BACKGROUND: The FAVOR (Comparison of Quantitative Flow Ratio Guided and Angiography Guided Percutaneous Intervention in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease) III China trial demonstrated that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) lesion selection using quantitative flow ratio (QFR) measurement, a novel angiography-based approach for estimating fractional flow reserve, improved two-year clinical outcomes compared with standard angiography guidance. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of QFR-guided PCI from the perspective of the current Chinese healthcare system. METHODS: This study is a pre-specified analysis of the FAVOR III China trial, which included 3825 patients randomized between December 25, 2018, and January 19, 2020, from 26 centers in China. Patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris or those ≥72 hours post-myocardial infarction who had at least one lesion with a diameter stenosis between 50% and 90% in a coronary artery with a ≥2.5 mm reference vessel diameter by visual assessment were randomized to a QFR-guided strategy or an angiography-guided strategy with 1:1 ratio. During the two-year follow-up, data were collected on clinical outcomes, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), estimated costs of index procedure hospitalization, outpatient cardiovascular medication use, and rehospitalization due to major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). The primary analysis calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as the cost per MACCE avoided. An ICER of ¥10,000/MACCE event avoided was considered economically attractive in China. RESULTS: At two years, the QFR-guided group demonstrated a reduced rate of MACCE compared to the angiography-guided group (10.8% vs . 14.7%, P <0.01). Total two-year costs were similar between the groups (¥50,803 ± 21,121 vs . ¥50,685 ± 23,495, P = 0.87). The ICER for the QFR-guided strategy was ¥3055 per MACCE avoided, and the probability of QFR being economically attractive was 64% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥10,000/MACCE avoided. Sensitivity analysis showed that QFR-guided PCI would become cost-saving if the cost of QFR were below ¥3682 (current cost: ¥3800). Cost-utility analysis yielded an ICER of ¥56,163 per QALY gained, with a 53% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥85,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing PCI, a QFR-guided strategy appears economically attractive compared to angiographic guidance from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03656848.
Humans ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods* ; Male ; Female ; Coronary Angiography/methods* ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Coronary Artery Disease/surgery* ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial/physiology*

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Over the past decades, transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been increasingly adopted in clinical practice. Women represent a large population who will possibly benefit from PCI, but they are often under-represented in clinical studies. Therefore, the role of TRI in women remains to be further defined. This study sought to compare safety and efficacy for transradial intervention (TRI) and transfemoral intervention (TFI) in women undergoing PCI in China. METHODS: The study population consisted of 5,067 women undergoing PCI at Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China between 2006 and 2011 (TRI: n=4,105, TFI: n=962). Incidence rates of clinical outcomes during hospitalization and at 1-year follow-up were compared between TRI and TFI. In order to minimize potential biases, a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. A total of 899 pairs were matched. RESULTS: Baseline and procedural characteristics were well-balanced between TRI and TFI groups after controlling for confounders using PSM. TRI was associated with reduced major post-PCI bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54–0.76; p < 0.001) and access site complications (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.61–0.74; p < 0.001) after PSM. There was no statistical differences in the incidence rates of major adverse cardiac events (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) both during hospitalization and at 1-year follow-up (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In this propensity score-based analysis of TRI versus TFI in Chinese women, TRI showed advantages of safety and feasibility over TFI. A wider adoption of TRI in women has the potential to improve outcomes in treatment of coronary artery diseases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Over the past decades, transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been increasingly adopted in clinical practice. Women represent a large population who will possibly benefit from PCI, but they are often under-represented in clinical studies. Therefore, the role of TRI in women remains to be further defined. This study sought to compare safety and efficacy for transradial intervention (TRI) and transfemoral intervention (TFI) in women undergoing PCI in China. METHODS: The study population consisted of 5,067 women undergoing PCI at Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China between 2006 and 2011 (TRI: n=4,105, TFI: n=962). Incidence rates of clinical outcomes during hospitalization and at 1-year follow-up were compared between TRI and TFI. In order to minimize potential biases, a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. A total of 899 pairs were matched. RESULTS: Baseline and procedural characteristics were well-balanced between TRI and TFI groups after controlling for confounders using PSM. TRI was associated with reduced major post-PCI bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54–0.76; p < 0.001) and access site complications (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.61–0.74; p < 0.001) after PSM. There was no statistical differences in the incidence rates of major adverse cardiac events (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) both during hospitalization and at 1-year follow-up (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity score-based analysis of TRI versus TFI in Chinese women, TRI showed advantages of safety and feasibility over TFI. A wider adoption of TRI in women has the potential to improve outcomes in treatment of coronary artery diseases.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Beijing ; Bias (Epidemiology) ; China ; Coronary Artery Disease ; Death ; Female ; Femoral Artery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hemorrhage ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Incidence ; Myocardial Infarction ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Propensity Score ; Radial Artery

