Introduction: Prediabetes or intermediate hyperglycemia (IH) represents a critical phase in the trajectory toward type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Recent evidence from the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) suggests that 1-hour OGTT (1HOGTT) ≥8.6 mmol/L is a more sensitive biomarker for early beta-cell dysfunction, with enhanced detection of IH and future T2DM risk. Conventional screening using hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or 2-Hour OGTT (2HOGTT) may delay identification of prediabetes, narrowing the window for early intervention. This study evaluates 1HOGTT as a screening tool for prediabetes among Malaysians. Methodology: This cross-sectional study enrolled adults without prior T2DM or prediabetes. Participants underwent 1HOGTT, 2HOGTT, and HbA1c, classified as per the Malaysian Clinical Practice Guideline for T2DM (6th Edition) and IDF 2024 criteria. Agreement between tests was assessed using McNemar’s test and Cohen’s kappa. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Cost-effectiveness was determined using reagent cost only. Results: The majority of the 310 participants were female (71.6%), Malay (87.1%), with average age of 40. The 1HOGTT identified prediabetes in 21.6% (n = 67) compared to 17.1% (n = 53) by HbA1c and 2.6% (n = 8) by 2HOGTT. McNemar’s test confirmed statistically significant discordance between 1HOGTT and 2HOGTT (chi-square = 53.397, p <0.001): 61 participants were prediabetic by 1HOGTT but normal by 2HOGTT, versus only 2 in the reverse direction. No significant discordance was found between 1HOGTT and HbA1c (chi-square = 2.817, p = 0.093). 1HOGTT demonstrated excellent discriminatory ability against 2HOGTT (AUC = 0.908; 95% CI: 0.837–0.978), significantly outperforming HbA1c (AUC = 0.664; CI: 0.462– 0.867; DeLong p = 0.012). In a population-level cost analysis, 1HOGTT achieved lowest cost per prediabetes case detected (RM 5.79) – approximately 8.3 times and 8.1 times more cost-effective than 2HOGTT (RM 48.08) and HbA1c (RM 46.78) respectively. Conclusion 1HOGTT identifies a significant proportion of individuals with prediabetes missed by 2HOGTT and HbA1c. Incorporating 1HOGTT enhances the detection of prediabetes, is cost-effective, and enables timely preventive measures in our population with high diabetes burden.
Glucose Tolerance Test ; Glycated Hemoglobin ; Prediabetic State

Introduction: The 2021 IDF-DAR risk calculator had been previously evaluated in multiple studies and subsequently widely accepted and applied in clinical practice as a practical standardized tool for patient risk stratification. Recently updated, the 2026 IDF-DAR Risk calculator enables a more individualized, evidence-related evaluation of patientrelated and disease-related risk factors, incorporating modern diabetes technologies, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, and advanced insulin formulations to enhance risk stratification. This tool allows medical professionals to tailor Ramadan practices based on overall factors toward promoting safe fasting. Methodology: This prospective multicentre observational study recruited adults with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes attending public hospitals nationwide. People with diabetes (PwD) intending to perform Ramadan fasting were invited to participate and assessed using the 2026 IDF-DAR Risk Calculator in the 6-week pre-Ramadan period between 30th January and 19th March 2026. Results: A total of 458 PwD were evaluated and stratified into low (15.7%), moderate (41%), and high risk (43.3%) categories. Most participants had Type 2 diabetes (83.6%), with 60.3% having a disease duration exceeding 10 years and 43% exhibiting poor glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c >9%). Insulin therapy was used by 76.4% of participants, including two individuals with Type 1 diabetes using AID systems. Most participants reported no recent hypoglycemia (76.4%), 81.0% performed glucose monitoring, and 3.3% used CGM. Severe comorbidities were uncommon, with 1.1% having unstable macrovascular disease and 4.4% advanced chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30). Notably, 72.2% received structured Ramadan education. Conclusion Majority of PwD attending tertiary diabetes clinics were in the moderate- to high-risk category and intended to fast despite medical advice against fasting in some cases. Although most participants were on insulin therapy, hypoglycemia was low in the pre-Ramadan period. Integration of modern technologies, advanced insulin therapies, and structured education may support safer fasting practices.
Risk Assessment ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Hospitals ; Fasting