Objective: To provide reference for the correct understanding and accurate implementation of the general chapters of physical and chemical analysis in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2025 Edition Volume Ⅳ.
Methods: Introduce the main characteristics and content of the additions and revisions of the general chapters of physical and chemical analysis in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2025 Edition Volume Ⅳ.
Results: The general chapters of physical and chemical analysis in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2025 Edition are more harmonized with the relevant guidelines of the ICH Q series, and the inclusion of advanced and mature instrument analysis technology standards and analysis method standards related to drug safety, efficacy, and quality controllability is further increased.
Conclusion: The general chapters of physical and chemical analysis in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2025 Edition have provided a more convenient new bridge for China’s drugs to go international, standardized testing technology support for achieving full process quality control, and better meet the needs of drug research and development, production, quality control, and supervision in China.

Objective:To explore the current situation of synergistic allocation of factors of production in China's medical research institutes,sort out the focuses and deficiencies of the existing policies,so as to provide references for the optimization of production factor and the new quality productivity formation in medical institutions.Methods:Based on the two-factor productivity theory,the index evaluation system is constructed,and the composite system synergy model is used to analyze the degree of order of production factors and the degree of synergy of the composite system,and explore the change of synergy degree of each sequential covariate;and the macro model of the health system is used in conjunction with the content analysis method to carry out the frequency counting of the policies to promote the enhancement of the capacity of each production factor of the main body of innovation of the medical scientific research institutes.Results:The synergistic degree of the production factors and the composite system of medical research institutions showed a non-synergistic development trend,with the worst synergistic level in 2021;number of personnel,number of institutions,building floor space,production factors and sequential coefficients were weakly synergized and in a state of non-synergistic development.Among the 43 policy texts,the internal submodular policy tools were used more,the external submodular policy tools were used less,and the use of internal and external policy tools is unbalanced.Conclusion:The number of personnel,institutions and building area of medical research institutions are constraints on the synergistic development of innovative entities.It is recommended to increase the training of innovative talents in medical research institutions,improve the construction of new institutions,coordinate the layout of large scientific devices and functional housing,introduce targeted systematic planning,improve the market of factors of production,and consolidate the technological foundation for future development.

Objective:To explore the current situation of synergistic allocation of factors of production in China's medical research institutes,sort out the focuses and deficiencies of the existing policies,so as to provide references for the optimization of production factor and the new quality productivity formation in medical institutions.Methods:Based on the two-factor productivity theory,the index evaluation system is constructed,and the composite system synergy model is used to analyze the degree of order of production factors and the degree of synergy of the composite system,and explore the change of synergy degree of each sequential covariate;and the macro model of the health system is used in conjunction with the content analysis method to carry out the frequency counting of the policies to promote the enhancement of the capacity of each production factor of the main body of innovation of the medical scientific research institutes.Results:The synergistic degree of the production factors and the composite system of medical research institutions showed a non-synergistic development trend,with the worst synergistic level in 2021;number of personnel,number of institutions,building floor space,production factors and sequential coefficients were weakly synergized and in a state of non-synergistic development.Among the 43 policy texts,the internal submodular policy tools were used more,the external submodular policy tools were used less,and the use of internal and external policy tools is unbalanced.Conclusion:The number of personnel,institutions and building area of medical research institutions are constraints on the synergistic development of innovative entities.It is recommended to increase the training of innovative talents in medical research institutions,improve the construction of new institutions,coordinate the layout of large scientific devices and functional housing,introduce targeted systematic planning,improve the market of factors of production,and consolidate the technological foundation for future development.

Objective:To explore the current situation of synergistic allocation of factors of production in China's medical research institutes,sort out the focuses and deficiencies of the existing policies,so as to provide references for the optimization of production factor and the new quality productivity formation in medical institutions.Methods:Based on the two-factor productivity theory,the index evaluation system is constructed,and the composite system synergy model is used to analyze the degree of order of production factors and the degree of synergy of the composite system,and explore the change of synergy degree of each sequential covariate;and the macro model of the health system is used in conjunction with the content analysis method to carry out the frequency counting of the policies to promote the enhancement of the capacity of each production factor of the main body of innovation of the medical scientific research institutes.Results:The synergistic degree of the production factors and the composite system of medical research institutions showed a non-synergistic development trend,with the worst synergistic level in 2021;number of personnel,number of institutions,building floor space,production factors and sequential coefficients were weakly synergized and in a state of non-synergistic development.Among the 43 policy texts,the internal submodular policy tools were used more,the external submodular policy tools were used less,and the use of internal and external policy tools is unbalanced.Conclusion:The number of personnel,institutions and building area of medical research institutions are constraints on the synergistic development of innovative entities.It is recommended to increase the training of innovative talents in medical research institutions,improve the construction of new institutions,coordinate the layout of large scientific devices and functional housing,introduce targeted systematic planning,improve the market of factors of production,and consolidate the technological foundation for future development.

