INTRODUCTION

Urinary stone disease remains a significant global and national health concern. This underscores the need for measures to improve disease outcomes. The development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines for urolithiasis was deemed essential due to variations in practice, the evolving urologic field with its emerging interventions, which may have significant cost implications.

METHODS

The CPG was developed following the GRADE Adolopment method, the CORE GRADE Approach and the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework, and utilized the Technical Manual for Clinical Practice Guideline Development of the Department of Health (2nd edition). The guideline development group was organized after review and management of the members' conflict of interest declarations. Clinical questions were prioritized and a systematic search and synthesis of the relevant literature to answer the questions was done. Considering the balance of benefits and harms, certainty of the evidence, cost and cost effectiveness, accessibility, acceptability and feasibility of the interventions, the guideline panel developed recommendations by consensus.

RESULTS

The CPG addresses eleven priority clinical questions involving diagnosis and treatment of acute flank pain due to suspected urolithiasis among adults, minimally invasive treatment of nephrolithiasis measuring 1-2 cm and the use of alpha blockers after ESWL through twelve recommendations and one good practice statement.

CONCLUSION

The Philippine CPG on the management of urolithiasis in adults provides actionable recommendations to address important clinical questions on the diagnosis and management of urinary stone disease. The full text of the clinical practice guideline may be viewed and downloaded from https://doh.gov.ph/dpcb/doh-approved-cpg/

Human ; Adult ; Urolithiasis

Human ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Urolithiasis ; Urologists