Introduction: Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) are increasingly recognised as important contributors to medication -related harm among older adults. However, published national data on the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIP in Brunei Darussalam are unavailable. The objectives of this study was to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIP among adults aged 65 years and above in Brunei Darussalam using Screening Tool of Older Persons ’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) version 2 criteria. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross -sectional study was conducted using data from the Brunei Healthcare Information Management System (Bru -HIMS). A stratified proportional random sample of 2,000 older adults with documented medical encounters in 2016 was selected. Polypharmacy was defined as the concurrent use of five or more medications. PIP was assessed using STOPP version 2 criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise prescribing patterns. Results: Of the 2000 older adults included (mean age 73.0 ± 6.6 years), 1,181 (59.1%) had polypharmacy. Among those with polypharmacy, 1,057 (89.5%) could be assessed using STOPP criteria, and 206 (19.5%) had at least one PIP. The most frequently identified PIPs involved prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors for uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease at full therapeutic dosage for more than eight weeks, where dose reduction, discontinuation, or transition to maintenance therapy (e.g. H2 receptor antagonists) is indicated, prescribing without evidence -based indication, duplication of drug classes, use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with hyperkalaemia, and use of first -generation antihistamines. Conclusion: Polypharmacy and PIP are common among older adults in Brunei Darussalam. The findings highlight the need for systematic medication review and deprescribing strategies to optimise pharmacotherapy and improve medication safety in older populations

Introduction: Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) are increasingly recognised as important contributors to medication -related harm among older adults. However, published national data on the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIP in Brunei Darussalam are unavailable. The objectives of this study was to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIP among adults aged 65 years and above in Brunei Darussalam using Screening Tool of Older Persons ’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) version 2 criteria. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross -sectional study was conducted using data from the Brunei Healthcare Information Management System (Bru -HIMS). A stratified proportional random sample of 2,000 older adults with documented medical encounters in 2016 was selected. Polypharmacy was defined as the concurrent use of five or more medications. PIP was assessed using STOPP version 2 criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise prescribing patterns. Results: Of the 2000 older adults included (mean age 73.0 ± 6.6 years), 1,181 (59.1%) had polypharmacy. Among those with polypharmacy, 1,057 (89.5%) could be assessed using STOPP criteria, and 206 (19.5%) had at least one PIP. The most frequently identified PIPs involved prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors for uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease at full therapeutic dosage for more than eight weeks, where dose reduction, discontinuation, or transition to maintenance therapy (e.g. H2 receptor antagonists) is indicated, prescribing without evidence -based indication, duplication of drug classes, use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with hyperkalaemia, and use of first -generation antihistamines. Conclusion: Polypharmacy and PIP are common among older adults in Brunei Darussalam. The findings highlight the need for systematic medication review and deprescribing strategies to optimise pharmacotherapy and improve medication safety in older populations

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare providers have been in great fear due to the high risk of contracting COVID-19 infection at any time. This study aimed to determine the mediating role of resilience on the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and burnout in primary care healthcare providers in Malaysia. Methods: This was an online cross-sectional study involving 1280 healthcare providers aged 18 years and older from 30 government primary care clinics in Malaysia. We used the COVID-19 Fear Scale, the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory Scale, and the Short Brief Resilience Scale to collect data from the respondents. Smart-PLS was used to perform mediation analysis. Results: The mean age of the respondents was 36 years old and mean duration of working experience was 11 years. The majority of the respondents were female (82.4%) and Malays (82.3%). The study population consisted of nurses (47.4%), doctors (26%), medical assistants (11.9), healthcare assistant (7.1%), medical laboratory technicians (6.4%) and drivers(1.3).The results show that fear of COVID-19 positively predicts burnout. According to the results, resilience mediates the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and all the three burnout domains, namely personal burnout (β=0.175,p<0.001), work-related burnout (β=0.175,p<0.001) and client-related burnout (β=0.172,p<0.001). Additionally, resilience reduces the impact of COVID-19 fear on the three domains of burnout. Conclusion: Our study has reported a mediating effect of resilience on the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and burnout.