Objective:To explore the current situation of synergistic allocation of factors of production in China's medical research institutes,sort out the focuses and deficiencies of the existing policies,so as to provide references for the optimization of production factor and the new quality productivity formation in medical institutions.Methods:Based on the two-factor productivity theory,the index evaluation system is constructed,and the composite system synergy model is used to analyze the degree of order of production factors and the degree of synergy of the composite system,and explore the change of synergy degree of each sequential covariate;and the macro model of the health system is used in conjunction with the content analysis method to carry out the frequency counting of the policies to promote the enhancement of the capacity of each production factor of the main body of innovation of the medical scientific research institutes.Results:The synergistic degree of the production factors and the composite system of medical research institutions showed a non-synergistic development trend,with the worst synergistic level in 2021;number of personnel,number of institutions,building floor space,production factors and sequential coefficients were weakly synergized and in a state of non-synergistic development.Among the 43 policy texts,the internal submodular policy tools were used more,the external submodular policy tools were used less,and the use of internal and external policy tools is unbalanced.Conclusion:The number of personnel,institutions and building area of medical research institutions are constraints on the synergistic development of innovative entities.It is recommended to increase the training of innovative talents in medical research institutions,improve the construction of new institutions,coordinate the layout of large scientific devices and functional housing,introduce targeted systematic planning,improve the market of factors of production,and consolidate the technological foundation for future development.

Objective:To explore the current situation of synergistic allocation of factors of production in China's medical research institutes,sort out the focuses and deficiencies of the existing policies,so as to provide references for the optimization of production factor and the new quality productivity formation in medical institutions.Methods:Based on the two-factor productivity theory,the index evaluation system is constructed,and the composite system synergy model is used to analyze the degree of order of production factors and the degree of synergy of the composite system,and explore the change of synergy degree of each sequential covariate;and the macro model of the health system is used in conjunction with the content analysis method to carry out the frequency counting of the policies to promote the enhancement of the capacity of each production factor of the main body of innovation of the medical scientific research institutes.Results:The synergistic degree of the production factors and the composite system of medical research institutions showed a non-synergistic development trend,with the worst synergistic level in 2021;number of personnel,number of institutions,building floor space,production factors and sequential coefficients were weakly synergized and in a state of non-synergistic development.Among the 43 policy texts,the internal submodular policy tools were used more,the external submodular policy tools were used less,and the use of internal and external policy tools is unbalanced.Conclusion:The number of personnel,institutions and building area of medical research institutions are constraints on the synergistic development of innovative entities.It is recommended to increase the training of innovative talents in medical research institutions,improve the construction of new institutions,coordinate the layout of large scientific devices and functional housing,introduce targeted systematic planning,improve the market of factors of production,and consolidate the technological foundation for future development.

Objective:To explore the current situation of synergistic allocation of factors of production in China's medical research institutes,sort out the focuses and deficiencies of the existing policies,so as to provide references for the optimization of production factor and the new quality productivity formation in medical institutions.Methods:Based on the two-factor productivity theory,the index evaluation system is constructed,and the composite system synergy model is used to analyze the degree of order of production factors and the degree of synergy of the composite system,and explore the change of synergy degree of each sequential covariate;and the macro model of the health system is used in conjunction with the content analysis method to carry out the frequency counting of the policies to promote the enhancement of the capacity of each production factor of the main body of innovation of the medical scientific research institutes.Results:The synergistic degree of the production factors and the composite system of medical research institutions showed a non-synergistic development trend,with the worst synergistic level in 2021;number of personnel,number of institutions,building floor space,production factors and sequential coefficients were weakly synergized and in a state of non-synergistic development.Among the 43 policy texts,the internal submodular policy tools were used more,the external submodular policy tools were used less,and the use of internal and external policy tools is unbalanced.Conclusion:The number of personnel,institutions and building area of medical research institutions are constraints on the synergistic development of innovative entities.It is recommended to increase the training of innovative talents in medical research institutions,improve the construction of new institutions,coordinate the layout of large scientific devices and functional housing,introduce targeted systematic planning,improve the market of factors of production,and consolidate the technological foundation for future development.

