Objective To evaluate the clinical outcome of kidney transplantation from donation after brain death(DBD)donors complicated with acute kidney injury(AKI).Methods Clinical data of 216 DBD donors were retrospectively analyzed,and they were divided into the AKI group(n=69)and control group(n=147)according to the Kidney Disease:Improving Global Outcomes(KDIGO)guidelines.Donors in the AKI group were further divided into the KDIGO stage 1 and stage 2-3 subgroups.One hundred and thirty-five recipients were assigned into the AKI group and 288 recipients in the control group.Postoperative recovery of renal function and clinical outcomes of the recipients were recorded.The risk factors of delayed graft function(DGF)were identified.Results The highest serum creatinine(Scr)level,Scr level before procurement,the highest blood sodium level and blood sodium level before procurement in the AKI group were higher than those in the control group.The application duration of vasopressors in the AKI group was longer than that in the control group.In the AKI group,the amount of fluid resuscitation within 48 h was higher,the HCO3-level at admission was lower,and the incidence of diabetes insipidus and hypotension was higher than those in the control group.The highest Scr level and the Scr level before procurement in KDIGO stage 2-3 donors were significantly higher than those in KDIGO stage 1 counterparts(all P＜0.05).Compared with the control group,the incidence of DGF and acute rejection was higher,the proportion of continuous renal replacement therapy was higher,the Scr level within postoperative 90 d was higher,and the urine amount within postoperative 3 d was less than those of recipients in the AKI group.Compared with KDIGO stage 1 recipients,KDIGO stage 2-3 recipients had higher Scr levels at postoperative 3,4,5 and 15 d,and less urine amount at postoperative 2 d(all P＜0.05).Univariate analysis showed that donor age,the highest Scr level,the highest blood sodium level and the amount of fluid resuscitation within 48 h were the risk factors for DGF in recipients after kidney transplantation.Multivariate analysis showed that donor age was the independent risk factor for DGF in recipients after kidney transplantation(all P＜0.05).Conclusions For the application of DBD donors complicated with AKI,active organ maintenance should be performed to alleviate AKI.It exerts no effect upon graft function and survival rate at postoperative 6 months,which may achieve equivalent efficacy as non-AKI donors and may be used as a source of extended criteria donor kidneys.

Objective:To follow-up the previous phase Ⅲ clinical trial of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (Follitrope ?), and to evaluate the cumulative pregnancy rate, the cumulative live birth rate, and the neonatal outcomes of subjects. Methods:The phase Ⅲ clinical study of Follitrope ? in China (CTR20150341/CTR20150341, May 15, 2015—June 27, 2016) was followed up until December 31, 2022. Patients were divided into Follitrope ? group and Gonal-F ? group. According to the age, patients were divided into three subgroups: 20-30 years old subgroup, 31-35 years old subgroup and 36-39 years old subgroup. Cumulative pregnancy rate, cumulative live birth rate, number of embryos transferred per cycle, live births per embryo transfer cycle, live births per oocyte retrieved, and neonatal characteristics were analyzed. Results:A total of 446 patients were included in the analysis, of which 336 (75.3%) were in the Follitrope ? group and 110 (24.7%) in the Gonal-F ? group, with a follow-up period of 6.5 years. There were no statistically significant differences between the Follitrope ? group and the Gonal-F ? group in terms of cumulative pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate (all P>0.05). Similar cumulative pregnancy rates and cumulative live birth rates were observed between the two groups within each age subgroup (all P>0.05). In the 36-39 years old subgroup, the Follitrope ? group showed a trend towards higher cumulative pregnancy rate [60.0% (12/20)] and cumulative live birth rate [55.0% (11/20)] compared with the Gonal-F ? group [28.6% (2/7), 14.3% (1/7)], however, none of the differences were statistically significant (all P>0.05). Twin pregnancy rates, live births per embryo, live birth per oocyte, newborn gender, birth weight, and birth defect rates were similar between the Follitrope ? group and the Gonal-F ? group without statistically significant differences (all P>0.05). Conclusion:The safety and effectiveness of Follitrope ? in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation are similar to those of Gonal-F ?. Compared with Gonal-F ?, there is a trend toward higher cumulative pregnancy rates and cumulative live birth rates in elderly patients with Follitrope ?, although there is no statistical difference.

Objective:To follow-up the previous phase Ⅲ clinical trial of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (Follitrope ?), and to evaluate the cumulative pregnancy rate, the cumulative live birth rate, and the neonatal outcomes of subjects. Methods:The phase Ⅲ clinical study of Follitrope ? in China (CTR20150341/CTR20150341, May 15, 2015—June 27, 2016) was followed up until December 31, 2022. Patients were divided into Follitrope ? group and Gonal-F ? group. According to the age, patients were divided into three subgroups: 20-30 years old subgroup, 31-35 years old subgroup and 36-39 years old subgroup. Cumulative pregnancy rate, cumulative live birth rate, number of embryos transferred per cycle, live births per embryo transfer cycle, live births per oocyte retrieved, and neonatal characteristics were analyzed. Results:A total of 446 patients were included in the analysis, of which 336 (75.3%) were in the Follitrope ? group and 110 (24.7%) in the Gonal-F ? group, with a follow-up period of 6.5 years. There were no statistically significant differences between the Follitrope ? group and the Gonal-F ? group in terms of cumulative pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate (all P>0.05). Similar cumulative pregnancy rates and cumulative live birth rates were observed between the two groups within each age subgroup (all P>0.05). In the 36-39 years old subgroup, the Follitrope ? group showed a trend towards higher cumulative pregnancy rate [60.0% (12/20)] and cumulative live birth rate [55.0% (11/20)] compared with the Gonal-F ? group [28.6% (2/7), 14.3% (1/7)], however, none of the differences were statistically significant (all P>0.05). Twin pregnancy rates, live births per embryo, live birth per oocyte, newborn gender, birth weight, and birth defect rates were similar between the Follitrope ? group and the Gonal-F ? group without statistically significant differences (all P>0.05). Conclusion:The safety and effectiveness of Follitrope ? in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation are similar to those of Gonal-F ?. Compared with Gonal-F ?, there is a trend toward higher cumulative pregnancy rates and cumulative live birth rates in elderly patients with Follitrope ?, although there is no statistical difference.

Objective Less than a decade ago, ER-positive and PgR-positive diagnostic criteria decrease from 10%to 1%. Up to 20%of current immunohistochemical determinations of ER and PgR worldwide may be inaccu-rate. It is necessary to study patients whose tumors are between luminal A (LABC) and triple-negative (TNBC) breast cancer. Methods Survival analysis grouping by the level of positive hormone receptor, CK5/6 and EGFR, and en-docrine therapy was carried out in 206 patients whose tumors were junction zone between LABC and TNBC. Re-sults There were no significant differences between the low-positive (1%-9%) HR group and positive HR (10%-19%) group in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). There was an apparent difference between the nor-mal-like group and basal-like group in OS and DFS, and between the patients with and without endocrine therapy. There were significant differences between death and tumor progression for EGFR and CK5/6, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy. Conclusions We conclude that EGFR and CK5/6 are better prognostic indicators than the lev-el of positive HR in patients whose tumors are junction zone at the junction zone between LABC and TNBC. En-docrine therapy can be highly beneficial to these patients regardless of the positive HR level.