BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality rates of lung cancer remain on the rise, creating an urgent need for screening among high-risk populations and early prevention. This study aims to explore the association and interaction between multidimensional lifestyle, socioeconomic status, and the incidence of lung cancer, and to provide scientific evidence for screening high-risk populations and preventing lung cancer. METHODS: Healthy lifestyle score was constructed using information on smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise, diet and sleep obtained through a questionnaire survey. Socioeconomic status was evaluated based on information on education, employment, and family income, and genetic testing data were used to assess the risk of genetic variation. A proportional hazards assumption test was conducted, and the Cox proportional hazards model was applied to analyze the associations between healthy lifestyle scores, socioeconomic status, and lung cancer, as well as the interactions among various factors, after adjusting for the risk of genetic variation, age, gender, diabetes, hypertension and the living environment score. RESULTS: A total of 245,538 samples that entered the cohort from March, 2006 to October, 2010 were included and followed up until December 31, 2022. The participants were divided into the case group (n=1472) and the control group (n=244,066). The analysis results showed that after adjusting for covariates, there was still an association between the healthy lifestyle score, socioeconomic status, and the incidence of lung cancer: compared with participants with a high healthy lifestyle score, the risk of lung cancer in participants with medium and low healthy lifestyle scores was significantly increased, with hazard ratios (HR) of 2.12 (95%CI: 1.86-2.41) and 3.36 (95%CI: 2.82-3.99) respectively; compared with participants with high socioeconomic status, the risk of lung cancer in participants with medium and low socioeconomic status was significantly increased, with HR of 1.29 (95%CI: 1.13-1.48) and 1.67 (95%CI: 1.46-1.90) respectively. Moreover, there were interactions between smoking status and socioeconomic status (Pfor interaction=0.05), as well as the other four lifestyle factors (Pfor interaction=0.02). CONCLUSIONS This study identified the association between multidimensional lifestyle factors and socioeconomic status with the incidence of lung cancer, as well as interactions between smoking and socioeconomic status and four other lifestyle factors, providing a scientific basis for screening and prevention in high-risk populations for lung cancer.
Humans ; Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Incidence ; Life Style ; Social Class ; Aged ; Adult ; Risk Factors

Objective To investigate the efficiency and safety of endoscopic large balloon dilation following small sphincterotomy (ESBD) for treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones, and to prospectively compare it with traditional sphincterotomy (ES). Methods Patients with single or multiple calculi in extra-hepatic bile ducts and with the diameter of CBD larger than 13 mm, were randomized into 2 groups to receive maximal sphincterotomy (ES group), or partial sphincterotomy plus sphincteroplasty with 15mm-balloon (ESBD group), respectively, followed by conventional stones removal and/or lithotripsy. The success rate of stone clearance, operation time and related complications were observed. Results A total of 86 patients were enrolled in 2 endoscopy centers, with 2 excluded because of papillary pre-cut in 1 and non-compliance with the protocol in the other, and were randomly divided into groups ES and ESBD, with 42 patients in each. The clinical characteristics, including average diameter of CBD, size and quantity of calculi, and incidences of peri-ampullary diverticulum, of patients in both groups were all similar. Stones clearance with single session in 2 groups were 88% and 93%, respectively (P =0. 531 ). The operation time were (25.76 ± 12. 74) min and (26. 38 ± 12. 86) min ( P = 0. 825 ). The rate of mechanical lithotripsy was 36% and 25%, respectively (P=0. 363). Complications occurred in 5 cases in ES group (3 mild, 2 medium), and 2 mild complications occurred in ESBD group (no statistical difference). No death happened in any group.Conclusion ESBD is an effective method for clearance of extra-hepatic bile duct stones with the similar safety, compared with traditional sphincterotomy. It could be an optimal alternative for those with large stones or difficult sphincterotomy.