Objective To explore the efficacy of endovascular treatment for closed articular artery injuries.Methods The clinical data of 13 patients from Jan 2010 to Dec 2014 treated for closed articular artery injuries were analyzed retrospectively.The location,severity and extent of arterial injury were confirmed by intraoperative arteriography.The diameter and length of the injured arteries were measured.The guidewire was sent to the lesion site and working wire pathway was established.When the guidewire was difficult to pass through the lesion site,femoral and posterior tibial or radial artery may be used to establish working wire pathway.The stent or stent-graft was implanted through the contralateral femoral artery or distal end of ipsilateral artery.Results Intraoperative angiography confirmed intimal injury (n =2),partial transection (n =5),complete transection (n =5) and arteriovenous fistula (n =1).Eighteen stents or stent-grafts were implanted.Treatment was successful in all patients without peiropeartive death and procedure-related complications.All were followed up for 15 to 48 months and the mean follow-up was (30 ± 11) months.Three patients with stent lumen stenosis less than 50％ as showed by angiography.There was no stent fracture,displacement,or deformation.Conclusions Endovascular treatment for closed articular artery injuries is of less invasion,shorter operative time and quick postoperative recovery.

Objective: To explore the correlation between antithrombotic strategy and its prognostic value in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients combining with atrial ifbrillation (AF) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods: A total of 570 CAD patients with AF received PCI in our hospital from 2012-01 to 2013-12 were retrospectively analyzed by CHADS2 and HAS-BLED Score system. According to CHADS2 < 2 and CHADS2 ≥ 2 or with/without warfarin medication, the patients were divided into 2 groups:①CHADS2 < 2 (Low risk of stroke) group,n=339 including 309 patients without warfarin and 30 with warfarin medication;②CHADS2 ≥ 2 (High risk of stroke) group,n=231 including 200 patients without warfarin and 31 with warfarin medication. All patients were followed-up for 15 months to compare the different anti-platelet/ anti-coagulation strategies for the occurrence rate of MACCE, ischemic and bleeding events.
Results: Compared with Low risk of stroke group, the patients in High risk of stroke group had the worse prognosis and higher rate of MACCE occurrence,P<0.001, HR=2.677, 95% CI (1.535-4.635), more ischemic events,P=0.013, HR=2.080, 95% CI (1.167-3.709). Multi-factor Cox surving analysis indicated that compared with low risk patients without warfarin medication, the high risk patients without warfarin had the higher rate of MACCE occurrence,P=0.001, HR=2.985, 95% CI (1.532-5.816), more ischemic events,P=0.026, HR=2.068, 95% CI (1.090-3.925). Whereas, the occurrence rates of MACCE and ischemic events in high risk, low risk patients with warfarin and low risk patients without warfarin were similar, all P>0.05. The major bleeding events in patients with warfarin were a little higher than those without warfarin,P>0.05. The minor bleeding events were increased in both Low risk stroke group asP<0.001, OR=4.458, 95% CI (1.934-10.277) and High risk stroke group asP=0.002, OR=4.155, 95% CI (1.717-10.055).
Conclusion: Warfarin medication may obviously decrease the occurrence rates of MACCE and ischemic events in high risk of stroke patients, while in low risk patients, warfarin could not further decrease the occurrence of MACCE and ischemic events. Warfarin could increase the risk for minor bleeding in both low risk and high risk of stroke in CAD patients combining with AF after PCI.

Objective: To evaluate the hybrid of drug eluting stent (DES) with bare metal stent (BMS) and exclusive DES implantation for treating the patients with multi-lesion coronary disease.
Methods: A total of 6495 patients with multi-lesion coronary disease received elective PCI in our hospital from 2004-04 to 2006-10 were retrospectively studied. The patients were divided into 2 groups, Hybrid group, n=848 and Exclusive DES group, n=5647. With 1:1 propensity score matching, there were 823 pair of patients were ifnally studied. The clinical outcomes included 1, 2 years post-operative all cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and in-stent thrombosis. The relative risks of all outcomes were assessed by Cox’s proportional-hazard model after propensity match.
Results: With propensity match, Cox’s proportional-hazard model analysis indicated that compared with Exclusive DES group, Hybrid group had the higher risks of TLR (HR 2.38, 95%CI 1.50-3.70), TVR (HR 1.61, 95%CI 1.15-2.27), MACE (HR 1.37, 95%CI 1.02-1.85), all P<0.01. The all cause death, MI and the ratio of all cause death/MI were similar between 2 groups in 1, 2 years follow-up period, all P>0.05.
Conclusion:Compared with exclusive DES, the hybrid of DES with BMS implantation had the higher risk of TLR, TVR and MACE for treating the patients with multi-lesion coronary disease.