Objective To explore the effect of positive ruminative thinking training(PRT)on negative emotions during modified electroconvulsive therapy(MECT)in depression patients.Method A total of 80 patients with depression who received MECT at Ganzhou Third People's Hospital from February 2024 to February 2025 were selected as subjects.Using a random number table method,they were divided into control group(n=40)and observation group(n=40).The control group received standard interventions,while the observation group received PRT in addition to control group's interventions.Both groups continued treatment until the completion of MECT,with all patients receiving 8-12 sessions of MECT.Negative emotions,self-efficacy,and the positive and negative ruminative thinking(PNR)scale were compared between two groups.Before and after intervention,adverse reactions were evaluated in both groups post-treatment.Results After intervention,the scores of anxiety,depression scale,and negative factor rumination thinking in observation group were lower than those in control group.The scores of general self-efficacy scale and positive factor rumination thinking were higher than those in control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).The total incidence of adverse reactions in observation group was lower than that in control group(P＜0.05).Conclusion PRT can reduce negative emotions and negative rumination thinking in depression patients during MECT,improve positive rumination thinking and self-efficacy.

Objective To explore the effect of positive ruminative thinking training(PRT)on negative emotions during modified electroconvulsive therapy(MECT)in depression patients.Method A total of 80 patients with depression who received MECT at Ganzhou Third People's Hospital from February 2024 to February 2025 were selected as subjects.Using a random number table method,they were divided into control group(n=40)and observation group(n=40).The control group received standard interventions,while the observation group received PRT in addition to control group's interventions.Both groups continued treatment until the completion of MECT,with all patients receiving 8-12 sessions of MECT.Negative emotions,self-efficacy,and the positive and negative ruminative thinking(PNR)scale were compared between two groups.Before and after intervention,adverse reactions were evaluated in both groups post-treatment.Results After intervention,the scores of anxiety,depression scale,and negative factor rumination thinking in observation group were lower than those in control group.The scores of general self-efficacy scale and positive factor rumination thinking were higher than those in control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).The total incidence of adverse reactions in observation group was lower than that in control group(P＜0.05).Conclusion PRT can reduce negative emotions and negative rumination thinking in depression patients during MECT,improve positive rumination thinking and self-efficacy.

Adaptation, Physiological ; Adenosine Monophosphate ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Administration, Intranasal ; Alanine ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Animals ; Betacoronavirus ; genetics ; physiology ; Chlorocebus aethiops ; Coronavirus Infections ; drug therapy ; virology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Female ; Host Specificity ; genetics ; Lung ; pathology ; virology ; Male ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Mutation, Missense ; Nasal Mucosa ; virology ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral ; drug therapy ; virology ; RNA, Viral ; administration & dosage ; genetics ; Turbinates ; virology ; Vero Cells ; Viral Load ; Virus Replication

ObjectiveTo explore the expression of MRP1 and CD34 in colorectal carcinoma tissue and the relationship with clinicopathological factors.MethodsImmunohistochemical streptavidin-perosidase method was used to examine the expression of MRP1 and CD34 in 53 cases with colorectal carcinoma and normal colorectal tissue.The correlation between the levels of MRP1and CD34 expression and clinicopathological factors were analyzed.ResultsThe positive expression rates of MRP1 in the carcinoma group and normal colorectal tissue group were 49.1％ and 15.1％ respectively,and there was a significant difference of the positive expression between the two groups( x2 =14.029,P ＜ 0.01 ).The expression of MRP1 had no correlation with the degree of differentiation,the depth of invasion,the metastasis of lymph node and all the other clinicopathological factors ( P ＞ 0.05 ).CD34 value in the carcinoma group and normal colorectal tissue group were ( 35.63 ± 12.23 ) MVD/HP and ( 6.12 ± 0.97) MVD/HP,respectively,and there was a significant difference between the two groups (t =17.565,P ＜ 0.01 ).CD34 was not correlated with age,sex,tumor size,localization of the primary tumor ( P ＞ 0.05 ),but correlated with Dukes staging,lymph node metastasis,differentiation of the tumor,depth of invasion( all P ＜ 0.05).ConclusionThe overexpression of MRP1 and CD34 protein may involve in colorectal carcinogenesis;MRP1 may involve in the primary multidrug resistance in colorectal carcinoma.; CD34 may involve in the colorectal carcinoma invasion and metastasis.Investigating the expression of MRP1 and CD34 in colorectal carcinoma simultaneously can provide new referential indexes for the treatment and prognosis of colorectal carcinoma.