of early gastric cancer,superficial elevation and depression of flat lesions as well as mucous membrane damage under white light endoscopy should be taken notice.
Aged
;
Early Detection of Cancer
;
Endoscopy
;
Female
;
Gastric Mucosa
;
Gastroscopy
;
Helicobacter pylori
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Stomach Neoplasms
8.Factors Affecting Endoscopic Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer in the Population-Based Screening Era.
Yoon Gwon MUN ; Myung Gyu CHOI ; Chul Hyun LIM ; Han Hee LEE ; Dong Hoon KANG ; Jae Myung PARK ; Kyo Young SONG
Clinical Endoscopy 2018;51(5):478-484
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Since population-based screening for gastric cancer in Korea was implemented, endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer has become increasingly popular. This study investigates factors affecting endoscopic curative resection of early gastric cancer in population-based screening for gastric cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer who underwent treatment at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. All patients completed questionnaires about clinical information, including interval between surveillance tests for gastric cancer. RESULTS: Of 469 gastric cancer patients, 147 (31.3%) had undergone curative endoscopic resection, 260 (55.4%) had undergone curative surgical resection, and 62 (13.3%) underwent non-curative resection or were in an inoperable state. Patients with curative endoscopic resection had fewer alarm symptoms/signs than other groups. In multivariate analysis, regular surveillance endoscopy was the only factor predicting curative endoscopic resection (odds ratio [OR], 6.099; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.532–14.933). In addition, patients undergoing gastric cancer screening had a significantly higher rate of endoscopic curative resection compared with subjects who had never been screened. (1-year interval: OR, 49.969; 95% CI, 6.340–393.827, 2-year interval: OR, 15.283; 95% CI, 1.833–127.406, over 2-year interval: OR, 10.651; 95% CI, 1.248–90.871). Shorter screening test intervals were associated with higher rates of endoscopic curative resection. CONCLUSIONS: Regular surveillance testing was the independent factor predicting curative endoscopic resection of gastric cancer.
Early Detection of Cancer
;
Endoscopy
;
Humans
;
Korea
;
Mass Screening*
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Seoul
;
Stomach Neoplasms*
9.Early Detection is Important to Reduce the Economic Burden of Gastric Cancer.
Jie Hyun KIM ; Sung Soo KIM ; Jeong Hoon LEE ; Da Hyun JUNG ; Dae Young CHEUNG ; Woo Chul CHUNG ; Soo Heon PARK
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2018;18(1):82-89
PURPOSE: Early detection of gastric cancer is important to improve prognosis. Early detection enables local treatment, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Therefore, we investigated whether early detection of gastric cancer could reduce healthcare costs by comparison according to stage and treatment modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical care costs were investigated according to tumor stage and initial treatment modality in 1,188 patients newly diagnosed with gastric cancer at 7 medical institutions from December 2011 to June 2012. Total medical care costs during the first-year after diagnosis (total first-year costs) were examined, including the costs of initial treatment, post-initial treatment, and inpatient and outpatient visits. RESULTS: Stage I (75.3%) was the most common cancer stage. ESD was the second most common treatment following surgery. Total first-year costs increased significantly from stages I to IV. The costs of initial treatment and post-initial treatment were lowest in patients with stage I cancer. Among patients with stage I cancer, total first-year costs were significantly lower when treated by ESD; in particular, initial ESD treatment costs were much lower than others. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of healthcare has increased significantly with increasing cancer stages. ESD can greatly reduce medical care costs of gastric cancer. Thus, early detection of gastric cancer is important to reduce healthcare costs.
Delivery of Health Care
;
Diagnosis
;
Early Detection of Cancer
;
Health Care Costs
;
Humans
;
Inpatients
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Outpatients
;
Prognosis
;
Stomach Neoplasms*
10.Revision of Quality Indicators for the Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea.
Jun Ki MIN ; Jae Myung CHA ; Yu Kyung CHO ; Jie Hyun KIM ; Soon Man YOON ; Jong Pil IM ; Yunho JUNG ; Jeong Seop MOON ; Jin Oh KIM ; Yoon Tae JEEN
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2018;71(5):269-281
Gastroscopy and colonoscopy are widely used for the early diagnosis of stomach and colorectal cancer. The present revision integrates recent data regarding previous quality indicators and novel indicators suggested for gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures for the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea. The new indicators, developed by the Quality Improvement Committee of the Korean Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vary in the level of supporting evidence, and most are based solely on expert opinion. Updated indicators validated by clinical research were prioritized, but were chosen by expert consensus when such studies were absent. The resultant quality indicators were graded according to the levels of consensus and recommendations. The updated indicators will provide a relevant guideline for high-quality endoscopy. The future direction of quality indicator development should include relevant outcome measures and an evidence-based approach to support proposed performance targets.
Colonoscopy
;
Colorectal Neoplasms
;
Consensus
;
Early Detection of Cancer*
;
Early Diagnosis
;
Endoscopy*
;
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
;
Expert Testimony
;
Gastroscopy
;
Korea*
;
Mass Screening
;
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
;
Quality Improvement*
;
Stomach

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail