Objective:To investigate the impact of different treatment sequences of immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the first-line therapy on the prognosis of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods:Clinical data of 112 patients with stage III NSCLC treated at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected, with follow-up continued until December 31, 2023. According to the sequence of CRT and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy, patients were divided into 3 groups: ICIs simultaneous with CRT (sICR, n=20), chemotherapy combined with ICIs followed by CRT (CI-CR, n=53), and CRT followed by consolidative ICIs (CR-I, n=39). Analyses were performed before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Survival outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank tests, and prognostic factors were identified through multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results:The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort were 30.1 months (95% CI: 21.4-38.9) and 12.8 months (95% CI: 9.14-16.1), respectively. Before PSM: No significant differences were observed in OS and PFS among the 3 groups ( χ2=0.18, 1.05; P=0.669, 0.305). However, OS in the sICR and CR-I groups was significantly better than that in the CI-CR group ( χ2=4.43, 6.11; P=0.035, 0.013). After PSM: Each group included 17 patients. There were no significant differences in OS or PFS among the 3 groups ( χ2=2.50, 2.74; P=0.287, 0.254), and pairwise comparisons also showed no significant differences. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that clinical stage ( HR=3.392, 95% CI: 1.215-9.470, P=0.020), number of immunotherapy cycles ( HR=0.312, 95% CI: 0.100-0.972, P=0.044), and treatment response ( HR=6.566, 95% CI: 1.705-25.284, P=0.006) were independent prognostic factors for OS. After PSM, the numbers of patients with grade ≥2 treatment-related adverse events were 13 in the sICR group, 10 in the CI-CR group, and 9 in the CR-I group, with no significant differences among them ( χ2=2.181, P=0.336). Conclusions:First-line immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy showed favorable clinical efficacy in locally advanced NSCLC compared to other studies, but the treatment sequence did not significantly affect prognosis. It is recommended that immunotherapy be administered for at least four cycles.

Objective:To investigate the impact of different treatment sequences of immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the first-line therapy on the prognosis of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods:Clinical data of 112 patients with stage III NSCLC treated at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected, with follow-up continued until December 31, 2023. According to the sequence of CRT and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy, patients were divided into 3 groups: ICIs simultaneous with CRT (sICR, n=20), chemotherapy combined with ICIs followed by CRT (CI-CR, n=53), and CRT followed by consolidative ICIs (CR-I, n=39). Analyses were performed before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Survival outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank tests, and prognostic factors were identified through multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results:The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort were 30.1 months (95% CI: 21.4-38.9) and 12.8 months (95% CI: 9.14-16.1), respectively. Before PSM: No significant differences were observed in OS and PFS among the 3 groups ( χ2=0.18, 1.05; P=0.669, 0.305). However, OS in the sICR and CR-I groups was significantly better than that in the CI-CR group ( χ2=4.43, 6.11; P=0.035, 0.013). After PSM: Each group included 17 patients. There were no significant differences in OS or PFS among the 3 groups ( χ2=2.50, 2.74; P=0.287, 0.254), and pairwise comparisons also showed no significant differences. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that clinical stage ( HR=3.392, 95% CI: 1.215-9.470, P=0.020), number of immunotherapy cycles ( HR=0.312, 95% CI: 0.100-0.972, P=0.044), and treatment response ( HR=6.566, 95% CI: 1.705-25.284, P=0.006) were independent prognostic factors for OS. After PSM, the numbers of patients with grade ≥2 treatment-related adverse events were 13 in the sICR group, 10 in the CI-CR group, and 9 in the CR-I group, with no significant differences among them ( χ2=2.181, P=0.336). Conclusions:First-line immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy showed favorable clinical efficacy in locally advanced NSCLC compared to other studies, but the treatment sequence did not significantly affect prognosis. It is recommended that immunotherapy be administered for at least four cycles.

Objective:To conduct a systematic evaluation of prognostic factors for retreatment of esophageal cancer patients with locoregional recurrence after radical chemoradiotherapy, and provide a clinical reference for selecting individualized retreatment schemes and improving their survival.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 85 patients with esophageal cancer who experienced locoregional recurrence at least 1 year after radical radiotherapy or chemotherapy at the Department of Radiation Oncology in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2008 to December 2017. The effects of different nutritional and immune status and retreatment schemes on survival were compared, and the prognostic factors for retreatment were subjected to comprehensive subgroup analysis.Results:As of December 2021, the follow-up rate for all patients was 93%. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of all patients after retreatment were 31.5%, 18.6%, 10.6%, and 6.6%, respectively. For patients who received radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 36.8%, 22.3%, 13.0% and 9.3%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that the time interval between the first treatment and recurrence, the retreatment schemes after recurrence, the level of serum albumin before retreatment, and the prognostic nutritional index before retreatment were independent prognostic factors for survival after retreatment ( P<0.05). Subgroup analysis was performed on the combinations of peripheral blood hemoglobin level, albumin level, and prognostic nutritional index before retreatment, as well as systemic immune inflammation index and short-term curative effect after retreatment. The results showed that the comprehensive analysis of blood routine and serum albumin indicators could accurately predict the survival after retreatment. Conclusions:The nutritional and immune status of patients with locoregional recurrence of esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy can be used to predict the prognosis of retreatment. The time interval between the first treatment and recurrence and the retreatment scheme significantly affect the survival after retreatment. The retreatment scheme should be rigorously evaluated and appropriately selected to improve the benefit-risk ratio.

Objective:To explore the impacts of two radiotherapy modalities, elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved-field irradiation (IFI), on the prognosis of patients with clinical T 1~4N 0M 0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive (chemotherapy) radiotherapy. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the prognosis of 324 patients with clinical T 1-4N 0M 0 ESCC, focusing on the impacts of ENI and IFI on the prognosis of these patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed based on the different composition ratios of the two groups, and stratified analysis was conducted for patients of different stages. Results:All the patients presented a median overall survival (OS) of 33.1 months (95% CI: 28.1-38.1) and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 22.3 months (95% CI: 18.2-26.4). There were 97 patients in the ENI group and 227 patients in the IFI group. The ENI group exhibited higher OS and PFS than the IFI group ( χ2 = 4.31, 4.10, P < 0.05). After 1∶1 PSM analysis, each of the groups contained 75 cases. Multivariate analysis revealed that independent factors affecting patient OS included patient age, gross tumor volume (GTV), and irradiation modality ( χ2 = 7.93, 5.88, 4.59, P < 0.05) and PFS ( χ2 = 7.10, 5.26, 3.39, P < 0.05). Further stratified analysis indicated that ENI yielded significantly better efficacy than IFI for patients with cT 1 and T 2stage ESCC ( χ2 = 9.41, 7.88, P < 0.05). However, this advantage was not found in T 3 and T 4 patients ( P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of radiation esophagitis and radiation pneumonia between both groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusions:Patients with clinical T 1-4N 0M 0 ESCC who undergone definitive (chemotherapy) radiotherapy may benefit from ENI, particularly those in the cT 1 and cT 2 stages, for whom ENI is recommended for definitive radiotherapy.

Objective:To explore the impacts of two radiotherapy modalities, elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved-field irradiation (IFI), on the prognosis of patients with clinical T 1~4N 0M 0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive (chemotherapy) radiotherapy. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the prognosis of 324 patients with clinical T 1-4N 0M 0 ESCC, focusing on the impacts of ENI and IFI on the prognosis of these patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed based on the different composition ratios of the two groups, and stratified analysis was conducted for patients of different stages. Results:All the patients presented a median overall survival (OS) of 33.1 months (95% CI: 28.1-38.1) and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 22.3 months (95% CI: 18.2-26.4). There were 97 patients in the ENI group and 227 patients in the IFI group. The ENI group exhibited higher OS and PFS than the IFI group ( χ2 = 4.31, 4.10, P < 0.05). After 1∶1 PSM analysis, each of the groups contained 75 cases. Multivariate analysis revealed that independent factors affecting patient OS included patient age, gross tumor volume (GTV), and irradiation modality ( χ2 = 7.93, 5.88, 4.59, P < 0.05) and PFS ( χ2 = 7.10, 5.26, 3.39, P < 0.05). Further stratified analysis indicated that ENI yielded significantly better efficacy than IFI for patients with cT 1 and T 2stage ESCC ( χ2 = 9.41, 7.88, P < 0.05). However, this advantage was not found in T 3 and T 4 patients ( P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of radiation esophagitis and radiation pneumonia between both groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusions:Patients with clinical T 1-4N 0M 0 ESCC who undergone definitive (chemotherapy) radiotherapy may benefit from ENI, particularly those in the cT 1 and cT 2 stages, for whom ENI is recommended for definitive radiotherapy.

Objective:To analyze the local recurrence patterns after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) through image fusion, and to explore the risk factors of local recurrence and its relationships with dosimetric indices.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted for 209 thoracic ESCC patients who received radical CCRT in Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University during 2016-2019. For the patients diagnosed as the local recurrence of esophageal lesions, their CT images were fused with the original planning CT images using image registration software to identify the recurrence sites. Through 1∶1 propensity score matching (PSM) of the clinal data of patients with local recurrence (the recurrence group, nbefore = 81, nafter = 62) and those without local recurrence (the recurrence-free group, nbefore = 128, nafter=62), the dose and volume parameters of the treatment plans for the two groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox regression model to analyze the factors affecting the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results:All patients had 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of 80.9%, 42.6%, and 33.0%, respectively, 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates of 67.9%, 34.0%, and 27.9%, respectively, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates of 71.3%, 39.2%, and 30.5%, respectively. T stage, N stage, and radiation dose were independent prognostic factors for the OS, PFS, and RFS ( HR = 1.42-1.87, P < 0.05) of the patients, respectively. Among 68 patients with local recurrence, 62 cases (91.2%) suffered recurrence within the gross tumor volume (GTV). The dose and volume parameters of patients with local recurrence, such as GTV- D95%, clinical target volume (CTV)- D95%, GTV- D50%, CTV- D50%, and planning target volume (PTV)- D50%, GTV- V60, CTV- V60, and PTV- V60, were significantly lower than those of patients free from the local recurrence ( t=1.90-2.15, P < 0.05). Conclusions:Local recurrence of patients with thoracic ESCC after radical CCRT occurs mainly within the GTV. Increasing radiation doses may contribute to their survival benefits. The D50% for each target volume in the radiotherapy plan may be related to local recurrence, and it is necessary to conduct further research.

Objective:To evaluate the effects of high mobility group protein box 1 (HMGB1) on clinical prognosis of esophagus squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy and the radiosensitivity of xenograft in nude mice.Methods:A total of 90 endoscopic biopsy specimens were obtained from ESCC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. The expression level of HMGB1 was determined by immunohistochemical staining. High expression level was defined when staining was observed on ≥50% of the tumor cells. All patients were divided into the high expression group ( n=48) and low expression group ( n=42), and their survival information was retrospectively analyzed. Cell transfection was performed with the plasmid carrying human HMGB1-shRNA to knockdown HMGB1 expression in ECA109 cells and xenograft mouse models were established. The tumor volume and mass were calculated after irradiation with a dose of 15 Gy. The cell apoptosis in xenograft tissues were detected. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate prognostic analysis was conducted by log-rank test. Intergroup comparison was performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results:The expression level of HMGB1 was significantly associated with gross tumor volume, longest diameter of tumor, T staging and distant metastasis ( χ2=9.663, 5.625, 4.068, 7.146, all P<0.05). In the low expression group, the overall survival (OS) ( χ2=4.826, P=0.028), progression-free survival (PFS) ( χ2=4.390, P=0.036) were longer compared with that in the high expression group. Further analysis of HMGB1-high expression patients showed that the radiation dose and the combination of chemoradiotherapy did not significantly affect the OS or PFS of ESCC patients. We observed that knockdown of HMGB1 slowed the growth rate of xenograft, decreased the tumor volume and increased the apoptosis rate after irradiation. Conclusions:ESCC patients with high expression level of HMGB1 obtain poor prognosis after chemoradiotherapy, which can be enhanced by increasing the sensitivity to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. HMGB1 knockdown can effectively increase the radiosensitivity of xenograft in ESCC nude mice.

