Introduction: Chinese medicine (CM) external therapy is commonly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in combination with conventional drug. This study aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis on the efficacy of CM external therapy combined with conventional drug treatment in RA. Methods: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) experimenting the efficacy of CM external therapy (acupuncture, moxibustion and CM fumigation) combined with conventional drug in comparison with conventional drug only in RA patients were collected from PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Central of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang databases. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The outcome measures which include Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF-α), serum levels of C-reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) were analysed using Review Manager 5.4.1 and GRADEpro GDT online software. Results: Fifty RCTs fulfilling the criteria were included. Although some level of efficacy was statistically noted on the use of CM external therapies, their certainty levels are mixed, ranging only in between moderate and low. Conclusions Mixed levels of certainty has hindered the drawing of conclusion. The addition of CM external therapies to conventional drug treatment may provide some benefits in RA. Further clinical trials with considerations in minimising the risk of bias are recommended to provide more high-quality evidence in the effect of CM external therapies as a complementary treatment in RA.
Medicine, Chinese Traditional ; Fumigation ; Meta-Analysis [Publication Type] ; Moxibustion ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; Systematic Review [Publication Type]

INTRODUCTION: Widespread mask use is an important intervention for control of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. However, data on the factors affecting mask use are lacking. In this observational study, we evaluated the proportion of and factors influencing face mask use and related hygiene practices. METHODS: We observed randomly selected members from the public in 367 venues across Singapore, and recorded the proportion of individuals with full compliance with mask use and mask hygiene (hand hygiene before and after touching the mask or face). Logistic regression analyses were used to determine variables associated with mask and hand hygiene compliance. RESULTS: We made 3,821 observations - 2,149 (56.2%) females, 3,569 (93.4%) adults (≥21 years), 212 (5.5%) children (6-20 years) and 40 (1.0%) children (2-5 years). The overall full compliance rate (correct mask use), poor compliance rate (incorrect mask use) and absent mask use were 84.5%, 12.9% and 2.6%, respectively. The factors - male gender, fabric mask usage and crowded indoor venues - were associated with lower mask compliance. Face or mask touching behaviour was observed in 10.7% and 13.7% of individuals observed, respectively. Only one individual performed hand hygiene before and after touching the mask. CONCLUSION The rate of mask compliance was high, probably due to legislation mandating mask usage. However, specific factors and crowded indoor venues associated with lower mask compliance were identified. We also noted an issue with the absence of hand hygiene before and after face or mask touching. These issues may benefit from targeted public health messaging.
Humans ; COVID-19/epidemiology* ; Singapore ; Masks ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Child ; Adolescent ; Hand Hygiene ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Young Adult ; Child, Preschool ; Pandemics/prevention & control* ; Middle Aged ; Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data*