2.Interpretation of Standard on Clinical Dental Treatment for Children under General Anesthesia Orsedation.
West China Journal of Stomatology 2025;43(4):469-477
In May 2023, the Chinese Stomatological Association promulgated the group standard of "Standard on Clinical Dental Treatment for Children under General Anesthesia Orsedation". These specifications were formulated through broad-based expert consultation, iterative revisions, and a comprehensive review of relevant literature, incorporating the collective expertise of nationally recognized authorities in the field. The standard establishes a unified evaluation system and clinical guidelines tailored to China's medical context, aiming to regulate related medical practices. This paper aims to provide an in-depth interpretation of the standard, integrating the clinical research and experiences from the Pediatric Dentistry Department of West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, in performing dental treatments under general anesthesia in last 12 years. It particularly focuses on interpreting key aspects, including safety considerations, treatment protocol selection, prevention and management of postoperative complication, postoperative follow-up, and oral health maintenance, to provide a reference for medical staffs to understand and apply them in clinical practice.
Humans
;
Anesthesia, General
;
Child
;
Dental Care for Children/standards*
;
China
;
Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*
;
Anesthesia, Dental/standards*
;
Practice Guidelines as Topic
3.Clinical study on hemodynamics and analgesic effect of local infiltration anesthesia in the treatment of severe early childhood caries under general anesthesia.
Xiaoxi LU ; Kuan YANG ; Baize ZHANG ; Yaqiu ZHANG ; Junhui WANG ; Xinxin HAN ; Yujiang CHEN ; Xiaojing WANG
West China Journal of Stomatology 2025;43(4):493-498
OBJECTIVES:
This study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy of severe early childhood caries (SECC) treatment combined with local anesthesia under general anesthesia.
METHODS:
A total of 108 children under 6 years old who underwent SECC dental treatment under general anesthesia at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Third Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University from March to December 2023 were selected as the study subjects, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of classⅠor Ⅱ. The study subjects were divided into a control group (n=54) and an experimental group (n=54) by retrieving intraoperative cases and postoperative follow-up records. The control group was given general anesthesia through inhalation combined with nasotracheal intubation, whereas the experimental group was given local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine on each treated tooth on the basis of general anesthesia. The basic information, preoperative anesthesia depth, hemodynamic changes during different surgical procedures, postoperative pain, and adverse reactions in the two groups were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS:
No statistically significant difference was found in the basic information and preoperative anesthesia depth between the two groups (P>0.05). Among the three procedures (pulpotomy, root canal treatment, and tooth extraction), the three observed indicators in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The proportion of patients in the experimental group who needed to take analgesic measures in accordance with the modified facial pain scale (FPS-R) score was significantly lower than that in the control group at postoperative wakefulness and 2 h after surgery (P<0.05). Meanwhile, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups at 24 h after surgery (P>0.05). The proportion of patients in the experimental group who needed to take analgesic measures on the basis of the parent posto-perative pain measurement (PPPM) score was significantly lower than that in the control group when they were awake after surgery (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups at 2 and 24 h after surgery (P>0.05). Moreover, no statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups at 24 h after surgery (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of local anesthesia during SECC dental treatment under general anesthesia results in minimal changes in intraoperative hemodynamics and mild postoperative pain response, hence worthy of clinical promotion.
Humans
;
Anesthesia, General
;
Child, Preschool
;
Dental Caries/therapy*
;
Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control*
;
Anesthesia, Local/methods*
;
Male
;
Hemodynamics
;
Female
;
Lidocaine/administration & dosage*
;
Child
;
Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage*
;
Anesthesia, Dental/methods*
4.Management of accidental tooth root displacement into the mandibular canal during tooth extraction.
West China Journal of Stomatology 2025;43(6):789-796
The accidental displacement of tooth roots into the mandibular canal is a serious complication during tooth extractions in oral and maxillofacial surgery, often resulting in direct damage to the structural and functional integrity of the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle (IANB). This article reviews the anatomical features of the mandibular canal, the IANB, and adjacent tooth roots; identifies high-risk factors and anatomically vulnerable sites for root displacement; and outlines the clinical manifestations and radiographic characteristics of intraoperative root intrusion into the mandibular canal. Furthermore, management principles, surgical approaches and techniques, inferior alveolar nerve injury treatment, and prognostic considerations are discussed. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive clinical reference for improving surgical outcomes, and reducing postoperative complications.
Humans
;
Tooth Extraction/adverse effects*
;
Mandible/surgery*
;
Tooth Root
;
Mandibular Nerve/anatomy & histology*
;
Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*
;
Intraoperative Complications
;
Mandibular Nerve Injuries/etiology*
5.Sparing piriformis and internus repairing externus vs. other conventional approaches for hip hemiarthroplasty: A report of early outcomes from a single UK trauma unit.
