Objective To explore the diagnostic value of acetic acid indigocarmine mixture(AIM)sandwich staining combined with flexile spectral imaging color enhancement(FICE)technology for colonoscopic Pit pattern classification for colorectal lesions.Methods 100 patients with colorectal lesions from June 2022 to October 2023 were selected as the research subjects,and 222 lesions;Patients were examined using conventional endoscopy,FICE,AIM sandwich staining+FICE,and the detection status and pathological type of Pit pattern classification were recorded.Calculate the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value(PPV),negative predictive value(NPV),and accuracy of Pit pattern classification diagnosis under different modes.Kappa was used to evaluate the consistency between Pit pattern classification and pathological examination under different modes.Evaluate diagnostic effectiveness using receiver operator characteristic curve(ROC curve).Results Compared with ordinary endoscopy(74.32％),FICE technology(92.34％)and AIM staining+FICE(97.30％)detected more lesions that matched the pathological results through Pit pattern classification,and AIM sandwich staining+FICE detected more than FICE,the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).Compared with ordinary endoscopy,the diagnostic accuracy of FICE and AIM staining+FICE for colorectal carcinoma lesions were higher,and AIM sandwich staining+FICE higher than FICE,the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).Compared with ordinary endoscopy,the diagnostic accuracy of FICE and AIM sandwich staining+FICE for early colorectal cancer were higher,the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).The area under the curve(AUC)predicted by ordinary endoscopy,FICE and AIM sandwich staining+FICE for colorectal carcinoma lesions were 0.815(95％CI:0.711～0.859),0.881(95％CI:0.752～0.904),and 0.933(95％CI:0.793～0.961),respectively;The AUC predicted by ordinary endoscopy,FICE and AIM sandwich staining+FICE for early colorectal cancer were 0.850(95％CI:0.720～0.866),0.938(95％CI:0.764～0.951),and 0.947(95％CI:0.803～0.972),respectively.For predicting colorectal carcinoma lesions and early colorectal cancer,the Youden index of AIM staining+FICE technology was the highest,with values of 0.955 and 0.968,respectively.Conclusion Under AIM sandwich staining+FICE,Pit pattern classification can detect more carcinoma lesions and early colorectal cancer,with high diagnostic accuracy and effective improvement of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment quality.

Objective:To design a knowledge-based cervical cancer planning model and apply it to cases of endometrial cancer and rectal cancer in order to explore the generalization of the model.Methods:A total of 179 cases of pelvic regions with different prescribed doses of dual-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy clinical plans were collected, of which 99 cases of cervical cancer clinical plans with a prescribed dose of 50.4 Gy were used as the training set to establish the RapidPlan model, and the remaining clinical plans were divided into 4 validation groups with 20 cases in each group. The clinical plans for cervical cancer and endometrial cancer with a prescription dose of 50.4 Gy were named groups A and B, while the clinical plan for endometrial cancer and rectal cancer with a prescription dose of 45 Gy were named groups C and D. The model was used to redesign the clinical plans in the 4 groups and the automatic plans were obtained. The planning target volume (PTV) and organ at risk (OAR) dosimetry parameters were compared between automatic plans and clinical plans.Results:The conformity index (CI) of the automatic plans in the A, B, C, and D groups were equivalent to that of the clinical plans ( P>0.05). The homogeneity index (HI) and D2% of the automatic plans in groups A, B, and C were all lower than those in clinical plans(HI, Z=-3.248, -3.360, -2.329, P<0.05; D2%, Z=-2.987, -3.397, -2.442, P<0.05). The HI and D2% of the automatic plans in group D were similar those in the clinical plans ( P>0.05). While ensuring the PTV coverage, the average value of OAR dosimetry parameters in all automatic plans groups were lower than that of the clinical plans. Conclusions:The RapidPlan model established by the cervical cancer clinical plans can complete the automatic plan design for endometrial cancer and rectal cancer under different prescription doses, which preliminarily proves the possibility of the generalization of the RapidPlan model.