Objective:To explore the current situation of synergistic allocation of factors of production in China's medical research institutes,sort out the focuses and deficiencies of the existing policies,so as to provide references for the optimization of production factor and the new quality productivity formation in medical institutions.Methods:Based on the two-factor productivity theory,the index evaluation system is constructed,and the composite system synergy model is used to analyze the degree of order of production factors and the degree of synergy of the composite system,and explore the change of synergy degree of each sequential covariate;and the macro model of the health system is used in conjunction with the content analysis method to carry out the frequency counting of the policies to promote the enhancement of the capacity of each production factor of the main body of innovation of the medical scientific research institutes.Results:The synergistic degree of the production factors and the composite system of medical research institutions showed a non-synergistic development trend,with the worst synergistic level in 2021;number of personnel,number of institutions,building floor space,production factors and sequential coefficients were weakly synergized and in a state of non-synergistic development.Among the 43 policy texts,the internal submodular policy tools were used more,the external submodular policy tools were used less,and the use of internal and external policy tools is unbalanced.Conclusion:The number of personnel,institutions and building area of medical research institutions are constraints on the synergistic development of innovative entities.It is recommended to increase the training of innovative talents in medical research institutions,improve the construction of new institutions,coordinate the layout of large scientific devices and functional housing,introduce targeted systematic planning,improve the market of factors of production,and consolidate the technological foundation for future development.

Objective:To explore the current situation of synergistic allocation of factors of production in China's medical research institutes,sort out the focuses and deficiencies of the existing policies,so as to provide references for the optimization of production factor and the new quality productivity formation in medical institutions.Methods:Based on the two-factor productivity theory,the index evaluation system is constructed,and the composite system synergy model is used to analyze the degree of order of production factors and the degree of synergy of the composite system,and explore the change of synergy degree of each sequential covariate;and the macro model of the health system is used in conjunction with the content analysis method to carry out the frequency counting of the policies to promote the enhancement of the capacity of each production factor of the main body of innovation of the medical scientific research institutes.Results:The synergistic degree of the production factors and the composite system of medical research institutions showed a non-synergistic development trend,with the worst synergistic level in 2021;number of personnel,number of institutions,building floor space,production factors and sequential coefficients were weakly synergized and in a state of non-synergistic development.Among the 43 policy texts,the internal submodular policy tools were used more,the external submodular policy tools were used less,and the use of internal and external policy tools is unbalanced.Conclusion:The number of personnel,institutions and building area of medical research institutions are constraints on the synergistic development of innovative entities.It is recommended to increase the training of innovative talents in medical research institutions,improve the construction of new institutions,coordinate the layout of large scientific devices and functional housing,introduce targeted systematic planning,improve the market of factors of production,and consolidate the technological foundation for future development.

Objective:To investigate the clinical, pathological and immunophenotypic features, and differential diagnosis of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) with B-cell proliferation or neoplasms.Methods:Eight qualified cases were collected from the Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China from January 2019 to July 2023. One case was diagnosed with AITL and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and the other seven cases were diagnosed with AITL and B-cell proliferation. Clinical characteristics and pathological morphology were summarized. Immunohistochemical analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization and gene rearrangement detection were performed.Results:The patients′ average age was 58 years. Five of them were male. Biopsies of the enlarged cervical lymph nodes showed structural destruction and exhibited various histologic patterns. Some cases revealed Burkitt-like morphology, a moderate tumor volume and slightly irregular nuclei. Some cases showed prominent nucleoli. High endothelial venules and expanded follicular dendritic cells were detected. Tumor cells derived from T-follicular helper (TFH) cells were positive for two or more TFH biomarkers. Nodular or diffuse patchy proliferation of B cells was noted around the tumor tissue, which was initially considered as B-cell lymphoma. All of the 8 cases showed monoclonal rearrangements of the T-cell receptor genes while 5 of them also showed clonal rearrangements of the Ig genes. Seven of the 8 cases were subject to the detection of C-MYC gene breakage and were all negative. EBV-positive cells were seen in 6 cases. Neoplastic B cells were positive for C-MYC (>40%), while proliferative B cells were negative for C-MYC (<40%).Conclusions:The histological morphology of AITL with B-cell proliferation or lymphoma may be different from AITL. An integrated analysis, incorporating clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular assessment, helps reach an accurate diagnosis. This group of cases demonstrated the clinical and pathological characteristics of AITL accompanied by B-cell proliferation and B-cell lymphoma. The findings suggest that C-MYC maybe a feasible indicator for distinguishing B-cell proliferation from B-cell lymphoma, and provide a simple and feasible immunohistochemical marker for the diagnosis and research of composite lymphoma.