OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical phenotype and genetic characteristics of a child with Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 8 (PFIC8). METHODS A child with PFIC diagnosed at Beijing Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University in September 2025 was selected as the study subject. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected from the child and her parents. Following extraction of genomic DNA, whole-exome sequencing (WES) was carried out. Candidate variants were validated by Sanger sequencing. The pathogenicity of the candidate variants was classified based on the guidelines from American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Beijing Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University (Ethics No.: 2023-E-126-Y). RESULTS: The proband, a 2-month-old female infant, had manifested jaundice of the skin and sclera, and slightly distended abdomen. She had no visible abdominal wall varicose veins, soft abdomen, and no palpable masses. Biliary atresia was ruled out by intraoperative cholangiography. WES revealed that she has harbored compound heterozygous variants of KIF12 gene, namely c.809C>T (p.Ala270Val) and c.1313G>A (p.Arg438Lys), which were verified by Sanger sequencing to have derived from her mother and father, respectively. According to the ACMG guidelines, both variants were classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Based on the pre-defined search strategy, 10 articles were retrieved, which involved 25 PFIC cases, including 5 from China. Together with the proband of this study, the 26 PFIC patients have primarily presented with high GGT cholestasis, with the genetic cause in all cases attributed to variants of the KIF12 gene. CONCLUSION The c.809C>T and c.1313G>A compound heterozygous variants of the KIF12 gene probably underlay the pathogenesis of cholestatic liver disease in this child. Above findings have enriched the mutational and phenotypic spectra of PFIC8.
Humans ; Kinesins/genetics* ; Female ; Cholestasis, Intrahepatic/genetics* ; Infant ; Heterozygote ; Mutation ; Exome Sequencing ; Male

Objective:To investigate the preventive efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide injection on esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).Methods:From February 1, 2021 to October 31, 2023, 82 patients who underwent ESD for esophageal lesions at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Cancer Hospital) were enrolled. According to the treatment of the surface after ESD, the patients were divided into the triamcinolone acetonide group (49 cases) and the no-special-treatment group (33 cases). The patients of triamcinolone acetonide group received multiple injections of triamcinolone acetonide solution post-ESD (immediate), week 1, and week 4, while the patients of no-special-treatment group did not receive additional pharmacological intervention. The patients were followed up for 3 months after ESD. The occurrence of esophageal stenosis after ESD was observed under endoscopy. The incidence of esophageal stenosis and the improvement of dysphagia after ESD were compared between the triamcinolone acetonide group and no-special-treatment group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyes were performed to identify influencing factors of esophageal stenosis after ESD. Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.Results:The incidence of esophageal stenosis after ESD in the triamcinolone acetonide group was lower than that in the no-special-treatment group (16.3% (8/49) vs. 66.7% (22/33)), and the proportion of patients without dysphagia (Stooler′s grading score of 0) was higher than that in the no-special-treatment group (83.7% (41/49) vs. 33.3% (11/33)), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=19.42 and 24.31, both P<0.001). In 42 patients with circumferential esophageal lesions involving >75%, the incidence of esophageal stenosis in the triamcinolone acetonide group was lower than that in the no-special-treatment group (28.6% (6/21) vs. 85.7% (18/21)), and the proportion of patients without dysphagia (Stooler′s grading score of 0) was higher than that in the no-special-treatment group (71.4% (15/21) vs. 14.3% (3/21)), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=11.76 and 15.33, both P<0.001). There was no statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the triamcinolone acetonide group and no-special-treatment group (4.1% (2/49) vs. 0; χ2=0.20, P=0.656), and no serious adverse reactions occurred in 2 groups. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the long distance from the proximal lesion margin to the incisors was a protective factor of whether esophageal stenosis occured or not after ESD ( OR=0.795, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.652 to 0.947, P=0.014), while the incidence of esophageal stenosis increased in patients with circumferential lesions involving >75% ( OR=7.064, 95% CI: 1.893 to 32.408, P=0.006), and the incidence of esophageal stenosis effectively reduced after the use of triamcinolone acetonide post ESD ( OR=0.062, 95% CI: 0.013 to 0.229, P<0.001). Conclusion:After ESD, triamcinolone acetonide can reduce the incidence of esophageal stenosis and improve patients′ dysphagia.

Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) have shown considerable therapeutic potential across diverse fields such as cancer, inflammation, and neurodegenerative diseases, with numerous candidates already progressing into clinical trials. More recently, their application in antiviral therapy has been rapidly gaining momentum. This review systematically outlines the mechanistic foundations and design principles of PROTACs, highlights recent advances targeting coronaviruses (including SARS-CoV-2), hepatitis C virus, human immunodeficiency virus, and influenza viruses, and critically assesses key challenges—particularly the limited diversity of E3 ligase ligands, suboptimal oral bioavailability, and the lack of integrated platforms for druggability evaluation. Looking ahead, innovations in ligand discovery, pathway modulation, delivery technologies, and conditionally activated PROTAC designs are anticipated to overcome these barriers, ushering in a new era of precise and effective antiviral therapeutics.

Objective:To explore the differences between the Phoenix sepsis scoring system including Phoenix sepsis score (PSS) and Phoenix-8 organ dysfunction score (hereinafter referred to as Phoenix-8) and the commonly used pediatric sepsis scores in evaluating clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of pediatric patients with severe sepsis diagnosed under traditional standards, namely the diagnostic criteria from the 2005 International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference.Methods:This study was a retrospective observational study. From December 2020 to March 2023, 202 pediatric patients with severe sepsis meeting the inclusion criteria were admitted to the Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Based on the sepsis diagnostic criteria outlined in the International Consensus Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock (2024), the pediatric patients were categorized into a sepsis group and a non-sepsis group. Sepsis group was further subdivided into a death subgroup and a survival subgroup based on the outcomes. The age, hospitalization costs, disease outcome indicators (e.g., mortality rate and incidence of septic shock), major organ (e.g., heart, liver, lungs, and kidneys) damage and their correlations, as well as PSS, Phoenix-8 and commonly used pediatric sepsis scores (e.g., pediatric sequential organ failure assessment (pSOFA), pediatric risk of mortality score Ⅲ (PRISM Ⅲ), pediatric logistic organ dysfunction-2 score (PELOD-2), pediatric multiple organ dysfunction score (P-MODS), pediatric critical illness score (PCIS), and pediatric early warning score (PEWS)) were collected and compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and precision-recall curve were plotted to evaluate the predictive ability of PSS, Phoenix-8, and commonly used pediatric sepsis scores for mortality risk in pediatric patients with severe sepsis under traditional standards. Predictive performance was quantified using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). Univariate logistic regression analysis was employed to quantify the odds ratios of PSS and Phoenix-8 for predicting mortality risk. Patients with severe sepsis under traditional standards were further stratified into subgroups based on complications and comorbidities, including central nervous system (CNS) diseases, multiple infections, cardiovascular system diseases, shock, and malignancies. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to assess calibration of PSS and Phoenix-8, and the DeLong test was used to compare whether there were statistically significant differences in the AUROC of PSS and Phoenix-8 for predicting mortality risk among different subgroups of pediatric patients. Results:Compared with those in non-sepsis group, pediatric patients in sepsis group were significantly older ( Z=-2.92, P<0.05) with higher incidences of septic shock and mortality, hospitalization costs, PRISM Ⅲ, PEWS, pSOFA, PELOD-2, PSS, and Phoenix-8 (with χ2 values of 21.28 and 13.64, respectively, Z values of -1.99, -5.33, -5.10, -8.55, -6.91, -10.98, and -9.93, respectively, P<0.05), and lower PCIS ( Z=-3.34, P<0.05). Compared with those in survival subgroup, hospitalization costs, PSS, Phoenix-8, PRISM Ⅲ, PEWS, pSOFA, PELOD-2, and P-MODS of pediatric patients in death subgroup was significantly higher (with Z values of -2.50, -3.50, -2.47, -5.11, -3.84, -2.94, -3.61, and -3.04, respectively, P<0.05). Compared with those in survival subgroup, the incidences of lung damage and liver damage of pediatric patients in death subgroup were also significantly higher (with χ2 values of 6.20 and 10.94, respectively, P<0.05), and 64.7% (97/150) of patients exhibited two or more concurrent organ damage. For predicting mortality risk in pediatric patients with severe sepsis under traditional standards, the AUROC values for PRISM Ⅲ, PCIS, PEWS, pSOFA, PELOD-2, P-MODS, PSS, and Phoenix-8 were approximately 0.70, with optimal cutoff values of 17.5, 91.0, 5.5, 4.5, 2.5, 4.5, 3.5, and 4.5, respectively; PELOD-2 demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.83); while PRISM Ⅲ, PSS, and Phoenix-8 showed high specificity (>0.80). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that for every 1-point increase in the PSS within 24 hours of pediatric intensive care unit admission, the relative risk of mortality increased by 63.7% (with odds ratio of 1.64, 95% confidence interval of 1.34-1.99, P<0.05). Similarly, for every 1-point increase in the Phoenix-8, the relative risk of mortality increased by 37.5% (with odds ratio of 1.38, 95% confidence interval of 1.18-1.60, P<0.05). The AUROC values (around 0.80) of PSS and Phoenix-8 for predicting mortality risk in pediatric patients with severe sepsis combined with CNS diseases, multiple infections, and cardiovascular system diseases were relatively high. In contrast, the AUROC values (0.60-0.80) for predicting mortality risk in pediatric patients with severe sepsis combined with shock or malignant tumors were moderate. All models passed the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test ( P>0.05). The DeLong test indicated no statistically significant differences in predictive ability between PSS and Phoenix-8 across subgroups of pediatric patients ( P>0.05). Conclusions:PSS and Phoenix-8 exhibited higher specificity than most of the commonly used pediatric sepsis scores in predicting mortality risk under traditional standards. Both scores performed much better in predicting the mortality risk in pediatric patients with severe sepsis combined with CNS diseases, multiple infections, and cardiovascular system diseases.

AIM: To investigate the current status of retinopathy of prematurity(ROP)in premature infants in Xiamen and analyze its influencing factors, aiming to provide a scientific basis for clinical treatment and preventive strategies.METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on the case data of 363 preterm infants with a gestational age of <32 wk who underwent fundus examination at Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University from February 11, 2020 to February 25, 2023. The incidence of ROP was statistically analyzed based on the screening results. All premature infants were divided into ROP group(37 cases, 64 eyes)and non-ROP group(326 cases, 652 eyes). General clinical data and perinatal-related information of the two groups were compared, and multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing the occurrence of ROP in premature infants.RESULTS: A total of 363 premature infants were included in this study. The fundus screening results showed that a total of 37 cases(64 eyes)of premature infants were detected with ROP, including 10 cases(10 eyes)monocular and 27 cases(54 eyes)binocular, with an overall incidence of 10.2%(37/363). The severity was determined according to the ROP international classification standard(ROP is divided into 5 stages, with stage I being the least severe and stage V the most severe). Among the 64 eyes, 30 eyes(46.9%)were in stage I, 20 eyes(31.3%)were in stage II, 10 eyes(15.6%)were in stage III, 4 eyes(6.3%)were in stage IV, and there were no cases in stage V. By comparing the clinical data of the two groups, no significant differences were found in gender, mode of delivery, singleton or multiple births, premature rupture of membranes, history of asphyxia, patent ductus arteriosus(PDA), or neonatal respiratory distress syndrome(NRDS)between the two groups(all P>0.05). However, premature infants in the ROP group had significantly younger gestational age and lower birth weight compared to those in the non-ROP group(all P<0.05). Additionally, the ROP group had higher proportions of longer hospital stays, bronchopulmonary dysplasia(BPD), neonatal sepsis, anemia, oxygen therapy for more than 1 wk, oxygen concentration above 40%, and blood transfusion treatment(all P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that combined neonatal sepsis(OR=166.985, 95% CI: 35.239-791.277, P<0.001), anemia(OR=8.111, 95% CI: 2.064-31.871, P=0.003), oxygen use time >1 wk(OR=10.216, 95% CI: 2.543-41.039, P=0.001), oxygen therapy concentration >40%(OR=7.647, 95% CI: 1.913-30.566, P=0.004), and receiving blood transfusion therapy(OR=5.879, 95% CI: 1.412-24.470, P=0.015)were the main risk factors affecting the occurrence of ROP in preterm infants, and the higher birth weight of preterm infants was a protective factor for ROP(OR=0.093, 95% CI: 0.022-0.394, P=0.001).CONCLUSION: The incidence of ROP in premature infants is relatively high, and there are multiple influencing factors. Low birth weight, neonatal sepsis, anemia, oxygen therapy, and blood transfusion treatment are high-risk factors for ROP in premature infants. Clinical attention should be given to such infants, and fundus screening should be conducted in a standardized manner to provide early treatment, thereby further reducing the risk of ROP in premature infants.