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy combined with surgery is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, which has been widely applied in clinical practice. Clinical efficacy has also been recognized by clinicians. However, even after the completion of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and subsequent surgical treatment, some patients still have local regional recurrence or distant metastasis in a short period of time. Among them, distant metastasis has become the main failure mode of patients undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, indicating that this treatment remains to be further improved. Based on the experience of patients with rectal cancer benefiting from total neoadjuvant therapy, the feasibility and implementation of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer were discussed in this article.

Objective:To investigate the radiation dose and fractionation regimens for limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) in Chinese radiation oncologists.Methods:Over 500 radiation oncologists were surveyed through questionnaire for radiation dose and fractionation regimens for LS-SCLC and 216 valid samples were collected for further analysis. All data were collected by online questionnaire designed by WJX software. Data collection and statistical analysis were performed by SPSS 25.0 statistical software. The differences in categorical variables among different groups were analyzed by Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Results:Among 216 participants, 94.9% preferred early concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 69.4% recommended conventional fractionation, 70.8% preferred a total dose of 60 Gy when delivering conventional radiotherapy and 78.7% recommended 45 Gy when administering hyperfractionated radiotherapy.Conclusions:Despite differences in LS-SCLC treatment plans, most of Chinese radiation oncologists prefer to choose 60 Gy conventional fractionated radiotherapy as the main treatment strategy for LS-SCLC patients. Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and Chinese Medical Association guidelines or expert consensus play a critical role in guiding treatment decision-making.

Objective:To investigate the efficacy of camrelizumab combined with second-line therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the real-world settings.Methods:Clinical data of 48 patients with esophageal cancer who met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively analyzed. The types of failure after first-line treatment, clinical efficacy, side effects and prognostic factors of second-line treatment were analyzed. SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Count data were expressed by composition ratio and analyzed by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Survival analysis was conducted by Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test. Non-normally distributed data were recorded with the median, range and quartile. Results:There were 26, 14, and 4 cases of combined chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of second-line camrelizumab, and 4 cases received immunotherapy alone. The median duration of immunotherapy was 6 cycles (range, 2-39 cycles). After second-line treatment, the short-term efficacy of 17, 27 and 4 cases was partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was 35.4% and disease control rate (DCR) was 91.7%. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 42.9% and 22.5%, and 1- and 2-year PFS rates were 29.0% and 5.8%. The median OS and PFS were 9.0 months (95% CI=6.4-11.7) and 8.5 months (95% CI=1.5-5.6), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that combined immunotherapy mode, number of cycles of immunotherapy and short-term efficacy were the independent prognostic indicators affecting OS in this group of patients ( HR=2.598, 0.222, 8.330, P=0.044, <0.001, <0.001). Lymphocyte count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), combined immunotherapy mode and short-term efficacy were the independent prognostic indicators affecting PFS in this group ( HR=3.704, 3.598, 6.855, 2.159, 2.747, P=0.009, 0.008, <0.001, 0.049, 0.012). Conclusions:Camrelizumab combined with second-line therapy can bring survival benefit to patients with recurrent or metastatic ESCC after first-line therapy, especially immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy can significantly provide survival benefit. Peripheral blood inflammatory biomarkers are independent indicators affecting clinical prognosis of patients. Patients with better short-term efficacy also achieve better prognosis. The final conclusion remains to be validated by a large number of randomized controlled studies.