Hemolymphangioma is an extremely rare lymphatic and vascular malformation, recognized as a benign lesion notable for its prolonged clinical course. The digestive tract mainly occurs in the esophagus and colorectum, the small intestine is rarely reported. Here, we report a case of small intestinal hemangiolymphangioma primarily manifesting as gastrointestinal bleeding, with the aim of providing a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Hemolymphangioma is an extremely rare lymphatic and vascular malformation, recognized as a benign lesion notable for its prolonged clinical course. The digestive tract mainly occurs in the esophagus and colorectum, the small intestine is rarely reported. Here, we report a case of small intestinal hemangiolymphangioma primarily manifesting as gastrointestinal bleeding, with the aim of providing a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic and recurrent inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract with unknown etiology and the treatment is difficult. Currently, research progress in IBD treatment mainly focuses on two aspects. The first is the development of biologics and small molecule drugs, including the new drugs and therapies and the improvement of the effectiveness of existing drugs. The second is the application of precision medicine in IBD treatment, utilizing technologies such as artificial intelligence to achieve precise treatment of IBD. This article explores the above topics in order to provide clinical and research insights.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic and recurrent inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract with unknown etiology and the treatment is difficult. Currently, research progress in IBD treatment mainly focuses on two aspects. The first is the development of biologics and small molecule drugs, including the new drugs and therapies and the improvement of the effectiveness of existing drugs. The second is the application of precision medicine in IBD treatment, utilizing technologies such as artificial intelligence to achieve precise treatment of IBD. This article explores the above topics in order to provide clinical and research insights.

Many biologics have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) . However, due to the lack of head-to-head randomized controlled studies comparing the efficacy and safety of biologics, and the lack of methods to accurately predict the efficacy of biologics, clinicians are often confused about how to select biologics. In this paper, based on the existing clinical evidence, combined with the international mainstream opinion and the application experience of China, suggestions on the options and switches of biologics in the treatment of IBD are put forward for the reference of clinicians.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) in the treatment of active Crohn′s disease (CD) .Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Clinical data of 45 patients with active CD at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from November 2020 to May 2022 were analyzed. All of the patients received VDZ at the dose of 300 mg per time at 0, 2th, 6th weeks and subsequently once every 8 weeks. The clinical response and remission were evaluated by Crohn′s disease activity index (CDAI) . The endoscopic response and remission were evaluated by simple endoscopic score for Crohn′s disease (SES-CD) . All of the adverse effects occurred during the treatment of VDZ were recorded in order to evaluate the safety. The primary endpoint was the clinical remission rate at 22 weeks after treatment. The secondary endpoints included the clinical response rate at 22 weeks after treatment, the clinical response rate and clinical remission rate at 52 weeks after treatment, the endoscopic response rate and remission rate at (22 ± 8) weeks after treatment. Thirty-one patients who had previously used infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) were set as non-Bio-Na?ve group, and 14 patients who had not previously used biologics were set as Bio-Na?ve group. The differences of the primary endpoint and some secondary endpoints between the two groups were compared.Results:At 22 weeks after treatment, the CDAI score of 45 patients decreased from baseline (261.4 ± 98.3) points to (166.6 ± 93.5) points, the difference was statistically significant ( t = 4.6, P<0.01) . Among them, 64.4% (29/45) patients achieved clinical response and 46.7% (21/45) patients achieved clinical remission. There were no significant difference in clinical response rate [71.4% (10/14) vs. 61.3% (19/31) , χ 2 = 0.4, P = 0.4] and clinical remission rate [42.9% (6/14) vs. 48.4% (15/31) , χ 2 = 0.1, P = 0.8] between the Bio-Na?ve group and non-Bio-Na?ve group at 22 weeks after treatment. At 52 weeks after treatment, the CDAI score of 33 patients decreased from baseline (306.9 ± 130.7) points to (126.6 ± 92.7) points, the difference was statistically significant ( t = 8.5, P<0.01) . Among them, 39.4% (13/33) of the patients achieved clinical response, 33.3% (11/33) of the patients achieved clinical remission, but 41.4% (12/29) of the patients had secondary loss of response. At (22 ± 8) weeks after treatment, the SES-CD score of 25 patients in active phase under endoscopy at baseline decreased from baseline 13.0 (7.0, 19.0) points to 8.0 (2.5, 18.5) points, the difference was statistically significant ( Z = -2.6, P<0.05) . Among them, 40.0% (10/25) patients achieved endoscopic response and 20.0% (5/25) patients achieved endoscopic remission. The new facial rash occurred in 1 patient (2.2%) , new joint pain in 2 (4.4%) and there was no new active tuberculosis and hepatitis B virus infection during the treatment of VDZ for 45 patients. Conclusions:Single drug of VDZ has a good effect on inducing remission in patients with mild to moderate CD and has a good safety. The previous use of IFX or ADA does not affect the efficacy of VDZ, but part of patients still have secondary loss of response.

Many biologics have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) . However, due to the lack of head-to-head randomized controlled studies comparing the efficacy and safety of biologics, and the lack of methods to accurately predict the efficacy of biologics, clinicians are often confused about how to select biologics. In this paper, based on the existing clinical evidence, combined with the international mainstream opinion and the application experience of China, suggestions on the options and switches of biologics in the treatment of IBD are put forward for the reference of clinicians.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) in the treatment of active Crohn′s disease (CD) .Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Clinical data of 45 patients with active CD at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from November 2020 to May 2022 were analyzed. All of the patients received VDZ at the dose of 300 mg per time at 0, 2th, 6th weeks and subsequently once every 8 weeks. The clinical response and remission were evaluated by Crohn′s disease activity index (CDAI) . The endoscopic response and remission were evaluated by simple endoscopic score for Crohn′s disease (SES-CD) . All of the adverse effects occurred during the treatment of VDZ were recorded in order to evaluate the safety. The primary endpoint was the clinical remission rate at 22 weeks after treatment. The secondary endpoints included the clinical response rate at 22 weeks after treatment, the clinical response rate and clinical remission rate at 52 weeks after treatment, the endoscopic response rate and remission rate at (22 ± 8) weeks after treatment. Thirty-one patients who had previously used infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) were set as non-Bio-Na?ve group, and 14 patients who had not previously used biologics were set as Bio-Na?ve group. The differences of the primary endpoint and some secondary endpoints between the two groups were compared.Results:At 22 weeks after treatment, the CDAI score of 45 patients decreased from baseline (261.4 ± 98.3) points to (166.6 ± 93.5) points, the difference was statistically significant ( t = 4.6, P<0.01) . Among them, 64.4% (29/45) patients achieved clinical response and 46.7% (21/45) patients achieved clinical remission. There were no significant difference in clinical response rate [71.4% (10/14) vs. 61.3% (19/31) , χ 2 = 0.4, P = 0.4] and clinical remission rate [42.9% (6/14) vs. 48.4% (15/31) , χ 2 = 0.1, P = 0.8] between the Bio-Na?ve group and non-Bio-Na?ve group at 22 weeks after treatment. At 52 weeks after treatment, the CDAI score of 33 patients decreased from baseline (306.9 ± 130.7) points to (126.6 ± 92.7) points, the difference was statistically significant ( t = 8.5, P<0.01) . Among them, 39.4% (13/33) of the patients achieved clinical response, 33.3% (11/33) of the patients achieved clinical remission, but 41.4% (12/29) of the patients had secondary loss of response. At (22 ± 8) weeks after treatment, the SES-CD score of 25 patients in active phase under endoscopy at baseline decreased from baseline 13.0 (7.0, 19.0) points to 8.0 (2.5, 18.5) points, the difference was statistically significant ( Z = -2.6, P<0.05) . Among them, 40.0% (10/25) patients achieved endoscopic response and 20.0% (5/25) patients achieved endoscopic remission. The new facial rash occurred in 1 patient (2.2%) , new joint pain in 2 (4.4%) and there was no new active tuberculosis and hepatitis B virus infection during the treatment of VDZ for 45 patients. Conclusions:Single drug of VDZ has a good effect on inducing remission in patients with mild to moderate CD and has a good safety. The previous use of IFX or ADA does not affect the efficacy of VDZ, but part of patients still have secondary loss of response.

Background/Aims: Risk of venous thrombosis is increased in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); data on Asian IBD patients is limited and status quo of thrombosis screening and prophylaxis are unknown. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the incidence, screening, prophylaxis, and risk factors for venous thrombosis among Asian IBD patients. Methods: Medical files of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) from 17 hospitals across China between 2011 and 2016 were reviewed for venous thrombosis, use of screening and prophylaxis. A case-control study was performed among hospitalized patients with venous thrombosis and their age-, sex-matched IBD controls hospitalized around the same period; disease characteristics and known provoking factors of venous thrombosis were recorded. Risk factors were analyzed in both univariate and logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 8,459 IBD patients were followed for 12,373 person-year. Forty-six patients (0.54%) had venous thrombosis, yielding an incidence of 37.18 per 10,000 person-year. Incidence increased with age, especially among CD. Less than 20% of patients received screening tests and 35 patients (0.41%) received prophylaxis. Severe disease flare was an independent risk factor for venous thrombosis (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: CD, 9.342 [1.813– 48.137]; UC, 5.198 [1.268–21.305]); past use of steroids and extensive involvement were 2 additional risk factors in CD and UC, respectively. Conclusions Incidence of venous thrombosis in China was 37.18 per 10,000 person-year (0.54%). Use of screening and prophylaxis were rare. Severe disease flare was an independent risk factor for thrombosis among hospitalized patients.

Background/Aims: Risk of venous thrombosis is increased in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); data on Asian IBD patients is limited and status quo of thrombosis screening and prophylaxis are unknown. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the incidence, screening, prophylaxis, and risk factors for venous thrombosis among Asian IBD patients. Methods: Medical files of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) from 17 hospitals across China between 2011 and 2016 were reviewed for venous thrombosis, use of screening and prophylaxis. A case-control study was performed among hospitalized patients with venous thrombosis and their age-, sex-matched IBD controls hospitalized around the same period; disease characteristics and known provoking factors of venous thrombosis were recorded. Risk factors were analyzed in both univariate and logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 8,459 IBD patients were followed for 12,373 person-year. Forty-six patients (0.54%) had venous thrombosis, yielding an incidence of 37.18 per 10,000 person-year. Incidence increased with age, especially among CD. Less than 20% of patients received screening tests and 35 patients (0.41%) received prophylaxis. Severe disease flare was an independent risk factor for venous thrombosis (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: CD, 9.342 [1.813– 48.137]; UC, 5.198 [1.268–21.305]); past use of steroids and extensive involvement were 2 additional risk factors in CD and UC, respectively. Conclusions Incidence of venous thrombosis in China was 37.18 per 10,000 person-year (0.54%). Use of screening and prophylaxis were rare. Severe disease flare was an independent risk factor for thrombosis among hospitalized patients.