Objective To analyze and explore the value of the mutislice spiral CT (MSCT) scanning,its reconstructive technology and MRI scanning for applying to the identifying diagnosis of new and old vertebral compresion fracture.Methods One hundred and sixty-seven cases with the new and old vertebral compresion fracture who have 189 vertebrae in total were examined using the MSCT scanning,their imaging information were postprocessed with 2D and 3D reconstruction at the work station.Thirty-four patients with overall 43 vertebrae were carried out by MRI scanning and their images were compared with those of MSCT.Results They had the highest proportion of vertebrae in L1 with accounting for 27.68% (31/112) and 35.06% (27/77) among the patients with new and old vertebral compresion fracture,respectively.The next was T12,L2 and T11.There were statistically significant differences between new and old cases in such appearance as fracture line clear and sharp(102 and 21),contusion and hemorrhage of spinal cord(15 and 0),parenchyma shadow beside vertebrae(103 and 11),appendant fracture(26 and 5),organ's lacerated wound around vertebral body(30 and 0),discus intervertebrales vacuum(10 and 36),derangement and hardening of vertebral bone trabecularism(29 and 51) (P＜0.01).Twenty-six vertebrae with the uneven low T1 WI signal,27 vertebrae with the T2 WI fat-suppresion irregular high signal were demonstrated in MRI scanning among 27 vertebrae of 21 cases with new vertebral compresion fracture.While 16 vertebrae with the T1WI and T2WI signals were the same as those of the normal vertebrae,16 vertebrae were the T2WI fat-suppresion low signal among 13 cases with old vertebral compresion fracture.Conclusions The MSCT plays an important role in identifying diagnosis for the most of the patients with the new and old vertebral compresion fracture, while MRI scanning may reflect the pathophysiological characteristics in diagnosis of the spinal cord and the ligament lesion.Therefore,the MSCT and MRI scanning should be integrated to be used to enhance remarkably the accurate rate of the diagnosis.

Objective To assess the concordance of MRI diagnosis for patients suspected of lumbar disk herniation by using Kappa statistic.Methods One hundred patients(48 males and 52 females)with lumbosaeral radicular pain,aged from 17 to 86(average 61).All patients underwent fast spin-echo T1 and T2 weighted imaging on a 3.0 T MR scanner and spine surface coil.Two radiologists(doctor A and doctor B)evaluated the lumbar disks from L3-4,L4-5.and L5-S1 in 50 out of the 100 patients independently.The presence of a bulging disk or a herniation was reported.Images were interpreted twice:once before and once after disclosure of clinical information.And disks of 52 patients out of the 100 samples were interpreted by the two radiologists independently without clinical information as well.The Kappa statistics was employed to assess the concordance of each radiologist's diagnoses as well as the observer variation of the two radiologists.Results Diagnoses before and after disclosure to clinical information were concordant in 114 disks for doctor A and in 109 for doctor B.respectively.Diagnoses before and after disclosure to clinical information were not concordant in 36 disks for doctor A and in 41 disks for doctor B,respectively.The Kappa values were 0.60±0.06 and 0.57±0.06 for doctor A and doctor B,respectively.The concordance was moderate.After disclosure to elinical information.the numbers of reported bulging disks increased significantly.by 10 and 31 for doctor A and doctor B,respectively.Without clinical information,the diagnoses of the two radiologists were concordant in 77 disks,while not concordant in 79 disks.The interobserver agreement was poor(Kappa=0.24±0.06).The diffcrence on diagenoses made between with and without clinical information mainly happened on the differential diagnosis of normal disks and bulging disks.The different,diagnoses made between with and without clinical information were on 20 disks and on 30 disks for doctor A and doctor B,respectively;that accounted for 55.6%(20/36)and 73.2%(30/41)of total variation respectively.The diagnostic difference between the 2 doctors happened mainly on differentiation of bulging disks and normal disks,which happened in 56 disks,aceountiong for 70.9%(56/79)of total variation.Conclusion Variation on diagnoses of the same radiologist or between tworadiologists was mainly caused by disagreement on bulging disks.