Introduction: Swyer syndrome (46, XY gonadal dysgenesis) is a rare disorder of sex development, characterized by a phenotypic female with streak gonads and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. It presents with primary amenorrhea and delayed puberty. Overlapping clinical features with Turner syndrome may cause diagnostic uncertainty, highlighting the role of karyotypic evaluation in diagnosis. Case: A 35-year-old phenotypic female was first evaluated at age 27 during admission for an acute viral illness, when incidental findings of primary amenorrhea, short stature (height 131 cm), webbed neck, pectus excavatum, and absent secondary sexual characteristics raised suspicion of Turner syndrome. She had hypertension, with initial imaging suggesting coarctation of the thoracic aorta. CT angiography showed focal narrowing of the descending aorta; multidisciplinary review favored aortic folding, and she was managed conservatively. Endocrine evaluation demonstrated hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, with markedly elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH 108.6 IU/L) and luteinizing hormone (LH 23.16 IU/L) in the presence of low estradiol levels. Pelvic imaging revealed an atrophic uterus with absence of bilateral ovaries, consistent with gonadal dysgenesis. Karyotypic analysis was performed, demonstrating a 46, XY genotype with confirmed SRY gene presence, establishing the diagnosis of Swyer syndrome. DEXA scan demonstrated osteoporosis, in keeping with prolonged hypogonadism. She was commenced on hormone replacement therapy, resulting in the development of secondary sexual characteristics and regular withdrawal bleeding. She remains under structured multidisciplinary follow-up, with endocrine-led management of hypothyroidism and osteoporosis, alongside cardiology follow-up and gynecological surveillance. Conclusion This case highlights the diagnostic complexity of disorders of sex development with overlapping phenotypes and the need for re-evaluation when clinical progression is atypical. Diagnosis enables hormone replacement therapy for induction of secondary sexual characteristics and preservation of bone health. Integration of clinical, biochemical, and genetic data within a multidisciplinary framework is essential to achieve diagnostic accuracy and optimize outcomes.
Turner Syndrome

Introduction: The 2021 IDF-DAR risk calculator had been previously evaluated in multiple studies and subsequently widely accepted and applied in clinical practice as a practical standardized tool for patient risk stratification. Recently updated, the 2026 IDF-DAR Risk calculator enables a more individualized, evidence-related evaluation of patientrelated and disease-related risk factors, incorporating modern diabetes technologies, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, and advanced insulin formulations to enhance risk stratification. This tool allows medical professionals to tailor Ramadan practices based on overall factors toward promoting safe fasting. Methodology: This prospective multicentre observational study recruited adults with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes attending public hospitals nationwide. People with diabetes (PwD) intending to perform Ramadan fasting were invited to participate and assessed using the 2026 IDF-DAR Risk Calculator in the 6-week pre-Ramadan period between 30th January and 19th March 2026. Results: A total of 458 PwD were evaluated and stratified into low (15.7%), moderate (41%), and high risk (43.3%) categories. Most participants had Type 2 diabetes (83.6%), with 60.3% having a disease duration exceeding 10 years and 43% exhibiting poor glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c >9%). Insulin therapy was used by 76.4% of participants, including two individuals with Type 1 diabetes using AID systems. Most participants reported no recent hypoglycemia (76.4%), 81.0% performed glucose monitoring, and 3.3% used CGM. Severe comorbidities were uncommon, with 1.1% having unstable macrovascular disease and 4.4% advanced chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30). Notably, 72.2% received structured Ramadan education. Conclusion Majority of PwD attending tertiary diabetes clinics were in the moderate- to high-risk category and intended to fast despite medical advice against fasting in some cases. Although most participants were on insulin therapy, hypoglycemia was low in the pre-Ramadan period. Integration of modern technologies, advanced insulin therapies, and structured education may support safer fasting practices.
Risk Assessment ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Hospitals ; Fasting