Objective:To explore the differences between the Phoenix sepsis scoring system including Phoenix sepsis score (PSS) and Phoenix-8 organ dysfunction score (hereinafter referred to as Phoenix-8) and the commonly used pediatric sepsis scores in evaluating clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of pediatric patients with severe sepsis diagnosed under traditional standards, namely the diagnostic criteria from the 2005 International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference.Methods:This study was a retrospective observational study. From December 2020 to March 2023, 202 pediatric patients with severe sepsis meeting the inclusion criteria were admitted to the Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Based on the sepsis diagnostic criteria outlined in the International Consensus Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock (2024), the pediatric patients were categorized into a sepsis group and a non-sepsis group. Sepsis group was further subdivided into a death subgroup and a survival subgroup based on the outcomes. The age, hospitalization costs, disease outcome indicators (e.g., mortality rate and incidence of septic shock), major organ (e.g., heart, liver, lungs, and kidneys) damage and their correlations, as well as PSS, Phoenix-8 and commonly used pediatric sepsis scores (e.g., pediatric sequential organ failure assessment (pSOFA), pediatric risk of mortality score Ⅲ (PRISM Ⅲ), pediatric logistic organ dysfunction-2 score (PELOD-2), pediatric multiple organ dysfunction score (P-MODS), pediatric critical illness score (PCIS), and pediatric early warning score (PEWS)) were collected and compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and precision-recall curve were plotted to evaluate the predictive ability of PSS, Phoenix-8, and commonly used pediatric sepsis scores for mortality risk in pediatric patients with severe sepsis under traditional standards. Predictive performance was quantified using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). Univariate logistic regression analysis was employed to quantify the odds ratios of PSS and Phoenix-8 for predicting mortality risk. Patients with severe sepsis under traditional standards were further stratified into subgroups based on complications and comorbidities, including central nervous system (CNS) diseases, multiple infections, cardiovascular system diseases, shock, and malignancies. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to assess calibration of PSS and Phoenix-8, and the DeLong test was used to compare whether there were statistically significant differences in the AUROC of PSS and Phoenix-8 for predicting mortality risk among different subgroups of pediatric patients. Results:Compared with those in non-sepsis group, pediatric patients in sepsis group were significantly older ( Z=-2.92, P<0.05) with higher incidences of septic shock and mortality, hospitalization costs, PRISM Ⅲ, PEWS, pSOFA, PELOD-2, PSS, and Phoenix-8 (with χ2 values of 21.28 and 13.64, respectively, Z values of -1.99, -5.33, -5.10, -8.55, -6.91, -10.98, and -9.93, respectively, P<0.05), and lower PCIS ( Z=-3.34, P<0.05). Compared with those in survival subgroup, hospitalization costs, PSS, Phoenix-8, PRISM Ⅲ, PEWS, pSOFA, PELOD-2, and P-MODS of pediatric patients in death subgroup was significantly higher (with Z values of -2.50, -3.50, -2.47, -5.11, -3.84, -2.94, -3.61, and -3.04, respectively, P<0.05). Compared with those in survival subgroup, the incidences of lung damage and liver damage of pediatric patients in death subgroup were also significantly higher (with χ2 values of 6.20 and 10.94, respectively, P<0.05), and 64.7% (97/150) of patients exhibited two or more concurrent organ damage. For predicting mortality risk in pediatric patients with severe sepsis under traditional standards, the AUROC values for PRISM Ⅲ, PCIS, PEWS, pSOFA, PELOD-2, P-MODS, PSS, and Phoenix-8 were approximately 0.70, with optimal cutoff values of 17.5, 91.0, 5.5, 4.5, 2.5, 4.5, 3.5, and 4.5, respectively; PELOD-2 demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.83); while PRISM Ⅲ, PSS, and Phoenix-8 showed high specificity (>0.80). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that for every 1-point increase in the PSS within 24 hours of pediatric intensive care unit admission, the relative risk of mortality increased by 63.7% (with odds ratio of 1.64, 95% confidence interval of 1.34-1.99, P<0.05). Similarly, for every 1-point increase in the Phoenix-8, the relative risk of mortality increased by 37.5% (with odds ratio of 1.38, 95% confidence interval of 1.18-1.60, P<0.05). The AUROC values (around 0.80) of PSS and Phoenix-8 for predicting mortality risk in pediatric patients with severe sepsis combined with CNS diseases, multiple infections, and cardiovascular system diseases were relatively high. In contrast, the AUROC values (0.60-0.80) for predicting mortality risk in pediatric patients with severe sepsis combined with shock or malignant tumors were moderate. All models passed the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test ( P>0.05). The DeLong test indicated no statistically significant differences in predictive ability between PSS and Phoenix-8 across subgroups of pediatric patients ( P>0.05). Conclusions:PSS and Phoenix-8 exhibited higher specificity than most of the commonly used pediatric sepsis scores in predicting mortality risk under traditional standards. Both scores performed much better in predicting the mortality risk in pediatric patients with severe sepsis combined with CNS diseases, multiple infections, and cardiovascular system diseases.

Objective:To investigate the preventive efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide injection on esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).Methods:From February 1, 2021 to October 31, 2023, 82 patients who underwent ESD for esophageal lesions at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Cancer Hospital) were enrolled. According to the treatment of the surface after ESD, the patients were divided into the triamcinolone acetonide group (49 cases) and the no-special-treatment group (33 cases). The patients of triamcinolone acetonide group received multiple injections of triamcinolone acetonide solution post-ESD (immediate), week 1, and week 4, while the patients of no-special-treatment group did not receive additional pharmacological intervention. The patients were followed up for 3 months after ESD. The occurrence of esophageal stenosis after ESD was observed under endoscopy. The incidence of esophageal stenosis and the improvement of dysphagia after ESD were compared between the triamcinolone acetonide group and no-special-treatment group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyes were performed to identify influencing factors of esophageal stenosis after ESD. Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.Results:The incidence of esophageal stenosis after ESD in the triamcinolone acetonide group was lower than that in the no-special-treatment group (16.3% (8/49) vs. 66.7% (22/33)), and the proportion of patients without dysphagia (Stooler′s grading score of 0) was higher than that in the no-special-treatment group (83.7% (41/49) vs. 33.3% (11/33)), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=19.42 and 24.31, both P<0.001). In 42 patients with circumferential esophageal lesions involving >75%, the incidence of esophageal stenosis in the triamcinolone acetonide group was lower than that in the no-special-treatment group (28.6% (6/21) vs. 85.7% (18/21)), and the proportion of patients without dysphagia (Stooler′s grading score of 0) was higher than that in the no-special-treatment group (71.4% (15/21) vs. 14.3% (3/21)), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=11.76 and 15.33, both P<0.001). There was no statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the triamcinolone acetonide group and no-special-treatment group (4.1% (2/49) vs. 0; χ2=0.20, P=0.656), and no serious adverse reactions occurred in 2 groups. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the long distance from the proximal lesion margin to the incisors was a protective factor of whether esophageal stenosis occured or not after ESD ( OR=0.795, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.652 to 0.947, P=0.014), while the incidence of esophageal stenosis increased in patients with circumferential lesions involving >75% ( OR=7.064, 95% CI: 1.893 to 32.408, P=0.006), and the incidence of esophageal stenosis effectively reduced after the use of triamcinolone acetonide post ESD ( OR=0.062, 95% CI: 0.013 to 0.229, P<0.001). Conclusion:After ESD, triamcinolone acetonide can reduce the incidence of esophageal stenosis and improve patients′ dysphagia.

Objective This study aimed to analyze the difference of clinical characteristics and risk factors for poor outcome between young patients and senior patients with spontaneous brainstem hemorrhage. Methods This was a retrospective study.The patients with spontaneous brainstem hemorrhage who presented to the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2013 to January 2021 were enrolled in this study.They were divided into two groups:Youth group (18-59 years old) and Senior group (60-90 years old).General information and clinical data were collected.Univariate analysis was used to compare the clinical characteristics of the two groups,and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the independent risk factors for poor prognosis. Results A total of 202 eligible patients were enrolled in this study,including 136 patients in the Youth group and 66 patients in the Senior group.Univariate analysis of the clinical data from the two groups demonstrated that the prevalence of poor outcome,the proportion of male patients,coma on admission,surgery operation,complicated pneumonia and the average NIHSS score,volume of hematoma,DBP,TG were significantly higher in the Youth group than the Senior group (P<0.05).The average GCS score was remarkably lower in the Youth group(P<0.05).Early coma,low GCS score,high NIHSS score,large volume of hematoma,poor glycemic control,complicated pneumonia and Acinetobacter baumannii infection were risk factors for poor prognosis of both group.Multivariate logistic regression showed that low GCS score was an independent predictor for poor prognosis of both group. Conclusion Young patients with spontaneous brainstem hemorrhage had worse prognosis than elderly patients.Avoiding or effective control of risk factors might ameliorate the final outcome.

Objective:To deeply understand the real experience of young and middle-aged lymphoma patients returning to society.Methods:From August to September 2021, 17 young and middle-aged lymphoma patients admitted to the Department of Hematology of the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University were selected as the research object by objective sampling. Phenomenological research method was using to conduct face-to-face in-depth interviews. Colaizzi 7-step analysis method was used to summarize, analyze and refine the theme.Results:A total of 3 first-level themes and 10 second-level themes were extracted. Among them, the willingness to return to society included firm willingness of social return and negative attitude of social return. The scope of social return included returning to work, interpersonal communication, family responsibilities, leisure and entertainment and lifestyle. The influencing mechanism of social return was composed of disease and treatment factors, mental factors, external support and economic capacity.Conclusions:The experience of young and middle-aged lymphoma patients returning to society is a dynamic change process in many aspects. In the future, it is necessary to further explore the status quo of social return of such groups and explore the influencing factors and change tracks of heterogeneity.

Clinical phenotypes and gene characteristics of a patient diagnosed with Mowat-Wilson syndrome (MWS) with Hirschsprung′s disease (HSCR) and vaginal atresia in the Department of Neonatal Surgery, Beijing Children′s Hospital, Capital Medical University in March 2021 were analyzed retrospectively.The eight-month-old girl was admitted to the hospital with symptoms of constipation for nine days and abdominal distension for two days.Lower digestive tract radiography and rectal mucosa biopsy results suggested HSCR.The child also had specific facial features and motor development delay.Whole exome test showed a de novo heterozygous mutation, ZEB2 gene c. 2761C>T (p.R921*). After laparoscopic-assisted Soave procedure, the child had normal bowel movements, and no surgery-related compli-cations occurred during the follow-up period.The child′s motor development improved after rehabilitation treatment.According to literature review, 2 female cases show similar clinical manifestations to this girl, but the genotypes were different.This patient expands the clinical phenotype of ZEB2 gene pathogenicity.