Michael APOSTOLIDES ; William THOMAS ; Darren LEONG ; Bogdan ROBU ; Nimesh PATEL
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2025;28(5):324-329
PURPOSE:
Over 30,000 hip hemiarthroplasties for neck of femur fractures are performed annually in the United Kingdom (UK). The national recommendation is via the lateral approach, to reduce the risk of dislocation, with the potential expense of reduced function and mobility post-operatively. Muscle-sparing approaches, such as SPAIRE (sparing piriformis and internus repairing externus), have been invented to address the issue of dislocation.
METHODS:
We performed a retrospective data collection at a single center with a high annual volume of hip hemiarthroplasties over 12 months. All patients who had hip hemiarthroplasty as their primary treatment were included. Patients who passed away and were non-ambulant before their surgery were excluded from the study. Our primary outcome was the dislocation rate and secondary outcomes were the time to mobilization after surgery and the duration of surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using XLSTAT software.
RESULTS:
We identified 194 cases, and these were divided into 3 groups based on the surgical approach: SPAIRE (n = 43), lateral (n = 97), and posterior (n = 54). Groups had similar demographics and a minimum 3-month follow-up after surgery. There were no dislocations in the SPAIRE group, whereas the dislocation rate for the other 2 groups was 2.5% in the lateral and 9.1% in the posterior groups at 6 months post-surgery. There was an earlier return to mobility in the SPAIRE (1.4 day) compared to the 2 other groups ( 2 days and 2.6 days). Average surgical times were very similar among all 3 groups (74 min vs. 79 min vs. 71 min).
CONCLUSION
The SPAIRE approach seems to be safe and provides a low risk of dislocation and good post-operative function for patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasties.
Humans
;
Hemiarthroplasty/methods*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Female
;
Male
;
Aged
;
United Kingdom
;
Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery*
;
Middle Aged
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods*
;
Trauma Centers
;
Hip Dislocation/prevention & control*
;
Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*
6.Association between maximal urethral length preservation and postoperative continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Tian-Yu XIONG ; Zhan-Liang LIU ; Hao-Yu WU ; Yun-Peng FAN ; Yi-Nong NIU
Asian Journal of Andrology 2025;27(2):225-230
Urinary incontinence is a common complication following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Urethral length has been identified as a factor affecting postoperative continence recovery. In this meta-analysis, we examined the association between use of the maximal urethral length preservation (MULP) technique and postoperative urinary continence in patients undergoing RARP. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to synthesize data and calculate the odds ratio (OR) from eligible studies on continence and MULP. Six studies involving 1869 patients met the eligibility criteria. MULP was positively associated with both early continence (1 month after RARP; Z = 3.62, P = 0.003, OR = 3.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68-5.73) and late continence (12 months after RARP; Z = 2.34, P = 0.019, OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.13-3.90). Oncological outcomes indicated that MULP did not increase the overall positive surgical margin rate or the positive surgical margin status at the prostate apex (both P > 0.05). In conclusion, the use of the MULP technique in RARP significantly improved both early and late postoperative continence outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes.
Humans
;
Prostatectomy/adverse effects*
;
Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods*
;
Male
;
Urethra/surgery*
;
Urinary Incontinence/prevention & control*
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Organ Sparing Treatments/methods*
7.Risk of coronary obstruction and protection strategies in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Yanren PENG ; Ruqiong NIE ; Haifeng ZHANG
Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences 2025;54(2):175-182
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as the first-line treatment for aortic valve stenosis. Coronary obstruction is a severe complication of TAVR, with mortality rates exceeding 30%. Coronary obstruction can be classified as acute or delayed based on the timing of the onset, and as direct or indirect obstruction according to the underlying mechanism. Risk factors for predicting coronary obstruction include a small sinus of Valsalva diameter, excessively long native leaflets, low coronary height, and small sinotubular junction height and diameter. Accurate preoperative assessment of these anatomical parameters using CT is crucial for selecting the appropriate valve type, size, and implantation depth. Preventive technical strategies for coronary obstruction include intraoperative interventional treatments (such as the "Chimney" stenting technique), leaflet modification (such as the BASILICA technique), and alignment of the annulus and coronaries. These techniques have demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing the incidence of coronary obstruction and associated mortality. This paper reviews the epidemiology, classification, and mechanisms of coronary obstruction, with a particular focus on the identification, prevention, and treatment of high-risk patients. The aim is to highlight the importance of recognizing and managing coronary risks during TAVR and to provide actionable recommendations for the prevention and treatment of coronary obstruction in clinical practice.
Humans
;
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods*
;
Risk Factors
;
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery*
;
Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*
;
Coronary Occlusion/etiology*
8.Effect of inverted-Y urethral function-preserving holmium laser enucleation of the prostate on postoperative urinary incontinence.
Jin-Zhuo NING ; Jin-Runo WANG ; Fan CHENG ; Hao-Yong LI
National Journal of Andrology 2025;31(1):45-49
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the effect of inverted-Y urethral function-preserving holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) on stress urinary incontinence after surgery in patients with BPH.
METHODS:
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data on 109 cases of BPH treated in our hospital from June 2022 to May 2023 by traditional HoLEP with preservation of the apical prostatic urethral valve (group A, n = 52) or inverted-Y urethral function-preserving HoLEP (group B, n = 57). We recorded the intra- and post-operative parameters, evaluated the urinary incontinence status and post-void symptoms according to the International Continence Society standards, and analyzed the effect of inverted-Y versus traditional HoLEP in improving the postoperative urinary incontinence of the patients.
RESULTS:
The incidence rate of stress urinary incontinence after catheter removal was significantly lower in group B than in A (10.52% vs 26.92%, P = 0.027), and so was it at 2 weeks after surgery (1.75% vs 11.54%, P = 0.037), and at 1 month postoperatively (0% vs 7.69%, P = 0.033).
CONCLUSION
For the treatment of BPH, inverted-Y urethral function-preserving HoLEP is superior to traditional HoLEP with preservation of the apical prostatic urethral valve in improving stress urinary incontinence after surgery.
Humans
;
Male
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use*
;
Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery*
;
Urethra/surgery*
;
Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*
;
Urinary Incontinence, Stress/etiology*
;
Prostatectomy/adverse effects*
;
Aged
;
Urinary Incontinence
;
Prostate/surgery*
9.Expert consensus on the protection of pelvic organ function in rectal cancer surgery (version 2025).
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2025;28(6):575-586
With the development of surgical techniques, adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant therapy, the survival time of rectal cancer patients after surgery has been significantly improved, but organ dysfunction is still an important problem affecting the quality of life of patients after surgery. With the continuous deepening of clinical research and practice and the updating of relevant theories, more detailed and reliable evidence-based medical evidence has been accumulated in the field of pelvic organ function protection in rectal cancer surgery, and has been continuously verified in the clinical real world at home and abroad. In order to further improve the awareness of domestic physicians on the protection of organ function during the treatment of rectal cancer, standardize the evaluation methods and surgical methods, reduce the incidence of organ dysfunction, and thus improve the quality of life of patients, Society of Colon & Rectal Surgeons of Chinese College of Surgeons of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Section of Colorectal Surgery of Branch of Surgery of Chinese Medical Association, National Health Commission Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center Colorectal Surgery Committee, and Colorectal and Anal Function Surgeons Committee of China Sexology Association organized the discussion among relevant experts. On the basis of the 2021 edition of the Chinese Expert Consensus on the Protection of Pelvic Organ Function in Rectal Cancer Surgery, the recent evidence-based medical evidence was analyzed and summarized, and the definition, risk factors, evaluation methods, prevention and other issues of organ dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery were analyzed with reference to relevant domestic and foreign studies and combined with clinical practice. Proposed the diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of pelvic organ dysfunction in rectal cancer surgery, and finally formed the "Chinese expert Consensus on the protection of pelvic organ function in rectal cancer surgery (version 2025)".
Humans
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Consensus
;
Pelvis/physiopathology*
;
Quality of Life
;
Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*
10.Standardized surgical procedure of proximally extended resection and sphincter-preserving surgery (Tianhe procedure®) for rectal cancer after radiotherapy (2025 version).
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2025;28(7):707-716
Tianhe procedure® is a functional sphincter-preserving surgical approach developed for rectal cancer patients following radiotherapy. This technique involves extended proximal resection of the colon beyond the pelvic cavity, followed by anastomosis of the non-irradiated proximal colon to the distal rectum or anal canal. This strategy aims to reduce the incidence of anastomotic complications and postoperative bowel dysfunction. However, there is currently a lack of standardized practice guideline for implementing Tianhe procedure® in China. Therefore, the Chinese Radiation Intestinal Injury Research Group, the Colorectal Surgery Group of Surgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, the Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, the Colorectal Cancer Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, and the Colorectal Cancer Committee of China Anti-cancer Association, and the Gastrointestinal Surgical Branch of Guangdong Medical Doctor Association, have jointly convened a panel of national experts to discuss and establish this standardized surgical procedure. This standard, based on the latest evidence from literature, research advancements, and expert experience, focuses on key aspects of the Tianhe procedure®, including its precise definition, indications, critical procedural steps, postoperative complications, and functional rehabilitation strategies. It aims to promote standardized implementation and broader clinical adoption of this innovative surgical technique.
Humans
;
Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy*
;
Anal Canal/surgery*
;
Anastomosis, Surgical/methods*
;
Organ Sparing Treatments/methods*
;
Rectum/surgery*
;
Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods*

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail