Introduction: Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) comprises sporadic and hereditary forms, the latter commonly associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) which is identifiable through genetic screening of germline RET protooncogene. We compared the clinicopathological features and outcomes of hereditary and sporadic MTC in our single centre. Methodology: We conducted a retrospective audit of patients with MTC from 2000 to 2026. Patients were classified as either hereditary or sporadic based on genetic testing and/or family history of MTC/MEN2A syndrome. Variables analyzed included age at diagnosis, mode of presentation, pre-operative calcitonin, tumor size, lymph node (LN) involvement, post-operative biochemical cure, repeat surgery and presence of structural residual/recurrent disease. Results: A total of 57 patients were included (18 hereditary [31.6%], 39 presumed sporadic [68.4%]) with a median follow-up of 7.5 years (IQR 1.5–12.4). Hereditary MTC was diagnosed at a significantly younger age than sporadic MTC (33.0 vs. 44.7 years, p = 0.010) where 33% of the cases were diagnosed via screening detection whereas sporadic MTC more commonly presented with symptomatic neck swelling (84.6% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in median pre-operative calcitonin (513.5 vs. 1148.0 pg/mL, p = 0.101), tumor size (24.5 vs. 22.5 mm, p = 0.301), or LN involvement (41.7% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.307) between hereditary and sporadic MTC. Long-term outcomes were also comparable, with no differences in biochemical status, need for repeat surgery or residual/recurrent structural disease. Conclusion Hereditary MTC presents earlier and is more frequently detected due to screening, whereas sporadic MTC often presents symptomatically. Long-term outcomes are not primarily determined by hereditary status alone. Early access to RET mutation testing with a view to initiating prophylactic treatments rather than post detection surgery may improve disease burden.
Thyroid Neoplasms ; Cohort Studies

Introduction: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a life-threatening complication associated with significant morbidity and healthcare burden. Despite advances in diabetes care, recurrent DKA remains common, often reflecting gaps in treatment adherence and patient education. Identifying predictors of recurrence is crucial for risk stratification and targeted intervention. Methodology: We conducted a retrospective observational study of all adult DKA admissions to a tertiary centre between 2001 and 2025. Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic data, biochemical parameters, precipitating factors, and clinical outcomes. DKA was defined using standard biochemical criteria. Recurrent DKA was defined as ≥2 admissions during the study period. Factors associated with recurrent DKA admissions were analyzed. Patients under the age of 18 years and those with missing vital information were excluded. Results: A total of 667 DKA admissions, comprising 566 patients, were identified, of which 101 admissions (15.1%) were recurrent, involving 65 patients. Among recurrent DKA episodes, the most common precipitating factors were infection (64.4%) and insulin omission (62.4%). After multivariate analyses, patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) were more likely to develop recurrent DKA compared to those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (aOR 4.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.58–6.70; p <0.001). Insulin omission was strongly associated with recurrent DKA (aOR 2.29; 95% CI 1.46–3.60; p <0.001). In contrast, baseline glycated hemoglobin and chronic kidney disease were not significantly associated with recurrence. Diabetic counseling during the first DKA admission did not reduce recurrent DKA. There were no significant differences in mortality (3.9% vs 6.2%, p = 0.524) or critical care admission rates (40.6% vs 38.7%, p = 0.718) between recurrent and first DKA episodes. Conclusion Recurrent DKA accounts for a substantial proportion of DKA admissions and is strongly associated with insulin omission and T1DM. Our findings suggest that recurrent DKA is driven predominantly by behavioral and adherencerelated factors, indicating the need for multidisciplinary interventions beyond standard inpatient counseling.
Diabetic Ketoacidosis ; Retrospective Studies

Introduction: The rising incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) represents a paradigm shift from its traditional recognition as a hallmark complication of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, contemporary data comparing clinical presentation, precipitating factors, and outcomes between these two populations remain limited. Methodology: In this retrospective observational study, all adult DKA admissions with T1DM or T2DM at a tertiary centre between 2001 and 2025 were studied. DKA was defined according to standard biochemical criteria. Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract demographic data, biochemical parameters, precipitating factors, management details, and clinical outcomes of all adult DKA admission in T1DM and T2DM. Patients aged <18 years or those with incomplete data were excluded. Results: A total of 601 DKA episodes were analyzed, comprising 130 (21.6%) in patients with T1DM and 471 (78.4%) in those with T2DM. Mean age was 26.9 ± 0.71 years for T1DM and 52.1 ± 0.7 years for T2DM. Gender distribution was balanced (male 48.3%, female 51.7%). Mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was 11.3 ± 0.3% in T1DM and 12.1 ± 0.2% in T2DM. Infection was the most common precipitating factor overall (69.0%), occurring more frequently in T2DM than in T1DM (74.7% vs. 56.2%), followed by medication non-adherence (62.4% vs. 43.8%). Significant differences were observed between groups in admission pH, bicarbonate (both p <0.001), blood ketones (p = 0.028), and HbA1c (p = 0.010), whereas anion gap (p = 0.056) and blood glucose levels (p = 0.755) did not differ significantly. Clinical outcomes were comparable with respect to intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates (40.0% in T1DM vs. 39.0% in T2DM, p = 0.779) and median resolution time (p = 0.462). However, the median length of hospital stay was significantly longer in T2DM (8.2 ± 0.32 vs. 5.4 ± 0.4 days; p <0.001). Overall mortality was 6.0%, with substantially higher mortality in T2DM compared to T1DM (7.4% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.013). Conclusion In this large regional series of adult DKA, most episodes occurred in T2DM. Despite similar ICU admission rates and time to resolution, T2DM was associated with more frequent infection-related precipitants, longer hospital stays, and higher mortality, underscoring the need for targeted preventive strategies in this population.
Adult ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 ; Diabetic Ketoacidosis ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Introduction: The 2021 IDF-DAR risk calculator had been previously evaluated in multiple studies and subsequently widely accepted and applied in clinical practice as a practical standardized tool for patient risk stratification. Recently updated, the 2026 IDF-DAR Risk calculator enables a more individualized, evidence-related evaluation of patientrelated and disease-related risk factors, incorporating modern diabetes technologies, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, and advanced insulin formulations to enhance risk stratification. This tool allows medical professionals to tailor Ramadan practices based on overall factors toward promoting safe fasting. Methodology: This prospective multicentre observational study recruited adults with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes attending public hospitals nationwide. People with diabetes (PwD) intending to perform Ramadan fasting were invited to participate and assessed using the 2026 IDF-DAR Risk Calculator in the 6-week pre-Ramadan period between 30th January and 19th March 2026. Results: A total of 458 PwD were evaluated and stratified into low (15.7%), moderate (41%), and high risk (43.3%) categories. Most participants had Type 2 diabetes (83.6%), with 60.3% having a disease duration exceeding 10 years and 43% exhibiting poor glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c >9%). Insulin therapy was used by 76.4% of participants, including two individuals with Type 1 diabetes using AID systems. Most participants reported no recent hypoglycemia (76.4%), 81.0% performed glucose monitoring, and 3.3% used CGM. Severe comorbidities were uncommon, with 1.1% having unstable macrovascular disease and 4.4% advanced chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30). Notably, 72.2% received structured Ramadan education. Conclusion Majority of PwD attending tertiary diabetes clinics were in the moderate- to high-risk category and intended to fast despite medical advice against fasting in some cases. Although most participants were on insulin therapy, hypoglycemia was low in the pre-Ramadan period. Integration of modern technologies, advanced insulin therapies, and structured education may support safer fasting practices.
Risk Assessment ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Hospitals ; Fasting